Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2591796.2591883acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesstocConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Analyze gauss: optimal bounds for privacy-preserving principal component analysis

Published: 31 May 2014 Publication History

Abstract

We consider the problem of privately releasing a low dimensional approximation to a set of data records, represented as a matrix A in which each row corresponds to an individual and each column to an attribute. Our goal is to compute a subspace that captures the covariance of A as much as possible, classically known as principal component analysis (PCA). We assume that each row of A has 2 norm bounded by one, and the privacy guarantee is defined with respect to addition or removal of any single row. We show that the well-known, but misnamed, randomized response algorithm, with properly tuned parameters, provides nearly optimal additive quality gap compared to the best possible singular subspace of A. We further show that when ATA has a large eigenvalue gap -- a reason often cited for PCA -- the quality improves significantly. Optimality (up to logarithmic factors) is proved using techniques inspired by the recent work of Bun, Ullman, and Vadhan on applying Tardos's fingerprinting codes to the construction of hard instances for private mechanisms for 1-way marginal queries. Along the way we define a list culling game which may be of independent interest.
By combining the randomized response mechanism with the well-known following the perturbed leader algorithm of Kalai and Vempala we obtain a private online algorithm with nearly optimal regret. The regret of our algorithm even outperforms all the previously known online non-private algorithms of this type. We achieve this better bound by, satisfyingly, borrowing insights and tools from differential privacy!

Supplementary Material

MP4 File (p11-sidebyside.mp4)

References

[1]
Dimitris Achlioptas and Frank Mcsherry. Fast computation of low-rank matrix approximations. Journal of the ACM (JACM), 54, 2007.
[2]
Peter N. Belhumeur, João P Hespanha, and David Kriegman. Eigenfaces vs. fisherfaces: Recognition using class specific linear projection. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, IEEE Transactions on, 19(7):711--720, 1997.
[3]
J. L. Bentley and J. B. Saxe. Decomposable searching problems i: Static-to-dynamic trnasformation. J. Algorithms, 1, 1980.
[4]
Avrim Blum, Cynthia Dwork, Frank McSherry, and Kobbi Nissim. Practical privacy: the sulq framework. In PODS, 2005.
[5]
Dan Boneh and James Shaw. Collusion-Secure Fingerprinting for Digital Data. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 44:1897--1905, 1998.
[6]
Mark Bun, Jonathan Ullman, and Salil Vadhan. Fingerprinting codes and the price of approximate differential privacy. In These Proceedings.
[7]
Emmanuel J Candès and Benjamin Recht. Exact matrix completion via convex optimization. Foundations of Computational mathematics, 2009.
[8]
Emmanuel J Candès and Terence Tao. The power of convex relaxation: Near-optimal matrix completion. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 2010.
[9]
Kamalika Chaudhuri, Anand D. Sarwate, and Kaushik Sinha. Near-optimal differentially private principal components. In NIPS, 2012.
[10]
Chandler Davis and William Morton Kahan. The rotation of eigenvectors by a perturbation. III. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 1970.
[11]
C. Dwork and A. Roth. Algorithmic foundations of differential privacy, 2014. Monograph in preparation.
[12]
Cynthia Dwork, Krishnaram Kenthapadi, Frank McSherry, Ilya Mironov, and Moni Naor. Our data, ourselves: Privacy via distributed noise generation. In EUROCRYPT, pages 486--503, 2006.
[13]
Cynthia Dwork and Jing Lei. Differential privacy and robust statistics. In Symp. Theory of Computing (STOC), pages 371--380, 2009.
[14]
Cynthia Dwork, Frank McSherry, Kobbi Nissim, and Adam Smith. Calibrating noise to sensitivity in private data analysis. In Theory of Cryptography Conference, pages 265--284. Springer, 2006.
[15]
Cynthia Dwork, Moni Naor, Toniann Pitassi, and Guy N Rothblum. Differential privacy under continual observation. In Proceedings of the 42nd ACM symposium on Theory of computing, pages 715--724. ACM, 2010.
[16]
Cynthia Dwork, Moni Naor, Omer Reingold, Guy Rothblum, and Salil Vadhan. On the complexity of differentially private data release: efficient algorithms and hardness results. In STOC, pages 381--390, 2009.
[17]
Moritz Hardt and Aaron Roth. Beating randomized response on incoherent matrices. In STOC, 2012.
[18]
Moritz Hardt and Aaron Roth. Beyond worst-case analysis in private singular vector computation. In STOC, 2013.
[19]
Elad Hazan, Satyen Kale, and Manfred K Warmuth. Corrigendum to "learning rotations with little regret" september 7, 2010. 2010.
[20]
Adam Kalai and Santosh Vempala. Efficient algorithms for online decision problems. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 2005.
[21]
Michael Kapralov and Kunal Talwar. On differentially private low rank approximation. In SODA, 2013.
[22]
Jyrki Kivinen and Manfred K Warmuth. Exponentiated gradient versus gradient descent for linear predictors. Information and Computation, 132(1):1--63, 1997.
[23]
F. McSherry and I. Mironov. Differentially private recommender systems: building privacy into the net. In Symp. Knowledge Discovery and Datamining (KDD), pages 627--636. ACM New York, NY, USA, 2009.
[24]
Frank McSherry. Spectral methods for data analysis. 2004.
[25]
Mehryar Mohri and Ameet Talwalkar. Can matrix coherence be efficiently and accurately estimated? In International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, 2011.
[26]
Benjamin Recht. A simpler approach to matrix completion. The Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2011.
[27]
Shai Shalev-Shwartz. Online learning and online convex optimization. Foundations and Trends® in Machine Learning, 2011.
[28]
Adam Smith and Abhradeep Thakurta. Personal Communication, 2013.
[29]
Ameet Talwalkar and Afshin Rostamizadeh. Matrix coherence and the Nystrom method. arXiv preprint arXiv:1004.2008, 2010.
[30]
Terence Tao. Topics in random matrix theory, volume 132. AMS Bookstore, 2012.
[31]
Gábor Tardos. Optimal probabilistic fingerprint codes. J. ACM, 55(2), 2008.
[32]
Manfred K Warmuth and Dima Kuzmin. Randomized online PCA algorithms with regret bounds that are logarithmic in the dimension. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2008.
[33]
John Wright, Allen Y Yang, Arvind Ganesh, Shankar S Sastry, and Yi Ma. Robust face recognition via sparse representation. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, IEEE Transactions on, 31(2):210--227, 2009.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)PrE-TextProceedings of the 41st International Conference on Machine Learning10.5555/3692070.3692836(19043-19061)Online publication date: 21-Jul-2024
  • (2024)Private gradient descent for linear regressionProceedings of the 41st International Conference on Machine Learning10.5555/3692070.3692253(4561-4584)Online publication date: 21-Jul-2024
  • (2024)Majority vote for distributed differentially private sign selectionThe Annals of Statistics10.1214/24-AOS241152:4Online publication date: 1-Aug-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
STOC '14: Proceedings of the forty-sixth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing
May 2014
984 pages
ISBN:9781450327107
DOI:10.1145/2591796
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 31 May 2014

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Funding Sources

Conference

STOC '14
Sponsor:
STOC '14: Symposium on Theory of Computing
May 31 - June 3, 2014
New York, New York

Acceptance Rates

STOC '14 Paper Acceptance Rate 91 of 319 submissions, 29%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 1,469 of 4,586 submissions, 32%

Upcoming Conference

STOC '25
57th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC 2025)
June 23 - 27, 2025
Prague , Czech Republic

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)172
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)19
Reflects downloads up to 24 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)PrE-TextProceedings of the 41st International Conference on Machine Learning10.5555/3692070.3692836(19043-19061)Online publication date: 21-Jul-2024
  • (2024)Private gradient descent for linear regressionProceedings of the 41st International Conference on Machine Learning10.5555/3692070.3692253(4561-4584)Online publication date: 21-Jul-2024
  • (2024)Majority vote for distributed differentially private sign selectionThe Annals of Statistics10.1214/24-AOS241152:4Online publication date: 1-Aug-2024
  • (2024)Utility-aware Privacy Perturbation for Training DataACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data10.1145/363941118:4(1-21)Online publication date: 13-Feb-2024
  • (2024)VLIA: Navigating Shadows with Proximity for Highly Accurate Visited Location Inference Attack against Federated Recommendation ModelsProceedings of the 19th ACM Asia Conference on Computer and Communications Security10.1145/3634737.3657019(1261-1271)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
  • (2024)Driver Maneuver Interaction Identification with Anomaly-Aware Federated Learning on Heterogeneous Feature RepresentationsProceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies10.1145/36314217:4(1-28)Online publication date: 12-Jan-2024
  • (2024)Distributed Differential Privacy via Shuffling Versus Aggregation: A Curious StudyIEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security10.1109/TIFS.2024.335147419(2501-2516)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2024
  • (2024)Differentially Private Synthetic Data with Private Density Estimation2024 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT)10.1109/ISIT57864.2024.10619641(599-604)Online publication date: 7-Jul-2024
  • (2024)Securing Personally Identifiable Information: A Survey of SOTA Techniques, and a Way ForwardIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2024.344701712(116740-116770)Online publication date: 2024
  • (2024)Cloud-Assisted Privacy-Preserving Spectral Clustering Algorithm Within a Multi-User SettingIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2024.340426512(75965-75982)Online publication date: 2024
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media