Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2517840.2517859acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesccsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open access

The post anachronism: the temporal dimension of facebook privacy

Published: 04 November 2013 Publication History

Abstract

This paper reports on two studies that investigate empirically how privacy preferences about the audience and emphasis of Facebook posts change over time. In a 63-participant longitudinal study, participants gave their audience and emphasis preferences for up to ten of their Facebook posts in the week they were posted, again one week later, and again one month later. In a 234-participant retrospective study, participants expressed their preferences about posts made in the past week, as well as one year prior. We found that participants did not want content to fade away wholesale with age; the audience participants wanted to be able to access posts remained relatively constant over time. However, participants did want a handful of posts to become more private over time, as well as others to become more visible. Participants' predictions about how their preferences would change correlated poorly with their actual changes in preferences over time, casting doubt on ideas for setting an expiration date for content. Although older posts were seen as less relevant and had often been forgotten, participants found value in these posts for reminiscence. Surprisingly, we observed few concerns about privacy or self-presentation for older posts. We discuss our findings' implications for retrospective privacy mechanisms.

References

[1]
A. Acquisti and R. Gross. Imagined communities: Awareness, information sharing, and privacy on the Facebook. In Proc. PETS, 2006.
[2]
H. Almuhimedi, S. Wilson, B. Liu, N. Sadeh, and A. Acquisti. Tweets are forever: A large-scale quantitative analysis of deleted tweets. In Proc. CSCW, 2013.
[3]
O. Ayalon and E. Toch. Retrospective privacy: Managing longitudinal privacy in online social networks. In Proc. SOUPS, 2013.
[4]
A. J. Berinsky, G. A. Huber, and G. S. Len. Evaluating online labor markets for experimental research: Amazon.com's Mechanical Turk. Political Analysis, 20:351--368, 2012.
[5]
M. S. Bernstein, E. Bakshy, M. Burke, and B. Karrer. Quantifying the invisible audience in social networks. In Proc. CHI, 2013.
[6]
J. Binder, A. Howes, and A. Sutcliffe. The problem of conflicting social spheres: Effects of network structure on experienced tension in social network sites. In Proc. CHI, 2009.
[7]
R. Geambasu, T. Kohno, A. Levy, and H. M. Levy. Vanish: Increasing data privacy with self-destructing data. In Proc. USENIX Security Symposium, 2009.
[8]
E. Goffman. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Anchor Books, 1959.
[9]
K. Hampton, L. Goulet, L. Rainie, and K. Purcell. Social networking sites and our lives. Pew Research Center, June 2011. http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2011/Technology-and-social-networks.aspx.
[10]
D. Hedeker. Mixed models for longitudinal ordinal and nominal outcomes, 2012. http://www.uic.edu/classes/bstt/bstt513/OrdNomLS.pdf.
[11]
B. Hogan. The presentation of self in the age of social media: Distinguishing performances and exhibitions online. Bulletin of Science Technology Society, 30(6):377--386, Dec. 2010.
[12]
P. G. Ipeirotis. Demographics of Mechanical Turk. Technical Report CEDER-10-01, New York University, 2010.
[13]
M. Johnson, S. Egelman, and S. M. Bellovin. Facebook and privacy: It's complicated. In Proc. SOUPS, 2012.
[14]
A. Kittur, E. H. Chi, and B. Suh. Crowdsourcing user studies with Mechanical Turk. In Proc. CHI, 2008.
[15]
E. Litt. Knock, knock. Who's there? The imagined audience. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 56(3):330--345, 2012.
[16]
M. Madden, A. Lenhart, S. Cortesi, U. Gasser, M. Duggan, and A. Smith. Teens, social media, and privacy. Pew Research Center, May 2013. http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2013/ Teens-Social-Media-And-Privacy.aspx.
[17]
H. Mao, X. Shuai, and A. Kapadia. Loose tweets: An analysis of privacy leaks on Twitter. In Proc. WPES, 2011.
[18]
S. T. Peesapati, V. Schwanda, J. Schultz, M. Lepage, S.-y. Jeong, and D. Cosley. Pensieve: Supporting everyday reminiscence. In Proc. CHI, 2010.
[19]
V. Schwanda Sosik, X. Zhao, and D. Cosley. See friendship, sort of: How conversation and digital traces might support reflection on friendships. In Proc. CSCW, 2012.
[20]
M. Sleeper, R. Balebako, S. Das, A. L. McConahy, J. Wiese, and L. F. Cranor. The post that wasn't: Exploring self-censorship on Facebook. In Proc. CSCW, 2013.
[21]
M. Sleeper, J. Cranshaw, P. G. Kelley, B. Ur, A. Acquisti, L. F. Cranor, and N. Sadeh. "I read my Twitter the next morning and was astonished" A conversational perspective on Twitter regrets. In Proc. CHI, 2013.
[22]
Snapchat, 2013. http://www.snapchat.com/.
[23]
F. Stutzman, R. Gross, and A. Acquisti. Silent listeners: The evolution of privacy and disclosure on Facebook. Journal of Privacy and Confidentiality, 4(2):7--41, 2012.
[24]
Z. Tufekci. Can you see me now? Audience and disclosure regulation in online social network sites. Bulletin of Science Technology Society, 28(1):20--36, February 2008.
[25]
Y. Wang, P. Leon, L. Cranor, A. Acquisti, X. Chen, and K. Scott. Privacy nudges for social media: An exploratory Facebook study. In PSOSM, 2013.
[26]
Y. Wang, G. Norcie, S. Komanduri, A. Acquisti, P. G. Leon, and L. F. Cranor. "I regretted the minute I pressed share": A qualitative study of regrets on Facebook. In Proc. SOUPS, 2011.
[27]
P. Wisniewski, H. Lipford, and D. Wilson. Fighting for my space: Coping mechanisms for SNS boundary regulation. In Proc. CHI, 2012.
[28]
A. L. Young and A. Quan-Haase. Information revelation and internet privacy concerns on social network sites: A case study of Facebook. In Proc. C&T, 2009.
[29]
X. Zhao, N. Salehi, S. Naranjit, S. Alwaalan, S. Voida, and D. Cosley. The many faces of Facebook: Experiencing social media as performance, exhibition, and personal archive. In Proc. CHI, 2013.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Designing a Data-Driven Survey System: Leveraging Participants' Online Data to Personalize SurveysProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642572(1-22)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
  • (2024)The social media discontinuance model: the trio of dark side, regret, and privacy controlBehaviour & Information Technology10.1080/0144929X.2024.232655144:3(523-551)Online publication date: 15-Mar-2024
  • (2023)Phishing in the Free Waters: A Study of Phishing Attacks Created using Free Website Building ServicesProceedings of the 2023 ACM on Internet Measurement Conference10.1145/3618257.3624812(268-281)Online publication date: 24-Oct-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. The post anachronism: the temporal dimension of facebook privacy

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    WPES '13: Proceedings of the 12th ACM workshop on Workshop on privacy in the electronic society
    November 2013
    306 pages
    ISBN:9781450324854
    DOI:10.1145/2517840
    • General Chair:
    • Ahmad-Reza Sadeghi,
    • Program Chair:
    • Sara Foresti
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 04 November 2013

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. access control
    2. facebook
    3. privacy
    4. sns
    5. temporality
    6. time
    7. users

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    CCS'13
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    WPES '13 Paper Acceptance Rate 30 of 103 submissions, 29%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 106 of 355 submissions, 30%

    Upcoming Conference

    CCS '25

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)110
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)13
    Reflects downloads up to 28 Feb 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Designing a Data-Driven Survey System: Leveraging Participants' Online Data to Personalize SurveysProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642572(1-22)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
    • (2024)The social media discontinuance model: the trio of dark side, regret, and privacy controlBehaviour & Information Technology10.1080/0144929X.2024.232655144:3(523-551)Online publication date: 15-Mar-2024
    • (2023)Phishing in the Free Waters: A Study of Phishing Attacks Created using Free Website Building ServicesProceedings of the 2023 ACM on Internet Measurement Conference10.1145/3618257.3624812(268-281)Online publication date: 24-Oct-2023
    • (2023)Social media discontinuance: the salient roles of dark side and regretJournal of Information Technology Case and Application Research10.1080/15228053.2023.218505925:1(28-57)Online publication date: 31-Mar-2023
    • (2022)Runtime permissions for privacy in proactive intelligent assistantsProceedings of the Eighteenth USENIX Conference on Usable Privacy and Security10.5555/3563609.3563643(633-651)Online publication date: 8-Aug-2022
    • (2022)Decaying Photos for Enhanced Privacy: User Perceptions Towards Temporal Redactions and 'Trusted' PlatformsProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/35555386:CSCW2(1-30)Online publication date: 11-Nov-2022
    • (2022)Image DePO: Towards Gradual Decentralization of Online Social Networks using Decentralized Privacy OverlaysProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/35129076:CSCW1(1-28)Online publication date: 7-Apr-2022
    • (2022)‘A right to be forgotten’: retrospective privacy concerns in social networking servicesBehaviour & Information Technology10.1080/0144929X.2022.204616242:7(829-850)Online publication date: 15-Mar-2022
    • (2021)Concerned but ineffectiveProceedings of the Seventeenth USENIX Conference on Usable Privacy and Security10.5555/3563572.3563596(455-473)Online publication date: 9-Aug-2021
    • (2021)Perceived ephemerality, privacy calculus, and the privacy settings of an ephemeral social media siteComputers in Human Behavior10.1016/j.chb.2021.106928124:COnline publication date: 1-Nov-2021
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Login options

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media