research-article

Software variability: the design space of configuration languages

Authors:

Sebastian Günther,

Thomas Cleenewerck,

Viviane JonckersAuthors Info & Claims

VaMoS '12: Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Variability Modeling of Software-Intensive Systems

Pages 157 - 164

https://doi.org/10.1145/2110147.2110165

Published: 25 January 2012 Publication History

Abstract

Software variability is a major driver in software development. In order to satisfy the increased variability requirements in today's software, several technical and non-technical variability mechanisms have been proposed. In this paper, we contribute with a language-specific perspective on how to manage variability. We explain our view on the concept of configuration languages, which are languages that offer structural and behavioral program configurations through specifically tailored expressions. We present seven design dimensions of configuration languages that determine how the variability model is defined and how a program's artifacts are represented and modified. To show the applicability of the design dimensions for explaining existing configuration languages, we analyze the Linux Kernel configuration language.

References

[1]

B. R. T. Arnold, A. V. Deursen, and M. Res. Algebraic Specification of a Language for describing Financial Products. In ICSE-17 Workshop on Formal Methods Application in Software Engineering, pages 6--13, Washington, DC, USA, 1995. IEEE Computer Society.

[2]

K. Bak, K. Czarnecki, and A. Wasowski. Feature and Meta-Models in Clafer: Mixed, Specialized, and Coupled. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Software Language Engineering (SLE), volume 6563 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 102--122, Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany, 2011. Springer-Verlag.

Digital Library

[3]

M. Becker. Towards a General Model of Variability in Product Families. In J. van Gurp and J. Bosch, editors, Proceedings of the First Workshop on Software Variability Management (SVM), pages 19--27. 2003. Available online, http://www.jillesvangurp.com/static/svm2003/svm2003-proceedings.pdf, last access 04/19/2011, 7:50 PM.

[4]

J. Bentley. Programming Pearls: Little Languages. Communications of the ACM, 29(8):711--721, 1986.

Digital Library

[5]

S. Berczuk and B. Appleton. Software Configuration Management Patterns: Effective Teamwork, Practical Integration. Addison-Wesley, Boston, USA, 2002.

Digital Library

[6]

T. Berger, S. She, R. Lotufo, A. Wąsowski, and K. Czarnecki. Variability Modeling in the Real: A Perspective from the Pperating Systems Domain. In Proceedings of the 25th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE), pages 73--82, New York, NY, USA, 2010. ACM.

Digital Library

[7]

E. H. Bersoff. Elements of Software Configuration Management. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 10:79--87, 1984.

Digital Library

[8]

T. Blecker, N. Abdelkafi, G. Kreutler, and G. Friedrich. Product Configuration Systems: State of the Art, Conceptualization and Extensions. In Proceedings of the 8th Maghrebian Conference on Software Engineering and Artificial Intelligence (MCSEAI), pages 25--36. 2004. Available online, http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/5291/, last access 10/29/2011, 09:35 PM.

[9]

G. A. Booch. Object-Oriented Analysis and Design with Applications. Addison-Wesley Longman, Redwood City, USA, 2nd edition, 1994.

Digital Library

[10]

Q. Boucher, A. Classen, P. Heymans, A. Bourdoux, and L. Demonceau. Tag and Prune: A Pragmatic Approach to Software Product Line Implementation. In Proceedings of the 25th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE), pages 333--336, New York, 2010. ACM.

Digital Library

[11]

R. Conradi and B. Westfechtel. Version Models for Software Configuration Management. ACM Computing Survey, 30:232--282, 1998.

Digital Library

[12]

J. Coplien, D. Hoffman, and D. Weiss. Commonality and Variability in Software Engineering. IEEE Software, 15(6):37--45, 1998.

Digital Library

[13]

K. Czarnecki. Overview of Generative Software Development. In J.-P. Banatre, P. Fradet, J.-L. Giavitto, and O. Michel, editors, Unconventional Programming Paradigms, volume 3566 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 97--113. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany, 2005.

Digital Library

[14]

K. Czarnecki and U. W. Eisenecker. Generative Programming: Methods, Tools, and Applications. Addison-Wesley, Boston, San Franciso et al., 2000.

Digital Library

[15]

S. Deelstra, M. Sinnema, J. Nijhuis, and J. Bosch. COSVAM: A Technique for Assessing Software Variability in Software Product Families. In Proceedings of the 20th IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance (ICSM), pages 458--462, Washington, DC, USA, 2004. IEEE Computer Society.

Digital Library

[16]

S. Ducasse, A. Lienhard, and L. Renggli. Seaside: A Flexible Environment for Building Dynamic Web Applications. IEEE Software, 24(5):56--63, 2007.

Digital Library

[17]

J. Estublier. Software Configuration Management: A Roadmap. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE), pages 279--289, New York, NY, USA, 2000. ACM.

Digital Library

[18]

S. Günther and T. Cleenewerck. Design Principles for Internal Domain-Specific Languages: A Pattern Catalog illustrated by Ruby. In 17th Conference on Pattern Languages of Programs (PLoP), 2010, to appear.

Digital Library

[19]

G. Halmans and K. Pohl. Communicating the Variability of a Software-Product Family to Customers. Informatik - Forschung und Entwicklung, 18:113--131, 2004.

[20]

P. Hudak. Modular Domain Specific Languages and Tools. In P. Davenbu and J. Poulin, editors, Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Software Reuse (ICSR), pages 134--142, Washington, USA, 1998. IEEE Computer Society.

Digital Library

[21]

K. Kang, S. Cohen, J. Hess, W. Novak, and A. Peterson. Feature-Oriented Domain Analysis (FODA) Feasibility Study. Technical Report CMU/SEI-90-TR-21, Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, USA, 1990.

[22]

P. J. Landin. The Next 700 Programming Languages. Communications of the ACM, 9(3):157--166, 1966.

Digital Library

[23]

N. Medvidovic and R. N. Taylor. A Classification and Comparison Framework for Software Architecture Description Languages. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 26(1):70--93, 2000.

Digital Library

[24]

M. Mernik, J. Heering, and A. M. Sloane. When and How to Develop Domain-Specific Languages. ACM Computing Survey, 37(4):316--344, 2005.

Digital Library

[25]

R. Michel, A. Classen, A. Hubaux, and Q. Boucher. A Formal Semantics for Feature Cardinalities in Feature Diagrams. In Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on Variability Modeling of Software-Intensive Systems (VaMoS), pages 82--89, New York, NY, USA, 2011. ACM.

Digital Library

[26]

J. Munnelly and S. Clarke. ALPH: A Domain-Specific Language for Crosscutting Pervasive Healthcare Concerns. In Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Domain Specific Aspect Languages (DSAL), New York, USA, 2007. ACM. Available online, http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1255400.1255404, last access 03/19/2011, 09:47 PM.

Digital Library

[27]

D. L. Parnas. On the Design and Development of Program Families. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 2:1--9, 1976.

Digital Library

[28]

M. Rosenmüller, N. Siegmund, T. Thüm, and G. Saake. Multi-Dimensional Variability Modeling. In Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on Variability Modeling of Software-Intensive Systems (VaMoS), pages 11--20, New York, NY, USA, 2011. ACM.

Digital Library

[29]

J. Sincero, H. Schirmeier, W. Schröder-Preikschat, and O. Spinczyk. Is The Linux Kernel a Software Product Line? Proceedings of the International Workshop on Open Source Software and Product Lines (SPLC-OSSPL), 2007. Available online, http://fame-dbms.org/publications/SPLC-OSSPL2007-Sincero.pdf, last access 03/06/2011, 6:22 PM.

[30]

D. Spinellis. Notable Design Patterns for Domain-Specific Languages. Journal of Systems and Software, 56(1):91--99, 2001.

Digital Library

[31]

R. Tartler, J. Sincero, W. Schröder-Preikschat, and D. Lohmann. Dead or Alive: Finding Zombie Features in the Linux Kernel. In Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Feature-Oriented Software Development (FOSD), pages 81--86, New York, 2009. ACM.

Digital Library

[32]

E. Tryggeseth, B. Gulla, and R. Conradi. Modelling Systems with Variability Using the PROTEUS Configuration Language. In J. Estublier, editor, Software Configuration Management, volume 1005 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 216--240. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany, 1995.

Digital Library

[33]

A. van der Hoek. Design-Time Product Line Architectures for Any-Time Variability. Science of Computer Programming, 53(3):285--304, 2004.

Digital Library

[34]

A. Van Deursen, P. Klint, and J. Visser. Domain-Specific Languages: An Annotated Bibliography. ACM SIGPLAN Notices, 35(6): pp. 26--36, 2000.

Digital Library

[35]

J. Van Gurp, J. Bosch, and M. Svahnberg. On the Notion of Variability in Software Product Lines. In Proceedings of the Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture (WISCA), pages 45--54, Los Alamitos, CA, USA, 2001. IEEE Computer Society.

Digital Library

[36]

M. Wermelinger, A. Lopes, and J. L. Fiadeiro. A Graph Based Architectural (Re)configuration Language. SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, 26:21--32, 2001.

Digital Library

[37]

L. A. Zaid, F. Kleinermann, and O. De Troyer. Feature Assembly Framework: Towards Scalable and Reusable Feature Models. In Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on Variability Modeling of Software-Intensive Systems (VaMoS), pages 1--9, New York, NY, USA, 2011. ACM.

Digital Library

Cited By

Raab M(2016)Unanticipated Context Awareness for Software Configuration Access Using the getenv APIComputer and Information Science10.1007/978-3-319-40171-3_4(41-57)Online publication date: 17-Jun-2016
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40171-3_4
Eichelberger HSchmid K(2015)Mapping the design-space of textual variability modeling languagesInternational Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer (STTT)10.1007/s10009-014-0362-x17:5(559-584)Online publication date: 1-Oct-2015
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/s10009-014-0362-x
Eichelberger HSchmid KKishi TJarzabek SGnesi S(2013)A systematic analysis of textual variability modeling languagesProceedings of the 17th International Software Product Line Conference10.1145/2491627.2491652(12-21)Online publication date: 26-Aug-2013
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2491627.2491652

Recommendations

VML* – a family of languages for variability management in software product lines
SLE'09: Proceedings of the Second international conference on Software Language Engineering

Managing variability is a challenging issue in software-product-line engineering. A key part of variability management is the ability to express explicitly the relationship between variability models (expressing the variability in the problem space, for ...
Implementing feature variability for models and code with projectional language workbenches
FOSD '10: Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Feature-Oriented Software Development

Product line engineering deals with managing and implementing the variability among a set of related products. We distinguish between two kinds of variability: configuration and customization. Customization variability can be described using programming ...
Empirical assessment of generating adversarial configurations for software product lines
Abstract
Software product line (SPL) engineering allows the derivation of products tailored to stakeholders’ needs through the setting of a large number of configuration options. Unfortunately, options and their interactions create a huge configuration ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences

VaMoS '12: Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Variability Modeling of Software-Intensive Systems

January 2012

193 pages

ISBN:9781450310581

DOI:10.1145/2110147

General Chair:
Ulrich W. Eisenecker
University of Leipzig, Germany
,
Program Chairs:
Sven Apel
University of Passau, Germany
,
Stefania Gnesi
ISTI-CNR, Italy

Copyright © 2012 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 25 January 2012

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Conference

VaMoS '12

VaMoS '12: Variability Modeling of Software-intensive Systems

January 25 - 27, 2012

Leipzig, Germany

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 66 of 147 submissions, 45%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

3
Total Citations
View Citations
262
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)5
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

Reflects downloads up to 09 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Raab M(2016)Unanticipated Context Awareness for Software Configuration Access Using the getenv APIComputer and Information Science10.1007/978-3-319-40171-3_4(41-57)Online publication date: 17-Jun-2016
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40171-3_4
Eichelberger HSchmid K(2015)Mapping the design-space of textual variability modeling languagesInternational Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer (STTT)10.1007/s10009-014-0362-x17:5(559-584)Online publication date: 1-Oct-2015
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/s10009-014-0362-x
Eichelberger HSchmid KKishi TJarzabek SGnesi S(2013)A systematic analysis of textual variability modeling languagesProceedings of the 17th International Software Product Line Conference10.1145/2491627.2491652(12-21)Online publication date: 26-Aug-2013
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2491627.2491652

View Options

Get Access

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents