Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2716281.2836086acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesconextConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

pHost: distributed near-optimal datacenter transport over commodity network fabric

Published: 01 December 2015 Publication History

Abstract

The importance of minimizing flow completion times (FCT) in datacenters has led to a growing literature on new network transport designs. Of particular note is pFabric, a protocol that achieves near-optimal FCTs. However, pFabric's performance comes at the cost of generality, since pFabric requires specialized hardware that embeds a specific scheduling policy within the network fabric, making it hard to meet diverse policy goals. Aiming for generality, the recent Fastpass proposal returns to a design based on commodity network hardware and instead relies on a centralized scheduler. Fastpass achieves generality, but (as we show) loses many of pFabric's performance benefits.
We present pHost, a new transport design aimed at achieving both: the near-optimal performance of pFabric and the commodity network design of Fastpass. Similar to Fastpass, pHost keeps the network simple by decoupling the network fabric from scheduling decisions. However, pHost introduces a new distributed protocol that allows end-hosts to directly make scheduling decisions, thus avoiding the overheads of Fastpass's centralized scheduler architecture. We show that pHost achieves performance on par with pFabric (within 4% for typical conditions) and significantly outperforms Fastpass (by a factor of 3.8×) while relying only on commodity network hardware.

References

[1]
CISCO: Per packet load balancing. http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_0s/feature/guide/pplb.html.
[2]
A. Agache and C. Raiciu. GRIN: Utilizing the empty half of full bisection networks. In Proc. of HotNets, 2012.
[3]
M. Al-Fares, A. Loukissas, and A. Vahdat. A scalable, commodity data center network architecture. In Proc. of SIGCOMM, 2008.
[4]
M. Al-Fares, S. Radhakrishnan, B. Raghavan, N. Huang, and A. Vahdat. Hedera: Dynamic flow scheduling for data center networks. In Proc. of NSDI, 2010.
[5]
M. Alizadeh, A. Greenberg, D. A. Maltz, J. Padhye, P. Patel, B. Prabhakar, S. Sengupta, and M. Sridharan. Data Center TCP (DCTCP). In Proc. of SIGCOMM, 2010.
[6]
M. Alizadeh, S. Yang, M. Sharif, S. Katti, N. McKeown, B. Prabhakar, and S. Shenker. pFabric: Minimal near-optimal datacenter transport. In Proc. of SIGCOMM, 2013.
[7]
T. E. Anderson, S. S. Owicki, J. B. Saxe, and C. P. Thacker. High-speed switch scheduling for local-area networks. ACM Transactions on Computer Systems (TOCS), 11(4):319--352, 1993.
[8]
W. Bai, L. Chen, K. Chen, D. Han, C. Tian, and H. Wang. Information-agnostic flow scheduling for commodity data centers. In Proc. of NSDI, 2015.
[9]
T. Benson, A. Akella, and D. A. Maltz. Network traffic characteristics of data centers in the wild. In Proc. of IMC, 2010.
[10]
A. Dixit, P. Prakash, Y. C. Hu, and R. R. Kompella. On the impact of packet spraying in data center networks. In Proc. of IEEE INFOCOM, 2013.
[11]
A. Greenberg, J. R. Hamilton, N. Jain, S. Kandula, C. Kim, P. Lahiri, D. A. Maltz, P. Patel, and S. Sengupta. VL2: A scalable and flexible data center network. In Proc. of SIGCOMM, 2009.
[12]
C.-Y. Hong, M. Caesar, and P. B. Godfrey. Finishing flows quickly with preemptive scheduling. In Proc. of SIGCOMM, 2012.
[13]
A. Munir, G. Baig, S. M. Irteza, I. A. Qazi, A. X. Liu, and F. R. Dogar. Friends, not foes: Synthesizing existing transport strategies for data center networks. In Proc. of SIGCOMM, 2014.
[14]
J. Perry, A. Ousterhout, H. Balakrishnan, D. Shah, and H. Fugal. Fastpass: A centralized "Zero-Queue" datacenter network. In Proc. of SIGCOMM, 2014.
[15]
G. Porter, R. Strong, N. Farrington, A. Forencich, P. Chen-Sun, T. Rosing, Y. Fainman, G. Papen, and A. Vahdat. Integrating microsecond circuit switching into the data center. In Proc. of SIGCOMM, 2013.
[16]
C. Raiciu, M. Ionescu, and D. Niculescu. Opening up black box networks with CloudTalk. In 4th USENIX Conference on Hot Topics in Cloud Ccomputing, 2012.
[17]
B. Vamanan, J. Hasan, and T. Vijaykumar. Deadline-aware datacenter TCP (D2TCP). In Proc. of SIGCOMM, 2012.
[18]
C. Wilson, H. Ballani, T. Karagiannis, and A. Rowtron. Better never than late: Meeting deadlines in datacenter networks. In Proc. of SIGCOMM, 2011.
[19]
A. Yaar, A. Perrig, and D. Song. SIFF: A stateless internet flow filter to mitigate ddos flooding attacks. In IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, 2004.

Cited By

View all
  • (2025)GraphCC: A practical graph learning-based approach to Congestion Control in datacentersComputer Networks10.1016/j.comnet.2024.110981257(110981)Online publication date: Feb-2025
  • (2024)HarmonyProceedings of the 21st USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation10.5555/3691825.3691845(329-343)Online publication date: 16-Apr-2024
  • (2024)A large-scale deployment of DCTCPProceedings of the 21st USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation10.5555/3691825.3691839(239-252)Online publication date: 16-Apr-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. pHost: distributed near-optimal datacenter transport over commodity network fabric

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CoNEXT '15: Proceedings of the 11th ACM Conference on Emerging Networking Experiments and Technologies
      December 2015
      483 pages
      ISBN:9781450334129
      DOI:10.1145/2716281
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Sponsors

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 01 December 2015

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. datacenter network
      2. flow scheduling
      3. packet transport

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article

      Conference

      CoNEXT '15
      Sponsor:

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate 198 of 789 submissions, 25%

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)104
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)18
      Reflects downloads up to 09 Jan 2025

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2025)GraphCC: A practical graph learning-based approach to Congestion Control in datacentersComputer Networks10.1016/j.comnet.2024.110981257(110981)Online publication date: Feb-2025
      • (2024)HarmonyProceedings of the 21st USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation10.5555/3691825.3691845(329-343)Online publication date: 16-Apr-2024
      • (2024)A large-scale deployment of DCTCPProceedings of the 21st USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation10.5555/3691825.3691839(239-252)Online publication date: 16-Apr-2024
      • (2024)Revisiting congestion control for lossless ethernetProceedings of the 21st USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation10.5555/3691825.3691833(131-148)Online publication date: 16-Apr-2024
      • (2024)Opportunistic Packet Forwarding for Proactive Transport in Datacenters2024 IFIP Networking Conference (IFIP Networking)10.23919/IFIPNetworking62109.2024.10619903(1-9)Online publication date: 3-Jun-2024
      • (2024)Shale: A Practical, Scalable Oblivious Reconfigurable NetworkProceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM 2024 Conference10.1145/3651890.3672248(449-464)Online publication date: 4-Aug-2024
      • (2024)NegotiaToR: Towards A Simple Yet Effective On-demand Reconfigurable Datacenter NetworkProceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM 2024 Conference10.1145/3651890.3672222(415-432)Online publication date: 4-Aug-2024
      • (2024)Understanding Incast Bursts in Modern DatacentersProceedings of the 2024 ACM on Internet Measurement Conference10.1145/3646547.3689028(674-680)Online publication date: 4-Nov-2024
      • (2024)Shaped Quota: More Efficient and More Versatile Congestion Control2024 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC)10.1109/WCNC57260.2024.10570647(1-6)Online publication date: 21-Apr-2024
      • (2024)SAR: Receiver-Driven Transport Protocol With Micro-Burst Prediction in Data Center NetworksIEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management10.1109/TNSM.2024.345059721:6(6409-6422)Online publication date: Dec-2024
      • Show More Cited By

      View Options

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media