Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2187836.2187874acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswebconfConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Factorizing YAGO: scalable machine learning for linked data

Published: 16 April 2012 Publication History
  • Get Citation Alerts
  • Abstract

    Vast amounts of structured information have been published in the Semantic Web's Linked Open Data (LOD) cloud and their size is still growing rapidly. Yet, access to this information via reasoning and querying is sometimes difficult, due to LOD's size, partial data inconsistencies and inherent noisiness. Machine Learning offers an alternative approach to exploiting LOD's data with the advantages that Machine Learning algorithms are typically robust to both noise and data inconsistencies and are able to efficiently utilize non-deterministic dependencies in the data. From a Machine Learning point of view, LOD is challenging due to its relational nature and its scale. Here, we present an efficient approach to relational learning on LOD data, based on the factorization of a sparse tensor that scales to data consisting of millions of entities, hundreds of relations and billions of known facts. Furthermore, we show how ontological knowledge can be incorporated in the factorization to improve learning results and how computation can be distributed across multiple nodes. We demonstrate that our approach is able to factorize the YAGO~2 core ontology and globally predict statements for this large knowledge base using a single dual-core desktop computer. Furthermore, we show experimentally that our approach achieves good results in several relational learning tasks that are relevant to Linked Data. Once a factorization has been computed, our model is able to predict efficiently, and without any additional training, the likelihood of any of the 4.3 ⋅ 1014 possible triples in the YAGO~2 core ontology.

    References

    [1]
    M. Ankerst, M. Breunig, H. Kriegel, and J. Sander. OPTICS: ordering points to identify the clustering structure. In ACM SIGMOD Record, volume 28, page 49--60, 1999.
    [2]
    S. Auer, C. Bizer, G. Kobilarov, J. Lehmann, R. Cyganiak, and Z. Ives. Dbpedia: A nucleus for a web of open data. The Semantic Web, page 722--735, 2008.
    [3]
    S. Auer and J. Lehmann. Creating knowledge out of interlinked data. Semantic Web, 1(1):97--104, Jan. 2010.
    [4]
    B. W. Bader, R. A. Harshman, and T. G. Kolda. Temporal analysis of semantic graphs using ASALSAN. In Seventh IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM 2007), pages 33--42, Omaha, NE, USA, Oct. 2007.
    [5]
    V. Bicer, T. Tran, and A. Gossen. Relational kernel machines for learning from Graph-Structured RDF data. The Semantic Web: Research and Applications, page 47--62, 2011.
    [6]
    C. Bizer, T. Heath, and T. Berners-Lee. Linked data-the story so far. International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems, 5(3):1--22, 2009.
    [7]
    S. Bloehdorn and Y. Sure. Kernel methods for mining instance data in ontologies. In Proceedings of the 6th international The semantic web and 2nd Asian conference on Asian semantic web conference, page 58--71, 2007.
    [8]
    R. Bro. PARAFAC. tutorial and applications. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 38(2):149--171, 1997.
    [9]
    C. d'Amato, N. Fanizzi, and F. Esposito. Non-parametric statistical learning methods for inductive classifiers in semantic knowledge bases. In Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE International Conference on Semantic Computing, page 291--298, Washington, DC, USA, 2008. IEEE Computer Society.
    [10]
    J. Davis and M. Goadrich. The relationship between Precision-Recall and ROC curves. In Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on Machine learning, page 233--240, 2006.
    [11]
    N. Fanizzi, C. D'Amato, and F. Esposito. DL-FOIL concept learning in description logics. In Proceedings of the 18th international conference on Inductive Logic Programming, ILP '08, page 107--121, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2008. Springer-Verlag.
    [12]
    T. Franz, A. Schultz, S. Sizov, and S. Staab. Triplerank: Ranking semantic web data by tensor decomposition. The Semantic Web-ISWC 2009, page 213--228, 2009.
    [13]
    H. Halpin, P. Hayes, J. McCusker, D. Mcguinness, and H. Thompson. When owl: same As isn't the same: An analysis of identity in linked data. The Semantic Web--ISWC 2010, page 305--320, 2010.
    [14]
    S. Hellmann, J. Lehmann, and S. Auer. Learning of OWL class descriptions on very large knowledge bases. Int. J. Semantic Web Inf. Syst, 5(2):25--48, 2009.
    [15]
    P. Hitzler and F. van Harmelen. A reasonable semantic web. Semantic Web, 1(1):39--44, 2010.
    [16]
    A. Hogan, A. Harth, A. Passant, S. Decker, and A. Polleres. Weaving the pedantic web. Linked Data on the Web (LDOW 2010), 2010.
    [17]
    Y. Huang, V. Tresp, M. Bundschus, and A. Rettinger. Multivariate structured prediction for learning on semantic web. 2010.
    [18]
    C. Kiefer, A. Bernstein, and A. Locher. Adding data mining support to SPARQL via statistical relational learning methods. In Proceedings of the 5th European semantic web conference, pages 478--492, 2008.
    [19]
    S. Kok and P. Domingos. Statistical predicate invention. In Proceedings of the 24th international conference on Machine learning, page 433--440, 2007.
    [20]
    T. G. Kolda and B. W. Bader. Tensor decompositions and applications. SIAM Review, 51(3):455, 2009.
    [21]
    H. T. Lin, N. Koul, and V. Honavar. Learning relational bayesian classifiers from RDF data. In Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC 2011), 2011. In press.
    [22]
    M. Nickel, V. Tresp, and H. Kriegel. A Three-Way model for collective learning on Multi-Relational data. In Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML '11, pages 809--816, Bellevue, WA, USA, 2011. ACM.
    [23]
    S. Rendle, C. Freudenthaler, and L. Schmidt-Thieme. Factorizing personalized markov chains for next-basket recommendation. In Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World wide web, page 811--820, 2010.
    [24]
    M. Richardson and P. Domingos. Markov logic networks. Machine Learning, 62(1):107--136, 2006.
    [25]
    D. Roy, C. Kemp, V. Mansinghka, and J. Tenenbaum. Learning annotated hierarchies from relational data. Advances in neural information processing systems, 19:1185, 2007.
    [26]
    P. Sen, G. Namata, M. Bilgic, L. Getoor, B. Galligher, and T. Eliassi-Rad. Collective classification in network data. AI Magazine, 29(3):93, 2008.
    [27]
    F. Suchanek, G. Kasneci, and G. Weikum. Yago: a core of semantic knowledge. In Proceedings of the 16th international conference on World Wide Web, page 697--706, 2007.
    [28]
    J. Sun, D. Tao, and C. Faloutsos. Beyond streams and graphs: dynamic tensor analysis. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, page 374--383, 2006.
    [29]
    I. Sutskever, R. Salakhutdinov, and J. B. Tenenbaum. Modelling relational data using bayesian clustered tensor factorization. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 22, 2009.
    [30]
    P. Tan, M. Steinbach, V. Kumar, et al. Introduction to data mining. Pearson Addison Wesley Boston, 2006.
    [31]
    J. Völker and M. Niepert. Statistical schema induction. The Semantic Web: Research and Applications, page 124--138, 2011.
    [32]
    K. Weinberger, A. Dasgupta, J. Langford, A. Smola, and J. Attenberg. Feature hashing for large scale multitask learning. In Proceedings of the 26th Annual International Conference on Machine Learning, page 1113--1120, 2009.
    [33]
    M. Welling and Y. W. Teh. Bayesian learning via stochastic gradient langevin dynamics. In Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Machine Learning, Bellevue, WA, USA, 2011.

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)From data to insights: the application and challenges of knowledge graphs in intelligent auditJournal of Cloud Computing10.1186/s13677-024-00674-013:1Online publication date: 29-May-2024
    • (2024)CoolGust: knowledge representation learning with commonsense knowledge guidelines and constraintsNeural Computing and Applications10.1007/s00521-024-09423-536:12(6305-6323)Online publication date: 16-Feb-2024
    • (2023)Error Detection on Knowledge Graphs with Triple Embedding2023 31st European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO)10.23919/EUSIPCO58844.2023.10289852(1604-1608)Online publication date: 4-Sep-2023
    • Show More Cited By

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    WWW '12: Proceedings of the 21st international conference on World Wide Web
    April 2012
    1078 pages
    ISBN:9781450312295
    DOI:10.1145/2187836
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    • Univ. de Lyon: Universite de Lyon

    In-Cooperation

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 16 April 2012

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. large-scale machine learning
    2. linked open data
    3. relational learning
    4. semantic web
    5. tensor factorization

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    WWW 2012
    Sponsor:
    • Univ. de Lyon
    WWW 2012: 21st World Wide Web Conference 2012
    April 16 - 20, 2012
    Lyon, France

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 1,899 of 8,196 submissions, 23%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)66
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)11

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)From data to insights: the application and challenges of knowledge graphs in intelligent auditJournal of Cloud Computing10.1186/s13677-024-00674-013:1Online publication date: 29-May-2024
    • (2024)CoolGust: knowledge representation learning with commonsense knowledge guidelines and constraintsNeural Computing and Applications10.1007/s00521-024-09423-536:12(6305-6323)Online publication date: 16-Feb-2024
    • (2023)Error Detection on Knowledge Graphs with Triple Embedding2023 31st European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO)10.23919/EUSIPCO58844.2023.10289852(1604-1608)Online publication date: 4-Sep-2023
    • (2023)The Tensor Brain: A Unified Theory of Perception, Memory, and Semantic DecodingNeural Computation10.1162/neco_a_0155235:2(156-227)Online publication date: 20-Jan-2023
    • (2023)Knowledge Graphs QueryingACM SIGMOD Record10.1145/3615952.361595652:2(18-29)Online publication date: 11-Aug-2023
    • (2023)Few-shot Low-resource Knowledge Graph Completion with Multi-view Task Representation GenerationProceedings of the 29th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining10.1145/3580305.3599350(1862-1871)Online publication date: 6-Aug-2023
    • (2023)LogicENN: A Neural Based Knowledge Graphs Embedding Model With Logical RulesIEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence10.1109/TPAMI.2021.312164645:6(7050-7062)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2023
    • (2023)Entity Summarization via Exploiting Description Complementarity and SalienceIEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems10.1109/TNNLS.2022.314904734:11(8297-8309)Online publication date: Nov-2023
    • (2023)OERL: Enhanced Representation Learning via Open Knowledge GraphsIEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering10.1109/TKDE.2022.321885035:9(8880-8892)Online publication date: 1-Sep-2023
    • (2023)FedCKE: Cross-Domain Knowledge Graph Embedding in Federated LearningIEEE Transactions on Big Data10.1109/TBDATA.2022.32057059:3(792-804)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2023
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media