Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2019136.2019182acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessplcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Quantifying value in software product line design

Published: 21 August 2011 Publication History

Abstract

A software product line is a strategic investment for an organization. Besides the initial decision to use a product line approach other strategic decisions are made, including which variations to accommodate. In this paper we present an adaptation of an equation for computing option values. The equation can be used to understand the economic impact of adding a variation point to the product line architecture. The equation was exercised on multiple sets of hypothetical data and and produced the expected changes from one data set to another. In the future the equation will be validated with data from real projects. We describe some practical sources of values for the parameters of the equation.

References

[1]
C. Baldwin. Keynote presentation: The power of modularity: The financial consequences of computer and code architecture, 2006.
[2]
C. Y. Baldwin and K. B. Clark. Design Rules: The power of modularity. The MIT Press, 2000.
[3]
G. Boeckle, P. Clements, J. D. McGregor, D. Muthig, and K. Schmid. A cost model for software product lines. In Proceedings of the Product Family Engineering Conference 5, volume 3014/2004, pages 310--316. Springer Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2004.
[4]
P. Clements and L. Northrop. Software Product Lines: Practices and Patterns. Addison-Wesley, 2001.
[5]
J. Hunt and J. D. McGregor. When less is more: Implementing optional features. In Proceedings of the ACM Southeast Conference 2007, pages 30--35, March 2007.
[6]
A. Olagbemiro, J. Mun, and M.-T. Shing. Application of real options theory to dod software acquisitions. Technical report. last visited May 2011.
[7]
R. Shishko, D. H. Ebbeler, and G. Fox. Nasa technology assessment using real options valuation. Systems Engineering, 7(1), 2004.
[8]
K. J. Sullivan, W. G. Griswold, Y. Cai, and B. Hallen. The structure and value of modularity in software design. In Proceedings of ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE, pages 99--108, 2001.

Cited By

View all
  • (2019)Evaluating variability at the software architecture levelProceedings of the 34th ACM/SIGAPP Symposium on Applied Computing10.1145/3297280.3297511(2354-2361)Online publication date: 8-Apr-2019
  • (2012)An early look at defining variability requirements for system of systems platforms2012 Second IEEE International Workshop on Requirements Engineering for Systems, Services, and Systems-of-Systems (RESS)10.1109/RES4.2012.6347693(30-33)Online publication date: Sep-2012

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
SPLC '11: Proceedings of the 15th International Software Product Line Conference, Volume 2
August 2011
306 pages
ISBN:9781450307895
DOI:10.1145/2019136
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

  • Pure-Systems: Pure-Systems GmbH
  • Hitachi
  • Siemens
  • Software Eng Inst: Software Engineering Institute
  • Biglever: BigLever Software, Inc.

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 21 August 2011

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. software engineering
  2. strategic software design

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

SPLC '11
Sponsor:
  • Pure-Systems
  • Software Eng Inst
  • Biglever
SPLC '11: The 2011 Software Product Line Conference
August 21 - 26, 2011
Munich, Germany

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 167 of 463 submissions, 36%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)3
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 26 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2019)Evaluating variability at the software architecture levelProceedings of the 34th ACM/SIGAPP Symposium on Applied Computing10.1145/3297280.3297511(2354-2361)Online publication date: 8-Apr-2019
  • (2012)An early look at defining variability requirements for system of systems platforms2012 Second IEEE International Workshop on Requirements Engineering for Systems, Services, and Systems-of-Systems (RESS)10.1109/RES4.2012.6347693(30-33)Online publication date: Sep-2012

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media