Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article

Social factors in group recommender systems

Published: 01 February 2013 Publication History

Abstract

In this article we review the existing techniques in group recommender systems and we propose some improvement based on the study of the different individual behaviors when carrying out a decision-making process. Our method includes an analysis of group personality composition and trust between each group member to improve the accuracy of group recommenders. This way we simulate the argumentation process followed by groups of people when agreeing on a common activity in a more realistic way. Moreover, we reflect how they expect the system to behave in a long term recommendation process. This is achieved by including a memory of past recommendations that increases the satisfaction of users whose preferences have not been taken into account in previous recommendations.

References

[1]
Aamodt, A. and Plaza, E. 1994. Case-based reasoning: Foundational issues, methodological variants, and system approaches. Artif. Intell. Commun. 7, 1, 39--59.
[2]
Amer-Yahia, S., Roy, S. B., Chawlat, A., Das, G., and Yu, C. 2009. Group recommendation: semantics and efficiency. Proc. VLDB Endow. 2, 1, 754--765.
[3]
Ardissono, L., Goy, A., Petrone, G., Segnan, M., and Torasso, P. 2003. Intrigue: Personalized recommendation of tourist attractions for desktop and handset devices. Appl. Artif. Intell. 17, 8, 687--714.
[4]
Baccigalupo, C. and Plaza, E. 2007. A case-based song scheduler for group customised radio. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Case-Based Reasoning (ICCBR '07). R. Weber and M. M. Richter, Eds., Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4626, Springer, 433--448.
[5]
Baltrunas, L., Makcinskas, T., and Ricci, F. 2010. Group recommendations with rank aggregation and collaborative filtering. In Proceedings of the 4th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (RecSys '10). ACM, New York, NY, 119--126.
[6]
Barsade, S. G. 2002. The ripple effect: Emotional contagion and its influence on group behavior. Admin. Sci. Quart. 47, 4, 644--675.
[7]
Berkovsky, S. and Freyne, J. 2010. Group-based recipe recommendations: analysis of data aggregation strategies. In Proceedings of the 4th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (RecSys '10). ACM, New York, NY, 111--118.
[8]
Bobadilla, J., Serradilla, F., and Hernando, A. 2009. Collaborative filtering adapted to recommender systems of e-learning. Knowl.-Based Syst. 22, 4, 261--265.
[9]
Chen, Y.-L., Cheng, L.-C., and Chuang, C.-N. 2008. A group recommendation system with consideration of interactions among group members. Expert Syst. Appl. 34, 3, 2082--2090.
[10]
Cooper, W. S. 1968. Expected search length: A single measure of retrieval effectiveness based on the weak ordering action of retrieval systems. Amer. Document. 19, 1, 30--41.
[11]
Crossen, A., Budzik, J., and Hammond, K. J. 2002. Flytrap: intelligent group music recommendation. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI '02). ACM, 184--185.
[12]
Deutsch, M. and Gerard, H. B. 1955. A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgement. J. Abnormal Social Psych. 51, 3, 629--36.
[13]
Gilbert, E. and Karahalios, K. 2009. Predicting tie strength with social media. In Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '09). ACM, 211--220.
[14]
Golbeck, J. 2006a. Combining provenance with trust in social networks for semantic web content filtering. In Provenance and Annotation of Data, International Provenance and Annotation Workshop, Revised Selected Papers, L. Moreau and I. T. Foster, Eds., Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4145, Springer, 101--108.
[15]
Golbeck, J. 2006b. Generating predictive movie recommendations from trust in social networks. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Trust Management. 93--104.
[16]
Granovetter, M. 1973. The strength of weak ties. Amer. J. Sociology 78, 6, 1360--1380.
[17]
Hatfield, E., Cacioppo, J., and Rapson, R. 1994. Emotional Contagion. Studies in Emotion and Social Interaction. Cambridge University Press.
[18]
Herlocker, J. L., Konstan, J. A., Terveen, L. G., and Riedl, J. T. 2004. Evaluating collaborative filtering recommender systems. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 22, 1, 5--53.
[19]
Jameson, A. 2004. More than the sum of its members: challenges for group recommender systems. In Proceedings of the Working Conference on Advanced visual interfaces (AVI '04). ACM, 48--54.
[20]
Jameson, A. and Smyth, B. 2007. Recommendation to groups. In The Adaptive Web, Methods and Strategies of Web Personalization, P. Brusilovsky, A. Kobsa, and W. Nejdl, Eds., Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4321, Springer, 596--627.
[21]
Kelleher, J. and Bridge, D. G. 2004. An accurate and scalable collaborative recommender. Artif. Intell. Rev. 21, 3-4, 193--213.
[22]
Kim, J. K., Kim, H. K., Oh, H. Y., and Ryu, Y. U. 2010. A group recommendation system for online communities. Int. J. Inf. Manage. 30, 3, 212--219.
[23]
Levin, D. Z., Cross, R., and Abrams, L. C. 2004. The strength of weak ties you can trust: the mediating role of trust in effective knowledge transfer. Manage. Sci. 50, 1477--1490.
[24]
Lieberman, H., Dyke, N. W. V., and Vivacqua, A. S. 1999. Let's browse: A collaborative web browsing agent. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces. 65--68.
[25]
Linden, G., Smith, B., and York, J. 2003. Amazon.com recommendations: Item-to-item collaborative filtering. IEEE Internet Comput. 7, 76--80.
[26]
Masthoff, J. 2004. Group modeling: Selecting a sequence of television items to suit a group of viewers. User Model. User-Adapt. Interact. 14, 1, 37--85.
[27]
Masthoff, J. and Gatt, A. 2006. In pursuit of satisfaction and the prevention of embarrassment: affective state in group recommender systems. User Model. User-Adapt. Interact. 16, 3--4, 281--319.
[28]
McCarthy, J. F. 2002. Pocket restaurant finder: A situated recommender systems for groups. In Proceedings of Workshop on Mobile Ad-Hoc Communication at the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computer Systems.
[29]
McCarthy, J. F. and Anagnost, T. D. 1998. MusicFX: An arbiter of group preferences for computer aupported collaborative workouts. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '98). ACM, 363--372.
[30]
McCarthy, K., McGinty, L., Smyth, B., and Salamó, M. 2006. The needs of the many: A case-based group recommender system. Adv. Case-Based Reas. 4106, 196--210.
[31]
O'Connor, M., Cosley, D., Konstan, J. A., and Riedl, J. 2001. Polylens: a recommender system for groups of users. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (ECSCW'01). Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA, 199--218.
[32]
O'Donovan, J. and Smyth, B. 2005. Trust in recommender systems. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI '05). ACM, 167--174.
[33]
Recio-García, J. A., Díaz-Agudo, B., and González-Calero, P. A. 2008. Prototyping Recommender Systems in jCOLIBRI. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Recommender syStems (RecSys '08). ACM, New York, NY, 243--250.
[34]
Recio-García, J. A., Jimenez-Diaz, G., Sánchez-Ruiz, A. A., and Díaz-Agudo, B. 2009. Personality aware recommendations to groups. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. L. D. Bergman, A. Tuzhilin, R. D. Burke, A. Felfernig, and L. Schmidt-Thieme, Eds., ACM, 325--328.
[35]
Sarwar, B., Karypis, G., Konstan, J., and Reidl, J. 2001. Item-based collaborative filtering recommendation algorithms. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW '01). ACM, New York, NY, 285--295.
[36]
Schafer, J., Frankowski, D., Herlocker, J., and Sen, S. 2007. Collaborative filtering recommender systems. In The Adaptive Web, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4321, Springer, 291--324.
[37]
Sinha, R. R. and Swearingen, K. 2001. Comparing recommendations made by online systems and friends. In Proceedings of the DELOS Workshop: Personalisation and Recommender Systems in Digital Libraries.
[38]
Thomas, K. and Kilmann, R. 1974. Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Mode Instrument. Tuxedo, NY.
[39]
Victor, P., Cornelis, C., Cock, M. D., and Teredesai, A. 2008. Key figure impact in trust-enhanced recommender systems. AI Com. 21, 2-3, 127--143.
[40]
Wu, A., DiMicco, J. M., and Millen, D. R. 2010. Detecting professional versus personal closeness using an enterprise social network site. In Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '10). ACM, New York, NY, 1955--1964.
[41]
Yu, Z., Zhou, X., Hao, Y., and Gu, J. 2006. TV program recommendation for multiple viewers based on user profile merging. User Model. User-Adapt. Interact. 16, 1, 63--82.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Supporting Group Decision-Making: Insights from a Focus Group StudyProceedings of the 32nd ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization10.1145/3627043.3659538(301-306)Online publication date: 22-Jun-2024
  • (2024)Investigating the Potential of Group Recommendation Systems As a Medium of Social Interactions: A Case of Spotify Blend Experiences between Two UsersProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642544(1-15)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
  • (2024)FAER: Fairness-Aware Event-Participant Recommendation in Event-Based Social NetworksIEEE Transactions on Big Data10.1109/TBDATA.2024.337240910:5(655-668)Online publication date: Oct-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology
ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology  Volume 4, Issue 1
Special section on twitter and microblogging services, social recommender systems, and CAMRa2010: Movie recommendation in context
January 2013
357 pages
ISSN:2157-6904
EISSN:2157-6912
DOI:10.1145/2414425
Issue’s Table of Contents
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 01 February 2013
Accepted: 01 July 2011
Revised: 01 April 2011
Received: 01 January 2011
Published in TIST Volume 4, Issue 1

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Memory
  2. personality
  3. recommender systems
  4. social networks
  5. trust

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed

Funding Sources

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)70
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)12
Reflects downloads up to 09 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Supporting Group Decision-Making: Insights from a Focus Group StudyProceedings of the 32nd ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization10.1145/3627043.3659538(301-306)Online publication date: 22-Jun-2024
  • (2024)Investigating the Potential of Group Recommendation Systems As a Medium of Social Interactions: A Case of Spotify Blend Experiences between Two UsersProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642544(1-15)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
  • (2024)FAER: Fairness-Aware Event-Participant Recommendation in Event-Based Social NetworksIEEE Transactions on Big Data10.1109/TBDATA.2024.337240910:5(655-668)Online publication date: Oct-2024
  • (2024)KGR: A Kernel-Mapping Based Group Recommender System Using Trust RelationsNeural Processing Letters10.1007/s11063-024-11639-456:4Online publication date: 19-Jun-2024
  • (2024)A dynamic fuzzy group recommender system based on intuitionistic fuzzy choquet integral aggregationSoft Computing10.1007/s00500-023-09485-yOnline publication date: 3-Jan-2024
  • (2024)Influence Based Group Recommendation System in Personality and Dynamic TrustHCI International 2024 Posters10.1007/978-3-031-61966-3_6(50-57)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2024
  • (2023)Web-Based Patient Recommender Systems for Preventive Care: Protocol for Empirical Research PropositionsJMIR Research Protocols10.2196/4331612(e43316)Online publication date: 30-Mar-2023
  • (2023)CHARM: A Group Recommender ChatBotAdjunct Proceedings of the 31st ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization10.1145/3563359.3597388(275-282)Online publication date: 26-Jun-2023
  • (2023)GMAP 2023: 2nd Workshop on Group Modeling, Adaptation and PersonalizationAdjunct Proceedings of the 31st ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization10.1145/3563359.3595628(249-252)Online publication date: 26-Jun-2023
  • (2023)A group recommender system for books based on fine-grained classification of commentsThe Electronic Library10.1108/EL-11-2022-025241:2/3(326-346)Online publication date: 1-May-2023
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Get Access

Login options

Full Access

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media