Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/191839.191850acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmodConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free access

Ensuring relaxed atomicity for flexible transactions in multidatabase systems

Published: 24 May 1994 Publication History

Abstract

Global transaction management requires cooperation from local sites to ensure the consistent and reliable execution of global transactions in a distributed database system. In a heterogeneous distributed database (or multidatabase) environment, various local sites make conflicting assertions of autonomy over the execution of global transactions. A flexible transaction model for the specification of global transactions makes it possible to deal robustly with these conflicting requirements. This paper presents an approach that preserves the semi-atomicity (a weaker form of atomicity) of flexible transactions, allowing local sites to autonomously maintain serializability and recoverability. We offer a fundamental characterization of the flexible transaction model and precisely define the semi-atomicity. We investigate the commit dependencies among the subtransactions of a flexible transaction. These dependencies are used to control the commitment order of the subtransactions. We next identify those restrictions that must be placed upon a flexible transaction to ensure the maintenance of its semi-atomicity. As atomicity is a restrictive criterion, semi-atomicity enhances the class of executable global transactions.

References

[1]
M. Ansari, L. Ness, M. Rusinkiewicz, and A. Sheth. Using Flexible Transactions to Support Multi- System Telecommunication Applications. In Proceedings of lhe 18th VLDB, pages 65-76, Vancouver, Canada, 1992.
[2]
P. Bernstein, V. Hadzilacos, and N. Goodman. Concurrency Control and Recovery in Databases Systems. Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., 1987.
[3]
Y. Breitbart, A. Silberschatz, and G. Thompson. Reliable Transaction Management in a Multidatabase System. In Proceedings of A CM SIG- MOD, pages 215-224, May 1990.
[4]
A. K. Elmagarmid, Y. Leu, W. Litwin, and M. Rusinkiewicz. A Multidatabase Transaction Model for InterBase. In Proceedings of the 16th VLDB, pages 507-581, Brisbane, Australia, 1990.
[5]
H. Garcia-Molina. Using Semantic Knowledge for Transaction Processing in a Distributed Database. A CM Transactions on Database Systems, 8(2):186- 213, June 1983.
[6]
V. Gligor and R. Popescu-Zeletin. Transaction Management in Distributed Heterogeneous Database Management Systems. Information Systems, 11(4):287-297, 1986.
[7]
H. Korth, E_ Levy, and A. Silberschatz. A Formal Approach to Recovery by Compensating Transactions. In Proceedings of the 16th VLDB, Brisbane, Australia, 1990.
[8]
E. Kiihn, F. Puntigam, and A. Elmagarmid. An execution model for distributed database transactions and its implementation in VPL. In A. Pirotte, C. Delobel, and G. Gottlob, editors, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Advances in Database Technology - EDBT'92, pages 483-498. 1992.
[9]
E. Levy, H. Korth, and A. $ilbersehatz. An Optimistic Commit Protocol for Distributed Transaction Management. In Proceedings of A CM SIG- MOD, Denver, Colorado, May 1991.
[10]
S. Mehrotra, R. Rastogi, H. F. Korth, and A. Silberschatz. A transaction model for multidatabase systems, in Proceedings of International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems, June 1992.
[11]
P. Muth and T. Rakow. Atomic commitment for integrated database systems. In Proceedings of the 7th Intl. Conf. on Data Engineering, pages 296- 304, Kobe, Japan, Apr. 1991.
[12]
M. H. Nodine. Interactions: Multidatabase Support for Planning Applications. PhD thesis, Brown University, April 1993.
[13]
M. H. Nodine and S. B. Zdonik. Automating compensation in a multidatabase. In Proceedings of the 27th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 1994.
[14]
W. Perrizo, J. Rajkumar, and P. Ram. HYDRO: a heterogeneous distributed database system, in Proceedings of A CM SIGMOD, pages 32-39, Denver, Colorado, May 1991.
[15]
A. Silberschatz, M. Stonebraker, and J. Ullman. Database systems: Achievements and opportunities. Communication of ACM, 34(10):110-120, 1991.
[16]
N. Soparkar, H. F. Korth, and A. Siberschatz. Failure-resilient transaction management in multidatabases. IEEE Computer, 24(12):28-36, December 1991.
[17]
J. Veijalainen, F. Eliassen, and B. Holtkamp. The S-transaction Model. In A. K. Elmagarmid, editor, Database Transaction Models for Advanced Applications. Morgan Kaufmann, 1992.
[18]
A. Wolski and J. Veijalainen. 2PC Agent method: Achieving serializability in presence of failures in a heterogeneous multidatabase. In Proceedings of PARBASE-90, Miami Beach, Florida, 1990.
[19]
A. Zhang and B. Bhargava. Scheduling with Compensation in Multidatabase Systems. Technical Report CSD-TR-93-063, Purdue University, October 1993.

Cited By

View all
  • (2020)Towards an Approach for Validating the Internet-of-Transactional-ThingsAdvanced Information Networking and Applications10.1007/978-3-030-44041-1_101(1176-1188)Online publication date: 28-Mar-2020
  • (2020)Atomicity in the Internet of Transactional Things (Io2T)Web, Artificial Intelligence and Network Applications10.1007/978-3-030-44038-1_5(46-55)Online publication date: 31-Mar-2020
  • (2018)Flex TransactionsEncyclopedia of Database Systems10.1007/978-1-4614-8265-9_726(1486-1487)Online publication date: 7-Dec-2018
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
SIGMOD '94: Proceedings of the 1994 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data
May 1994
525 pages
ISBN:0897916395
DOI:10.1145/191839
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 24 May 1994

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Qualifiers

  • Article

Conference

SIGMOD/PODS94

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 785 of 4,003 submissions, 20%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)162
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)25
Reflects downloads up to 12 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2020)Towards an Approach for Validating the Internet-of-Transactional-ThingsAdvanced Information Networking and Applications10.1007/978-3-030-44041-1_101(1176-1188)Online publication date: 28-Mar-2020
  • (2020)Atomicity in the Internet of Transactional Things (Io2T)Web, Artificial Intelligence and Network Applications10.1007/978-3-030-44038-1_5(46-55)Online publication date: 31-Mar-2020
  • (2018)Flex TransactionsEncyclopedia of Database Systems10.1007/978-1-4614-8265-9_726(1486-1487)Online publication date: 7-Dec-2018
  • (2016)Managing Consistency in e-Government TransactionsProceedings of the 9th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance10.1145/2910019.2910104(313-322)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2016
  • (2015)Evaluating the effectiveness of the abstract transaction model in testing Web services transactionsConcurrency and Computation: Practice & Experience10.1002/cpe.285127:4(765-781)Online publication date: 25-Mar-2015
  • (2014)Managing consistency anomalies in distributed integrated databases with relaxed ACID propertiesProceedings of the 8th International Conference on Ubiquitous Information Management and Communication10.1145/2557977.2557982(1-7)Online publication date: 9-Jan-2014
  • (2014)The CAP theorem versus databases with relaxed ACID propertiesProceedings of the 8th International Conference on Ubiquitous Information Management and Communication10.1145/2557977.2557981(1-7)Online publication date: 9-Jan-2014
  • (2013)Architecture for Integration and Migration of Information Systems by Using SOA Services across Heterogeneous System BoundariesEnterprise Resource Planning10.4018/978-1-4666-4153-2.ch019(314-328)Online publication date: 2013
  • (2013)Integration of Health Records by Using Relaxed ACID Properties between Hospitals, Physicians and Mobile Units like Ambulances and DoctorsMobile and Handheld Computing Solutions for Organizations and End-Users10.4018/978-1-4666-2785-7.ch015(275-287)Online publication date: 2013
  • (2013)Architecture for Integration and Migration of Information Systems by Using SOA Services across Heterogeneous System BoundariesIntegrated Information and Computing Systems for Natural, Spatial, and Social Sciences10.4018/978-1-4666-2190-9.ch009(177-191)Online publication date: 2013
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Login options

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media