Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/1390156.1390282acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicmlConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Detecting statistical interactions with additive groves of trees

Published: 05 July 2008 Publication History

Abstract

Discovering additive structure is an important step towards understanding a complex multi-dimensional function because it allows the function to be expressed as the sum of lower-dimensional components. When variables interact, however, their effects are not additive and must be modeled and interpreted simultaneously. We present a new approach for the problem of interaction detection. Our method is based on comparing the performance of unrestricted and restricted prediction models, where restricted models are prevented from modeling an interaction in question. We show that an additive model-based regression ensemble, Additive Groves, can be restricted appropriately for use with this framework, and thus has the right properties for accurately detecting variable interactions.

References

[1]
Camacho, R. (1998). Inducing models of human control skills. Proc. ECML'98.
[2]
Caruana, R., Elhawary, M., Fink, D., Hochachka, W. M., Kelling, S., Munson, A., Riedewald, M., & Sorokina, D. (2006). Mining citizen science data to predict prevalence of wild bird species. KDD'06.
[3]
Christensen, R. (1996). Plane answers to complex questions, the theory of linear models. Springer.
[4]
Friedman, J. (2005). RuleFit with R. http://www-stat.stanford.edu/~jhf/R-RuleFit.html.
[5]
Friedman, J. H. (2001). Greedy function approximation: a gradient boosting machine. Annals of Statistics, 29, 1189--1232.
[6]
Friedman, J. H., & Popescu, B. E. (2005). Predictive learning via rule ensembles (Technical Report). Stanford University.
[7]
Guyon, I., & Elisseeff, A. (2003). An introduction to variable and feature selection. JMLR, 3.
[8]
Hooker, G. (2004). Discovering ANOVA structure in black box functions. Proc. ACM SIGKDD.
[9]
Hooker, G. (2007). Generalized functional ANOVA diagnostics for high dimensional functions of dependent variables. JCGS.
[10]
Jakulin, A., & Bratko, I. (2004). Testing the significance of attribute interactions. Proc. ICML'04.
[11]
Pace, R. K., & Barry, R. (1997). Sparse spatial autoregressions. Statistics and Probability Letters, 33.
[12]
Rasmussen, C. E., Neal, R. M., Hinton, G., van Camp, D., Revow, M., Ghahramani, Z., Kustra, R., & Tibshirani, R. (2003). Delve. University of Toronto. http://www.cs.toronto.edu/~delve.
[13]
Ruppert, D., Wand, M. P., & Carroll, R. J. (2003). Semiparametric regression. Cambridge.
[14]
Sorokina, D., Caruana, R., & Riedewald, M. (2007). Additive Groves of regression trees. Proc. ECML.
[15]
Torgo, L. (2007). Regression DataSets. www.liacc.up.pt/~ltorgo/Regression/DataSets.html.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Assessing the feasibility of statistical inference using synthetic antibody-antigen datasetsStatistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology10.1515/sagmb-2023-002723:1Online publication date: 3-Apr-2024
  • (2024)Foundations & Trends in Multimodal Machine Learning: Principles, Challenges, and Open QuestionsACM Computing Surveys10.1145/365658056:10(1-42)Online publication date: 22-Jun-2024
  • (2024)Finding Component Relationships: A Deep-Learning-Based Anomaly Detection InterpreterIEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems10.1109/TCSS.2024.336043511:3(4149-4162)Online publication date: Jun-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
ICML '08: Proceedings of the 25th international conference on Machine learning
July 2008
1310 pages
ISBN:9781605582054
DOI:10.1145/1390156
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

  • Pascal
  • University of Helsinki
  • Xerox
  • Federation of Finnish Learned Societies
  • Google Inc.
  • NSF
  • Machine Learning Journal/Springer
  • Microsoft Research: Microsoft Research
  • Intel: Intel
  • Yahoo!
  • Helsinki Institute for Information Technology
  • IBM: IBM

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 05 July 2008

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Funding Sources

Conference

ICML '08
Sponsor:
  • Microsoft Research
  • Intel
  • IBM

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 140 of 548 submissions, 26%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)24
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
Reflects downloads up to 30 Aug 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Assessing the feasibility of statistical inference using synthetic antibody-antigen datasetsStatistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology10.1515/sagmb-2023-002723:1Online publication date: 3-Apr-2024
  • (2024)Foundations & Trends in Multimodal Machine Learning: Principles, Challenges, and Open QuestionsACM Computing Surveys10.1145/365658056:10(1-42)Online publication date: 22-Jun-2024
  • (2024)Finding Component Relationships: A Deep-Learning-Based Anomaly Detection InterpreterIEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems10.1109/TCSS.2024.336043511:3(4149-4162)Online publication date: Jun-2024
  • (2024)Machine collaborationStat10.1002/sta4.66113:1Online publication date: 29-Feb-2024
  • (2023)SmoothHessProceedings of the 37th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems10.5555/3666122.3668328(50697-50729)Online publication date: 10-Dec-2023
  • (2023)Quantifying & modeling multimodal interactionsProceedings of the 37th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems10.5555/3666122.3667314(27351-27393)Online publication date: 10-Dec-2023
  • (2023)Does a neural network really encode symbolic concepts?Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Machine Learning10.5555/3618408.3619251(20452-20469)Online publication date: 23-Jul-2023
  • (2023)How to address monotonicity for model risk management?Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Machine Learning10.5555/3618408.3618616(5282-5295)Online publication date: 23-Jul-2023
  • (2023)Identification of Milk Adulteration in Camel Milk Using FT-Mid-Infrared Spectroscopy and Machine Learning ModelsFoods10.3390/foods1224451712:24(4517)Online publication date: 18-Dec-2023
  • (2023)Multimodal Fusion Interactions: A Study of Human and Automatic QuantificationProceedings of the 25th International Conference on Multimodal Interaction10.1145/3577190.3614151(425-435)Online publication date: 9-Oct-2023
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Get Access

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media