Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2809563.2809581acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesi-knowConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Collaborative writing in the context of science 2.0

Published: 21 October 2015 Publication History

Abstract

The increasing number of co-authored academic papers points to the importance of collaborative writing in contemporary research. Digital technologies add a new dimension to collaborative writing by providing co-authors with access to the same document and enabling co-authors to edit the shared text at the same time. The availability of web-based tools for collaborative writing prompts the question of the extent to which researchers incorporate these tools into their scholarly practices. Based on my statistical analysis of the data from the Science 2.0 Survey (2014), conducted in cooperation with the Leibniz Research Alliance Science 2.0, I examine the usage of digital technologies in the process of collaborative writing among researchers in Germany. I use the concepts of asynchronous and synchronous modes of writing, derived from the field of Computer Supported Cooperative Work, to discuss collaborative writing strategies in the context of Science 2.0. My study shows that researchers use a mixture of different writing strategies and that they tend to use the same tool for different writing strategies. Moreover, I discuss researchers' attitudes towards online text editors. In reflecting on collaborative writing, I consider both the technological and social aspects.

References

[1]
Birnholtz, J. and Ibara, S. 2012. Tracking Changes in Collaborative Writing: Edits, Visibility and Group Maintenance. CSCW'12 (Seattle, Washington, USA, February 11-15, 2012).
[2]
Boellstorff, T., Nardi, B., Pearce, C., and Taylor, T. L. 2013. Words with Friends: Writing Collaboratively Online. Interactions, Lessons Learned (September / October 2013)
[3]
Bosley, D. 1989. A National Study of the Uses of Collaborative Writing in Business Communications Courses among Members of the ABC. Unpublished dissertation, Illinois State University.
[4]
Bozeman, B. and Boardman, C. 2014. Research Collaboration and Team Science: A State-of-the-Art Review and Agenda. Springer, Heidelberg.
[5]
Cerrato, T. 1999. Instrumenting Collaborative Writing and its Cognitive Tools. HCP'99 (September 199).
[6]
Ede, L. and Lunsford, A. 1990. Singular Texts/Plural Authors: Perspectives on Collaborative Writing. Southern Illinois University Press.
[7]
Feldman A. J., Zeller W. P., Freedman, M. J., and Felten E. W. 2010. SPORC: Group Collaboration using Untrusted Cloud Resources. OSDI'10 Proceedings of the 9th USENIX conference on Operating systems design and implementation.
[8]
Gehrmann, S., Urke, L. Amir, O., and Grosz, B. J. 2015. Deploying AI Methods to Support Collaborative Writing: a Preliminary Investigation. CHI EA '15 Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 917--922.
[9]
Hall, W. 2015. Interview by Scheliga, K. in Encore 2014, The Annual Research Magazine of the Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society, 2014, 51--53. http://www.hiig.de/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/encore2014_small.pdf
[10]
Lowry, P. B., Curtis, A. and M. R. Lowry. 2004. Building a Taxonomy and Nomenclature of Collaborative Writing to Improve Interdisciplinary Research and Practice. Journal of Business Communication, 41 (2004), 66--99. DOI=10.1177/0021943603259363
[11]
Miles, V. C., McCarthy, J. C., Dix, A. J., Harrison, M. D., and Monk A. F. 1993. Reviewing Designs for a Synchronous-asynchronous Group Editing Environment. In Computer Supported Collaborative Writing Ed. M. Sharples. Springer, 137--160.
[12]
Noel, S. and Robert, J.-M. 2004. Empirical Study on Collaborative Writing: What do Co-authors do, Use and Like? CSCW, 13(2004), 63--89.
[13]
Pscheida, D., Albrecht, S., Herbst, S., Minet, C., Köhler, T. Science 2.0 Survey 2013. Nutzung von Social Media und onlinebasierten Anwendungen in der Wissenschaft. Erste Ergebnisse des Science 2.0-Survey 2013 des Leibniz-Forschungsverbunds "Science 2.0". http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:14-qucosa-132962
[14]
Pscheida, D., Minet, C., Herbst, S., Albrecht, S., Köhler, T. Science 2.0 Survey 2014. Nutzung von Social Media und onlinebasierten Anwendungen in der Wissenschaft. Ergebnisse des Science 2.0-Survey 2014. Datenreport Hochschulen 2014. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:14-qucosa-163135
[15]
Posner, I. R., and Baecker, R. M. 1992. How People Write Together. Proceedings 25th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, IV (1992), 127--138.
[16]
Tammaro, S. G., Moseir, J. N., Goodwin, N. C., and Spitz, G. 1997. Collaborative Writing is Hard to Support: A Field Study of Collaborative Writing. Computer Supported Cooperative Work. Journal of Collaborative Computing, 6, (1997), 19--51.
[17]
Wuchty, S., Jones, B. F. and Uzzi, B. 2007. The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge. Report. Science 316, 5827 (May 2007), 1036--1039. DOI=10.1126/science.1136099.

Cited By

View all
  • (2018)Impact of digital tools on the research writing process: A case study of collaborative writing in computer scienceDiscourse, Context & Media10.1016/j.dcm.2018.01.00524(16-23)Online publication date: Aug-2018

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
i-KNOW '15: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Knowledge Technologies and Data-driven Business
October 2015
314 pages
ISBN:9781450337212
DOI:10.1145/2809563
  • General Chairs:
  • Stefanie Lindstaedt,
  • Tobias Ley,
  • Harald Sack
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 21 October 2015

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. asynchronous
  2. co-authorship
  3. collaborative writing
  4. digital technologies
  5. online survey
  6. open science
  7. researchers
  8. science 2.0
  9. synchronous
  10. writing strategies

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

i-KNOW '15

Acceptance Rates

i-KNOW '15 Paper Acceptance Rate 25 of 78 submissions, 32%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 77 of 238 submissions, 32%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)2
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 03 Sep 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2018)Impact of digital tools on the research writing process: A case study of collaborative writing in computer scienceDiscourse, Context & Media10.1016/j.dcm.2018.01.00524(16-23)Online publication date: Aug-2018

View Options

Get Access

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media