research-article

Delay-bounded scheduling

Authors:

Shaz Qadeer, and

Zvonimir RakamarićAuthors Info & Claims

POPL '11: Proceedings of the 38th annual ACM SIGPLAN-SIGACT symposium on Principles of programming languages

January 2011

Pages 411 - 422

https://doi.org/10.1145/1926385.1926432

Published: 26 January 2011 Publication History

Abstract

We provide a new characterization of scheduling nondeterminism by allowing deterministic schedulers to delay their next-scheduled task. In limiting the delays an otherwise-deterministic scheduler is allowed, we discover concurrency bugs efficiently---by exploring few schedules---and robustly---i.e., independent of the number of tasks, context switches, or buffered events. Our characterization elegantly applies to any systematic exploration (e.g., testing, model checking) of concurrent programs with dynamic task-creation. Additionally, we show that certain delaying schedulers admit efficient reductions from concurrent to sequential program analysis.

Supplementary Material

MP4 File (37-mpeg-4.mp4)

Download
389.16 MB

References

[1]

M. Abadi and L. Lamport. The existence of refinement mappings. Theor. Comput. Sci., 82 (2): 253--284, 1991.

Digital Library

[2]

M. F. Atig, A. Bouajjani, and S. Qadeer. Context-bounded analysis for concurrent programs with dynamic creation of threads. In TACAS '09: Proc. 15th International Conference on Tools and Algorithms for the Construction and Analysis of Systems, volume 5505 of LNCS, pages 107--123. Springer, 2009.

Digital Library

[3]

T. Ball, S. Burckhardt, K. E. Coons, M. Musuvathi, and S. Qadeer. Preemption sealing for efficient concurrency testing. In TACAS '10: Proc. 16th International Conference on Tools and Algorithms for the Construction and Analysis of Systems, volume 6015 of LNCS, pages 420--434. Springer, 2010.

Digital Library

[4]

M. Barnett and K. R. M. Leino. Weakest-precondition of unstructured programs. In PASTE '05: Proc. ACM SIGPLAN-SIGSOFT Workshop on Program Analysis For Software Tools and Engineering, pages 82--87. ACM, 2005.

Digital Library

[5]

A. Bouajjani and R. Majumdar. Personal communication, July 2010.

[6]

S. Burckhardt and M. Musuvathi. Personal communication, November 2010.

[7]

S. Burckhardt, P. Kothari, M. Musuvathi, and S. Nagarakatte. A randomized scheduler with probabilistic guarantees of finding bugs. In ASPLOS '10: Proc. 15th International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems, pages 167--178. ACM, 2010.

Digital Library

[8]

E. M. Clarke and E. A. Emerson. Design and synthesis of synchronization skeletons using branching-time temporal logic. In Logic of Programs, volume 131 of LNCS, pages 52--71. Springer, 1981.

Digital Library

[9]

J. Corbet, A. Rubini, and G. Kroah-Hartman. Linux Device Drivers. O'Reilly Media, Inc., 3rd edition, 2005.

Digital Library

[10]

L. M. de Moura and N. Bjørner. Z3: An efficient SMT solver. In TACAS '08: Proc. 14th International Conference on Tools and Algorithms for the Construction and Analysis of Systems, volume 4963 of LNCS, pages 337--340. Springer, 2008.

Digital Library

[11]

R. DeLine and K. R. M. Leino. BoogiePL: A typed procedural language for checking object-oriented programs. Technical Report MSR-TR-2005-70, Microsoft Research, 2005.

[12]

O. Edelstein, E. Farchi, E. Goldin, Y. Nir, G. Ratsaby, and S. Ur. Framework for testing multi-threaded Java programs. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, 15 (3--5): 485--499, 2003.

[13]

M. Emmi, S. Qadeer, and Z. Rakamarić. Delay-bounded scheduling: A canonical characterization of scheduler nondeterminism. Technical Report MSR-TR-2010-123, Microsoft Research, 2010. http://research.microsoft.com/apps/pubs/?id=138569.

[14]

P. Ganty and R. Majumdar. Algorithmic verification of asynchronous programs. CoRR, abs/1011.0551, 2010. http://arxiv.org/abs/1011.0551.

Digital Library

[15]

J. J. Garrett. Ajax: A new approach to web applications, February 2005. http://www.adaptivepath.com/ideas/essays/archives/000385.php.

[16]

N. Ghafari, A. J. Hu, and Z. Rakamarić. Context-bounded translations for concurrent software: An empirical evaluation. In SPIN '10: Proc. 17th International Workshop on Model Checking Software, volume 6349 of LNCS, pages 227--244. Springer, 2010.

Digital Library

[17]

P. Godefroid. Model checking for programming languages using VeriSoft. In POPL '97: Proc. 24th ACM SIGPLAN-SIGACT Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages, pages 174--186. ACM, 1997.

Digital Library

[18]

J. L. Hill, R. Szewczyk, A. Woo, S. Hollar, D. E. Culler, and K. S. J. Pister. System architecture directions for networked sensors. In ASPLOS '00: Proc. 9th International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems, pages 93--104. ACM, 2000.

Digital Library

[19]

R. Jhala and R. Majumdar. Interprocedural analysis of asynchronous programs. In POPL '07: Proc. 34th ACM SIGPLAN-SIGACT Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages, pages 339--350. ACM, 2007.

Digital Library

[20]

P. Joshi, M. Naik, C.-S. Park, and K. Sen. CalFuzzer: An extensible active testing framework for concurrent programs. In CAV '09: Proc. 21st International Conference on Computer Aided Verification, volume 5643 of LNCS, pages 675--681. Springer, 2009.

Digital Library

[21]

N. Kidd, S. Jagannathan, and J. Vitek. One stack to run them all: Reducing concurrent analysis to sequential analysis under priority scheduling. In SPIN '10: Proc. 17th International Workshop on Model Checking Software, volume 6349 of LNCS, pages 245--261. Springer, 2010.

Digital Library

[22]

E. Kohler, R. Morris, B. Chen, J. Jannotti, and M. F. Kaashoek. The Click modular router. ACM Trans. Comput. Syst., 18 (3): 263--297, 2000.

Digital Library

[23]

S. La Torre, P. Madhusudan, and G. Parlato. Reducing context-bounded concurrent reachability to sequential reachability. In CAV '09: Proc. 21st International Conference on Computer Aided Verification, volume 5643 of LNCS, pages 477--492. Springer, 2009.

Digital Library

[24]

S. La Torre, P. Madhusudan, and G. Parlato. Model-checking parameterized concurrent programs using linear interfaces. In CAV '10: Proc. 22nd International Conference on Computer Aided Verification, volume 6174 of LNCS, pages 629--644. Springer, 2010.

Digital Library

[25]

S. La Torre, P. Madhusudan, and G. Parlato. Sequentializing parameterized programs, 2010. Under submission.

[26]

S. K. Lahiri, S. Qadeer, and Z. Rakamarić. Static and precise detection of concurrency errors in systems code using SMT solvers. In CAV '09: Proc. 21st International Conference on Computer Aided Verification, volume 5643 of LNCS, pages 509--524. Springer, 2009.

Digital Library

[27]

A. Lal and T. W. Reps. Reducing concurrent analysis under a context bound to sequential analysis. Formal Methods in System Design, 35 (1): 73--97, 2009.

Digital Library

[28]

L. Lamport. Proving the correctness of multiprocess programs. IEEE Trans. Software Eng., 3 (2): 125--143, 1977.

Digital Library

[29]

M. Musuvathi and S. Qadeer. Iterative context bounding for systematic testing of multithreaded programs. In PLDI '07: Proc. ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation, pages 446--455. ACM, 2007.

Digital Library

[30]

M. Musuvathi, S. Qadeer, T. Ball, G. Basler, P. A. Nainar, and I. Neamtiu. Finding and reproducing Heisenbugs in concurrent programs. In OSDI '08: Proc. 8th USENIX Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation, pages 267--280. USENIX Association, 2008.

Digital Library

[31]

W. Oney. Programming the Microsoft Windows Driver Model. Microsoft Press, 2nd edition, 2002.

Digital Library

[32]

V. S. Pai, P. Druschel, and W. Zwaenepoel. Flash: An efficient and portable web server. In USENIX '99: Proc. General Track of the USENIX Annual Technical Conference, pages 199--212. USENIX, 1999.

Digital Library

[33]

C. H. Papadimitriou. Computational Complexity. Addison Wesley, 1993.

[34]

S. Qadeer and J. Rehof. Context-bounded model checking of concurrent software. In TACAS '05: Proc. 11th International Conference on Tools and Algorithms for the Construction and Analysis of Systems, volume 3440 of LNCS, pages 93--107. Springer, 2005.

Digital Library

[35]

S. Qadeer and D. Wu. KISS: Keep it simple and sequential. In PLDI '04: Proc. ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation, pages 14--24. ACM, 2004.

Digital Library

[36]

G. Ramalingam. Context-sensitive synchronization-sensitive analysis is undecidable. ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst., 22 (2): 416--430, 2000.

Digital Library

[37]

K. Sen and M. Viswanathan. Model checking multithreaded programs with asynchronous atomic methods. In CAV '06: Proc. 18th International Conference on Computer Aided Verification, volume 4144 of LNCS, pages 300--314. Springer, 2006.

Digital Library

Cited By

Abdulla PAtig MBouajjani AKumar KSaivasan P(2024)Verification under Intel-x86 with PersistencyProceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages10.1145/36564258:PLDI(1189-1212)Online publication date: 20-Jun-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3656425
Ang ZMathur U(2024)Predictive Monitoring against Pattern Regular LanguagesProceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages10.1145/36329158:POPL(2191-2225)Online publication date: 5-Jan-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3632915
Dai YWu PCui SMa L(2024)Intrathread Method Orders Based Adaptive Testing of Concurrent ObjectsTheoretical Aspects of Software Engineering10.1007/978-3-031-64626-3_6(91-108)Online publication date: 14-Jul-2024
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-64626-3_6
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Delay-bounded scheduling

Recommendations

Delay-bounded scheduling
POPL '11

We provide a new characterization of scheduling nondeterminism by allowing deterministic schedulers to delay their next-scheduled task. In limiting the delays an otherwise-deterministic scheduler is allowed, we discover concurrency bugs efficiently---by ...
Read More
Asynchronous programs with prioritized task-buffers
FSE '12: Proceedings of the ACM SIGSOFT 20th International Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering

We consider the algorithmic analysis of asynchronous software systems as a means for building reliable software. A key challenge in designing such analyses is identifying a concurrency model which does not extraneously introduce behaviors infeasible in ...
Read More
A program logic for concurrent objects under fair scheduling
POPL '16: Proceedings of the 43rd Annual ACM SIGPLAN-SIGACT Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages

Existing work on verifying concurrent objects is mostly concerned with safety only, e.g., partial correctness or linearizability. Although there has been recent work verifying lock-freedom of non-blocking objects, much less efforts are focused on ...
Read More

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

POPL '11: Proceedings of the 38th annual ACM SIGPLAN-SIGACT symposium on Principles of programming languages

January 2011

652 pages

ISBN:9781450304900

DOI:10.1145/1926385

General Chair:
Thomas Ball
Microsoft Research, USA
,
Program Chair:
Mooly Sagiv
Tel Aviv University, Israel

ACM SIGPLAN Notices Volume 46, Issue 1
POPL '11
January 2011
624 pages
ISSN:0362-1340
EISSN:1558-1160
DOI:10.1145/1925844
Issue’s Table of Contents

Copyright © 2011 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

SIGPLAN: ACM Special Interest Group on Programming Languages

In-Cooperation

SIGACT: ACM Special Interest Group on Algorithms and Computation Theory

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 26 January 2011

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Conference

POPL '11

Sponsor:

SIGPLAN

POPL '11: The 38th Annual ACM SIGPLAN-SIGACT Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages

January 26 - 28, 2011

Texas, Austin, USA

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 824 of 4,130 submissions, 20%

Upcoming Conference

POPL '25

Sponsor:
sigplan

The 52nd Annual ACM SIGPLAN Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages

January 19 - 25, 2025

Denver , CO , USA

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

133
Total Citations
View Citations
705
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)25
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Abdulla PAtig MBouajjani AKumar KSaivasan P(2024)Verification under Intel-x86 with PersistencyProceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages10.1145/36564258:PLDI(1189-1212)Online publication date: 20-Jun-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3656425
Ang ZMathur U(2024)Predictive Monitoring against Pattern Regular LanguagesProceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages10.1145/36329158:POPL(2191-2225)Online publication date: 5-Jan-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3632915
Dai YWu PCui SMa L(2024)Intrathread Method Orders Based Adaptive Testing of Concurrent ObjectsTheoretical Aspects of Software Engineering10.1007/978-3-031-64626-3_6(91-108)Online publication date: 14-Jul-2024
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-64626-3_6
Winter LBuse Fde Graaf Dvon Gleissenthall KKulahcioglu Ozkan B(2023)Randomized Testing of Byzantine Fault Tolerant AlgorithmsProceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages10.1145/35860537:OOPSLA1(757-788)Online publication date: 6-Apr-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3586053
Gao MChakraborty SOzkan BAamodt TJerger NSwift M(2023)Probabilistic Concurrency Testing for Weak Memory ProgramsProceedings of the 28th ACM International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems, Volume 210.1145/3575693.3575729(603-616)Online publication date: 27-Jan-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3575693.3575729
Jiang ZWen MYang YPeng CYang PJin H(2023)Effective Concurrency Testing for Go via Directional Primitive-Constrained Interleaving Exploration2023 38th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE)10.1109/ASE56229.2023.00086(1364-1376)Online publication date: 11-Sep-2023
https://doi.org/10.1109/ASE56229.2023.00086
Inverso OLa Torre SParlato GTomasco E(2023)Verifying Programs by Bounded Tree-Width Behavior GraphsMulti-Agent Systems10.1007/978-3-031-43264-4_8(116-132)Online publication date: 14-Sep-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/978-3-031-43264-4_8
Deligiannis PSenthilnathan ANayyar FLovett CLal A(2023)Industrial-Strength Controlled Concurrency Testing for Programs with Tools and Algorithms for the Construction and Analysis of Systems10.1007/978-3-031-30820-8_26(433-452)Online publication date: 22-Apr-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/978-3-031-30820-8_26
Cirisci BEnea CFarzan AMutluergil S(2023)A Pragmatic Approach to Stateful Partial Order ReductionVerification, Model Checking, and Abstract Interpretation10.1007/978-3-031-24950-1_7(129-154)Online publication date: 16-Jan-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/978-3-031-24950-1_7
Wen CHe MWu BXu ZQin SDwyer MDamian DZeller A(2022)Controlled concurrency testing via periodical schedulingProceedings of the 44th International Conference on Software Engineering10.1145/3510003.3510178(474-486)Online publication date: 21-May-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3510003.3510178
Show More Cited By

View Options

Get Access

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents