Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article

Using Metrics of Curation to Evaluate Information-Based Ideation

Published: 30 June 2014 Publication History

Abstract

Evaluating creativity support environments is challenging. Some approaches address people’s experiences of creativity. The present method measures creativity, across conditions, in the products that people make.
This research introduces information-based ideation (IBI), a paradigm for investigating open-ended tasks and activities in which users develop new ideas. IBI tasks span imagining, planning, and reflecting on a weekend, vacation, outfit, makeover, paper, internship, thesis, design, campaign, crisis response, career, or invention. What products do people create through engagement in IBI? Curation of digital media incorporates conceptualization, finding and choosing information objects, annotation, and synthesis. Through engagement in IBI tasks, people create curation products. This article formulates a quantitative methodology for evaluating IBI support tools, building on prior creative cognition research in engineering design to derive a battery of ideation metrics of curation. Elemental ideation metrics evaluate creativity within curated found objects. Holistic ideation metrics evaluate how a curation puts elements together.
IBI support environments are characterized by their underlying medium of curation. Curation media include lists, such as listicles, and grids, such as the boards of Pinterest.
An in-depth case study investigates information composition, an art-based medium representing a curation as a freeform visual semantic connected whole. We raise two creative cognition challenges for IBI. One challenge is overcoming fixation—for instance, when a person gets stuck in a counterproductive mental set. The other challenge is to bridge information visualization’s synthesis gap, by providing support for connecting findings. To address the challenges, we develop mixed-initiative information composition (MI2C), integrating human curation of information composition with automated agents of information retrieval and visualization.
We hypothesize that MI2C generates provocative stimuli that help users overcome fixation to become more creative on IBI tasks. We hypothesize that MI2C’s integration of curation and visualization bridges the synthesis gap to help users become more creative. To investigate these hypotheses, we apply ideation metrics of curation to interpret results from experiments with 44 and 49 participants.

References

[1]
Teresa M. Amabile. 1996. Creativity and innovation in organizations. Harvard Business School Background Note 396--239.
[2]
Robert Amar and John Stasko. 2004. BEST PAPER: A knowledge task-based framework for design and evaluation of information visualizations. In Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, 143--150.
[3]
Doug Babb. 2012. Shrinking World of World News. Managing Issues: CFM Public Affairs Blog. Available at http://www.cfm-online.com/public-affairs-blog/2012/6/25/shrinking-world-of-world-news.html.
[4]
Alan Baddeley. 1986. Working Memory. Clarendon Press.
[5]
Marcia J. Bates. 1989. The design of browsing and berrypicking techniques for the online search interface. Online Information Review 13, 5, 407--424.
[6]
Ronald A. Beghetto and James C. Kaufman. 2007. Toward a broader conception of creativity: A case for “mini-c” creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts 1, 2, 73--79.
[7]
Nicholas J. Belkin, Robert N. Oddy, and Helen M. Brooks. 1982. ASK for information retrieval. Part I: Background and theory. Journal of Documentation 38, 2, 61--71.
[8]
Steve Benford, Andy Crabtree, Martin Flintham, Chris Greenhalgh, Boriana Koleva, Matt Adams, Nick Tandavanitj, Ju Row Farr, Gabriella Giannachi, and Irma Lindt. 2011. Creating the spectacle: Designing interactional trajectories through spectator interfaces. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interacttion 18, 3, Article 11.
[9]
Enrico Bertini, Adam Perer, Catherine Plaisant, and Guiseppe Santucci. 2008. Beyond time and errors: Novel evaluation methods for information visualization. In Proceedings of CHI’08: Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI EA’08). 3913--3916.
[10]
Catherine Blake and Wanda Pratt. 2006. Collaborative information synthesis II: Recommendations for information systems to support synthesis activities. JASIST 57, 14, 1888--1895.
[11]
Margaret Boden. 2003. The Creative Mind: Myths and Mechanisms. Routledge.
[12]
Edward M. Bowden, Mark Jung-Beeman, Jessica Fleck, and John Kounios. 2005. New approaches to demystifying insight. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 9, 7, 322--328.
[13]
Bill Buxton. 2007. Sketching User Experiences: Getting the Design Right and the Right Design. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA.
[14]
John Cage. 1961. Silence: Lectures and Writings. Wesleyan University Press.
[15]
Stuart K. Card, Jock D. Mackinlay, and Ben Shneiderman. 1999. Readings in Information Visualization: Using Vision to Think. Morgan Kaufmann. Available at http://books.google.com/books?id= wdh2gqWfQmgC.
[16]
Stuart K. Card, Thomas P. Moran, and Allen Newell. 1980. Computer text-editing: An information-processing analysis of a routine cognitive skill. Cognitive Psychology 12, 1 (January 1980), 32--74.
[17]
Erin A. Carroll, Celine Latulipe, Richard Fung, and Michael Terry. 2009. Creativity factor evaluation: Towards a standardized survey metric for creativity support. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM Conference on Creativity and Cognition (C&C’’09). ACM, New York, NY, 127--136.
[18]
Remco Chang, Caroline Ziemkiewicz, Tera Marie Green, and William Ribarsky. 2009. Defining insight for visual analytics. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 29, 2 (March 2009), 14--17.
[19]
Carina Chocano. 2012. Pinterest, tumblr and the trouble with ‘curation.’ New York Times Magazine.
[20]
Bo T. Christensen and Christian D Schunn. 2007. The relationship between analogical distance to analogical function and pre-inventive structure: The case of engineering design. Memory Cognition 35, 29--38.
[21]
Juliet Corbin and Anselm Strauss. 2008. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Sage.
[22]
Council on Competitiveness. 2005. Innovate America: National Innovation Initiative Summit and Report.
[23]
Steven Dow, Anand Kulkarni, Scott Klemmer, and Björn Hartmann. 2012. Shepherding the crowd yields better work. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW’12). ACM, New York, NY, 1013--1022.
[24]
Steven P. Dow, Alana Glassco, Jonathan Kass, Melissa Schwarz, Daniel L. Schwartz, and Scott R. Klemmer. 2010. Parallel prototyping leads to better design results, more divergence, and increased self-efficacy. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interactions 17, 4, Article 18.
[25]
Susan Dumais, Edward Cutrell, JJ Cadiz, Gavin Jancke, Raman Sarin, and Daniel C. Robbins. 2003. Stuff I’ve seen: A system for personal information retrieval and re-use. In Proceedings of the 26th Annual International ACM SIGR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. ACM, New York, NY, 72--79.
[26]
Clive Dym, Alice Agogino, Ozgur, Daniel Frey, and Larry Leifer. 2005. Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning. Journal of Engineering Communication 94, 103--120.
[27]
Ronald A. Finke, Thomas B. Ward, and Steven M. Smith. 1992. Creative Cognition: Theory, Research, and Applications. MIT Press. Available at http://books.google.com/books?id=FVOwHAAACAAJ.
[28]
William W. Gaver, Jacob Beaver, and Steve Benford. 2003. Ambiguity as a resource for design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’03). ACM, New York, NY, 233--240.
[29]
Arthur M. Glenberg and William E. Langston. 1992. Comprehension of illustrated text: Pictures help to build mental models. Journal of Memory and Language 31, 2, 129--151. 10.1016/0749-596X(92)90008-L
[30]
Joy P. Guilford. 1950. Creativity. American Psychologist 5, 444--454.
[31]
Joy P. Guilford. 1956. The structure of intellect. Psychological Bulletin 53, 267--293.
[32]
Joy P. Guilford. 1968. Intelligence, Creativity, and Their Educational Implications. Knapp.
[33]
Joshua Hailpern, Erik Hinterbichler, Caryn Leppert, Damon Cook, and Brian P. Bailey. 2007. TEAM STORM: Demonstrating an interaction model for working with multiple ideas during creative group work. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Creativity and Cognition. 193--202.
[34]
James A. Hampton. 1997. Emergency attributes in combine concepts. In Creative Thought: An Investigation of Conceptual Structures and Processes. American Psychological Association, 83--110.
[35]
Harvard College Writing Program. 2011. Writing Resources. The Writing Center. Available at http://isites.harvard.edu/icb/icb.do?keyword=k33202&pageid=icb.page143936.
[36]
William L. Hays. 1988. Statistics (4th ed.). Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
[37]
Marti A. Hearst. 2008. UIs for faceted navigation: Recent advances and remaining open problems. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Computer Interaction and Information Retrieval (HCIR’08).
[38]
Yosef Hochberg and Ajit C. Tamhane. 1987. Multiple Comparison Procedures. Wiley.
[39]
Eva Hornecker, Paul Marshall, Nick Sheep Dalton, and Yvonne Rogers. 2008. Collaboration and interference: Awareness with mice or touch input. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW’08). ACM, New York, NY, 167--176.
[40]
Eric Horvitz. 1999. Principles of mixed-initiative user interfaces. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: The CHI Is the Limit (CHI’99). ACM, New York, NY, 159--166.
[41]
Ivan Illich. 2001. Tools for Conviviality. Marion Boyars.
[42]
Interface Ecology Lab. 2013. IdeaMâché. Retrieved May 22, 2014, from http://ideamache.ecologylab.net.
[43]
David G. Jansson and Steven M. Smith. 1991. Design fixation. Design Studies 12, 1, 3--11. 10.1016/0142-694X(91)90003-F
[44]
Benny Johnson. 2013. 24 Delightful Inauguration Firsts. BuzzFeed. Retrieved May 22, 2013, from http://www.buzzfeed.com/bennyjohnson/23-delightful-inauguration-firsts.
[45]
William Jones, Susan Dumais, and Harry Bruce. 2002. Once found what then? A study of “keeping” behaviors in the personal use of Web information. In Proceedings of the 65th ASIST Annual Meeting (ASIST’02). 391--402.
[46]
Wassily Kandinsky. 1994. Kandinsky, Complete Writings on Art. Da Capo Press.
[47]
James C. Kaufman and Robert J. Sternberg (Eds.). 2010. The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA.
[48]
Andruid Kerne and Eunyee Koh. 2007. Representing collections as compositions to support distributed creative cognition and situated creative learning. New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia 13, 2 (December 2007), 135--162.
[49]
Andruid Kerne, Eunyee Koh, Blake Dworaczyk, J. Michael Mistrot, Hyun Choi, Steven M. Smith, Ross Graeber, Daniel Caruso, Andrew Webb, Rodney Hill, and Joel Albea. 2006. combinFormation: A mixed-initiative system for representing collections as compositions of image and text surrogates. In Proceedings of the 6th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL’06). ACM, New York, NY, 11--20.
[50]
Andruid Kerne, Eunyee Koh, Steven Smith, Hyun Choi, Ross Graeber, and Andrew Webb. 2007. Promoting emergence in information discovery by representing collections with composition. In Proceedings of the 6th ACM SIGCHI Conference on Creativity and Cognition (C&C’’07). ACM, New York, NY, 117--126.
[51]
Andruid Kerne, Eunyee Koh, Steven M. Smith, Andrew Webb, and Blake Dworaczyk. 2008. combinFormation: Mixed-initiative composition of image and text surrogates promotes information discovery. ACM Transactions on Information Systems 27, 1 (December 2008), Article 5.
[52]
Andruid Kerne, Yin Qu, Andrew M. Webb, Sashikanth Damaraju, Nic Lupfer, and Abhinav Mathur. 2010. Meta-metadata: A metadata semantics language for collection representation applications. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Iinternational Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM’10). ACM, New York, NY, 1129--1138.
[53]
Andruid Kerne, Steven M. Smith, Eunyee Koh, Hyun Choi, and Ross Graeber. 2008. An experimental method for measuring the emergence of new ideas in information discovery. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 24, 460--477.
[54]
Mi Jeong Kim and Mary Lou Maher. 2005. Comparison of designers using a tangible user interface and a graphical user interface and the impact on spatial cognition. In Proceedings of Human Behaviour in Design ’05, J. S. G. U. Lindemann and U. Lindemann (Eds.). University of Sydney.
[55]
Eunyee Koh, Andruid Kerne, Andrew Webb, Sashikanth Damaraju, and David Sturdivant. 2007. Generating views of the buzz: Browsing popular media and authoring using mixed-initiative composition. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Multimedia (MULTIMEDIA’07). ACM, New York, NY, 228--237.
[56]
Nicholas W. Kohn and Steven M. Smith. 2009. Partly versus completely out of your mind: Effects of incubation and distraction on resolving fixation. Journal of Creative Behavior 43, 2, 102--118.
[57]
Nicholas W. Kohn and Steven M. Smith. 2011. Collaborative fixation: Effects of others’ ideas on brainstorming. Applied Cognitive Psychology 25, 3, 359--371.
[58]
Rosalind Krauss. 1998. The Optical Unconscious. MIT Press.
[59]
Ranjitha Kumar, Jerry O. Talton, Salman Ahmad, and Scott R. Klemmer. 2011. Bricolage: Example-based retargeting for Web design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’11). ACM, New York, NY, 2197--2206.
[60]
Rhema Linder, Clair Snodgrass, and Andruid Kerne. 2014. Everyday ideation: All of my ideas are on Pinterest. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’14). ACM, New York, NY, 2411--2420.
[61]
Julie S. Linsey, Matthew G. Green, J. T. Murphy, Kristin L. Wood, and Art B. Markman. 2005. Collaborating to success: An experimental study of group idea generation techniques. In Proceedings of the ASME Design Theory and Methodology Conference. 24--28.
[62]
Lucy Lippard. 1972. Dadas on Art. Prentice Hall.
[63]
Kate Maccariello. 2013. The World Is My Oyster. Pinterest. Retrieved May 22, 2014, from http://www.pinterest.com/katemaccariello/havelovewilltravel/.
[64]
Norman R. F. Maier. 1931. Reasoning in humans. II. The solution of a problem and its appearance in consciousness. Journal of Comparative Psychology 12, 2, 181--194. 10.1037/h0071361
[65]
Gary Marchionini. 2006. Exploratory search: From finding to understanding. Communications of the ACM 49, 4 (April 2006), 41--46.
[66]
Joe Marks, Brad Andalman, Paul A. Beardsley, William Freeman, Sarah Gibson, Jessica, Thomas Kang, Brian Mirtich, Hanspeter Pfister, Wheeler Ruml, Kathy Ryall, Joshua, and Stuart Shieber. 1997. Design Galleries: A general approach to setting parameters for computer graphics and animation. In Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques (SIGGRAPH’97). ACM Press/Addison-Wesley, New York, NY, 389--400.
[67]
Catherine C. Marshall and Sara Bly. 2005. Saving and using encountered information: Implications for electronic periodicals. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’05). ACM, New York, NY, 111--120.
[68]
Catherine C. Marshall and Russell A. Rogers. 1992. Two years before the mist: Experiences with Aquanet. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Hypertext (ECHT’92). ACM, New York, NY, 53--62.
[69]
Catherine C. Marshall and Frank M. Shipman III. 1993. Searching for the missing link: Discovering implicit structure in spatial hypertext. In Proceedings of the 5th ACM Conference on Hypertext (HYPERTEXT ’93). ACM, New York, NY, 217--230.
[70]
Sarnoff A. Mednick. 1962. The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 220--232.
[71]
Pranav Mistry. 2012. SixthSense—a wearable gestural interface. Video. Retrieved May 22, 2014, from http://www.pranavmistry.com/projects/sixthsense/.
[72]
National Academy of Engineering. 2005. Engineering Research and America’s Future: Meeting the Challenges of a Global Economy. National Academies Press.
[73]
National Academy of Engineering. 2010. Rising Above the Gathering Storm, Revisited: Rapidly Approaching Category 5. National Academies Press.
[74]
Brent A. Nelson, Jamal O. Wilson, David Rosen, and Jeannette Yen. 2009. Refined metrics for measuring ideation effectiveness. Design Studies 30, 6, 737--743.
[75]
Chris North and Ben Shneiderman. 2000. Snap-together visualization: Can users construct and operate coordinated visualizations? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 53, 5, 715--739.
[76]
Jum C. Nunnally and Ira H. Bernstein. 1994. Psychometric Theory. Issue 972. McGraw-Hill Series in Psychology. Available at http://books.google.com/books?id=r0fuAAAAMAAJ.
[77]
OpenDNS. 2013. OpenDNS Community—Domain Categories. Available at http://community.opendns.com/domaintagging/categories.
[78]
Alex F. Osborn. 1963. Applied Imagination: Principles and Procedures of Creative Problem-Solving. Scribner. Available at http://books.google.com/books?id=2GcaAAAAIAAJ.
[79]
Oxford University Press. 2013. Oxford English Dictionary. Available at http://www.oed.com.
[80]
Emmanuel Parzen. 1960. Modern Probability Theory and Its Applications. Wiley.
[81]
Emanuel Parzen and Subhadeep Mukhopadhyay. 2012. Modeling, dependence, classification, united statistical science, many cultures. arXiv preprint arXiv:1204.4699.
[82]
Sharoda A. Paul and Meredith Ringel Morris. 2009. CoSense: Enhancing sensemaking for collaborative Web search. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’09). ACM, New York, NY, 1771--1780.
[83]
Adam Perer and Ben Shneiderman. 2008. Integrating statistics and visualization: Case studies of gaining clarity during exploratory data analysis. In Proceedings of the 26th Annual SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’08). ACM, New York, NY, 265--274.
[84]
Peter Pirolli and Stuart Card. 1999. Information foraging. Psychological Review 106, 4, 643--675.
[85]
Peter Pirolli, Patricia Schank, Marti Hearst, and Christine Diehl. 1996. Scatter/gather browsing communicates the topic structure of a very large text collection. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’96). ACM, New York, NY, 213--220.
[86]
Douglas Quenqua. 2013. The Boy Wonder of BuzzFeed. New York Times. Retrieved May 22, 2014, from http://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/17/fashion/ben-smith-the-boy-wonder-of- buzzfeed.html.
[87]
Alan L. Rector, Sean Bechhofer, Carole A. Goble, Ian Horrocks, W. Anthony Nowlan, and W. Danny Solomon. 1997. The GRAIL concept modelling language for medical terminology. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine 9, 2, 139--171. 10.1016/S0933-3657(96)00369-7
[88]
Daniel Ritchie, Ankita Arvind Kejriwal, and Scott R. Klemmer. 2011. d.tour: Style-based exploration of design example galleries. In Proceedings of the 24th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST’11). ACM, New York, NY, 165--174.
[89]
Steven Rosenbaum. 2011. Curation Nation: How to Win in a World Where Consumers Are Creators. McGraw-Hill.
[90]
Mark A. Runco and Robert S. Albert. 1985. The reliability and validity of ideational originality in the divergent thinking of academically gifted and nongifted children. Educational and Psychological Measurement 45, 3, 483--501.
[91]
Mark A. Runco and Shawn M. Okuda. 1988. Problem discovery, divergent thinking, and the creative process. Journal of Youth and Adolescence 17, 3, 211--220. 10.1007/BF01538162
[92]
Daniel M. Russell, Mark J. Stefik, Peter Pirolli, and Stuart K. Card. 1993. The cost structure of sensemaking. In Proceedings of the INTERACT’93 and CHI’93 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’93). ACM, New York, NY, 269--276.
[93]
Gerard Salton and Christopher Buckley. 1988. Term-weighting approaches in automatic text retrieval. Information Processing and Management 24, 5, 513--523. 10.1016/0306-4573(88)90021-0
[94]
Colleen M. Seifert, David E. Meyer, Natalie Davidson, Andrea L. Patalano, and Ilan Yaniv. 1995. Demystification of cognitive insight: Opportunistic assimilation and the prepared-mind perspective. In The Nature of Insight. MIT Press.
[95]
Jami J. Shah. 1998. Experimental investigation of collaborative techniques for progressive idea generation. In Proceedings of ASME Design Theory. 50.
[96]
Jami J. Shah, Steve M. Smith, and Noe Vargas-Hernandez. 2002. Metrics for measuring ideation effectiveness. Design Studies 24, 2, 111--134. 10.1016/S0142-694X(02)00034-0
[97]
Jami J. Shah, Steve M. Smith, Noe Vargas-Hernandez, David R. Gerkins, and Muqi Wulan. 2003. Empirical studies of design ideation: Alignment of design experiments with lab experiments. In Proceedings of the ASME Conference on Design Theory and Methodology. 1--10.
[98]
Jami J. Shah, Noe Vargas-Hernandez, Joshua D. Summers, and Santosh Kulkarni. 2001. Collaborative sketching (C-Sketch): An idea generation technique for engineering design. Journal of Creative Behavior 35, 3, 168--198.
[99]
Ben Shneiderman. 1996. The eyes have it: A task by data type taxonomy for information visualizations. In Proceedings of the 1996 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages (VL’96). IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, 336--. Available at http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=832277.834354.
[100]
Ben Shneiderman, Gerhard Fischer, Mary Czerwinski, Brad Myers, and Mitch Resnick. 2005. Creativity Support Tools: A Workshop Sponsored by the National Science Foundation.
[101]
Herbert A. Simon. 1960. The New Science of Management Decision. Harper & Brothers, 50--xii.
[102]
Dean Keith Simonton. 1999. Creativity as blind variation and selective retention: Is the creative process darwinian? Psychological Inquiry 10, 4, 309--328. Available at http://www.jstor.org/stable/1449455.
[103]
Tobias Skog, Sara Ljungblad, and Lars Erik Holmquist. 2003. Between aesthetics and utility: Designing ambient information visualizations. In Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization. 233--240.
[104]
Smith M. Smith. 1996. Getting into and out of mental ruts: A theory of fixation, incubation, and insight. In The Nature of Insight, R. J. Sternberg and J. E. Davidson (Eds.). MIT Press, 229--251.
[105]
Steven M. Smith and Edward Vela. 1991. Incubated reminiscence effects. Memory and Cognition 19, 2, 168--176.
[106]
Steven M. Smith, Thomas B. Ward, and Ronald A. Finke (Eds.). 1995. The Creative Cognition Approach. MIT Press.
[107]
Steven M. Smith, Thomas B. Ward, and Ronald A. Finke. 1995. The Creative Cognition Approach. MIT Press. Available at http://books.google.com/books?id=iEMWI4Z1rF8C.
[108]
Steven M. Smith, Thomas B. Ward, and Jay Schumacher. 1993. Constraining effects of examples in a creative generation task. Memory and Cognition 21, 6, 837--845.
[109]
Steven M. Smith and Steven E. Blankenship. 1989. Incubation effects. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 27, 4, 311--314.
[110]
Steven M. Smith and Steven E. Blankenship. 1991. Incubation and the persistence of fixation in problem solving. American Journal of Psychology 104, 1, 61--87. Available at http://www.jstor.org/stable/1422851.
[111]
Steven M. Smith and Deborah R. Tindell. 1997. Memory blocks in word fragment completion caused by involuntary retrieval of orthographically related primes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 23, 2, 355--370.
[112]
Cees G. M. Snoek and Marcel Worring. 2009. Concept-based video retrieval. Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval 4, 2, 215--322.
[113]
Rion Snow, Brendan O’Connor, Daniel Jurafsky, and Andrew Y. Ng. 2008. Cheap and fast—but is it good?: Evaluating non-expert annotations for natural language tasks. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP’08). Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA, 254--263. Available at http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1613715.1613751.
[114]
Shuang Song and Alice M. Agogino. 2004. Insights on designers’ sketching activities in new product design teams. In Proceedings of the ASME Design Theory and Methods Conference. 351--360.
[115]
Rebecca R. Springmeyer, Meera M. Blattner, and Nelson L. Max. 1992. A characterization of the scientific data analysis process. In Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE Conference on Visualization. 235--242. Available at http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=949685.949728.
[116]
STEM to STEAM. 2013. What Is STEAM. Retrieved May 22, 2014, from http://stemtosteam.org/.
[117]
Robert J. Sternberg. 1999. Handbook of Creativity. Cambridge University Press. Available at http://books.google.com/books?id=d1KTEQpQ6vsC.
[118]
Jaime Teevan, Edward Cutrell, Danyel Fisher, Steven M. Drucker, Gonzalo Ramos, Paul André, and Chang Hu. 2009. Visual snippets: Summarizing Web pages for search and revisitation. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’09). ACM, New York, NY, 2023--2032.
[119]
Elizabeth Thiry, Sian Lindley, Richard Banks, and Tim Regan. 2013. Authoring personal histories: Exploring the timeline as a framework for meaning making. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’13). ACM, New York, NY, 1619--1628.
[120]
James J. Thomas and Kristin A. Cook. 2005. Illuminating the Path: The Research and Development Agenda for Visual Analytics. IEEE Computer Society Press. Available at http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=DybZPAAACAAJ.
[121]
James J. Thomas and Kristin A. Cook. 2006. A visual analytics agenda. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 26, 1 (January 2006), 10--13.
[122]
Alice Thudt, Uta Hinrichs, and Sheelagh Carpendale. 2012. The Bohemian Bookshelf: Supporting serendipitous book discoveries through information visualization. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1461--1470.
[123]
Priyamvada Tripathi and Winslow Burleson. 2012. Predicting creativity in the wild: Experience sample and sociometric modeling of teams. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW’12). ACM, New York, NY, 1203--1212.
[124]
Edward R. Tufte. 1990. Envisioning Information. Graphics Press, Cheshire, CT.
[125]
Garrick Utley. 1997. The shrinking of foreign news: From broadcast to narrowcast. Foreign Affairs 76, 2, 2--10. Available at http://www.jstor.org/stable/20047932.
[126]
Velcro. 2013. Velcro Industries History and George de Mestral. Retrieved May 22, 2014, from http://www.velcro.com/About-Us/History.aspx.
[127]
Vitruvius. 1914. The Ten Books on Architecture. Harvard University Press. Available at http://www.gutenberg.org/files/20239/20239-h/29239-h.htm.
[128]
Edward Vul and Harold Pashler. 2007. Incubation benefits only after people have been misdirected. Memory and Cognition 35, 4, 701--710. 10.3758/BF03193308.
[129]
Andrew Webb and Andruid Kerne. 2008. The in-context slider: A fluid interface component for visualization and adjustment of values while authoring. In Proceedings of the Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces (AVI ’08). ACM, New York, NY, 91--99.
[130]
Andrew M. Webb and Andruid Kerne. 2011. Integrating implicit structure visualization with authoring promotes ideation. In Proceedings of the 11th Annual International ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL’11). ACM, New York, NY, 203--212.
[131]
Andrew M. Webb, Rhema Linder, Andruid Kerne, Nic Lupfer, Yin Qu, Bryant Poffenberger, and Colton Revia. 2013. Promoting reflection and interpretation in education: Curating rich bookmarks as information composition. In Proceedings of the 9th ACM Conference on Creativity and Cognition. 53--62.
[132]
Mark Weiser and John Seely Brown. 1997. The coming age of calm technology. In Beyond Calculation. Copernicus, New York, NY, 75--85. Available at http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=504928.504934.
[133]
Ryen W. White, Bill Kules, Steven M. Drucker, and M. C. Schraefel. 2006. Supporting exploratory search: Introduction. Communications of the ACM 49, 4, (April 2006), 36--39.
[134]
Merryl J. Wilkenfeld and Thomas B. Ward. 2001. Similarity and emergence in conceptual combination. Journal of Memory and Language 45, 21--38.
[135]
Max L. Wilson, Paul Resnick, David Coyle, and Ed H. Chi. 2013. RepliCHI: The workshop. In Proceedings of the CHI’13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA’13). ACM, New York, NY, 3159--3162.
[136]
Allison Woodruff, Andrew Faulring, Ruth Rosenholtz, Julie Morrsion, and Peter Pirolli. 2001. Using thumbnails to search the Web. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’01). ACM, New York, NY, 198--205.
[137]
William Wright, David Schroh, Pascale Proulx, Alex Skaburskis, and Brian Cort. 2006. The sandbox for analysis: Concepts and methods. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’06). ACM, New York, NY, 801--810.
[138]
Lauren Yapalater. 2013. The 22 Most Fabulous Beyoncé Moments from the Inauguration. BuzzFeed. Retrieved May 22, 2014, from http://www.buzzfeed.com/lyapalater/the-most-fabulous-beyonce- moments-at-the-inaugurat.
[139]
Lauren Yapalater and Katie Notopoulos. 2013. 23 Reasons Sasha and Malia Stole the Inauguration. BuzzFeed. Retrieved May 22, 2014, from http://www.buzzfeed.com/lyapalater/23-reasons-sasha-and-malia-stole-th e-inauguration.
[140]
Ka-Ping Yee, Kirsten Swearingen, Kevin Li, and Marti Hearst. 2003. Faceted metadata for image search and browsing. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’03). ACM, New York, NY, 401--408.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Idea-Centric Search: Four Patterns of Information Seeking During Creative IdeationProceedings of the 16th Conference on Creativity & Cognition10.1145/3635636.3656193(280-291)Online publication date: 23-Jun-2024
  • (2024)Evaluating digital creativity support for childrenInternational Journal of Child-Computer Interaction10.1016/j.ijcci.2023.10060338:COnline publication date: 27-Feb-2024
  • (2023)Manifesting Creativity in Virtual World Building: A Case Study in GatherProceedings of the 15th Conference on Creativity and Cognition10.1145/3591196.3596822(298-304)Online publication date: 19-Jun-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Using Metrics of Curation to Evaluate Information-Based Ideation

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction
    ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction  Volume 21, Issue 3
    June 2014
    174 pages
    ISSN:1073-0516
    EISSN:1557-7325
    DOI:10.1145/2633906
    Issue’s Table of Contents
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 30 June 2014
    Accepted: 01 February 2014
    Revised: 01 February 2014
    Received: 01 August 2012
    Published in TOCHI Volume 21, Issue 3

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Creativity support tools
    2. creative cognition
    3. digital curation
    4. exploratory search
    5. ideation
    6. information foraging
    7. information visualization
    8. interactive information
    9. sensemaking

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed

    Funding Sources

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)126
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)17
    Reflects downloads up to 16 Oct 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Idea-Centric Search: Four Patterns of Information Seeking During Creative IdeationProceedings of the 16th Conference on Creativity & Cognition10.1145/3635636.3656193(280-291)Online publication date: 23-Jun-2024
    • (2024)Evaluating digital creativity support for childrenInternational Journal of Child-Computer Interaction10.1016/j.ijcci.2023.10060338:COnline publication date: 27-Feb-2024
    • (2023)Manifesting Creativity in Virtual World Building: A Case Study in GatherProceedings of the 15th Conference on Creativity and Cognition10.1145/3591196.3596822(298-304)Online publication date: 19-Jun-2023
    • (2023)SearchIdea: An Idea Generation Tool to Support Creativity in Academic SearchProceedings of the 2023 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval10.1145/3576840.3578294(161-171)Online publication date: 19-Mar-2023
    • (2023)Tacit Descriptions: Uncovering Ambiguity in Crowdsourced Descriptions of Motions and MaterialsProceedings of the 2023 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3563657.3596048(2522-2536)Online publication date: 10-Jul-2023
    • (2023)Towards a Reflection in Creative Experience QuestionnaireProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3581077(1-16)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
    • (2023)Alleviating design fixation with Alternative Uses Task: The role of an integrated and design-independent intervention in promoting creative incubationThinking Skills and Creativity10.1016/j.tsc.2023.10140650(101406)Online publication date: Dec-2023
    • (2022)The Creativity of Text-to-Image GenerationProceedings of the 25th International Academic Mindtrek Conference10.1145/3569219.3569352(192-202)Online publication date: 16-Nov-2022
    • (2022)Wigglite: Low-cost Information Collection and TriageProceedings of the 35th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology10.1145/3526113.3545661(1-16)Online publication date: 29-Oct-2022
    • (2022)Metaphoraction: Support Gesture-based Interaction Design with Metaphorical MeaningsACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction10.1145/351189229:5(1-33)Online publication date: 20-Oct-2022
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    Full Access

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media