Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2684103.2684135acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmommConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

User Experience Evaluation of Mobile AR services

Published: 08 December 2014 Publication History

Abstract

Mobile Augmented Reality (MAR) is state-of-the-art technology that has modernized the way of accessing and interacting with information thus invoking new experiences for users all around the world. However User Experience (UX) evaluation for mobile AR is still a widely unexplored area. In order to identify the potential problems faced by the end users while using MAR applications, it is important to evaluate the UX of current Mobile AR service. This paper narrates the findings and analysis from a pilot study. We report a cross-sectional survey for evaluating the user experience of latest mobile AR applications. A framework of qualities related to user experience is applied on the acquired results to understand and articulate different aspects of UX. The outcomes show a positive attitude of users towards mobile AR services. The results help in considering key acceptance issues and potential user expectations in the development of future mobile AR services.

References

[1]
www.junaio.com.
[2]
www.layer.com.
[3]
BlippAR. Available from: https://blippar.com/en/.
[4]
13407, I.O.f.S.I., Human-centered design processes for interactive systems, 1999.
[5]
Azuma, Ronald T and others A survey of augmented reality. Presence., 6(4):355--385, 1997.
[6]
Desmet, P. M. and P. Hekkert. Framework of product experience. International Journal of Design., 1(1):57--66, 2007.
[7]
DIS, I., 9241-210: 2010. Ergonomics of human system interaction-Part 210: Human-centred design for interactive systems. International Standardization Organization (ISO). Switzerland, 2009.
[8]
Dnser, A. R. Grasset, and M. Billinghurst. A survey of evaluation techniques used in augmented reality studies. Human Interface Technology Laboratory New Zealand, 2008
[9]
Feiner, S., B. Macintyre, and D. Seligmann. Knowledge-based augmented reality. Communications of the ACM., 36(7):53--62, 1993.
[10]
Gliem, J. A. and R. R. Gliem. Calculating, interpreting, and reporting Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient for Likert-type scales. Midwest Research-to-Practice Conference in Adult, Continuing, and Community Education., 2003.
[11]
Gulliksen and J. Key Principles for user-centred systems design Behaviour and Information Technology., 22(6):397--409, 2003.
[12]
Hassenzahl, M. and N. Tractinsky. User experience-a research agenda. Behaviour and Information Technology., 25(2):91--97, 2006.
[13]
Henrysson, A., M. Billinghurst, and M. Ollila. Face to face collaborative AR on mobile phones. Fourth IEEE and ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality., 2005.
[14]
Hrst, W. and C. Wezel. Gesture-based interaction via finger tracking for mobile augmented reality. Multimedia Tools and Applications., 62(1):233--258, 2013.
[15]
Jsk, V. and T. Mattelmki. Observing and probing. ACM Proceedings of the 2003 international conference on Designing pleasurable products and interfaces., 2003.
[16]
Kaufmann, H. Construct3D: an augmented reality application for mathematics and geometry education. Proceedings of the tenth ACM international conference on Multimedia., 2002.
[17]
Law and E.L.-C. Understanding, scoping and defining user experience: a survey approach. ACM Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems., 2009.
[18]
Livingston, M.A. Technologies for augmented reality systems: realizing ultrasound-guided needle biopsies. ACM Proceedings of the 23rd annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques., 1996.
[19]
Matcha, W. and D.R.A. Rambli. Preliminary investigation on the use of augmented reality in collaborative learning, in Informatics Engineering and Information Science. Springer., 189--198, 2011.
[20]
Milgram, P. and F. Kishino. A taxonomy of mixed reality visual displays. IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information and Systems., 77(12):1321--1329, 1994.
[21]
Milgram, P. Augmented reality: A class of displays on the reality-virtuality continuum in Photonics for Industrial Applications. International Society for Optics and Photonics., 1995.
[22]
Mohring, M., C. Lessig, and O. Bimber. Video see-through ar on consumer cell-phones. Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality., 2004.
[23]
Mller, A., Experimental evaluation of user interfaces for visual indoor navigation. in 32nd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2014. 2014. Toronto, ON: Association for Computing Machinery. Desmet, P. M. and P. Hekkert. Framework of product experience. International Journal of Design., 1(1):57--66, 2007.
[24]
Morrison, A. like bees around the hive: a comparative study of a mobile augmented reality map. ACM Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems., 2009.
[25]
Mulloni, A., D. Wagner, and D. Schmalstieg. Mobility and social interaction as core gameplay elements in multi-player augmented reality. ACM Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on Digital Interactive Media in Entertainment and Arts., 2008.
[26]
Nam, Y. Designing interactive narratives for mobile augmented reality. Cluster Computing., 1--12, 2014.
[27]
Olsson, T. and M. Salo. Online user survey on current mobile augmented reality applications. 10th IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality, ISMAR, 2011.
[28]
Olsson, T. User evaluation of mobile augmented reality scenarios. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Smart Environments., 4(1):29--47, 2012.
[29]
Olsson, T. Expected user experience of mobile augmented reality services: a user study in the context of shopping centres. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 17(2):287--304, 2013.
[30]
Olsson, T. Reflections on experience-driven design: a case study on designing for playful experiences. ACM Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Designing Pleasurable Products and Interfaces. Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom, 165--174, 2013.
[31]
Pfeiffer, T. and P. Renner. EyeSee3D: a low-cost approach for analyzing mobile 3D eye tracking data using computer vision and augmented reality technology. ACM Proceedings of the Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications. Safety Harbor, Florida. 195--202, 2014.
[32]
Regenbrecht, H.T. and R. Specht. A mobile passive augmented reality device-mpard. Proceedings of IEEE and ACM International Symposium on Augmented Reality., 2000.
[33]
Rohs, M. Impact of item density on magic lens interactions. ACM Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services., 2009.
[34]
Roto, V. User experience white paper: bringing clarity to the concept of user experience. Dagstuhl Seminar on User Experience-2010, Dagstuhl. 2011.
[35]
Santos, M.E.C. Augmented reality learning experiences: Survey of prototype design and evaluation. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies., 7(1):38--56, 2014.
[36]
Scholtz, J. and S. Consolvo. Toward a framework for evaluating ubiquitous computing applications. Pervasive Computing, IEEE., 3(2):82--88, 2004.
[37]
Speager, G. and R. Huntrods. Augmented Reality: Past, Present, and Future., 2012.
[38]
Takacs, G. Outdoors augmented reality on mobile phone using loxel-based visual feature organization. Proceedings of the 1st ACM international conference on Multimedia information retrieval., 2008.
[39]
Tiefenbacher, P., N.H. Lehment, and G. Rigoll. Augmented reality evaluation: A concept utilizing virtual reality. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)., 226--236, 2014.
[40]
Visual, Q. World Lens. Available from: http://questvisual.com/us/.
[41]
Wagner, D. Real-time detection and tracking for augmented reality on mobile phones. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics., 16(3):355--368, 2010.
[42]
Zhou, F., H.B.-L. Duh, and M. Billinghurst. Trends in augmented reality tracking, interaction and display: A review of ten years of ISMAR. Proceedings of the 7th IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality, IEEE Computer Society., 2008.
[43]
Tom Tullis and Bill Albert. Chapter 3 - Planning a Usability Study, In Interactive Technologies. Measuring the User Experience, ISBN 9780123735584, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-373558-4.00003-0., 45--62, 2008.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Enhancing User Experience: Exploring Mobile Augmented Reality ExperiencesVFAST Transactions on Software Engineering10.21015/vtse.v12i1.174112:1(121-132)Online publication date: 31-Mar-2024
  • (2024)Creative Precarity in Motion: Revealing the Hidden Labor Behind Animating Virtual CharactersProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3661545(3471-3484)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
  • (2023)Designing Between Virtuality and Reality: Improving Inclusiveness in Hybrid SpacesProceedings of the 41st ACM International Conference on Design of Communication10.1145/3615335.3623033(184-190)Online publication date: 26-Oct-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. User Experience Evaluation of Mobile AR services

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    MoMM '14: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Advances in Mobile Computing and Multimedia
    December 2014
    464 pages
    ISBN:9781450330084
    DOI:10.1145/2684103
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    In-Cooperation

    • JKU: Johannes Kepler Universität Linz

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 08 December 2014

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Evaluation
    2. Human Computer Interaction
    3. Mobile Augmented Reality
    4. Pilot Study
    5. Quality Framework
    6. Survey
    7. User Experience
    8. User Interface

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Conference

    MoMM '14

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)59
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
    Reflects downloads up to 13 Jan 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Enhancing User Experience: Exploring Mobile Augmented Reality ExperiencesVFAST Transactions on Software Engineering10.21015/vtse.v12i1.174112:1(121-132)Online publication date: 31-Mar-2024
    • (2024)Creative Precarity in Motion: Revealing the Hidden Labor Behind Animating Virtual CharactersProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3661545(3471-3484)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
    • (2023)Designing Between Virtuality and Reality: Improving Inclusiveness in Hybrid SpacesProceedings of the 41st ACM International Conference on Design of Communication10.1145/3615335.3623033(184-190)Online publication date: 26-Oct-2023
    • (2023)Collaborative Virtual 3D Object Modeling for Mobile Augmented Reality Streaming Services Over 5G NetworksIEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing10.1109/TMC.2022.314954322:7(3855-3869)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2023
    • (2020)Design and implementation of user experience model for augmented reality systemsProceedings of the 18th International Conference on Advances in Mobile Computing & Multimedia10.1145/3428690.3429169(48-57)Online publication date: 30-Nov-2020
    • (2019)Understanding Users' Preferences for Augmented Reality Television2019 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR)10.1109/ISMAR.2019.00024(269-278)Online publication date: Oct-2019
    • (2019)Consolidating the Research Agenda of Augmented Reality Television with Insights from Potential End-Users2019 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality Adjunct (ISMAR-Adjunct)10.1109/ISMAR-Adjunct.2019.00033(73-74)Online publication date: Oct-2019
    • (2018)A UX Oriented Evaluation approach for Mobile Augmented Reality ApplicationsProceedings of the 16th International Conference on Advances in Mobile Computing and Multimedia10.1145/3282353.3282357(108-112)Online publication date: 19-Nov-2018
    • (2017)Mobile Augmented Reality Survey: From Where We Are to Where We GoIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2017.26981645(6917-6950)Online publication date: 2017
    • (2017)Advances in Mobile Augmented Reality from User Experience Perspective: A Review of StudiesAdvances in Visual Informatics10.1007/978-3-319-70010-6_43(466-477)Online publication date: 29-Oct-2017
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media