Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2348283.2348289acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesirConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Adaptive query suggestion for difficult queries

Published: 12 August 2012 Publication History

Abstract

Query suggestion is a useful tool to help users formulate better queries. Although this has been found highly useful globally, its effect on different queries may vary. In this paper, we examine the impact of query suggestion on queries of different degrees of difficulty. It turns out that query suggestion is much more useful for difficult queries than easy queries. In addition, the suggestions for difficult queries should rely less on their similarity to the original query. In this paper, we use a learning-to-rank approach to select query suggestions, based on several types of features including a query performance prediction. As query suggestion has different impacts on different queries, we propose an adaptive suggestion approach that makes suggestions only for difficult queries. We carry out experiments on real data from a search engine. Our results clearly indicate that an approach targeting difficult queries can bring higher gain than a uniform suggestion approach.

References

[1]
G. Amati, C. Carpineto, and G. Romano. Query difficulty, robustness, and selective application of query expansion. In ECIR, pages 127--137, 2004.
[2]
R. A. Baeza-Yates, C. A. Hurtado, and M. Mendoza. Query recommendation using query logs in search engines. In EDBT Workshops, pages 588--596, 2004.
[3]
R. A. Baeza-Yates and A. Tiberi. Extracting semantic relations from query logs. In KDD, pages 76--85, 2007.
[4]
N. Balasubramanian, G. Kumaran, and V. R. Carvalho. Exploring reductions for long web queries. In SIGIR, pages 571--578, 2010.
[5]
N. Balasubramanian, G. Kumaran, and V. R. Carvalho. Predicting query performance on the web. In SIGIR, pages 785--786, 2010.
[6]
D. Beeferman and A. L. Berger. Agglomerative clustering of a search engine query log. In KDD, pages 407--416, 2000.
[7]
S. Bhatia, D. Majumdar, and P. Mitra. Query suggestions in the absence of query logs. In SIGIR, pages 795--804, 2011.
[8]
H. Cao, D. Jiang, J. Pei, Q. He, Z. Liao, E. Chen, and H. Li. Context-aware query suggestion by mining click-through and session data. In KDD, pages 875--883, 2008.
[9]
D. Carmel and E. Yom-Tov. Estimating the query difficulty for information retrieval. In SIGIR, page 911, 2010.
[10]
D. Carmel, E. Yom-Tov, A. Darlow, and D. Pelleg. What makes a query difficult? In SIGIR, pages 390--397, 2006.
[11]
S. Cronen-Townsend, Y. Zhou, and W. B. Croft. Predicting query performance. In SIGIR, pages 299--306, 2002.
[12]
V. Dang and W. B. Croft. Query reformulation using anchor text. In WSDM, pages 41--50, 2010.
[13]
N. Eiron and K. S. McCurley. Analysis of anchor text for web search. In SIGIR, pages 459--460, 2003.
[14]
C. Fox. Lexical analysis and stoplists. Information Retrieval - Data Structures & Algorithms, pages 102--130, 1992.
[15]
J. Gao, X. Li, D. Micol, C. Quirk, and X. Sun. A large scale ranker-based system for search query spelling correction. In COLING, pages 358--366, 2010.
[16]
J. Guo, G. Xu, H. Li, and X. Cheng. A unified and discriminative model for query refinement. In SIGIR, pages 379--386, 2008.
[17]
K. Jarvelin and J. Kekalainen. Cumulated gain-based evaluation of ir techniques. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst., 20(4):422--446, 2002.
[18]
J.C.Borda. Memoire sur les elections au scrutin. Histoire de l'Academie Royale des Sciences, 1781.
[19]
T. Joachims. Optimizing search engines using clickthrough data. In KDD, pages 133--142, 2002.
[20]
R. Jones, B. Rey, O. Madani, and W. Greiner. Generating query substitutions. In WWW, pages 387--396, 2006.
[21]
R. Kraft and J. Y. Zien. Mining anchor text for query refinement. In WWW, pages 666--674, 2004.
[22]
V. Lavrenko and W. B. Croft. Relevance-based language models. In SIGIR, pages 120--127, 2001.
[23]
H. Ma, H. Yang, I. King, and M. R. Lyu. Learning latent semantic relations from clickthrough data for query suggestion. In CIKM, pages 709--718, 2008.
[24]
Q. Mei, D. Zhou, and K. W. Church. Query suggestion using hitting time. In CIKM, pages 469--478, 2008.
[25]
F. Peng, N. Ahmed, X. Li, and Y. Lu. Context sensitive stemming for web search. In SIGIR, pages 639--646, 2007.
[26]
M. Porter. An algorithm for suffix stripping. Program: electronic library and information systems, 14(3):130--137, 1980.
[27]
S. E. Robertson. The probability ranking principle in ir. Journal of Documentation, 33:130--137, 1977.
[28]
Y. Song and L. wei He. Optimal rare query suggestion with implicit user feedback. In WWW, pages 901--910, 2010.
[29]
Y. Song, D. Zhou, and L. wei He. Post-ranking query suggestion by diversifying search results. In SIGIR, pages 815--824, 2011.
[30]
T. Tao and C. Zhai. Regularized estimation of mixture models for robust pseudo-relevance feedback. In SIGIR, pages 162--169, 2006.
[31]
X. Wang and C. Zhai. Mining term association patterns from search logs for effective query reformulation. In CIKM, pages 479--488, 2008.
[32]
J.-R. Wen, J.-Y. Nie, and H. Zhang. Clustering user queries of a search engine. In WWW, pages 162--168, 2001.
[33]
J. Xu and W. B. Croft. Improving the effectiveness of information retrieval with local context analysis. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst., 18(1):79--112, 2000.
[34]
E. Yom-Tov, S. Fine, D. Carmel, and A. Darlow. Learning to estimate query difficulty: including applications to missing content detection and distributed information retrieval. In SIGIR, pages 512--519, 2005.
[35]
Y. Zhou and W. B. Croft. Ranking robustness: a novel framework to predict query performance. In CIKM, pages 567--574, 2006.
[36]
Y. Zhou and W. B. Croft. Query performance prediction in web search environments. In SIGIR, pages 543--550, 2007.

Cited By

View all
  • (2022)Where Do Queries Come From?Proceedings of the 45th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval10.1145/3477495.3531711(2850-2862)Online publication date: 6-Jul-2022
  • (2021)Location‐Aware Keyword Query Suggestion Techniques With Artificial Intelligence PerspectiveComputational Analysis and Deep Learning for Medical Care10.1002/9781119785750.ch2(35-51)Online publication date: 13-Aug-2021
  • (2020)Query Auto-CompletionQuery Understanding for Search Engines10.1007/978-3-030-58334-7_7(145-170)Online publication date: 2-Dec-2020
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Adaptive query suggestion for difficult queries

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    SIGIR '12: Proceedings of the 35th international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval
    August 2012
    1236 pages
    ISBN:9781450314725
    DOI:10.1145/2348283
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 12 August 2012

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. adaptive query suggestion
    2. difficult queries
    3. query suggestion evaluation

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    SIGIR '12
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 792 of 3,983 submissions, 20%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)11
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3
    Reflects downloads up to 24 Jan 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2022)Where Do Queries Come From?Proceedings of the 45th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval10.1145/3477495.3531711(2850-2862)Online publication date: 6-Jul-2022
    • (2021)Location‐Aware Keyword Query Suggestion Techniques With Artificial Intelligence PerspectiveComputational Analysis and Deep Learning for Medical Care10.1002/9781119785750.ch2(35-51)Online publication date: 13-Aug-2021
    • (2020)Query Auto-CompletionQuery Understanding for Search Engines10.1007/978-3-030-58334-7_7(145-170)Online publication date: 2-Dec-2020
    • (2019)Disjunctive Sets of Phrase Queries for Diverse Query SuggestionIEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence10.1145/3350546.3352566(449-455)Online publication date: 14-Oct-2019
    • (2016)Detecting Promotion Campaigns in Query Auto CompletionProceedings of the 25th ACM International on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management10.1145/2983323.2983709(125-134)Online publication date: 24-Oct-2016
    • (2016)Query Suggestion for Struggling Search by Struggling Flow Graph2016 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence (WI)10.1109/WI.2016.0040(224-231)Online publication date: Oct-2016
    • (2016)Location Aware Keyword Query Suggestion Based on Document ProximityIEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering10.1109/TKDE.2015.246539128:1(82-97)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2016
    • (2016)Eager to be Lazy: Towards a Complexity-guided Textual Case-Based Reasoning SystemCase-Based Reasoning Research and Development10.1007/978-3-319-47096-2_6(77-92)Online publication date: 29-Sep-2016
    • (2015)Recommending high-utility search engine queries via a query-recommending modelNeurocomputing10.1016/j.neucom.2015.04.076167:C(195-208)Online publication date: 1-Nov-2015
    • (2015)Query ranking model for search engine query recommendationInternational Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics10.1007/s13042-015-0362-58:3(1019-1038)Online publication date: 3-May-2015
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media