Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2405688.2405694acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmiddlewareConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Towards dependable clients: improving the reliability and availability of the browsers

Published: 03 December 2012 Publication History

Abstract

According to autonomic computing vision, system dependability can be improved by adding self-healing properties to make it capable of realizing failures and recovering from them automatically. Server-side self-healing is a well-established discipline and has resulted in substantial cost reductions for data centers. In contrast, self-healing on the client side has not been so well-studied.
In this work, we present our approach for improving browser dependability. As desktop applications are being replaced by web applications, browsers are becoming the common application platform; therefore, it is critical for the browsers to be highly reliable and available. Our system is designed to achieve this goal by monitoring the browser components, analyzing the collected data using statistical techniques to predict failures, and taking actions to remove or reduce effects of errors if needed. This paper presents the overall draft of our solution for making the browser dependable, including the prototype architecture, its different components, and the related state of the art and future work.

References

[1]
Alexa the web information company. http://www.alexa.com/topsites. Visited: Aug. 2012.
[2]
Chrome browser. https://www.google.com/chrome. Visited: May 2012.
[3]
ChromeDevTools protocol. http://code.google.com/p/chromedevtools/wiki/ChromeDevToolsProtocol. Visited: May 2012.
[4]
chromium issues. http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues.
[5]
Firebug, web development evolved. http://getfirebug.com/. Visited: Aug 2012.
[6]
StatCounter Global Stats. http://gs.statcounter.com/. Visited: May 2012.
[7]
J. Alonso, J. Torres, J. Berral, and R. Gavalda. Adaptive on-line software aging prediction based on machine learning. In Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks, 2010.
[8]
S. Andrica and G. Candea. WaRR: A tool for high-fidelity web application record and replay. In Proceedings of 41st International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks, 2011.
[9]
A. Avizienis, J. Laprie, B. Randell, and C. Landwehr. Basic concepts and taxonomy of dependable and secure computing. IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing, 1(1), 2004.
[10]
G. Candea, A. Brown, A. Fox, and D. Patterson. Recovery-oriented computing: Building multitier dependability. Computer, 37(11), 2004.
[11]
G. Candea, S. Kawamoto, Y. Fujiki, G. Friedman, and A. Fox. Microreboot--a technique for cheap recovery. In Proceedings of the 6th Symposium on Opearting Systems Design & Implementation, 2004.
[12]
V. Castelli, R. Harper, P. Heidelberger, S. Hunter, K. Trivedi, K. Vaidyanathan, and W. Zeggert. Proactive management of software aging. IBM Journal of Research and Development, 45(2), 2001.
[13]
D. Cotroneo, R. Natella, R. Pietrantuono, and S. Russo. Software aging analysis of the linux operating system. In Proceedings of the 21st International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering, 2010.
[14]
B. Cully, G. Lefebvre, D. Meyer, M. Feeley, N. Hutchinson, and A. Warfield. Remus: High availability via asynchronous virtual machine replication. In Proceedings of the 5th USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation, 2008.
[15]
A. Ganapathi and D. Patterson. Crash data collection: A windows case study. In Proceedings of the 35th International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks, 2005.
[16]
S. Garg, A. Van Moorsel, K. Vaidyanathan, and K. Trivedi. A methodology for detection and estimation of software aging. In Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering, 1998.
[17]
D. Ghosh, R. Sharman, H. Raghav Rao, and S. Upadhyaya. Self-healing systems---survey and synthesis. Decision Support Systems, 42(4), 2007.
[18]
M. Grottke, L. Li, K. Vaidyanathan, and K. Trivedi. Analysis of software aging in a web server. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 55(3), 2006.
[19]
Y. Huang, C. Kintala, N. Kolettis, and N. Fulton. Software rejuvenation: Analysis, module and applications. In Proceedings of 25th International Symposium on Fault-Tolerant Computing, 1995.
[20]
M. Isard. Autopilot: Automatic data center management. ACM SIGOPS Operating Systems Review, 41(2), 2007.
[21]
E. Kiciman and B. Livshits. Ajaxscope: a platform for remotely monitoring the client-side behavior of web 2.0 applications. ACM SIGOPS Operating Systems Review, 41(6), 2007.
[22]
M. Littman, N. Ravi, E. Fenson, and R. Howard. Reinforcement learning for autonomic network repair. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Autonomic Computing, 2004.
[23]
J. Mickens, J. Elson, and J. Howell. Mugshot: Deterministic Capture and Replay for Javascript Applications. In Proceedings of the 7th USENIX Conference on Networked Systems Design and Implementation, 2010.
[24]
F. Qin, J. Tucek, Y. Zhou, and J. Sundaresan. Rx: Treating bugs as allergies--a safe method to survive software failures. ACM Transactions on Computer Systems, 25(3), 2007.
[25]
C. Reis and S. Gribble. Isolating web programs in modern browser architectures. In Proceedings of the 4th European Conference on Computer Systems, 2009.
[26]
G. Richards, S. Lebresne, B. Burg, and J. Vitek. An analysis of the dynamic behavior of javascript programs. ACM SIGPLAN Notices, 45(6), 2010.
[27]
S. Sidiroglou, O. Laadan, C. Perez, N. Viennot, J. Nieh, and A. Keromytis. Assure: automatic software self-healing using rescue points. ACM SIGPLAN Notices, 44(3), 2009.
[28]
M. Swift, B. Bershad, and H. Levy. Improving the reliability of commodity operating systems. ACM SIGOPS Operating Systems Review, 37(5), 2003.
[29]
K. Vaidyanathan and K. Trivedi. A comprehensive model for software rejuvenation. IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing, 2(2), 2005.

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
MIDDLEWARE '12: Proceedings of the 9th Middleware Doctoral Symposium of the 13th ACM/IFIP/USENIX International Middleware Conference
December 2012
52 pages
ISBN:9781450316118
DOI:10.1145/2405688
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

  • Professional
  • USENIX Assoc: USENIX Assoc
  • IFIP

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 03 December 2012

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. browser
  2. error detection
  3. metric analysis
  4. recovery
  5. web application

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

Middleware '12
Sponsor:
  • USENIX Assoc
Middleware '12: 13th International Middleware Conference
December 3, 2012
Quebec, Montreal, Canada

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 203 of 948 submissions, 21%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 88
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 16 Oct 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

Get Access

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media