Assessing the feasibility of a process plan: a study in variable interaction
Authors: 
G. Yut, T. C. ChangAuthors Info & Claims
G. Yut, T. C. ChangAuthors Info & ClaimsPages 322 - 335
References
[1]
L. Alting and H. Zhang. Computer aided process planning: The state-of-the-art survey. International Journal of Production Research, 27(4):553- 585, 1989.
[2]
D. C. Anderson and T. C. Chang. Geometric reasoning in feature-based design and process planning. Computers ~ Graphics, 14(2):225-235, 1990.
[3]
S. L. Brooks and M. L. Wolf. Overview of Allied Signal's XCUT system. In J. J. Shah, M. Mantyla, and D. Nau, editors, Advances in Feature Ba~ed Manufacturing. Elsevier/North Holland, 1994.
[4]
D. R. Brown, M. R. Cutkosky, and J. M. Tenenbaum. Next-Cut: A computational framework for concurrent engineering. In Second International Symposium on Concurrent Engineering, Morgantown, West Virginia, February 7-9 1990.
[5]
N. G. Bruyevich and B. Y. Chelishchev. Problems of automation of technological planning. I. Formal description of technological planning. Engineering Cybernetics, 12(5):154-162, 1974.
[6]
T. C. Chang. Expert Process Planning for Manufacturing. Addison-Wesley, 1990.
[7]
T. H. Cormen, C. E. Leiserson, and R. L. Rivest. Introduction to Algorithms. The MIT Press, 1990.
[8]
Y. Descotte and J.-C. Latombe. Making compromises among antagonist constraints in a planner. Artificial Intelligence, 27:183-217, 1985.
[9]
G. Eshel, M. Barash, and T. C. Chang. Generate & test and rectify--a plan synthesis tactic for automatic process planning. International Yournal for Artificial Intelligence in Engineering, 3(1):18-31, 1988.
[10]
M. R. Garey and D. S. Johnson. Computers and Intractability. Bell Laboratories, 1979.
[11]
A. R. Grayer. The automatic production of machined components starting from a stored geometric description. In D. McPherson, editor, Advances in Computer-Aided Manufacture, pages 137-151. North-Holland, 1977.
[12]
P. Gu and Y. Zhang. OOPPS: An object-oriented process planning system. Computers ~ Industrial Engineering, 26(4):709-731, 1994.
[13]
S. K. Gupta and D. S. Nau. A systematic approach for analysing the manufacturability of machined parts. Computer Aided Design, 27(5):323- 342, 1994.
[14]
I. Ham and S. C.-Y. Lu. Computer-aided process planning: The present and the future. Annals of CIRP, 37(2):591-601, 1988.
[15]
M. R. Henderson and G.-J. Chang. FRAPP: Automated feature recognition and process planning from solid model data. In Computers in Engineering, 1988, pages 529-536, San Francisco, CA, July 31-August 4, 1988. ASME.
[16]
M. Inui and F. Kimura. Using a truth-maintenance system to assist product-model construction for design and process planning. Computer Aided Design, 25(1):59-70, 199 .
[17]
K. Iwata and N. Sugimura. An integrated CAD/CAPP system with "know-hows" on machining accuracies of parts. Journal of Engineering for Industry, 109:128-133, 1987.
[18]
S. Kambhampati, M. R. Cutkosky, J. M. Tenenbaum, and S. H. Lee. Integrating general purpose planners and specialized reasoners: Case study of a hybrid planning architecture. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 23(6):1503- 1518, 1993.
[19]
R. Karinthi, D. S. Nau, and Q. Yang. Handling feature interactions in process planning. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 6(4):389-415, 1992. Special issue on AI for manufacturing.
[20]
M. Marefat and R. L. Kashyap. Automatic construction of process plans from solid model representations. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 22(5):1097-1115, 1992.
[21]
P. G. Maropoulos. Review of research in tooling technology, process modelling and process planning: Part ii: Process planning. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 8(1):13-20, 1995.
[22]
K. Matsushima, N. Okada, and T. Sata. The integration of CAD and CAM by application of artificial-intelligence techniques. Annals of CIRP, 31 (1):329-332, 1982.
[23]
F. G. Mill, J. C. Salmon, and A. G. Pedley. Representation problems in feature-based approaches to design and process planning. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 6(1&2):27- 33, 1993.
[24]
T. Ochiai and D. A. Hoeltzel. A non-linear machining process planner for concurrent mechanical design. In B. J. Gilmore, D. A. Hoeltzel, S. Azarm, and H. A. Eschenauer, editors, Advances in Design Automation, volume DE 65-2, pages 545-552. ASME, 1993. Presented at the 1993 ASME Design Technical Conferences, Albuquerque, NM, September 19-22, 1993.
[25]
K. Preiss and E. Kaplanski. Automatic mill routing from solid geometry information. In E. A. Warman, editor, Computer Applications in Production and Engineering, pages 773-785. North-Holland, 1983.
[26]
H. Sakuri. Automatic setup planning and fixture design for machining. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 11 (1):30-37, 1992.
[27]
J. J. Shah, P. Sreevalsan, and A. Mathew. Survey of CAD/feature-based process planning and NC programming techniques. Computer-Aided Engineering Journal, 8(1):25-33, 1991.
[28]
H. Suzuki, H. Ando, and F. Kimura. Geometric constraints and reasoning for geometrical CAD systems. Computers ~ Graphics, 14(2):211-224, 1990.
[29]
M. D. Tsai, S. Takata, M. Inui, F. Kimura, and T. Sata. Operation planning based on cutting process models. Annals of CIRP, 40(1):95-98, 1991.
[30]
C. Tsatsoulis and R. L. Kashyap. Case-based reasoning and learning in manufacturing with the TOLTEC planner. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 23(4):1010-1023, 1993.
[31]
F. J. A. M. van Houten. PART: A Computer Aided Process Planning System. PhD thesis, University of Twente, 1991.
[32]
H. B. Voelcker and A. A. G. Requicha. Research in progress: Modelling & planning N C machining processes. In P. K. Wright, editor, Computer-Based Factory Automation: Proceedings of the 11th Conference on Production Research and Technology, pages 11-20. SME, 1984.
[33]
G. Yut. Process Plan Feasibility: Accounting for Interactions Between Planning Decisions. P hD thesis, Purdue University, 1996.
[34]
G. Yut and T. C. Chang. A heuristic grouping algorithm for fixture and tool setups. Engineering Design and Automation, 1(1):21-31, 1995.
[35]
G. Yut and T. C. Chang. Hierarchical operation sequencing using a heuristic grouping algorithm. Manufacturing Systems, 25(3):303-311, 1996.
Index Terms
- Assessing the feasibility of a process plan: a study in variable interaction
Recommendations
Flexible Plan Verification: Feasibility Results
RCRA 2009 Experimental Evaluation of Algorithms for Solving Problems with Combinatorial ExplosionTimeline-based planning techniques have demonstrated wide application possibilities in heterogeneous real world domains. For a wider diffusion of this technology, a more thorough investigation of the connections with formal methods is needed. This paper ...
Process plan controllers for non-deterministic manufacturing systems
IJCAI'17: Proceedings of the 26th International Joint Conference on Artificial IntelligenceDetermining the most appropriate means of producing a given product, i.e., which manufacturing and assembly tasks need to be performed in which order and how, is termed process planning . In process planning, abstract manufacturing tasks in a process ...
Continuing plan quality optimisation
Finding high quality plans for large planning problems is hard. Although some current anytime planners are often able to improve plans quickly, they tend to reach a limit at which the plans produced are still very far from the best possible, but these ...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
May 1997
387 pages
ISBN:0897919467
DOI:10.1145/267734
Copyright © 1997 ACM.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]
Sponsors
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 01 May 1997
Check for updates
Qualifiers
- Article
Conference
4SSMA97
Sponsor:
4SSMA97: Fourth ACM SIGGRAPH Symposium on Solid Modeling and Applications
May 14 - 16, 1997
Georgia, Atlanta, USA
Acceptance Rates
Overall Acceptance Rate 86 of 173 submissions, 50%
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 531Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)22
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4
Reflects downloads up to 12 Sep 2024
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Get Access
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign in