Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2809695.2809718acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessensysConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Smart Devices are Different: Assessing and MitigatingMobile Sensing Heterogeneities for Activity Recognition

Published: 01 November 2015 Publication History

Abstract

The widespread presence of motion sensors on users' personal mobile devices has spawned a growing research interest in human activity recognition (HAR). However, when deployed at a large-scale, e.g., on multiple devices, the performance of a HAR system is often significantly lower than in reported research results. This is due to variations in training and test device hardware and their operating system characteristics among others. In this paper, we systematically investigate sensor-, device- and workload-specific heterogeneities using 36 smartphones and smartwatches, consisting of 13 different device models from four manufacturers. Furthermore, we conduct experiments with nine users and investigate popular feature representation and classification techniques in HAR research. Our results indicate that on-device sensor and sensor handling heterogeneities impair HAR performances significantly. Moreover, the impairments vary significantly across devices and depends on the type of recognition technique used. We systematically evaluate the effect of mobile sensing heterogeneities on HAR and propose a novel clustering-based mitigation technique suitable for large-scale deployment of HAR, where heterogeneity of devices and their usage scenarios are intrinsic.

References

[1]
M. V. Albert, S. Toledo, M. Shapiro, and K. Kording. Using mobile phones for activity recognition in parkinson's patients. Frontiers in neurology, 3, 2012.
[2]
O. Amft. On the need for quality standards in activity recognition using ubiquitous sensors. In How To Do Good Research In Activity Recognition. Workshop in conjunction with Pervasive, 2010.
[3]
S. A. Antos, M. V. Albert, and K. P. Kording. Hand, belt, pocket or bag: Practical activity tracking with mobile phones. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 231:22--30, 2014.
[4]
O. Banos, A. Calatroni, M. Damas, H. Pomares, I. Rojas, H. Sagha, J. del R Millán, G. Troster, R. Chavarriaga, and D. Roggen. Kinect= imu? learning mimo signal mappings to automatically translate activity recognition systems across sensor modalities. In IEEE Int. Symp. Wearable Computers (ISWC), 2012.
[5]
L. Bao and S. S. Intille. Activity recognition from user-annotated acceleration data. In 2nd Intl. Conf. Pervasive Computing (Pervasive), pages 1--17, 2004.
[6]
C. Barthold, K. Subbu, and R. Dantu. Evaluation of gyroscope-embedded mobile phones. In IEEE Intl. Conf. Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC), Oct 2011.
[7]
P. Batista, C. Silvestre, P. Oliveira, and B. Cardeira. Accelerometer calibration and dynamic bias and gravity estimation: Analysis, design, and experimental evaluation. IEEE Trans. Control Systems Technology, 19(1):1128--1137, 2011.
[8]
S. Bhattacharya, H. Blunck, M. Kjærgaard, and P. Nurmi. Robust and energy-efficient trajectory tracking for mobile devices. IEEE Trans. Mobile Computing (TMC), 14(2):430--443, 2015.
[9]
S. Bhattacharya, P. Nurmi, N. Hammerla, and T. Plötz. Using unlabeled data in a sparse-coding framework for human activity recognition. Pervasive and Mobile Computing, 15(0):242--262, 2014.
[10]
G. Bieber, P. Koldrack, C. Sablowski, C. Peter, and B. Urban. Mobile physical activity recognition of stand-up and sit-down transitions for user behavior analysis. In Intl. Conf. Pervasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments (PETRA). ACM, 2010.
[11]
G. Bieber, J. Voskamp, and B. Urban. Activity recognition for everyday life on mobile phones. In Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction (UAHCI). Springer, 2009.
[12]
C. M. Bishop. Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning. Springer, 2006.
[13]
H. Blunck, N. O. Bouvin, T. Franke, K. Grønbæk, M. B. Kjærgaard, P. Lukowicz, and M. Wüstenberg. On heterogeneity in mobile sensing applications aiming at representative data collection. In UbiComp '13 Adjunct, pages 1087--1098. ACM, 2013.
[14]
T. Brezmes, J.-L. Gorricho, and J. Cotrina. Activity recognition from accelerometer data on a mobile phone. In Intl. Work-Conf. Artificial Neural Networks (IWANN). Springer, 2009.
[15]
A. Bulling, U. Blanke, and B. Schiele. A tutorial on human activity recognition using body-worn inertial sensors. Computing Surveys (CSUR, 46(3), 2014.
[16]
F. Buttussi and L. Chittaro. Mopet: A context-aware and user-adaptive wearable system for fitness training. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 42(2):153--163, 2008.
[17]
Y. Chen, Z. Zhao, S. Wang, and Z. Chen. Extreme learning machine-based device displacement free activity recognition model. Soft Computing, 16(9), 2012.
[18]
J. Dai, X. Bai, Z. Yang, Z. Shen, and D. Xuan. Mobile phone-based pervasive fall detection. Personal Ubiquitous Comput., 14(7), 2010.
[19]
S. Dey, N. Roy, W. Xu, R. R. Choudhury, and S. Nelakuditi. Accelprint: Imperfections of accelerometers make smartphones trackable. Network and Distributed System Security Symp. (NDSS), 2014.
[20]
D. Figo, P. C. Diniz, D. R. Ferreira, and J. M. P. Cardoso. Preprocessing techniques for context recognition from accelerometer data. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 14(7):645--662, 2010.
[21]
B. J. Frey and D. Dueck. Clustering by passing messages between data points. science, 315(5814):972--976, 2007.
[22]
F. Gulmammadov. Analysis, modeling and compensation of bias drift in mems inertial sensors. IEEE 4th Intl. Conf. Recent Advances in Space Technologies (RAST), June 2009.
[23]
N. Y. Hammerla, R. Kirkham, P. Andras, and T. Ploetz. On preserving statistical characteristics of accelerometry data using their empirical cumulative distribution. In ISWC. ACM, 2013.
[24]
S. Hemminki, P. Nurmi, and S. Tarkoma. Accelerometer-based transportation mode detection on smartphones. In 11th ACM Conf. Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (SenSys), 2013.
[25]
A. Henpraserttae, S. Thiemjarus, and S. Marukatat. Accurate activity recognition using a mobile phone regardless of device orientation and location. In IEEE Body Sensor Networks Conference (BSN), 2011.
[26]
J. D. Hol. Sensor fusion and calibration of inertial sensors, vision, Ultra-Wideband and GPS. PhD thesis, Linköping University, Sweden, 2011.
[27]
Y. Kawahara, H. Kurasawa, and H. Morikawa. Recognizing User Context Using Mobile Handsets with Acceleration Sensors. In IEEE Intl. Conf. Portable Information Devices (PORTABLE), pages 1--5, 2007.
[28]
K. Kunze and P. Lukowicz. Dealing with sensor displacement in motion-based onbody activity recognition systems. In ACM Intl. Joint Conf. on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp), pages 20--29. ACM, 2008.
[29]
J. R. Kwapisz, G. M. Weiss, and S. A. Moore. Activity recognition using cell phone accelerometers. In SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter. ACM, 2011.
[30]
N. Lane, E. Miluzzo, H. Lu, D. Peebles, T. Choudhury, and A. Campbell. A survey of mobile phone sensing. Communications Magazine, IEEE, 48(9), 2010.
[31]
J. Lester, T. Choudhury, and G. Borriello. A practical approach to recognizing physical activities. In 4th Intl. Conf. Pervasive Computing (Pervasive), 2006.
[32]
B. Logan, J. Healey, M. Philipose, E. M. Tapia, and S. Intille. A long-term evaluation of sensing modalities for activity recognition. In Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Ubiquitous computing (UbiComp), 2007.
[33]
J. C. Lötters, J. Schipper, P. H. Veltink, W. Olthuis, and P. Bergveld. Procedure for in-use calibration of triaxial accelerometers in medical applications. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 68(1--3):221--228, 1998.
[34]
S. Mazilu, M. Hardegger, Z. Zhu, D. Roggen, G. Troster, M. Plotnik, and J. M. Hausdorff. Online detection of freezing of gait with smartphones and machine learning techniques. In IEEE Intl. Conf. Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (PervasiveHealth), pages 123--130. IEEE, 2012.
[35]
Q. McNemar. Note on the sampling error of the difference between correlated proportions or percentages. Psychometrika, 12(2):153--157, 1947.
[36]
OpenSignal. Android Fragmentation Visualized. http://opensignal.com/reports/2014/ android-fragmentation/, 2014. Accessed 17-Mar-2015. {37} J. Pärkkä, M. Ermes, P. Korpipää, J. Mäntyjärvi, J. Peltola, and I. Korhonen. Activity classification using realistic data from wearable sensors. Biomedicine, 10(1):119--128, 2006.
[37]
C. Pham and P. Olivier. Slice&dice: Recognizing food preparation activities using embedded accelerometers. In Intl. Conf. Ambient Intelligent (AmI), 2009.
[38]
T. Plötz, N. Y. Hammerla, and P. Olivier. Feature learning for activity recognition in ubiquitous computing. In Intl. Joint Conf. Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), volume 22, page 1729, 2011. {40} T. Plötz, P. Moynihan, C. Pham, and P. Olivier. Activity recognition and healthier food preparation. In Activity Recognition in Pervasive Intelligent Environments. Atlantis Press, 2011.
[39]
S. J. Preece, J. Y. Goulermas, L. P. J. Kenney, and D. Howard. A comparison of feature extraction methods for the classification of dynamic activities from accelerometer data. IEEE Trans. Biomedical Engineering, 56(3):871--879, 2009.
[40]
S. Reddy, M. Mun, J. Burke, D. Estrin, M. Hansen, and M. Srivastava. Using mobile phones to determine transportation modes. ACM Trans. Sen. Netw., 6(2):13:1--13:27, 2010.
[41]
H. Sagha, S. Digumarti, J. del R Millan, R. Chavarriaga, A. Calatroni, D. Roggen, and G. Tröster. Benchmarking classification techniques using the Opportunity human activity dataset. In IEEE Intl. Conf. Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC), 2011.
[42]
P. Siirtola and J. Röning. Recognizing human activities user-independently on smartphones based on accelerometer data. Intl. Journ. Interactive Multimedia and Artificial Intelligence, 1(5), 2012.
[43]
X. Su, H. Tong, and P. Ji. Activity recognition with smartphone sensors. Tsinghua Science and Technology, 19(3):235--249, 2014.
[44]
L. Sun, D. Zhang, B. Li, B. Guo, and S. Li. Activity recognition on an accelerometer embedded mobile phone with varying positions and orientations. In Ubiquitous intelligence and computing (UIC). Springer, 2010.
[45]
J. Yang. Toward physical activity diary: motion recognition using simple acceleration features with mobile phones. In 1st Intl. Workshop Interactive Multimedia for Consumer Electronics, pages 1--10. ACM, 2009.

Cited By

View all
  • (2025)Cross-Domain HAR: Few-Shot Transfer Learning for Human Activity RecognitionACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology10.1145/370492116:1(1-35)Online publication date: 20-Jan-2025
  • (2025)Self-Sustainable Wearable and Internet of Things (IoT) Devices for Health Monitoring: Opportunities and ChallengesIEEE Design & Test10.1109/MDAT.2024.343286242:2(35-60)Online publication date: Apr-2025
  • (2025)Learning under label noise through few-shot human-in-the-loop refinementScientific Reports10.1038/s41598-025-87046-z15:1Online publication date: 4-Feb-2025
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Smart Devices are Different: Assessing and MitigatingMobile Sensing Heterogeneities for Activity Recognition

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    SenSys '15: Proceedings of the 13th ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems
    November 2015
    526 pages
    ISBN:9781450336314
    DOI:10.1145/2809695
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 01 November 2015

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. activity recognition
    2. mobile sensing

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Funding Sources

    • Danish Advanced Technology Foundation
    • The Danish Council for Strategic Research

    Conference

    Acceptance Rates

    SenSys '15 Paper Acceptance Rate 27 of 132 submissions, 20%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 198 of 990 submissions, 20%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)370
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)30
    Reflects downloads up to 27 Feb 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2025)Cross-Domain HAR: Few-Shot Transfer Learning for Human Activity RecognitionACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology10.1145/370492116:1(1-35)Online publication date: 20-Jan-2025
    • (2025)Self-Sustainable Wearable and Internet of Things (IoT) Devices for Health Monitoring: Opportunities and ChallengesIEEE Design & Test10.1109/MDAT.2024.343286242:2(35-60)Online publication date: Apr-2025
    • (2025)Learning under label noise through few-shot human-in-the-loop refinementScientific Reports10.1038/s41598-025-87046-z15:1Online publication date: 4-Feb-2025
    • (2025)Deep clustering analysis via variational autoencoder with Gamma mixture latent embeddingsNeural Networks10.1016/j.neunet.2024.106979183(106979)Online publication date: Mar-2025
    • (2025)SCGC : Self-supervised contrastive graph clusteringNeurocomputing10.1016/j.neucom.2024.128629611(128629)Online publication date: Jan-2025
    • (2025)An enhanced ResNet deep learning method for multimodal signal-based locomotion intention recognitionBiomedical Signal Processing and Control10.1016/j.bspc.2024.107254101(107254)Online publication date: Mar-2025
    • (2025)Application of human activity/action recognition: a reviewMultimedia Tools and Applications10.1007/s11042-024-20576-2Online publication date: 8-Jan-2025
    • (2025)Digitale Phänotypisierung – Integration alltagsnah erhobener Daten in die EinzelfallbeurteilungPsychologische Begutachtung10.1007/978-3-662-64797-4_143(527-537)Online publication date: 5-Feb-2025
    • (2024)CauDiTSProceedings of the 41st International Conference on Machine Learning10.5555/3692070.3693414(33113-33146)Online publication date: 21-Jul-2024
    • (2024)Overcoming saturation in density ratio estimation by iterated regularizationProceedings of the 41st International Conference on Machine Learning10.5555/3692070.3692726(16502-16529)Online publication date: 21-Jul-2024
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media