Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/1362550.1362615acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesecceConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

The effects of time limitations on target identification

Published: 28 August 2007 Publication History

Abstract

Motivation -- Aiming at making image interpretation more efficient, we studied the effects of limiting exposure durations on performance.
Research approach -- Two psychophysical experiments were performed examining the performance of 36 expert image analysts. The targets were presented at three image quality levels.
Findings -- The results suggest that limiting the exposure duration of an image to four seconds does not impair the performance of the analysts, i.e., four seconds suffice for identification in an the image interpretation task, no matter what the quality of the image.
Research Implications -- This finding suggests that limiting the exposure duration during actual image interpretation would be beneficial since it would shorten the total amount of time needed for interpretation while not lowering the probability of correct identification.
Take away message -- Sometimes unlimited time is not necessary in order to obtain the best results. When someone is an expert at what s/he does, making a quick decision might yield equivalent outcomes

References

[1]
Beechler, R. L., Winterstein, S. H., Kamper R. M., Jeffrey T. E. (1969). A study of rapid photointerpretation methods. US-Army-BESRL-Technical-Research-Note, 1153: 76
[2]
Dunning, D., Stern, L-B., (1994). Distinguishing accurate from inaccurate eyewitness identifications via inquiries about decision processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(5). 818--835.
[3]
Dunning, D., & Perretta, S. (2002). Automaticity and eyewitness accuracy: A 10- to 12-second rule for distinguishing accurate from inaccurate positive identifications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(5), 951--962.
[4]
Kahneman, D. (2003) A perspective on judgment and choice. Mapping bounded rationality. American Psychologist, 58(9), 697--720.
[5]
Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (1999). Discrepancies between normative and descriptive models of decision making and the understanding/acceptance principle. Cognitive Psychology, 38, 349--385.
  1. The effects of time limitations on target identification

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    ECCE '07: Proceedings of the 14th European conference on Cognitive ergonomics: invent! explore!
    August 2007
    334 pages
    ISBN:9781847998491
    DOI:10.1145/1362550
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    • The British Computer Society
    • ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
    • SIGCHI: Specialist Interest Group in Computer-Human Interaction of the ACM
    • Interactions, the Human-Computer Interaction Specialist Group of the BCS
    • Middlesex University, London, School of Computing Science
    • European Office of Aerospace Research and Development, Air Force Office of Scientific Research, United States Air Force Research Laboratory
    • EACE: European Association of Cognitive Ergonomics
    • Brunel University, West London, Department of Information Systems and Computing

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 28 August 2007

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. identification
    2. image interpretation
    3. intuitive decision making
    4. limited exposure duration

    Qualifiers

    • Poster

    Conference

    ECCE07
    Sponsor:
    ECCE07: European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics 2007
    August 28 - 31, 2007
    London, United Kingdom

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 56 of 91 submissions, 62%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • 0
      Total Citations
    • 88
      Total Downloads
    • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 16 Jan 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media