Article

Software evolution and maintenance

Author:

Václav RajlichAuthors Info & Claims

FOSE 2014: Future of Software Engineering Proceedings

Pages 133 - 144

https://doi.org/10.1145/2593882.2593893

Published: 31 May 2014 Publication History

Abstract

Successful software requires constant change that is triggered by evolving requirements, technologies, and stakeholder knowledge. This constant change constitutes software evolution. Software evolution has gained steadily in importance and recently moved into the center of attention of software developers. There is the new prominence of evolutionary software development that includes agile, iterative, open source, inner source, and other processes. As a consequence, the bulk of software development now happens in the stage of software evolution and this changed the face of software engineering. This paper discusses evolutionary software development and also discusses the software change, which is the fundamental software evolution task. It further discusses research methodologies, teaching software evolution in undergraduate curriculum, and difference between software evolution and software maintenance. For all these themes, this travelogue paper presents the current state of the art and the perspective of the future advance.

References

[1]

Bennett, K. H. and Rajlich, V. T. 2000. Software maintenance and evolution: a roadmap. In Proceedings of the Conference on the Future of Software Engineering, pp. 73- 87.

Digital Library

[2]

Rajlich, V. 2012. Software Engineering: The Current Practice. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

Digital Library

[3]

Belady, L. A. and Lehman, M. M. 1976. A model of large program development. IBM Systems Journal, vol. 15, pp. 225-252.

Digital Library

[4]

Godfrey, M. W. and German, D. M. 2008. The past, present, and future of software evolution. In Proceedings of the Frontiers of Software Maintenance, 2008. pp. 129-138.

[5]

Mens, T. and Demeyer, S. 2008. Software evolution. Springer.

Digital Library

[6]

Rajlich, V. and Bennett, K. H. 2000. A Staged Model for the Software Life Cycle. IEEE Computer, vol. 33, pp. 66-71.

Digital Library

[7]

Larman, C. and Basili, V. R. 2003. Iterative and Incremental Development: A Brief History, IEEE Computer, vol. 36, pp. 47 - 56.

Digital Library

[8]

Schwaber, K. and Beedle, M. 2002. Agile Software Development with Scrum. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Digital Library

[9]

Rising, L. and Janoff, N. S. 2000. The Scrum software development process for small teams. IEEE Software, vol. 17, pp. 26-32.

Digital Library

[10]

Beck, K. 2000. Extreme Programming Explained. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.

Digital Library

[11]

Rajlich, V. and Hua, J. 2013. Which Practices are Suitable for an Academic Software Project? In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenace (ICSM), pp. 440 - 443.

Digital Library

[12]

Madden, W. A. and Rone, K. Y. 1984. Design, development, integration: space shuttle primary flight software system, Commun. ACM, vol. 27, pp. 914-925.

Digital Library

[13]

Weber, S. 2004. The success of open source. Cambridge University Press.

Digital Library

[14]

Feller, J. and Fitzgerald, B. 2002. Understanding open source software development: Addison-Wesley London.

Digital Library

[15]

Gurbani, V. K., Garvert, A., and Herbsleb, J. D. 2006. A case study of a corporate open source development model. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE), pp. 472-481.

Digital Library

[16]

Lindman, J., Rossi, M., and Marttiin, P. 2008. Applying open source development practices inside a company. In Open Source Development, Communities and Quality, Springer, pp. 381-387.

[17]

Humphrey, W. S. 1999. Introduction to the team software process Addison-Wesley Professional.

Digital Library

[18]

Cusumano, M. A. and Selby, R. W. 1997. How Microsoft builds software. Communications of the ACM, vol. 40, pp. 53-61.

Digital Library

[19]

Dorman, C. and Rajlich, V. 2012. Software Change in the Solo Iterative Process: An Experience Report. .In Proceedings of the Agile (AGILE), IEEE Computer Society, pp. 22-30.

Digital Library

[20]

2013. Chaos Manifesto 2013. Available at: http://versionone.com/assets/img/files/ChaosManifesto2013. pdf, accessed on

[21]

Shah, S. K. 2006. Motivation, governance, and the viability of hybrid forms in open source software development. Management Science, vol. 52, pp. 1000-1014.

Digital Library

[22]

Friebel, G. and Schnedler, W. 2011. Team governance: Empowerment or hierarchical control. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, vol. 78, pp. 1-13.

[23]

Silva da Silva, T., Martin, A., Maurer, F., and Silveira, M. 2011. User-centered design and Agile methods: a systematic review. In Proceedings of the Agile Conference (AGILE), IEEE Computer Society, pp. 77-86.

Digital Library

[24]

McLeod, L. and MacDonell, S. G. 2011. Factors that affect software systems development project outcomes: A survey of research. ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 43.

Digital Library

[25]

Clarke, P. and O’Connor, R. V. 2012. The situational factors that affect the software development process: Towards a comprehensive reference framework. Information and Software Technology, vol. 54, pp. 433-447.

Digital Library

[26]

2009. Survey Finds Majority of Senior Software Business Leaders See Rise in Development Budgets. Available at: http://www.softserveinc.com/news/survey-senior-softwarebusiness-leaders-rise-development-budgets/, accessed on 3/12/2014

[27]

Hu, E. 2013. This Slide Shows Why HealthCare.gov Wouldn't Work At Launch. Available at: http://www.npr.org/blogs/alltechconsidered/2013/11/19/2461 32770/this-slide-shows-why-healthcare-gov-wouldnt-workat-launch, accessed on 3/12/2014

[28]

Carroll, P. B. 1988.Computer glitch: Patching up software occupies programmers and disables systems. Wall Street Journal, vol. 118, p. 1.

[29]

Beck, K. 2003. Test driven development: By example. Addison-Wesley Professional.

Digital Library

[30]

Feathers, M. 2005. Working Effectively with Legacy Code. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall PTR.

Digital Library

[31]

Rajlich, V. and Gosavi, P. 2004. Incremental Change in Object-Oriented Programming. IEEE Software, vol. 21, pp. 62-69.

Digital Library

[32]

Febbraro, N., Rajlich, V. 2007. The Role of Incremental Change in Agile Software Processes. In Proceedings of the Agile (AGILE), IEEE Computer Society, pp. 92-103.

Digital Library

[33]

Nuseibeh, B. 2014. Requirements Engineering Travelogue. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE), Future of Software Engineering.

[34]

Fowler, M. 1999. Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.

Digital Library

[35]

Mens, T. and Tourwé, T. 2004. A survey of software refactoring," Software Engineering, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 30, pp. 126-139.

Digital Library

[36]

Orso, A. and Rothermel, G. 2014. Software Testing: A Research Travelogue (2000 – 2014). In Proceedings of the IEEE International conference on Software Engineering (ICSE), Future of Software Engineering.

Digital Library

[37]

Duvall, P. M., Matyas, S., and Glover, A. 2007. Continuous integration: improving software quality and reducing risk: Pearson Education.

Digital Library

[38]

Frege, G. 1964. The basic laws of arithmetic University of California Press.

[39]

De Saussure, F. 2006. Writings in general linguistics Oxford University Press.

[40]

Petrenko, M. and Rajlich, V. 2013. Concept location using program dependencies and information retrieval (DepIR). Inform. Softw. Technol., vol. 55, pp. 651-659.

Digital Library

[41]

Rajlich, V. 2009. Intensions are a key to program comprehension.In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Program Comprehension (ICPC), pp. 1-9.

[42]

Wilde, N., Buckellew, M., Page, H., Rajlich, V., and Pounds, L. 2003. A Comparison of Methods for Locating Features in Legacy Software. Journal of Systems and Software, vol. 65, pp. 105-114.

Digital Library

[43]

Dit, B., Revelle, M., Gethers, M., and Poshyvanyk, D. 2013. Feature location in source code: a taxonomy and survey. Journal of Software: Evolution and Process, vol. 25, pp. 53- 95.

[44]

Ratiu, D. and Deissenboeck, F. 2007. From reality to programs and (not quite) back again. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Program Comprehension (ICPC), pp. 91-102.

Digital Library

[45]

Wilson, L. A., Petrenko, M., and Rajlich, V. 2012. Using Concept Maps to Assist Program Comprehension and Concept Location: An Empirical Study. Journal of Information & Knowledge Management, vol. 11.

[46]

Li, B., Sun, Z., Leung, H., and Zhang, S. 2012. A survey of code-based change impact analysis techniques. Softw. Test. Verif. Reliab. Vol. 23(8), pp. 613-646

[47]

Petrenko, M. 2011. JRipples. Available at: http://jripples.sourceforge.net/

[48]

Hassan, A. E. and Holt, R. C. 2006. Replaying development history to assess the effectiveness of change propagation tools. Empirical Software Engineering, vol. 11, pp. 335 - 367.

Digital Library

[49]

Rajlich, V. 2000. Incremental Redocumentation Using the Web. IEEE Software, September/October, pp. 102-106.

Digital Library

[50]

Antoniol, G., Canfora, G., Casazza, G., De Lucia, A., and Merlo, E. 2002. Recovering traceability links between code and documentation. Software Engineering, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 28, pp. 970-983.

Digital Library

[51]

Marcus, A. and Maletic, J. I. 2003. Recovering Documentation-to-Source-Code Traceability Links using Latent Semantic Indexing.In Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE), Portland, Oregon, USA, pp. 125-135.

Digital Library

[52]

Petrenko, M., Rajlich, V., and Vanciu, R. 2008. Partial Domain Comprehension in Software Evolution and Maintenance. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Software Comprehension (ICPC), pp.13 - 22.

Digital Library

[53]

Petrenko, M. 2009. On use of dependency and semantics information in incremental change. PhD thesis. Department of Computer Science, Wayne State University.

Digital Library

[54]

Murphy-Hill, E. and Black, A. P. 2008. Refactoring tools: Fitness for purpose. IEEE Software, vol. 25, pp. 38-44.

Digital Library

[55]

Wohlin, C., Höst, M., and Henningsson, K. 2003. Empirical research methods in software engineering. in Empirical Methods and Studies in Software Engineering, Springer, pp. 7-23.

[56]

Wilde, N., Gust, T., Gomez, J. A., and Strasburg, D. 1992. Locating User Functionality in Old Code. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Software Maintenance (CSM), pp. 200-205.

[57]

Chen, K. and Rajlich, V. 2000. Case Study of Feature Location Using Dependency Graph. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Workshop on Program Comprehension (IWPC), pp. 241-249.

Digital Library

[58]

Runeson, P. and Höst, M. 2009. Guidelines for conducting and reporting case study research in software engineering, Empirical Software Engineering, vol. 14, pp. 131-164.

Digital Library

[59]

Jász, J., Beszédes, Á., Gyimóthy, T., and Rajlich, V. 2008. Static execute after/before as a replacement of traditional software dependencies. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance (ICSM), pp. 137-146.

[60]

Kagdi, H., Collard, M., and Maletic, J. 2007. A survey and taxonomy of approaches for mining software repositories in the context of software evolution. Journal of Software Maintenace and Evolution, vol. 19, pp. 77-131.

Digital Library

[61]

Demeyer, S., Murgia, A., Wyckmans, K., and Lamkanfi, A. 2013. Happy birthday! a trend analysis on past MSR papers. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Mining Software Repositories (MSR), pp. 353-362.

Digital Library

[62]

Petrenko, M. and Rajlich, V. 2009. Variable Granularity for Improving Precision of Impact Analysis. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Program Comprehension (ICPC), pp. 10-19.

[63]

Canfora, G. and Cerulo, L. 2005. Impact Analysis by Mining Software and Change Request Repositories. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Software Metrics, pp. 9-29.

Digital Library

[64]

Antoniol, G., Canfora, G., Casazza, G., and De Lucia, A. 2000. Identifying the Starting Impact Set of a Maintenance Request: a Case Study. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Software Maintenance and Reengineering (CSMR), pp. 227-230.

Digital Library

[65]

Poshyvanyk, D., Gueheneuc, Y.-G., Marcus, A., Antoniol, G., and Rajlich, V. 2007. Feature Location Using Probabilistic Ranking of Methods Based on Execution Scenarios and Information Retrieval. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, vol. 33, pp. 420-432.

Digital Library

[66]

Kitchenham, B. A., et al. 2002. Preliminary guidelines for empirical research in software engineering, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, vol. 28, pp. 721-734.

Digital Library

[67]

Shah, H. B., Gorg, C., and Harrold, M. J. 2010. Understanding exception handling: Viewpoints of novices and experts. Software Engineering, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 36, pp. 150-161.

Digital Library

[68]

Popper, K. R. 2002. The logic of scientific discovery. London and New York: Routledge.

[69]

Brooks Jr, F. P. 1987. No silver bullet - essence and accidents of software engineering, IEEE Computer, vol. 20, pp. 10-19.

Digital Library

[70]

Sneed, H. M. 1989.Software engineering management: Halsted Press.

Digital Library

[71]

Lehner, F. 1991. Software life cycle management based on a phase distinction method. Microprocessing and Microprogramming, vol. 32, pp. 603-608.

[72]

Johnson, P., Jacobson, I., Goedicke, M., and Kajko-Mattsson, M. 2013. 2nd SEMAT workshop on a general theory of software engineering. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE), pp. 1525-1526.

Digital Library

[73]

Stol, K. J. and Fitzgerald, B. 2013. Uncovering Theories in Software Engineering. In Proceedings of the General Theories of Software Engineering (GTSE 2013), pp. 5 - 14.

[74]

Stroustrup, B. 2010. What Should We Teach New Software Developers? Why? Communications of the ACM, vol. 53, pp. 40-42.

Digital Library

[75]

Rajlich, V. 2013. Teaching Developer Skills in the First Software Engineering Course. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE), San Francisco, pp. 1109 - 1116.

Digital Library

[76]

Rajlich, V. 2013. Software Engineering: The Current Practice”, Lab manual. Available at: http://www.cs.wayne.edu/rajlich/ProjectAndLabs/index.html, accessed on 3/12/2014

Digital Library

[77]

Shaw, M. 2000. Software engineering education: a roadmap.In Proceedings of the Conference on The Future of Software Engineering, pp. 371-380.

Digital Library

[78]

2008. "ISO/IEC/IEEE Standard for Systems and Software Engineering - Software Life Cycle Processes". Available at: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/mostRecentIssue.jsp?punumber =4475822, accessed on 1/06.

[79]

Bugde, S., Nagappan, N., Rajamani, S., and Ramalingam, G. 2008. Global software servicing: Observational experiences at microsoft. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Global Software Engineering, (ICGSE). pp. 182-191.

Digital Library

[80]

April, A., Huffman Hayes, J., Abran, A., and Dumke, R. 2005. Software Maintenance Maturity Model (SMmm): the software maintenance process model. Journal of Software Maintenance and Evolution: Research and Practice, vol. 17, pp. 197-223.

Digital Library

[81]

Pino, F. J., Ruiz, F., García, F., and Piattini, M. 2012. A software maintenance methodology for small organizations: Agile_MANTEMA, Journal of Software: Evolution and Process, vol. 24, pp. 851-876.

[82]

Xiong, C. J., Xie, M., and Ng, S. H. 2011. Optimal software maintenance policy considering unavailable time. Journal of Software Maintenance and Evolution: Research and Practice, vol. 23, pp. 21-33.

Digital Library

[83]

Gkantsidis, C., Karagiannis, T., and Vojnovic, M. 2006.Planet scale software updates. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, vol. 36, pp. 423-434.

Digital Library

[84]

Khan, A. S. and Kajko-Mattsson, M. 2010. Taxonomy of handover activities. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Product Focused Software, pp. 131-134.

Digital Library

[85]

Pigoski, T. M. 1996. Practical software maintenance: best practices for managing your software investment. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Digital Library

[86]

Eick, S. G., Graves, T. L., Karr, A. F., Marron, J. S., and Mockus, A. 2001. Does Code Decay? Assessing the Evidence from Change Management Data. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, vol. 27, pp. 1-12.

Digital Library

[87]

Parnas, D. L. 1994. Software aging.In Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE), pp. 279-287.

Digital Library

[88]

Rajlich, V., Wilde, N. B., M., and Page, H. 2001. Software Cultures and Evolution. IEEE Computer, pp. 24-29.

Digital Library

Cited By

Zhao YLi CChen ZDing Z(2025)Dissecting Code Features: An Evolutionary Analysis of Kernel Versus Nonkernel Code in Operating SystemsJournal of Software: Evolution and Process10.1002/smr.275237:1Online publication date: 25-Jan-2025
https://doi.org/10.1002/smr.2752
Vishnu Iyengar (2024)Managing Large-Scale Internal Platform Evolution: AI-Assisted Tools and Techniques for Enterprise Engineering TeamsInternational Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology10.32628/CSEIT24106110110:6(605-615)Online publication date: 18-Nov-2024
https://doi.org/10.32628/CSEIT241061101
Braunisch NHeppner SGarmaev IRistin MMiny TKleinert TVan De Venn HWollschlaeger M(2024)Software Evolution of I4.0 Digital Twins with Semantic Patching2024 IEEE 33rd International Symposium on Industrial Electronics (ISIE)10.1109/ISIE54533.2024.10595745(1-6)Online publication date: 18-Jun-2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/ISIE54533.2024.10595745
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Software evolution and maintenance
1. Social and professional topics
  1. Professional topics
    1. Management of computing and information systems
      1. Project and people management
      2. Software management
        Software maintenance
2. Software and its engineering
  1. Software creation and management
    1. Software development process management
    2. Software post-development issues
  2. Software notations and tools
    1. Software configuration management and version control systems

Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

Recommendations

Software Maintenance versus Software Evolution: An Approach to Software Systems Evolution
ECBS '96: Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium and Workshop on Engineering of Computer Based Systems

Software development is traditionally conceived as a process where the software development team elaborates, implements and maintains executable models of Information Systems (in the broad sense). In this paper we present an evolutionary view of the ...
Which Practices Are Suitable for an Academic Software Project?
ICSM '13: Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance

This paper presents the practices observed in successful academic projects. It classifies them by the software lifecycle stage they belong to, most of the academic projects are in stage of evolution. It also classifies them by their purpose into the ...
Maintenance and evolution: GrimoireLab graal
MSR '22: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Mining Software Repositories

E-type open-source software inevitably grows in size and complexity over time, and without performing anti-regressive tasks this type of software has a limited lifespan. In this project, a case study of the effect of such anti-regressive tasks is ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

FOSE 2014: Future of Software Engineering Proceedings

May 2014

224 pages

ISBN:9781450328654

DOI:10.1145/2593882

General Chair:
James Herbsleb
Carnegie Mellon University, USA
,
Program Chairs:
Matthew B. Dwyer
University of Nebraska at Lincoln, USA
,
James Herbsleb
Carnegie Mellon University, USA

Copyright © 2014 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

SIGSOFT: ACM Special Interest Group on Software Engineering

In-Cooperation

TCSE: IEEE Computer Society's Tech. Council on Software Engin.

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 31 May 2014

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Article

Conference

ICSE '14

Sponsor:

SIGSOFT

ICSE '14: 36th International Conference on Software Engineering

May 31 - June 7, 2014

Hyderabad, India

Upcoming Conference

ICSE 2025

2025 IEEE/ACM 46th International Conference on Software Engineering

April 26 - May 3, 2025

Ottawa , ON , Canada

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

61
Total Citations
View Citations
2,146
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)259
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)9

Reflects downloads up to 05 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Zhao YLi CChen ZDing Z(2025)Dissecting Code Features: An Evolutionary Analysis of Kernel Versus Nonkernel Code in Operating SystemsJournal of Software: Evolution and Process10.1002/smr.275237:1Online publication date: 25-Jan-2025
https://doi.org/10.1002/smr.2752
Vishnu Iyengar (2024)Managing Large-Scale Internal Platform Evolution: AI-Assisted Tools and Techniques for Enterprise Engineering TeamsInternational Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology10.32628/CSEIT24106110110:6(605-615)Online publication date: 18-Nov-2024
https://doi.org/10.32628/CSEIT241061101
Braunisch NHeppner SGarmaev IRistin MMiny TKleinert TVan De Venn HWollschlaeger M(2024)Software Evolution of I4.0 Digital Twins with Semantic Patching2024 IEEE 33rd International Symposium on Industrial Electronics (ISIE)10.1109/ISIE54533.2024.10595745(1-6)Online publication date: 18-Jun-2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/ISIE54533.2024.10595745
Rosenkranz SStaegemann DVolk MTurowski K(2024)Explaining the Business-Technological Age of Legacy Information SystemsIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2024.341437712(84579-84611)Online publication date: 2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3414377
Cury OAvelino GNeto PValente MBritto R(2024)Source code expert identification: Models and applicationInformation and Software Technology10.1016/j.infsof.2024.107445170(107445)Online publication date: Jun-2024
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2024.107445
Almogahed AMahdin HOmar MZakaria NAlawadhi ABarraood S(2023)Empirical Investigation of the Diverse Refactoring Effects on Software Quality: The Role of Refactoring Tools and Software Size2023 3rd International Conference on Emerging Smart Technologies and Applications (eSmarTA)10.1109/eSmarTA59349.2023.10293407(1-6)Online publication date: 10-Oct-2023
https://doi.org/10.1109/eSmarTA59349.2023.10293407
Pfeiffer RLungu MTell P(2023)Live Is Life: Teaching Software Engineering on Live SystemsIEEE Software10.1109/MS.2023.331137640:6(117-125)Online publication date: 1-Nov-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1109/MS.2023.3311376
Almogahed AMahdin HOmar MZakaria NMuhammad GAli Z(2023)Optimized Refactoring Mechanisms to Improve Quality Characteristics in Object-Oriented SystemsIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2023.331318611(99143-99158)Online publication date: 2023
https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3313186
Almogahed AOmar MZakaria NMuhammad GAlQahtani S(2023)Revisiting Scenarios of Using Refactoring Techniques to Improve Software Systems QualityIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2022.321800711(28800-28819)Online publication date: 2023
https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3218007
Chondamrongkul NSun J(2023)Software Evolutionary Architecture: Automated Planning for Functional ChangesScience of Computer Programming10.1016/j.scico.2023.102978(102978)Online publication date: Jun-2023
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scico.2023.102978
Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Figures

Tables

Media

View Table of Conten