Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/1806689.1806733acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesstocConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Multi-parameter mechanism design and sequential posted pricing

Published: 05 June 2010 Publication History

Abstract

We study the classic mathematical economics problem of Bayesian optimal mechanism design where a principal aims to optimize expected revenue when allocating resources to self-interested agents with preferences drawn from a known distribution. In single parameter settings (i.e., where each agent's preference is given by a single private value for being served and zero for not being served) this problem is solved [20]. Unfortunately, these single parameter optimal mechanisms are impractical and rarely employed [1], and furthermore the underlying economic theory fails to generalize to the important, relevant, and unsolved multi-dimensional setting (i.e., where each agent's preference is given by multiple values for each of the multiple services available) [25].
In contrast to the theory of optimal mechanisms we develop a theory of sequential posted price mechanisms, where agents in sequence are offered take-it-or-leave-it prices. We prove that these mechanisms are approximately optimal in single-dimensional settings. These posted-price mechanisms avoid many of the properties of optimal mechanisms that make the latter impractical. Furthermore, these mechanisms generalize naturally to multi-dimensional settings where they give the first known approximations to the elusive optimal multi-dimensional mechanism design problem. In particular, we solve multi-dimensional multi-unit auction problems and generalizations to matroid feasibility constraints. The constant approximations we obtain range from 1.5 to 8. For all but one case, our posted price sequences can be computed in polynomial time.
This work can be viewed as an extension and improvement of the single-agent algorithmic pricing work of [9] to the setting of multiple agents where the designer has combinatorial feasibility constraints on which agents can simultaneously obtain each service.

References

[1]
Lawrence M. Ausubel and Paul Milgrom. The lovely but lonely vickrey auction. In P. Cramton, Y. Shoham, and R. Steinberg, editors, Combinatorial Auctions, chapter 1, pages 17--40. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2006.
[2]
M. Babaioff, N. Immorlica, and R. Kleinberg. Matroids, secretary problems, and online mechanisms. In Proc. 19th ACM Symp. on Discrete Algorithms, 2007.
[3]
Moshe Babaioff, Michael Dinitz, Anupam Gupta, Nicole Immorlica, and Kunal Talwar. Secretary problems: weights and discounts. In SODA '09: Proceedings of the Nineteenth Annual ACM -SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, pages 1245--1254, Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2009. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.
[4]
A. Blum and J. Hartline. Near-optimal online auctions. In Proc. 16th ACM Symp. on Discrete Algorithms. ACM/SIAM, 2005.
[5]
A. Blum, V. Kumar, A. Rudra, and F. Wu. Online learning in online auctions. Theoretical Computer Science, 324:137--146, 2004.
[6]
L. Blumrosen and T. Holenstein. Posted prices vs. negotiations: an asymptotic analysis. In Proc. 10th ACM Conf. on Electronic Commerce, 2008.
[7]
P. Briest. Towards hardness of envy-free pricing. Technical Report TR06-150, ECCC, 2006.
[8]
J. Bulow and J. Roberts. The simple economics of optimal auctions. The Journal of Political Economy, 97:1060--90, 1989.
[9]
S. Chawla, J. Hartline, and R. Kleinberg. Algorithmic pricing via virtual valuations. In Proc. 9th ACM Conf. on Electronic Commerce, pages 243--251, 2007.
[10]
S. Chawla, D. Malec, and B. Sivan. The power of randomness in Bayesian optimal mechanism design. In Proc. 12th ACM Conf. on Electronic Commerce, 2010.
[11]
Shuchi Chawla, Jason D. Hartline, David Malec, and Balu Sivan. Multi-parameter mechanism design and sequential posted pricing. CoRR, abs/0907.2435, 2009.
[12]
A. Goldberg and J. Hartline. Collusion-resistant mechanisms for single-parameter agents. In Proc. 16th ACM Symp. on Discrete Algorithms, 2005.
[13]
V. Guruswami, J. Hartline, A. Karlin, D. Kempe, C. Kenyon, and F. McSherry. On profit-maximizing envy-free pricing. In Proc. 16th ACM Symp. on Discrete Algorithms, 2005.
[14]
J. Hartline and T. Roughgarden. Simple versus optimal mechanisms. In Proc. 11th ACM Conf. on Electronic Commerce, 2009.
[15]
Catherine Holahan. Auctions on eBay: A Dying Breed. http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/jun2008/tc2008062_112762%.htm, June 3 2008.
[16]
R. Kleinberg and T. Leighton. The value of knowing a demand curve: Bounds on regret for on-line posted--price auctions. In Proc. 44th IEEE Symp. on Foundations of Computer Science, 2003.
[17]
Nitish Korula and Martin Pál. Algorithms for secretary problems on graphs and hypergraphs. In ICALP '09: Proceedings of the 36th Internatilonal Collogquium on Automata, Languages and Programming, pages 508--520, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2009. Springer-Verlag.
[18]
D. Lehmann, L. I. O'Callaghan, and Y. Shoham. Truth revelation in approximately efficient combinatorial auctions. In Proc. 1st ACM Conf. on Electronic Commerce, pages 96--102. ACM Press, 1999.
[19]
R.P. McAfee and J. McMillan. Multidimensional incentive compatibility and mechanism design. Journal of Economic Theory, 46(2):335--354, 1988.
[20]
R. Myerson. Optimal auction design. Mathematics of Operations Research, 6:58--73, 1981.
[21]
N. Nisan and A. Ronen. Algorithmic mechanism design. In Proc. 31st ACM Symp. on Theory of Computing, pages 129--140. ACM Press, 1999.
[22]
Jean-Charles Rochet and Philippe Chone. Ironing, Sweeping, and Multidimensional Screening. Econometrica, 66(4):783--826, 1998.
[23]
Ester Samuel-Cahn. Comparison of threshold stop rules and maximum for independent nonnegative random variables. The Annals of Probability, 12(4):1213--1216, 1984.
[24]
Tuomas Sandholm and Andrew Gilpin. Sequences of take-it-or-leave-it offers: near-optimal auctions without full valuation revelation. In AAMAS '06: Proceedings of the fifth international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems, pages 1127--1134, New York, NY, USA, 2006. ACM.
[25]
D. Vincent and A. Manelli. Multidimensional mechanism design: Revenue maximization and the multiple-good monopoly. Journal of Economic Theory, 137(1):153--185, 2007.
[26]
Robert B. Wilson. Nonlinear Pricing. Oxford University Press, 1997.

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
STOC '10: Proceedings of the forty-second ACM symposium on Theory of computing
June 2010
812 pages
ISBN:9781450300506
DOI:10.1145/1806689
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 05 June 2010

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tag

  1. Bayesian mechanism design

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

STOC'10
Sponsor:
STOC'10: Symposium on Theory of Computing
June 5 - 8, 2010
Massachusetts, Cambridge, USA

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 1,469 of 4,586 submissions, 32%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)100
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)11
Reflects downloads up to 15 Oct 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Conformal Online Auction DesignSSRN Electronic Journal10.2139/ssrn.4823113Online publication date: 2024
  • (2024)Buying from a GroupAmerican Economic Review10.1257/aer.20230914114:8(2596-2632)Online publication date: 1-Aug-2024
  • (2024)Prophet Inequalities with Cancellation CostsProceedings of the 56th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing10.1145/3618260.3649786(1247-1258)Online publication date: 10-Jun-2024
  • (2024)Online Query-Based Data Pricing with Time-Discounting Valuations2024 IEEE 40th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE)10.1109/ICDE60146.2024.00266(3449-3461)Online publication date: 13-May-2024
  • (2024)On Submodular Prophet Inequalities and Correlation GapTheoretical Computer Science10.1016/j.tcs.2024.114814(114814)Online publication date: Aug-2024
  • (2024)Near-Optimal Auctions on Independence SystemsTheory of Computing Systems10.1007/s00224-024-10189-5Online publication date: 17-Aug-2024
  • (2024)Non-Adaptive Matroid Prophet InequalitiesAlgorithmic Game Theory10.1007/978-3-031-71033-9_22(389-404)Online publication date: 31-Aug-2024
  • (2024)To Regulate or Not to Regulate: Using Revenue Maximization Tools to Maximize Consumer UtilityAlgorithmic Game Theory10.1007/978-3-031-71033-9_18(315-332)Online publication date: 31-Aug-2024
  • (2024)Online Incentive Mechanism Design for Real-Time Decision Making: Case Study of Collaborative Task Offloading in Mobile Edge ComputingEfficient Online Incentive Mechanism Designs for Wireless Communications10.1007/978-3-031-58453-4_4(77-103)Online publication date: 15-Apr-2024
  • (2023)Refined mechanism design for approximately structured priors via active regressionProceedings of the 37th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems10.5555/3666122.3667217(25185-25194)Online publication date: 10-Dec-2023
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Get Access

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media