Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2132176.2132299acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiconferenceConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Children's formal and informal definition of technology

Published: 07 February 2012 Publication History

Abstract

Though today's children have many chances to interact with technology, what they understand about technology from their point of view still needs to be explored. In this poster we report how children define technology and what they understand technology to be in a real-life context. We use qualitative methods aiming to identify the differences in children's formal definitions and their practical understanding of technology. We interviewed six focus groups and asked twenty-six children to create video self documentaries in two countries: Hungary and India. We found consistency between their formal definitions and their statements on their actual use of technology. For example, they stated that technology makes things easier, uses electricity, is entertaining, useful, and harmful as well, which can also be found in their statements of technology use. The differences were that they expressed technology is easy in daily life while in the definition they indicated its complexity. Moreover, they mentioned technology's influence on their social lives, which never appeared in the formal definitions.

References

[1]
Druin, A., Cavallo, D., Fabian, C., Bederson, B. B., Revelle, G., Rogers, Y., and Gray, J. 2009. Mobile technologies for the world's children. In Proceedings of the 27th ACM CHI Extended Abstracts. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3297--3300.
[2]
Bruckman, A., Druin, A., Inkpen, K., and Preece, J. 2001. The children's challenge: new technologies to support co-located and distributed collaboration. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Bull.: suppl. interactions (March 2001). CSCW '00. ACM, New York, NY, 6-ff. DOI=http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/967181.967187.
[3]
eMarketer. Tweens and Teens: Do you know the difference? 2006. Retrieved October 1, 2008. DOI=http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?1004194.
[4]
Kennedy, J. 2006. Irish Teens: Young, fickle and onlinesavvy. SilicoRepublic.com. Retrived September 28, 2008, DOI=http://www.siliconrepublic.com/news/news.nv?storyid=sin.gle7129.
[5]
Paton, M. Q. 2001. Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
[6]
Roberts, D. F. and Foehr, U. G. Trends in media use. Children and Electronic Media. 18(1), pp. 11--38.
[7]
The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. 2004. Children, The Digital Divide And Federal Policy. (September, 2004). DOI=http://www.kff.org/entmedia/7090.cfm.

Cited By

View all
  • (2025)Co-designing an Ideal Nature-Related Digital Tool With Children: An Exploratory Study From the NetherlandsEnvironment and Behavior10.1177/00139165241311071Online publication date: 11-Jan-2025
  • (2024)CloChat: Understanding How People Customize, Interact, and Experience Personas in Large Language ModelsProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642472(1-24)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
  • (2023)Children’s Ideal Nature-Related Digital Tools: A Co-design ExperimentHCI International 2023 Posters10.1007/978-3-031-35989-7_22(176-181)Online publication date: 9-Jul-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
iConference '12: Proceedings of the 2012 iConference
February 2012
667 pages
ISBN:9781450307826
DOI:10.1145/2132176

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 07 February 2012

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tag

  1. children and technology

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

iConference '12
iConference '12: iConference 2012
February 7 - 10, 2012
Ontario, Toronto, Canada

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)3
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 20 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2025)Co-designing an Ideal Nature-Related Digital Tool With Children: An Exploratory Study From the NetherlandsEnvironment and Behavior10.1177/00139165241311071Online publication date: 11-Jan-2025
  • (2024)CloChat: Understanding How People Customize, Interact, and Experience Personas in Large Language ModelsProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642472(1-24)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
  • (2023)Children’s Ideal Nature-Related Digital Tools: A Co-design ExperimentHCI International 2023 Posters10.1007/978-3-031-35989-7_22(176-181)Online publication date: 9-Jul-2023
  • (2022)Examining Teenagers’ Perceptions of Conversational Agents in Learning SettingsProceedings of the 21st Annual ACM Interaction Design and Children Conference10.1145/3501712.3529740(374-381)Online publication date: 27-Jun-2022
  • (2018)Using Co-Design to Examine How Children Conceptualize Intelligent InterfacesProceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3173574.3174149(1-14)Online publication date: 21-Apr-2018

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media