Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2229012.2229022acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesecConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

On bitcoin and red balloons

Published: 04 June 2012 Publication History

Abstract

Many large decentralized systems rely on information propagation to ensure their proper function. We examine a common scenario in which only participants that are aware of the information can compete for some reward, and thus informed participants have an incentive not to propagate information to others. One recent example in which such tension arises is the 2009 DARPA Network Challenge (finding red balloons). We focus on another prominent example: Bitcoin, a decentralized electronic currency system.
Bitcoin represents a radical new approach to monetary systems. It has been getting a large amount of public attention over the last year, both in policy discussions and in the popular press. Its cryptographic fundamentals have largely held up even as its usage has become increasingly widespread. We find, however, that it exhibits a fundamental problem of a different nature, based on how its incentives are structured. We propose a modification to the protocol that can eliminate this problem.
Bitcoin relies on a peer-to-peer network to track transactions that are performed with the currency. For this purpose, every transaction a node learns about should be transmitted to its neighbors in the network. As the protocol is currently defined and implemented, it does not provide an incentive for nodes to broadcast transactions they are aware of. In fact, it provides an incentive not to do so. Our solution is to augment the protocol with a scheme that rewards information propagation. Since clones are easy to create in the Bitcoin system, an important feature of our scheme is Sybil-proofness.
We show that our proposed scheme succeeds in setting the correct incentives, that it is Sybil-proof, and that it requires only a small payment overhead, all this is achieved with iterated elimination of dominated strategies. We complement this result by showing that there are no reward schemes in which information propagation and no self-cloning is a dominant strategy.

References

[1]
BITCOIN. The Bitcoin wiki. Available online at https://bitcoin.it.
[2]
CHITNIS, R., HAJIAGHAYI, M. T., KATZ, J., AND MUKHERJEE, K. 2012. A game-theoretic model for the darpa network challenge. Manuscript.
[3]
DARPA. 2009. The DARPA network challenge. Available online at http://archive.darpa.mil/networkchallenge/.
[4]
DAVIS, J. 2011. The crypto-currency: Bitcoin and its mysterious inventor. The New Yorker, October 10.
[5]
DOUCEUR, J. R. AND MOSCIBRODA, T. 2007. Lottery trees: motivational deployment of networked systems. SIGCOMM Comput. Commun. Rev. 37, 121--132.
[6]
DRUCKER, F. AND FLEISCHER, L. 2012. Simple sybil-proof mechanisms for multi-level marketing. In Proceedings of the 13th ACM conference on Electronic commerce. EC '12.
[7]
DYAGILEV, K., MANNOR, S., AND YOM-TOV, E. 2010. Generative models for rapid information propagation. In Proceedings of the First Workshop on Social Media Analytics. SOMA '10. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 35--43.
[8]
EMEK, Y., KARIDI, R., TENNENHOLTZ, M., AND ZOHAR, A. 2011. Mechanisms for multi-level marketing. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM conference on Electronic commerce. EC '11. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 209--218.
[9]
KLEINBERG, J. AND RAGHAVAN, P. 2005. Query incentive networks. In FOCS '05: Proceedings of the 46th IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science. 132--141.
[10]
KRUGMAN, P. 2011. Golden cyberfetters. Available online at http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09/07/goldencyberfetters/.
[11]
NAKAMOTO, S. 2008. Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system. Available online at http://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf.
[12]
PICKARD, G., PAN, W., RAHWAN, I., CEBRIAN, M., CRANE, R., MADAN, A., AND PENTLAND, A. 2011. Time-critical social mobilization. Science 334, 6055, 509--512.
[13]
REID, F. AND HARRIGAN, M. 2011. An analysis of anonymity in the Bitcoin system. CoRR arXiv/1107.4524.
[14]
SUROWIECKI, J. 2011. Cryptocurrency. Technology Review, MIT. September/October. Available online: http://www.technologyreview.com/computing/38392/.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Optimal Referral Auction DesignProceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems10.5555/3635637.3662867(198-206)Online publication date: 6-May-2024
  • (2024)The Bitcoin Backbone Protocol: Analysis and ApplicationsJournal of the ACM10.1145/365344571:4(1-49)Online publication date: 18-Apr-2024
  • (2024)Evaluating blockchain technology adoption in multi-tier supply chains from an institutional entrepreneurship theory perspectiveTransportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies10.1016/j.trc.2024.104510160(104510)Online publication date: Mar-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
EC '12: Proceedings of the 13th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce
June 2012
1016 pages
ISBN:9781450314152
DOI:10.1145/2229012
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 04 June 2012

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. information propagation
  2. mechanism design
  3. sybil-proof mechanisms

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

EC '12
Sponsor:
EC '12: ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce
June 4 - 8, 2012
Valencia, Spain

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 664 of 2,389 submissions, 28%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)31
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3
Reflects downloads up to 10 Oct 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Optimal Referral Auction DesignProceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems10.5555/3635637.3662867(198-206)Online publication date: 6-May-2024
  • (2024)The Bitcoin Backbone Protocol: Analysis and ApplicationsJournal of the ACM10.1145/365344571:4(1-49)Online publication date: 18-Apr-2024
  • (2024)Evaluating blockchain technology adoption in multi-tier supply chains from an institutional entrepreneurship theory perspectiveTransportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies10.1016/j.trc.2024.104510160(104510)Online publication date: Mar-2024
  • (2024)When is Slower Block Propagation More Profitable for Large Miners?Computer Security – ESORICS 202310.1007/978-3-031-51479-1_15(285-305)Online publication date: 12-Jan-2024
  • (2023)IRS: An Incentive-compatible Reward Scheme for AlgorandProceedings of the 2023 International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems10.5555/3545946.3598697(661-669)Online publication date: 30-May-2023
  • (2023)Multilevel marketing: Pyramid‐shaped schemes or exploitative scams?Theoretical Economics10.3982/TE489018:2(633-668)Online publication date: 2023
  • (2023)SageProceedings of the VLDB Endowment10.14778/3565838.356584415:13(3897-3910)Online publication date: 20-Jan-2023
  • (2023)Fair Reward Distribution in Federated Byzantine Agreement Systems2023 5th Conference on Blockchain Research & Applications for Innovative Networks and Services (BRAINS)10.1109/BRAINS59668.2023.10316929(1-8)Online publication date: 11-Oct-2023
  • (2023)Enhanced incentive schemes for volunteers to distribute surplus food in smart citiesSustainable Cities and Society10.1016/j.scs.2023.10440991(104409)Online publication date: Apr-2023
  • (2023)Breaking Blockchain Rationality with Out-of-Band CollusionFinancial Cryptography and Data Security. FC 2023 International Workshops10.1007/978-3-031-48806-1_31(489-501)Online publication date: 5-Dec-2023
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Get Access

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media