Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2566486.2567973acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesthewebconfConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Don't like RDF reification?: making statements about statements using singleton property

Published: 07 April 2014 Publication History

Abstract

Statements about RDF statements, or meta triples, provide additional information about individual triples, such as the source, the occurring time or place, or the certainty. Integrating such meta triples into semantic knowledge bases would enable the querying and reasoning mechanisms to be aware of provenance, time, location, or certainty of triples. However, an efficient RDF representation for such meta knowledge of triples remains challenging. The existing standard reification approach allows such meta knowledge of RDF triples to be expressed using RDF by two steps. The first step is representing the triple by a Statement instance which has subject, predicate, and object indicated separately in three different triples. The second step is creating assertions about that instance as if it is a statement. While reification is simple and intuitive, this approach does not have formal semantics and is not commonly used in practice as described in the RDF Primer. In this paper, we propose a novel approach called Singleton Property for representing statements about statements and provide a formal semantics for it. We explain how this singleton property approach fits well with the existing syntax and formal semantics of RDF, and the syntax of SPARQL query language. We also demonstrate the use of singleton property in the representation and querying of meta knowledge in two examples of Semantic Web knowledge bases: YAGO2 and BKR. Our experiments on the BKR show that the singleton property approach gives a decent performance in terms of number of triples, query length and query execution time compared to existing approaches. This approach, which is also simple and intuitive, can be easily adopted for representing and querying statements about statements in other knowledge bases.

References

[1]
J. J. Carroll, C. Bizer, P. Hayes, and P. Stickler. Named Graphs, Provenance and Trust. In Proceedings of the 14th international conference on World Wide Web, pages 613--622. ACM, 2005.
[2]
C. V. Damásio and F. Ferreira. Practical RDF Schema Reasoning with Annotated Semantic Web Data. In The Semantic Web--ISWC 2011, pages 746--761. Springer, 2011.
[3]
G. Flouris, I. Fundulaki, P. Pediaditis, Y. Theoharis, and V. Christophides. Coloring RDF Triples to Capture Provenance. In The Semantic Web-ISWC 2009, pages 196--212. Springer, 2009.
[4]
S. Harris and A. Seaborne. SPARQL 1.1 Query Language. W3C Working Draft, 12 May 2011.
[5]
P. Hayes and B. McBride. RDF Semantics. W3C Recommendation, 10 February 2004.
[6]
P. Hitzler, M. Krotzsch, and S. Rudolph. Foundations of Semantic Web Technologies. Chapman and Hall/CRC, 2011.
[7]
J. R. Hobbs and F. Pan. Time Ontology in OWL. W3C Working Draft, 27 September 2006.
[8]
J. Hoffart, F. M. Suchanek, K. Berberich, and G. Weikum. Yago2: a Spatially and Temporally Enhanced Knowledge Base from Wikipedia. Artificial Intelligence, 2012.
[9]
P. J. Leach, M. Mealling, and R. Salz. A Universally Unique Identifier (UUID) URN Namespace. 2005.
[10]
T. Lebo, S. Sahoo, and D. McGuinness. Prov-o: The PROV Ontology. W3C Working Draft, 03 May 2012.
[11]
A. Mallea, M. Arenas, A. Hogan, and A. Polleres. On Blank Nodes. In The Semantic Web--ISWC 2011, pages 421--437. Springer, 2011.
[12]
F. Manola, E. Miller, and B. McBride. RDF Primer. W3C Recommendation, 10 February 2004.
[13]
L. Moreau. The Foundations for Provenance on the Web. Foundations and Trends in Web Science, 2(2--3):99--241, 2010.
[14]
P. Pediaditis, G. Flouris, I. Fundulaki, and V. Christophides. On explicit provenance management in rdf/s graphs. TAPP, 9:1--10, 2009.
[15]
S. Sahoo, V. Nguyen, O. Bodenreider, P. Parikh, T. Minning, and A. Sheth. A Unified Framework for Managing Provenance Information in Translational Research. BMC Bioinformatics, 2011.
[16]
S. S. Sahoo, O. Bodenreider, P. Hitzler, A. Sheth, and K. Thirunarayan. Provenance Context Entity (PaCE): Scalable Provenance Tracking for Scientific RDF Data. SSDBM'10, pages 461--470, 2010.
[17]
B. Schueler, S. Sizov, S. Staab, and D. T. Tran. Querying for Meta Knowledge. In Proceedings of the 17th international conference on World Wide Web, pages 625--634. ACM, 2008.
[18]
Y. Simmhan, B. Plale, and D. Gannon. A Survey of Data Provenance in e-Science. ACM Sigmod Record, 34(3):31--36, 2005.
[19]
U. Straccia, N. Lopes, G. Lukacsy, and A. Polleres. A General Framework for Representing and Reasoning with Annotated Semantic Web Data. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-10), AAAI Press, volume 28, 2010.
[20]
F. M. Suchanek, G. Kasneci, and G. Weikum. Yago: A Core of Semantic Knowledge. In Proceedings of the 16th international conference on World Wide Web, pages 697--706. ACM, 2007.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Declarative generation of RDF-star graphs from heterogeneous dataSemantic Web10.3233/SW-243602(1-19)Online publication date: 20-Mar-2024
  • (2024)Regulus infers signed regulatory relations from few samples’ information using discretization and likelihood constraintsPLOS Computational Biology10.1371/journal.pcbi.101181620:1(e1011816)Online publication date: 22-Jan-2024
  • (2024)MetaMap: Facilitating Mapping Reuse and Lifecycle Documentation2024 IEEE 18th International Conference on Semantic Computing (ICSC)10.1109/ICSC59802.2024.00058(323-328)Online publication date: 5-Feb-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Don't like RDF reification?: making statements about statements using singleton property

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      WWW '14: Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on World wide web
      April 2014
      926 pages
      ISBN:9781450327442
      DOI:10.1145/2566486

      Sponsors

      • IW3C2: International World Wide Web Conference Committee

      In-Cooperation

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 07 April 2014

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. RDF
      2. RDF singleton property
      3. SPARQL
      4. meta triples
      5. reification
      6. semantic web

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article

      Funding Sources

      Conference

      WWW '14
      Sponsor:
      • IW3C2

      Acceptance Rates

      WWW '14 Paper Acceptance Rate 84 of 645 submissions, 13%;
      Overall Acceptance Rate 1,899 of 8,196 submissions, 23%

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)42
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3
      Reflects downloads up to 13 Jan 2025

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2024)Declarative generation of RDF-star graphs from heterogeneous dataSemantic Web10.3233/SW-243602(1-19)Online publication date: 20-Mar-2024
      • (2024)Regulus infers signed regulatory relations from few samples’ information using discretization and likelihood constraintsPLOS Computational Biology10.1371/journal.pcbi.101181620:1(e1011816)Online publication date: 22-Jan-2024
      • (2024)MetaMap: Facilitating Mapping Reuse and Lifecycle Documentation2024 IEEE 18th International Conference on Semantic Computing (ICSC)10.1109/ICSC59802.2024.00058(323-328)Online publication date: 5-Feb-2024
      • (2024)A Semantic Augmented Approach to FEMA P-58 based Dynamic Regional Seismic Loss Estimation ApplicationJournal of Building Engineering10.1016/j.jobe.2024.111224(111224)Online publication date: Nov-2024
      • (2024)A survey for managing temporal data in RDFInformation Systems10.1016/j.is.2024.102368122:COnline publication date: 2-Jul-2024
      • (2024)Creating and validating a scholarly knowledge graph using natural language processing and microtask crowdsourcingInternational Journal on Digital Libraries10.1007/s00799-023-00360-725:2(273-285)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2024
      • (2024)Statement Graphs: Unifying the Graph Data Model LandscapeDatabase Systems for Advanced Applications10.1007/978-981-97-5575-2_27(364-376)Online publication date: 2-Sep-2024
      • (2024)LLMs for Knowledge-Graphs Enhanced Task-Oriented Dialogue Systems: Challenges and OpportunitiesAdvanced Information Systems Engineering Workshops10.1007/978-3-031-61003-5_15(168-179)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2024
      • (2024)Knowledge Graph Multilevel Abstraction: A Property Graph Reification Based ApproachResearch Challenges in Information Science10.1007/978-3-031-59468-7_2(12-19)Online publication date: 4-May-2024
      • (2023)LPG-Based Knowledge Graphs: A Survey, a Proposal and Current TrendsInformation10.3390/info1403015414:3(154)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2023
      • Show More Cited By

      View Options

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media