research-article

Learning computer science concepts with scratch

Authors:

Orni Meerbaum-Salant,

Mordechai (Moti) Ben-AriAuthors Info & Claims

ICER '10: Proceedings of the Sixth international workshop on Computing education research

Pages 69 - 76

https://doi.org/10.1145/1839594.1839607

Published: 09 August 2010 Publication History

Abstract

Scratch is a visual programming environment that is widely used by young people. We investigated if Scratch can be used to teach concepts of computer science. We developed new learning materials for middle-school students that were designed according to the constructionist philosophy of Scratch and evaluated them in two schools. The classes were normal classes, not extracurricular activities whose participants are self-selected. Questionnaires and a test were constructed based upon a novel combination of the Revised Bloom Taxonomy and the SOLO taxonomy. These quantitative instruments were augmented with a qualitative analysis of observations within the classes. The results showed that in general students could successfully learn important concepts of computer science, although there were some problems with initialization, variables and concurrency; these problems can be overcome by modifications to the teaching process.

References

[1]

Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airasian, P. W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Pintrich, P. R., Raths, R. and Wittrock, M. C. Eds. 2001. A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching and Assessing. A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Addison-Wesley Longman.

[2]

Bell, T., Witten, I.H., Fellows, M. 2005. Computer Science Unplugged. http://csunplugged.com/ (last accessed 20 April 2010).

[3]

Berelson, B. 1952. Content Analysis in Communication Research. Free Press.

[4]

Biggs, J. B. and Collis, K. F. 1982. Evaluating the Quality of Learning: The SOLO Taxonomy (Structure of the Observed Learning Outcome). Academic Press.

[5]

Bloom, B. S., Mesia, B. B., and Krathwohl, D. R. 1964. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives (2 volumes: The affective domain; The cognitive domain). David McKay.

[6]

Carter, L. 2006. Why students with an apparent aptitude for computer science don't choose to major in computer science. SIGCSE Bull. 38, 1, 27--31

Digital Library

[7]

Curzon, P. and McOwan, P. W. 2008. Engaging with computer science through magic shows. SIGCSE Bull. 40, 3, 179--183.

Digital Library

[8]

Dancik, G. and Kumar, A.N. 2003. A tutor for countercontrolled loop concepts and its evaluation. In Proceedings of the Frontiers in Education Conference (Boulder, CO, November 05-08, 2003). Session T3C (no page numbers).

[9]

Dann, W., Cooper, S. and Pausch, R. 2009. Learning to Program with Alice, Second Edition. Pearson.

Digital Library

[10]

Fuller, U., Johnson, C. G., Ahoniemi, T., Cukierman, D., Hernán-Losada, I., Jackova, J., Lahtinen, E., Lewis, T. L., Thompson, D. M., Riedesel, C., and Thompson, E. 2007. Developing a computer science-specific learning taxonomy. SIGCSE Bull. 39, 4, 152--170.

Digital Library

[11]

Johnson, C. J. and Fuller, U. 2006. Is Bloom's taxonomy appropriate for computer Science? In Proceedings of the 6th Baltic Sea Conference on Computing Education Research: Koli Calling 2006 (Uppsala, Sweden, November 09-12, 2006). ACM, New York, NY, 120--123.

Digital Library

[12]

Johnson, R. B. and Onwuegbuzie, A. J. 2004. Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33, 7, 14--26.

[13]

Kelleher, C., Pausch, R., and Kiesler, S. 2007. Storytelling Alice motivates middle school girls to learn computer programming. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (San Jose, California, USA, April 28 - May 03, 2007). ACM, New York, NY, 1455--1464.

Digital Library

[14]

Kelleher, C. and Pausch, R. 2005. Lowering the barriers to programming: A taxonomy of programming environments and languages for novice programmers. ACM Comput. Surv. 37, 2, 83--137.

Digital Library

[15]

Krathwohl, D, R. 2002. A revision of Bloom's taxonomy: An overview. Theory into Practice 41, 4, 212--264. http://www.unco.edu/cetl/sir/stating_outcome/documents/Krathwohl.pdf (last accessed 20 April 2010).

[16]

Kuittinen, M, and Sajaniemi, J. 2004. Teaching roles of variables in elementary programming courses. SIGCSE Bull. 36, 3, 57--61.

Digital Library

[17]

Lambert, L. and Guiffre, H. 2009. Computer science outreach in an elementary school. J. Comput. Small Coll., 24, 3, 118--124.

Digital Library

[18]

Lister, R. and Leaney, J. 2003. Introductory programming, criterion-referencing and Bloom. SIGCSE Bull. 35, 1, 143--147.

Digital Library

[19]

Lister, R., Simon, B., Thompson, E., Whalley, J.L. and Prasad, C. 2006. Not seeing the forest for the trees: Novice programmers and the SOLO taxonomy. SIGCSE Bull. 38, 3, 118--122.

Digital Library

[20]

Malan, D. J. and Leitner, H. H. 2007. Scratch for budding computer scientists. SIGCSE Bull. 39, 1, 223--227.

Digital Library

[21]

Maloney, J., Peppler, K., Kafai, Y., Resnick, M., and Rusk, N. 2008. Programming by choice: Urban youth learning programming with Scratch. SIGCSE Bull. 40, 1, 367--371.

Digital Library

[22]

Moskal, B., Lurie, D. and Cooper, S. 2004. Evaluating the effectiveness of a new instructional approach. In Proceedings of the 35th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (Norfolk, VA, March 03-07, 2004), ACM Press, New York, NY, 75--79.

Digital Library

[23]

Papert, S. and Harel, I. 1991. Constructionism. Ablex. Resnick, M., Maloney, J. Monroy-Hernández, A., Rusk, N., Eastmond, E., Brennan, K., Millner, A., Rosenbaum, E., Silver, J., Silverman, B., and Kafai, Y. 2009. Scratch: Programming for all. Commun. ACM, 52, 11, 60--67.

Digital Library

[24]

Robins, A., Rountree, J., and Rountree, N. 2003. Learning and Teaching Programming: A Review and Discussion. Computer Science Education, 13, 2, 137--172.

[25]

Samurçay, R. 1989. The concept of variable in programming: its meaning and use in problem-solving by novice programmers. In E. Soloway and J. C. Spohrer (Eds.). Studying the Novice Programmer, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 161--178.

[26]

Taub, R., Ben-Ari, M., and Armoni, M. 2009. The effect of CS Unplugged on middle-school students' views of CS. SIGCSE Bull. 41, 3, 99--103.

Digital Library

[27]

Thompson, E., Luxton-Reilly, A., Whalley, J. L., Hu, M., and Robbins, P. 2008. Bloom's taxonomy for CS assessment. Proceedings of the Tenth Conference Australasian Computing Education (Wollongong, NSW, Australia, January 20-23, 2008), 155--161.

Digital Library

[28]

Whalley, J., Lister, R., Thompson, E., Clear, T., Robbins, P., and Prasad, C. 2006. An Australasian study of reading and comprehension skills in novice programmers, using the Bloom and SOLO taxonomies. In Proceedings of the Eighth Australasian Conference Computing Education (Hobart, Australia, January 16-19, 2006), 243--252.

Digital Library

[29]

Wolz, U., Leitner, H. H., Malan, D. J., and Maloney, J. 2009. Starting with Scratch in CS1. SIGCSE Bull. 4, 1, 2--3.

Digital Library

[30]

Wolz, U., Maloney, J., and Pulimood, S. M. 2008. 'Scratch' your way to introductory CS. SIGCSE Bull. 40, 1, 298--299.

Digital Library

Cited By

Sudihartinih ERachmatin D(2024)The Online Game Design Uses Scratch, Geogebra, and Geogebra AR Through Mathematics Education Multimedia LecturesKnE Social Sciences10.18502/kss.v9i8.15618Online publication date: 3-Apr-2024
https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v9i8.15618
Bevilacqua JChiodini LMoreno Santos IHauswirth M(2024)Assessing the Understanding of Expressions: A Qualitative Study of Notional-Machine-Based Exam QuestionsProceedings of the 24th Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research10.1145/3699538.3699554(1-12)Online publication date: 12-Nov-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3699538.3699554
de Wit SHermans FSpecht MAivaloglou EHermans FBohrer R(2024)Gender Differences in Story, Game and Visual Adventures in HedyProceedings of the 2024 ACM SIGPLAN International Symposium on SPLASH-E10.1145/3689493.3689983(1-11)Online publication date: 17-Oct-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3689493.3689983
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Learning computer science concepts with scratch
1. Social and professional topics
  1. Professional topics
    1. Computing education
      1. Computing education programs
        Computer science education
        Information science education

Recommendations

From Scratch to “Real” Programming

Computer science (CS) activities for young students are widely used, particularly visual programming environments. We investigated the use of the Scratch environment for teaching CS concepts to middle school students. In a previous article [Meerbaum-...
Assessment of computer science learning in a scratch-based outreach program
SIGCSE '13: Proceeding of the 44th ACM technical symposium on Computer science education

Many institutions have created and deployed outreach programs for middle school students with the goal of increasing the number and diversity of students who later pursue careers in computer science. While these programs have been shown to increase ...
Bringing Grades K-5 to the Mainstream of Computer Science Education
SIGCSE '15: Proceedings of the 46th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education
As awareness of computer science education grows in the general public, it is important to showcase computer science education as accessible for all grades K-12 and beyond. As panelists present the projects and research they've been conducting, we will ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

ICER '10: Proceedings of the Sixth international workshop on Computing education research

August 2010

124 pages

ISBN:9781450302579

DOI:10.1145/1839594

General Chair:
Michael E. Caspersen
Aarhus University, Denmark
,
Program Chairs:
Mike Clancy
University of California, Berkeley, California, USA
,
Kathryn Sanders
Rhode Island College, Providence, USA

Copyright © 2010 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

SIGCSE: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Science Education

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 09 August 2010

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Conference

ICER '10

Sponsor:

SIGCSE

ICER '10: International Computing Education Research Workshop

August 9 - 10, 2010

Aarhus, Denmark

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 189 of 803 submissions, 24%

Upcoming Conference

ICER 2025

Sponsor:
sigcse

ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research

August 3 - 6, 2025

Charlottesville , VA , USA

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

114
Total Citations
View Citations
2,612
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)166
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)22

Reflects downloads up to 25 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Sudihartinih ERachmatin D(2024)The Online Game Design Uses Scratch, Geogebra, and Geogebra AR Through Mathematics Education Multimedia LecturesKnE Social Sciences10.18502/kss.v9i8.15618Online publication date: 3-Apr-2024
https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v9i8.15618
Bevilacqua JChiodini LMoreno Santos IHauswirth M(2024)Assessing the Understanding of Expressions: A Qualitative Study of Notional-Machine-Based Exam QuestionsProceedings of the 24th Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research10.1145/3699538.3699554(1-12)Online publication date: 12-Nov-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3699538.3699554
de Wit SHermans FSpecht MAivaloglou EHermans FBohrer R(2024)Gender Differences in Story, Game and Visual Adventures in HedyProceedings of the 2024 ACM SIGPLAN International Symposium on SPLASH-E10.1145/3689493.3689983(1-11)Online publication date: 17-Oct-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3689493.3689983
Atashpendar ARothkugel SMonga MLonati VBarendsen ESheard JPaterson J(2024)Block-Based Programming for Mobile with Conventional Exceptions and Automatic EvaluationProceedings of the 2024 on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education V. 110.1145/3649217.3653549(597-603)Online publication date: 3-Jul-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3649217.3653549
Tabarsi BReichert HLytle NCatete VBarnes T(2024)Scaffolding Novices: Analyzing When and How Parsons Problems Impact Novice Programming in an Integrated Science AssignmentProceedings of the 2024 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research - Volume 110.1145/3632620.3671110(42-54)Online publication date: 12-Aug-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3632620.3671110
Magda DGardner-McCune CJimenez YChu SKulkarni AStephenson BStone JBattestilli LRebelsky SShoop L(2024)The Integration of Computational Thinking and Making in the ClassroomProceedings of the 55th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 110.1145/3626252.3630948(778-784)Online publication date: 7-Mar-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3626252.3630948
Limke AHill MCateté VBarnes T(2024)A Survey of K-12 Teacher Needs for an Online Programming Learning SystemExtended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613905.3651110(1-7)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613905.3651110
Morgan MGash KLudi STruong T(2024)Investigating the Usability of Coding Applications for Children: Insights from Teacher Interviews2024 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (VL/HCC)10.1109/VL/HCC60511.2024.00016(47-58)Online publication date: 2-Sep-2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/VL/HCC60511.2024.00016
Yang QLi KLu Y(2024)Enhancing College Students' Programming Ability Based on Individual Factors and Strategies2024 13th International Conference on Educational and Information Technology (ICEIT)10.1109/ICEIT61397.2024.10540698(409-415)Online publication date: 22-Mar-2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEIT61397.2024.10540698
Asgari MTsai FMannila LStrömbäck FSadique K(2024)Students’ perspectives on using digital tools in programming coursesDiscover Education10.1007/s44217-024-00144-43:1Online publication date: 22-May-2024
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-024-00144-4
Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents