Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2818052.2869089acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescscwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
abstract

Motivational Impact of Facebook Posts on Environmental Communities

Published: 27 February 2016 Publication History

Abstract

As environmental groups utilize social media to increase the participation of citizens in contributing scientific data, the question of what kind of content will motivate user engagement becomes increasingly important. Using a Social Network Analysis framework and following on the heels of motivational studies, we examine the Facebook Fan Pages of three environmental communities: eBird, Aspen Center for Environmental Studies and the Anacostia Watershed Society. We find that whether posts originate with the page owner (Page Posts), with users (User Posts), or whether they are posted by Fan Pages of other sites (Mention Posts), posts on a site fall into 4 main categories based on their message and intent: informational, invitational, motivational and investigational. While thematic content analysis corroborates that posts by owners motivate the most user engagement across the board, the degree to which Page Posts cumulatively fall into the motivational category on a site critically impacts user engagement.

References

[1]
Golbeck, J. (2013). Analyzing the social web. Boston: Morgan Kaufmann.
[2]
Grace, K., Maher, M. Lou, Preece, J., Yeh, T., Stangl, A., & Boston, C. (2014). A Process Model for Crowd-Sourcing Design. Design Computing and Cognition, 263-282.
[3]
Ingram, M., Ingram, H., & Lejano, R. (2014). What's the story? Creating and sustaining environmental networks. Environmental Politics, 23(6), 984-1002.
[4]
Newman, G., Wiggins, A., Crall, A., Graham, E., Newman, S., & Crowston, K. (2012). The future of citizen science: emerging technologies and shifting paradigms. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 10(6), 298-304.
[5]
Robson, C., Hearst, M., Kau, C., & Pierce, J. (2013). Comparing the use of social networking and traditional media channels for promoting citizen science. In Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work (1463-1468). ACM.
[6]
Rotman, D., Preece, J., Hammock, J., Procita, K., Hansen, D., Parr, C., Jacobs, D. (2012). Dynamic changes in motivation in collaborative citizen-science projects. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (217). ACM.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Engaging with Nature through Technology: A Scoping Review of HCI ResearchProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3581534(1-18)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
  • (2020)Social Media Interaction as Informal Science Learning: a Comparison of Message Design in Two NichesResearch in Science Education10.1007/s11165-019-09911-yOnline publication date: 10-Jan-2020
  • (2019)Scientific Twitter: The flow of paleontological communication across a topic networkPLOS ONE10.1371/journal.pone.021968814:7(e0219688)Online publication date: 30-Jul-2019
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
CSCW '16 Companion: Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing Companion
February 2016
549 pages
ISBN:9781450339506
DOI:10.1145/2818052
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 27 February 2016

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Facebook fan pages
  2. Social Network Analysis
  3. environmental communities
  4. motivation

Qualifiers

  • Abstract

Conference

CSCW '16
Sponsor:
CSCW '16: Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing
February 26 - March 2, 2016
California, San Francisco, USA

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 2,235 of 8,521 submissions, 26%

Upcoming Conference

CSCW '25

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)9
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 08 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Engaging with Nature through Technology: A Scoping Review of HCI ResearchProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3581534(1-18)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
  • (2020)Social Media Interaction as Informal Science Learning: a Comparison of Message Design in Two NichesResearch in Science Education10.1007/s11165-019-09911-yOnline publication date: 10-Jan-2020
  • (2019)Scientific Twitter: The flow of paleontological communication across a topic networkPLOS ONE10.1371/journal.pone.021968814:7(e0219688)Online publication date: 30-Jul-2019
  • (2016)Social Media as an Indigenized Information World For Environmental StewardshipProceedings of the First African Conference on Human Computer Interaction10.1145/2998581.2998587(126-137)Online publication date: 21-Nov-2016
  • (2016)Citizen Science: New Research Challenges for Human–Computer InteractionInternational Journal of Human-Computer Interaction10.1080/10447318.2016.119415332:8(585-612)Online publication date: 16-Jun-2016

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media