Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article
Free access

De-escalating IT projects: the DMM model

Published: 01 October 2009 Publication History

Abstract

Introduction
Taming runaway Information Technology (IT) projects is a challenge that most organizations have faced and that managers continue to wrestle with. These are projects that grossly exceed their planned budgets and schedules, often by a factor of 2--3 fold or greater. Many end in failure; failure not only in the sense of budget or schedule, but in terms of delivered functionality as well.
Runaway projects are frequently the result of escalating commitment to a failing course of action, a phenomenon that occurs when investments fail to work out as envisioned and decision-makers compound the problem by persisting irrationally. Keil, Mann, and Rai reported that 30--40% of IT projects exhibit some degree of escalation. To break the escalation cycle, de-escalation of commitment to the failing course of action must occur so that valuable resources can be channeled into more productive use. But, making de-escalation happen is neither easy nor intuitive.
This article briefly examines three approaches that have been suggested for managing de-escalation. By combining elements from the three approaches, we introduce a de-escalation management maturity (DMM) model that provides a useful framework for improving practice.

References

[1]
Drummond, H. Deescalation in decision making: a case of a disastrous partnership. J. of Management Studies 32, 3, (1995), 265--281.
[2]
Ewusi-Mensah, K. Critical issues in abandoned information systems development projects. Comm. ACM 40, 9, (1997), 74--80.
[3]
Iacovou, C.L. and Dexter, A.S. Managing runaway projects: a Delphi survey. Proceedings of the 6th European Conference on Information Systems, W.R.J. Baets (ed.), Aix-en-Provence, France, (1998), 1140--1153.
[4]
Iacovou, C.L. and Dexter, A.S. Turning around runaway information technology projects. California Management Review 46, 4, (2004), 68--88.
[5]
Keil, M., and Robey, D. Turning around troubled software projects: an exploratory study of the deescalation of commitment to failing courses of action. J of Management Information Systems 15, 4, (1999), 63--87.
[6]
Keil, M., and Montealegre, R. Cutting your losses: extricating your organization when a big project goes awry. Sloan Management Review 41, 3, 2000, 55--68.
[7]
Keil, M., Mann, J., and Rai, A. Why software projects escalate: an empirical analysis and test of four theoretical models. MIS Quarterly 24, 4, (Dec. 2000), 631--664.
[8]
Montealegre, R., and Keil, M. De-escalating information technology projects: Lessons from the Denver international airport. MIS Quarterly 24, 3, (2000), 417--447.
[9]
Pan, G., Pan, S., Newman, M., and Flynn, D.J. Escalation and de-escalation of commitment to information systems projects: Insights from a project evaluation model. European Journal of Operational Research 173, 3, (2006a), 1139--1160.
[10]
Pan G, Pan S, Newman M, and Flynn D.J. Escalation and de-escalation of commitment: A transformational analysis of an e-government project. Information Systems Journal 16, (2006b), 3--21.
[11]
Staw, B., and Ross, J. Knowing when to pull the plug, Harvard Business Review. March-April, (1987), 68--74.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Herausforderung des De-Eskalationsmanagements in einem volatilen Umfeld – Ist Projektmanagement in der Finanzbranche vollumfänglich etabliert?Finance-Perspektiven im Wandel10.1007/978-3-658-42840-2_17(289-304)Online publication date: 13-Feb-2024
  • (2023)Information Technology Project Management Research: A Review of Works by Influential PioneersProject Management Journal10.1177/8756972823117105654:4(366-391)Online publication date: 29-May-2023
  • (2022)Engaging Knowledge Capabilities to Sustain the Application of Information Technology Governance in Healthcare InstitutionsSage Open10.1177/2158244022113278312:4Online publication date: 21-Oct-2022
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Communications of the ACM
Communications of the ACM  Volume 52, Issue 10
A View of Parallel Computing
October 2009
134 pages
ISSN:0001-0782
EISSN:1557-7317
DOI:10.1145/1562764
Issue’s Table of Contents
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 01 October 2009
Published in CACM Volume 52, Issue 10

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Popular
  • Refereed

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)297
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)82
Reflects downloads up to 18 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Herausforderung des De-Eskalationsmanagements in einem volatilen Umfeld – Ist Projektmanagement in der Finanzbranche vollumfänglich etabliert?Finance-Perspektiven im Wandel10.1007/978-3-658-42840-2_17(289-304)Online publication date: 13-Feb-2024
  • (2023)Information Technology Project Management Research: A Review of Works by Influential PioneersProject Management Journal10.1177/8756972823117105654:4(366-391)Online publication date: 29-May-2023
  • (2022)Engaging Knowledge Capabilities to Sustain the Application of Information Technology Governance in Healthcare InstitutionsSage Open10.1177/2158244022113278312:4Online publication date: 21-Oct-2022
  • (2019)Intensifying to ceaseMIS Quarterly10.25300/MISQ/2019/1371743:1(141-166)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2019
  • (2019)Themengebiet FührenProjekte spielend zum Erfolg führen10.1007/978-3-658-26769-8_8(189-287)Online publication date: 7-Aug-2019
  • (2019)IT Business ValueEnterprise Governance of Information Technology10.1007/978-3-030-25918-1_4(91-124)Online publication date: 4-Sep-2019
  • (2018)Developing the capability to terminate IT projects when they can no longer deliver business valueInternational Journal of Managing Projects in Business10.1108/IJMPB-06-2017-006011:2(406-431)Online publication date: 8-May-2018
  • (2017)A Business Case Process for IT-Enabled InvestmentsStrategic IT Governance and Alignment in Business Settings10.4018/978-1-5225-0861-8.ch001(1-23)Online publication date: 2017
  • (2016)The Effect of a Multichannel Customer Service System on Customer Service and Financial PerformanceACM Transactions on Management Information Systems (TMIS)10.1145/28754447:1(1-15)Online publication date: 26-Feb-2016
  • (2015)IT-Enabled ValueEnterprise Governance of Information Technology10.1007/978-3-319-14547-1_4(71-101)Online publication date: 30-Jan-2015
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Magazine Site

View this article on the magazine site (external)

Magazine Site

Login options

Full Access

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media