Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article
Free access

Women in computing---take 2

Published: 01 February 2009 Publication History

Abstract

Inspiring, recruiting, and retaining women for a career in computing remains a challenge.

References

[1]
American Council on Education. Office of Women in Higher Education (2008); www.acenet.edu.
[2]
Badagliacco, J. Gender and race differences in computing attitudes and experiences. Social Science Computer Review 8 (1990), 42--63.
[3]
Blum, T.C., Fields, D.L., and Goodman, J.S. Organization-level determinants of women in management. Academy of Management Journal 37, 2 (1994), 241--266.
[4]
Bureau of Labor Statistics. Occupational Outlook Handbook (OOH), 2008-09 Edition; www.bls.gov/OCO/.
[5]
Computer Science Teachers Association. CSTA National Secondary Computer Science Survey: Comparison of 2005 and 2007 Survey Results (2007); www.csta.acm.org/Research/sub/New_Folder/ResearchFiles/CSTASurvey05_07Cornp.pdf.
[6]
Computing Research Association. Taulbee Survey Report 2006--2007 (2008).
[7]
Coyle, E.J., Jamison, L.H., and Oakes, W.C. Integrating engineering education and community service: Themes for the future of engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education (2006), 7--11.
[8]
Dickinson, K. Five years of mentoring by the numbers: SEED mentoring program. Presentation at the 2006 Grace Hopper Celebration of Women and Computing; research.sun.com/SEED/hopper.presentation.oct06.pdf.
[9]
Dodds, Z., Libeskind-Hadas, R., Alvarado, C., and Kuenning, G. Evaluating breadth-first CS1 for scientists. In Proceedings of the 39th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (2008); Sedgewick, R. and Wayne, K. Introduction to Programming in Java: A textbook for a first course in computer science for the next generation of scientists and engineers, 2004; www.cs.princeton.edu/introcs/home/.
[10]
Eagly, A. and Carau, S.J. Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review 109, 3 (2002), 573--598.
[11]
Government Accountability Office. Gender Issues: Women's Participation in the Science Has Increased but Agencies Need to Do More to Ensure Compliance with Title IX, United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Requesters (Report 04-639), July 2004.
[12]
Harrod, M.J. Distributed mentor project: Evaluation of impact and experiences of participants. Computing Research News (Sept. 2000); www.cra.org/Activities/craw/reports/sepOO.pdf/.
[13]
Humphreys, S. and Spertus, E. Leveraging an alternative source of computer scientists: Reentry programs. Commun, ACM 34, 2 (Feb. 2002): 53--56; Klawe, M., Cavers, I., Popowich, F., and Chen, G. A computer science post-baccalaureate diploma program that appeals to women. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Women, Work, and Computerization (2000).
[14]
Igbaria, M. and Chidambaram, L. Examination of gender effects on intention to stay among information systems employees. SIGCPR (Nashville, TN, 1995).
[15]
Kanter, R.M. Men and Women of the Corporation. Basic Books, NY, 1993.
[16]
Kekelis, L.S., Ancheta, R.W., and Heber, E. Hurdles in the pipeline: Girls and technology careers. Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies 26, 1 (2005).
[17]
Mannix, E.A. and Neale, E.A. What difference makes a difference? Psychological Science in the Public Interest 6, 2 (2005), 31--32.
[18]
Margolis, J., and Fisher, A. Unlocking the Clubhouse. MIT Press, 2002.
[19]
McDowell, C., Werner, L., Bullock, H.E., and Fernald, J. Pair programming improves student retention, confidence, and program quality. Commun, ACM 49, 8 (Aug. 2006), 90--95.
[20]
Morrell, C., Cotten, S., Sparks, A., and Spurgas, A. Computer Mania Day: An effective intervention for increasing youth's interest in technology. Report to the Maryland Commission for Women, 2004.
[21]
National Center for Women & Information Technology. NCWIT Scorecard 2007: A Report on the Status of Women in Information Technology (2007); ncwit.org/pdf/2007_Scorecard_Web.pdf; Alliance for Board Diversity. Women and Minorities on Fortune 100 Boards (2008).
[22]
National Center for Women & Information Technology. Who Invents IT? An Analysis of Women's Participation in Information Technology Patenting, 2007.
[23]
National Science Board. Science and Engineering Indicators 2008 (NSB 08-01), Arlington, VA; www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind08/.
[24]
National Science Foundation. Broadening Participation in America's Science and Engineering Workforce: The 1994--2003 Decennial & 2004 Biennial Reports to Congress, Arlington, VA, Dec. 2004.
[25]
National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics. Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering (NSF 07-315). Arlington, VA, Feb. 2007; www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/.
[26]
Proceedings of a Banff International Research Station Workshop, Mentoring for Engineering Academia II. (2007); http://birs07.stanford.edu/.
[27]
Rich, L., Perry, H., and Guzdial, M. A CS1 course designed to address interests of women. In Proceedings of the 35th SIGCSE Technical Symposium of Computer Science Education (2004); www.cs.ubc.ca/~hoos/Courses/CPSC101-05/Handouts/about.pdf; Shmishek, E. Where the girls aren't. UBC Reports, 2003; www.publicaffairs.ubc.ca/ubcreports/2003/03jun05/girls.html.
[28]
Shiebinger, L., Henderson, A., and Gilmartin, S.K. Dual-Career Academic Couples: What Universities Need to Know. Clayman Institute for Gender Research, Stanford University, 2008.
[29]
Tillberg, H.K. and McGrath Cohoon, J. Attracting women to the CS major. Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies 26,1 (2005), 126--140.
[30]
Thomas, D.A. Diversity as strategy. Harvard Business Review (Sept. 2004).
[31]
Touchton, J.G., and Ingram, D. Women Presidents in US Colleges and Universities, A 1995 Higher Education Update. American Council on Education, Washington, DC, 1995.
[32]
Turner, S., Bernt, P., and Pecora, N. Why women choose information technology careers: Educational, social and familial influences. Presented at the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED456878), Apr. 2002.
[33]
Valian, V. Why So Slow? The Advancement of Women. MIT Press, 1999.
[34]
West, M.S., and Curtis, J.W. AAUP Faculty Gender Equity Indicators. American Association of University Professors, 2006.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Problematic Workplace Behaviours in the Software Development Profession: Using Transactional Analysis to Diagnose Toxicity and Improve Relationships at WorkGroup & Organization Management10.1177/10596011241276586Online publication date: 26-Aug-2024
  • (2023)Factors associated with the gender gap in the STEM sector: Comparison of theoretical and empirical concept maps and qualitative SWOT analysisHeliyon10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e174999:6(e17499)Online publication date: Jun-2023
  • (2022)Female underrepresentation in the cybersecurity workforce – a study on cybersecurity professionals in Sri LankaInformation & Computer Security10.1108/ICS-08-2021-012930:3(402-421)Online publication date: 26-Jan-2022
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Communications of the ACM
Communications of the ACM  Volume 52, Issue 2
Inspiring Women in Computing
February 2009
127 pages
ISSN:0001-0782
EISSN:1557-7317
DOI:10.1145/1461928
Issue’s Table of Contents
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 01 February 2009
Published in CACM Volume 52, Issue 2

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Popular
  • Refereed

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)189
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)19
Reflects downloads up to 16 Oct 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Problematic Workplace Behaviours in the Software Development Profession: Using Transactional Analysis to Diagnose Toxicity and Improve Relationships at WorkGroup & Organization Management10.1177/10596011241276586Online publication date: 26-Aug-2024
  • (2023)Factors associated with the gender gap in the STEM sector: Comparison of theoretical and empirical concept maps and qualitative SWOT analysisHeliyon10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e174999:6(e17499)Online publication date: Jun-2023
  • (2022)Female underrepresentation in the cybersecurity workforce – a study on cybersecurity professionals in Sri LankaInformation & Computer Security10.1108/ICS-08-2021-012930:3(402-421)Online publication date: 26-Jan-2022
  • (2022)The Tech Trajectory: Examining the Role of College Environments in Shaping Students’ Interest in Computing CareersResearch in Higher Education10.1007/s11162-021-09671-763:5(871-898)Online publication date: 8-Jan-2022
  • (2021)Bilim, Teknoloji ve Kadın: Çalışmanın Geleceğine Dair Bir DeğerlendirmePamukkale University Journal of Business Research10.47097/piar.932215Online publication date: 10-Jun-2021
  • (2021)Gender Gap in STEM: A Cross-Sectional Study of Primary School Students’ Self-Perception and Test Anxiety in MathematicsIEEE Transactions on Education10.1109/TE.2020.300407564:1(40-49)Online publication date: Feb-2021
  • (2021)Work-in-Progress: Closing the Gaps: Diversity in Programming Education2021 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON)10.1109/EDUCON46332.2021.9454035(1449-1453)Online publication date: 21-Apr-2021
  • (2020)An Exploration of the Cybersecurity Workforce ShortageCyber Warfare and Terrorism10.4018/978-1-7998-2466-4.ch063(1072-1081)Online publication date: 2020
  • (2020)GENDER DIFFERENCES IN STUDENTS’ ACHIEVEMENTS IN LEARNING CONCEPTS OF ELECTRICITY VIA STEAM INTEGRATED APPROACH UTILIZING SCRATCHProblems of Education in the 21st Century10.33225/pec/20.78.42378:3(423-448)Online publication date: 15-Jun-2020
  • (2020)Understanding Gender Differences to Improve Equity in Computer Programming EducationProceedings of the Twenty-Second Australasian Computing Education Conference10.1145/3373165.3373186(185-194)Online publication date: 3-Feb-2020
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Digital Edition

View this article in digital edition.

Digital Edition

Magazine Site

View this article on the magazine site (external)

Magazine Site

Get Access

Login options

Full Access

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media