Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2063576.2063724acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescikmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Do all birds tweet the same?: characterizing twitter around the world

Published: 24 October 2011 Publication History

Abstract

Social media services have spread throughout the world in just a few years. They have become not only a new source of information, but also new mechanisms for societies world-wide to organize themselves and communicate. Therefore, social media has a very strong impact in many aspects -- at personal level, in business, and in politics, among many others. In spite of its fast adoption, little is known about social media usage in different countries, and whether patterns of behavior remain the same or not. To provide deep understanding of differences between countries can be useful in many ways, e.g.: to improve the design of social media systems (which features work best for which country?), and influence marketing and political campaigns. Moreover, this type of analysis can provide relevant insight into how societies might differ. In this paper we present a summary of a large-scale analysis of Twitter for an extended period of time. We analyze in detail various aspects of social media for the ten countries we identified as most active. We collected one year's worth of data and report differences and similarities in terms of activity, sentiment, use of languages, and network structure. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first on-line social network study of such characteristics.

References

[1]
M. M. Bradley and P. J. Lang. Affective norms for english words (ANEW): Stimuli, instruction manual, and affective ratings. In In Technical Report C-1, The Center for Research in Psychophysiology, Gainesville, Florida, 1999.
[2]
C. Castillo, M. Mendoza, and B. Poblete. Information credibility on twitter. In Proceedings of the 20th international conference on World wide web, WWW '11, pages 675--684, New York, NY, USA, 2011. ACM.
[3]
M. Cha, H. Haddadi, F. Benevenuto, and K. P. Gummadi. Measuring User Influence in Twitter: The Million Follower Fallacy. In In Proceedings of the 4th International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM).
[4]
M. D. Choudhury, Y.-R. Lin, H. Sundaram, K. S. Cnadan, L. Xie, and A. Kelliher. How does the data sampling strategy impact the discovery of information difussion in social media? Many May, 2010.
[5]
P. S. Dodds, K. D. Harris, I. M. Kloumann, C. A. Bliss, and C. M. Danforth. Temporal patterns of happiness and information in a global social network: Hedonometrics and Twitter. Computing Research Repository abs/1101.5120v3{physics.soc-ph}, Feb. 2011.
[6]
M. Girvan and M. E. J. Newman. Community structure in social and biological networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99(12):7821--7826, 2002.
[7]
R. Hanneman and M. Riddle. Introduction to social network methods. University of California Riverside, CA, 2005.
[8]
A. Java, X. Song, T. Finin, and B. Tseng. Why we twitter: understanding microblogging usage and communities. In Proceedings of the 9th WebKDD and 1st SNA-KDD 2007 workshop on Web mining and social network analysis, WebKDD/SNA-KDD '07, pages 56--65, New York, NY, USA, 2007. ACM.
[9]
H. Kwak, C. Lee, H. Park, and S. Moon. What is twitter, a social network or a news media? In Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World wide web, WWW '10, pages 591--600, New York, NY, USA, 2010. ACM.
[10]
A. Mislove, M. Marcon, P. K. Gummadi, P. Druschel, and B. Bhattacharjee. Measurement and analysis of online social networks. In Internet Measurement Comference, pages 29--42, 2007.
[11]
J.-P. Onnela, S. Arbesman, A.-L. Barabási, and N. A. Christakis. Geographic constraints on social network groups. Nov. 2010.
[12]
J. Redondo, I. Fraga, I. Padrn, and M. Comesaa. The spanish adaptation of anew (affective norms for english words). In Volumne 39, number 3, pages 600--605. Psychonomic Society Publications, 2007.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)COVID-19 Increased Mortality Salience, Collectivism, and Subsistence Activities: A Theory-Driven Analysis of Online Adaptation in the United States, Indonesia, Mexico, and JapanJournal of Cross-Cultural Psychology10.1177/0022022123122631055:3(239-259)Online publication date: 8-Feb-2024
  • (2024)Comparing User Activity on X and Mastodon2024 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData)10.1109/BigData62323.2024.10825212(2967-2972)Online publication date: 15-Dec-2024
  • (2023)Towards a Cross-Country Analysis of Software-Related TweetsRequirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality10.1007/978-3-031-29786-1_19(272-282)Online publication date: 4-Apr-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Do all birds tweet the same?: characterizing twitter around the world

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    CIKM '11: Proceedings of the 20th ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management
    October 2011
    2712 pages
    ISBN:9781450307178
    DOI:10.1145/2063576
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 24 October 2011

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. social media analytics
    2. social networks
    3. twitter

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    CIKM '11
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 1,861 of 8,427 submissions, 22%

    Upcoming Conference

    CIKM '25

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)47
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
    Reflects downloads up to 04 Feb 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)COVID-19 Increased Mortality Salience, Collectivism, and Subsistence Activities: A Theory-Driven Analysis of Online Adaptation in the United States, Indonesia, Mexico, and JapanJournal of Cross-Cultural Psychology10.1177/0022022123122631055:3(239-259)Online publication date: 8-Feb-2024
    • (2024)Comparing User Activity on X and Mastodon2024 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData)10.1109/BigData62323.2024.10825212(2967-2972)Online publication date: 15-Dec-2024
    • (2023)Towards a Cross-Country Analysis of Software-Related TweetsRequirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality10.1007/978-3-031-29786-1_19(272-282)Online publication date: 4-Apr-2023
    • (2022)Leveraging Dynamic Heterogeneous Networks to Study Transnational Issue Publics. The Case of the European COVID-19 Discourse on TwitterFrontiers in Sociology10.3389/fsoc.2022.8846407Online publication date: 30-Jun-2022
    • (2021)Let Them Tweet Cake: Estimating Public Dissent Using TwitterDefence and Peace Economics10.1080/10242694.2020.186504233:3(327-346)Online publication date: 11-Jan-2021
    • (2021)Eyewitness Prediction During Crisis via Linguistic FeaturesService-Oriented Computing – ICSOC 2020 Workshops10.1007/978-3-030-76352-7_39(421-429)Online publication date: 30-May-2021
    • (2020)Representativeness of Abortion Legislation Debate on Twitter: A Case Study in Argentina and ChileCompanion Proceedings of the Web Conference 202010.1145/3366424.3383561(765-774)Online publication date: 20-Apr-2020
    • (2020)Misinformation debunking and cross-platform information sharing through Twitter during Hurricanes Harvey and Irma: a case study on shelters and ID checksNatural Hazards10.1007/s11069-020-04016-6Online publication date: 27-May-2020
    • (2019)Les médias sociaux comme prédicteurs de la criminalité urbaineSocial media as a predictor of urban crimeLas redes sociales como predictores de la criminalidad urbanaCriminologie10.7202/1065857ar52:2(83)Online publication date: 2019
    • (2019)Urban Computing Leveraging Location-Based Social Network DataACM Computing Surveys10.1145/330128452:1(1-39)Online publication date: 13-Feb-2019
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media