Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2124295.2124300acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswsdmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Auralist: introducing serendipity into music recommendation

Published: 08 February 2012 Publication History

Abstract

Recommendation systems exist to help users discover content in a large body of items. An ideal recommendation system should mimic the actions of a trusted friend or expert, producing a personalised collection of recommendations that balance between the desired goals of accuracy, diversity, novelty and serendipity. We introduce the Auralist recommendation framework, a system that - in contrast to previous work - attempts to balance and improve all four factors simultaneously. Using a collection of novel algorithms inspired by principles of "serendipitous discovery", we demonstrate a method of successfully injecting serendipity, novelty and diversity into recommendations whilst limiting the impact on accuracy. We evaluate Auralist quantitatively over a broad set of metrics and, with a user study on music recommendation, show that Auralist's emphasis on serendipity indeed improves user satisfaction.

Supplementary Material

JPG File (wsdm_day1_session1_2.jpg)
MP4 File (wsdm_day1_session1_2.mp4)

References

[1]
G. Adomavicius and Y. O. Kwon. Towards more diverse recommendations: Item re-ranking methods for recommender systems. In Workshop on Information Technologies and Systems, 2009.
[2]
J. An, D. Quercia, and J. Crowcroft. This paper won't change your mind, but...: Why individuals seek diverse opinions (or why they don't). In Technical Report of the University of Cambridge, 2012.
[3]
D. M. Blei, A. Y. Ng, and M. I. Jordan. Latent dirichlet allocation. Joural of Machine Learning Research, 2003.
[4]
O. Celma and P. Cano. From hits to niches?: or how popular artists can bias music recommendation and discovery. In ACM NETFLIX, 2008.
[5]
O. Celma and P. Herrera. A new approach to evaluating novel recommendations. In ACM RecSys, 2008.
[6]
D. A. Easley and J. M. Kleinberg. Networks, Crowds, and Markets - Reasoning About a Highly Connected World. Cambridge University Press, 2010.
[7]
T. L. Griffiths and M. Steyvers. Finding scientific topics. PNAS, 2004.
[8]
J. L. Herlocker, J. A. Konstan, L. G. Terveen, and J. T. Riedl. Evaluating collaborative filtering recommender systems. ACM Transactions of Information Systems, 2004.
[9]
T. Hofmann. Latent semantic models for collaborative filtering. ACM Transactions of Information Systems, 2004.
[10]
Y. Hu, Y. Koren, and C. Volinsky. Collaborative filtering for implicit feedback datasets. In Proceedings of the 2008 Eighth IEEE International Conference on Data Mining, 2008.
[11]
T. Jambor and J. Wang. Optimizing multiple objectives in collaborative filtering. In ACM RecSys, 2010.
[12]
M. Levy and K. Bosteels. Music recommendation and the long tail. In WOMRAD, 2010.
[13]
G. Linden, B. Smith, and J. York. Amazon.com recommendations: Item-to-item collaborative filtering. IEEE Internet Computing, 2003.
[14]
A. K. McCallum. Mallet: A machine learning for language toolkit. http://mallet.cs.umass.edu, 2002.
[15]
S. M. McNee, J. Riedl, and J. A. Konstan. Being accurate is not enough: how accuracy metrics have hurt recommender systems. In ACM CHI EA, 2006.
[16]
T. Murakami, K. Mori, and R. Orihara. Metrics for evaluating the serendipity of recommendation lists. In JSAI, 2007.
[17]
E. Pariser. The Filter Bubble: What the Internet Is Hiding from You. Penguin Group USA, 2011.
[18]
P. Pu and L. Chen. A user-centric evaluation framework of recommender systems. In UCERSTI Workshop, ACM RecSys, 2010.
[19]
R. K. Ratner, B. E. Kahn, and D. Kahneman. Choosing less-preferred experiences for the sake of variety. The Journal of Consumer Research, 1999.
[20]
B. Sarwar, G. Karypis, J. Konstan, and J. Reidl. Item-based collaborative filtering recommendation algorithms. In ACM WWW, 2001.
[21]
J. B. Schafer, J. Konstan, and J. Riedi. Recommender systems in e-commerce. In ACM EC, 1999.
[22]
X. Su and T. M. Khoshgoftaar. A survey of collaborative filtering techniques. Advances in Artificial Intelligence, 2009.
[23]
K. Swearingen and R. Sinha. Beyond Algorithms: An HCI Perspective on Recommender Systems. SIGIR, 2001.
[24]
K. O. Takayuki Akiyama and M. Tanizaki. Proposal and evaluation of serendipitous recommendation method using general unexpectedness. In PRSAT, 2010.
[25]
S. Vargas and P. Castells. Rank and relevance in novelty and diversity metrics for recommender systems. ACM RecSys, 2011.
[26]
D. J. Watts and S. H. Strogatz. Collective dynamics of 'small-world' networks. Nature, 1998.
[27]
T. Zhuo, Z. Kuscik, J.-G. Liu, M. Medo, J. R. Wakeling, and Y.-C. Zhang. Solving the apparent diversity-accuracy dilemma of recommender systems. PNAS, 2010.
[28]
C.-N. Ziegler, G. Lausen, and S.-T. Lars. Taxonomy-driven computation of product recommendations. In ACM CIKM, 2004.
[29]
C.-N. Ziegler, S. M. McNee, J. A. Konstan, and G. Lausen. Improving recommendation lists through topic diversification. In ACM WWW, 2005.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)The Impact of Recommendation System on User Satisfaction: A Moderated Mediation ApproachJournal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research10.3390/jtaer1901002419:1(448-466)Online publication date: 27-Feb-2024
  • (2024)Assessing the Impact of Recommendation Novelty on Older Consumers: Older Does Not Always Mean the Avoidance of Innovative ProductsBehavioral Sciences10.3390/bs1406047314:6(473)Online publication date: 5-Jun-2024
  • (2024)Modelling & Analyzing View Growth Pattern of YouTube Videos inculcating the impact of Subscribers, Word of Mouth and Recommendation SystemsInternational Journal of Mathematical, Engineering and Management Sciences10.33889/IJMEMS.2024.9.3.0239:3(435-450)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
WSDM '12: Proceedings of the fifth ACM international conference on Web search and data mining
February 2012
792 pages
ISBN:9781450307475
DOI:10.1145/2124295
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 08 February 2012

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. accuracy
  2. collaborative filtering
  3. diversification
  4. metrics
  5. novelty
  6. recommender systems
  7. serendipity

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 498 of 2,863 submissions, 17%

Upcoming Conference

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)202
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)10
Reflects downloads up to 12 Sep 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)The Impact of Recommendation System on User Satisfaction: A Moderated Mediation ApproachJournal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research10.3390/jtaer1901002419:1(448-466)Online publication date: 27-Feb-2024
  • (2024)Assessing the Impact of Recommendation Novelty on Older Consumers: Older Does Not Always Mean the Avoidance of Innovative ProductsBehavioral Sciences10.3390/bs1406047314:6(473)Online publication date: 5-Jun-2024
  • (2024)Modelling & Analyzing View Growth Pattern of YouTube Videos inculcating the impact of Subscribers, Word of Mouth and Recommendation SystemsInternational Journal of Mathematical, Engineering and Management Sciences10.33889/IJMEMS.2024.9.3.0239:3(435-450)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2024
  • (2024)The Dark Matter of Serendipity in Recommender SystemsProceedings of the 2024 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval10.1145/3627508.3638342(108-118)Online publication date: 10-Mar-2024
  • (2024)On the Negative Perception of Cross-domain Recommendations and ExplanationsProceedings of the 47th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval10.1145/3626772.3657735(2102-2113)Online publication date: 10-Jul-2024
  • (2024)Virtual Instrument Performances (VIP): A Comprehensive ReviewComputer Graphics Forum10.1111/cgf.1506543:2Online publication date: 30-Apr-2024
  • (2024)Exploration Principles for Decision-Making Systems with Binary Feedbacks2024 IEEE International Systems Conference (SysCon)10.1109/SysCon61195.2024.10553578(1-8)Online publication date: 15-Apr-2024
  • (2024)Towards the design of user-centric strategy recommendation systems for collaborative Human–AI tasksInternational Journal of Human-Computer Studies10.1016/j.ijhcs.2023.103216184(103216)Online publication date: Apr-2024
  • (2024)Predicting diversification scores of videos in recommendation networkExpert Systems with Applications: An International Journal10.1016/j.eswa.2023.121803238:PAOnline publication date: 15-Mar-2024
  • (2024)Uncertainty-aware graph neural network for semi-supervised diversified recommendationSocial Network Analysis and Mining10.1007/s13278-024-01242-914:1Online publication date: 17-Apr-2024
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Get Access

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media