Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2667317.2667338acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesautomotiveuiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
tutorial

User Authentication for Rotary Knob Controlled In-car Applications

Published: 17 September 2014 Publication History

Abstract

In recent years, the automobile has become more connected and has started offering drivers a variety of services and applications for in-car use, such as Facebook, Twitter, and mobile payment. Many such services require user authentication. We have investigated the requirements and potential of authenticating users with a rotary control knob, which constitutes the central control entity (CCE) in many modern cars. In a user-centered design approach we adapted three established authentication schemes for in-car usage with consideration to driver distraction. We performed extensive user experiments in a driving simulator focusing on usability, security and driver distraction. The results of our experiments provide relevant insights for integrating user authentication methods into the automotive context solely based on present hardware components.

References

[1]
Azenkot, S., Rector, K., Ladner, R., and Wobbrock, J. Passchords: secure multi-touch authentication for blind people. In Proc. SIGACCESS '12, ACM (2012).
[2]
Bianchi, A., Oakley, I., Lee, J. K., and Kwon, D. S. The haptic wheel: design and evaluation of a tactile password system. In CHI'10 Extended Abstracts, ACM (2010).
[3]
Bianchi, A., Oakley, I., Lee, J. K., and Kwon, D. S. The haptic wheel: Design and evaluation of a tactile password system. In CHI '10 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI EA '10, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2010), 3625--3630.
[4]
Biddle, R., Chiasson, S., and Van Oorschot, P. C. Graphical passwords: Learning from the first twelve years. ACM Computing Surveys 44, 4 (2012), 19.
[5]
Brooke, J. Sus-a quick and dirty usability scale. Usability evaluation in industry 189 (1996), 194.
[6]
De Angeli, A., Coventry, L., Johnson, G., and Renaud, K. Is a picture really worth a thousand words? exploring the feasibility of graphical authentication systems. Intl. J. Human-Comp. Studies 63, 1 (2005), 128--152.
[7]
Dirik, A. E., Memon, N., and Birget, J.-C. Modeling user choice in the passpoints graphical password scheme. In Proceedings of the 3rd Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security, SOUPS '07, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2007), 20--28.
[8]
Driver Focus-Telematics WG. Statement of principles, criteria and verification procedures on driver interactions with advanced in-vehicle information and communication systems. Tech. rep., Alliance of Automotive Manufacturers, 2002.
[9]
Ferro, M., Pioggia, G., Tognetti, A., Carbonaro, N., and De Rossi, D. A sensing seat for human authentication. IEEE Trans. Info. Forensics & Sec. 4, 3 (2009), 451--459.
[10]
Hart, S. G., and Staveland, L. E. Development of nasa-tlx (task load index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. Advances in psychology 52 (1988), 139--183.
[11]
Jermyn, I., Mayer, A., Monrose, F., Reiter, M. K., Rubin, A. D., et al. The design and analysis of graphical passwords. In Proc. USENIX Sec. Symp. (1999).
[12]
Kun, A. L., Royer, T., and Leone, A. Using tap sequences to authenticate drivers. In Proc. AutoUI '13, ACM (2013).
[13]
Lewis, J. R. Ibm computer usability satisfaction questionnaires: Psychometric evaluation and instructions for use. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 7, 1 (Jan. 1995), 57--78.
[14]
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Visual-manual NHTSA driver distraction guidelines for in-vehicle electronic devices. Tech. Rep. NHTSA-2010-0053, 2012.
[15]
Nelson, D. L., Reed, V. S., and Walling, J. R. Pictorial superiority effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 2, 5 (1976), 523.
[16]
Pauzie, A. A method to assess the driver mental workload: The driving activity load index (dali). IET Intelligent Transport Systems 2, 4 (2008), 315--322.
[17]
Rogers, W. A., Fisk, A. D., McLaughlin, A. C., and Pak, R. Touch a screen or turn a knob: Choosing the best device for the job. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 47, 2 (2005), 271--288.
[18]
SBD, and GSMA. Connected Car Forecast: Global Connected Car Market to Grow Threefold Within Five Years, 2013 (accessed March, 2014). http://www.gsma.com/connectedliving/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/cl_ma_forecast_06_13.pdf.
[19]
Schaub, F., Walch, M., Könings, B., and Weber, M. Exploring the design space of graphical passwords on smartphones. In Proc. SOUPS '13, ACM (2013).
[20]
Schroeder, P., Meyers, M., and Kostyniuk, L. National survey on distracted driving attitudes and behaviors--2012. Tech. rep., 2013.
[21]
Tao, H., and Adams, C. Pass-go: A proposal to improve the usability of graphical passwords. IJ Network Security 7, 2 (2008), 273--292.
[22]
Thorpe, J., MacRae, B., and Salehi-Abari, A. Usability and security evaluation of geopass: a geographic location-password scheme. In Proc. SOUPS '13, ACM (2013).
[23]
Valentine, T. An evaluation of the passface personal authentication system. tech report, Goldsmiths College, University of London, 1998.
[24]
von Zezschwitz, E., Koslow, A., De Luca, A., and Hussmann, H. Making graphic-based authentication secure against smudge attacks. In Proc. IUI '13, ACM (2013).
[25]
Wiedenbeck, S., Waters, J., Birget, J.-C., Brodskiy, A., and Memon, N. Passpoints: Design and longitudinal evaluation of a graphical password system. Intl. J. Human-Comp. Studies 63, 1 (2005), 102--127.
[26]
Wobbrock, J. O. Tapsongs: tapping rhythm-based passwords on a single binary sensor. In Proc. UIST '09, ACM (2009).

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Extending the Interaction Space of Rotary Knobs by Multi-touch-based Grasp RecognitionProceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia10.1145/3626705.3627797(198-209)Online publication date: 3-Dec-2023
  • (2021)How to Increase Automated Vehicles’ Acceptance through In-Vehicle Interaction Design: A ReviewInternational Journal of Human–Computer Interaction10.1080/10447318.2020.186051737:4(308-330)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2021
  • (2018)How Usability Can Save the Day - Methodological Considerations for Making Automated Driving a Success StoryProceedings of the 10th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications10.1145/3239060.3239076(278-290)Online publication date: 23-Sep-2018
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. User Authentication for Rotary Knob Controlled In-car Applications

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    AutomotiveUI '14: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications
    September 2014
    287 pages
    ISBN:9781450332125
    DOI:10.1145/2667317
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    In-Cooperation

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 17 September 2014

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Authentication
    2. Automotive User Interfaces
    3. Driver Distraction

    Qualifiers

    • Tutorial
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Conference

    AutomotiveUI '14

    Acceptance Rates

    AutomotiveUI '14 Paper Acceptance Rate 36 of 79 submissions, 46%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 248 of 566 submissions, 44%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)6
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 17 Jan 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2023)Extending the Interaction Space of Rotary Knobs by Multi-touch-based Grasp RecognitionProceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia10.1145/3626705.3627797(198-209)Online publication date: 3-Dec-2023
    • (2021)How to Increase Automated Vehicles’ Acceptance through In-Vehicle Interaction Design: A ReviewInternational Journal of Human–Computer Interaction10.1080/10447318.2020.186051737:4(308-330)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2021
    • (2018)How Usability Can Save the Day - Methodological Considerations for Making Automated Driving a Success StoryProceedings of the 10th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications10.1145/3239060.3239076(278-290)Online publication date: 23-Sep-2018
    • (2018)Who's driving you?2018 15th IEEE Annual Consumer Communications & Networking Conference (CCNC)10.1109/CCNC.2018.8319199(1-4)Online publication date: Jan-2018

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media