Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2839509.2844620acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessigcseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Toward More Gender Diversity in CS through an Artificial Intelligence Summer Program for High School Girls

Published: 17 February 2016 Publication History

Abstract

The field of computer science suffers from a lack of diversity. The Stanford Artificial Intelligence Laboratory's Outreach Summer (SAILORS), a two-week non-residential free summer program, recruits high school girls to computer science, specifically to Artificial Intelligence (AI). The program was organized by graduate student and professor volunteers. The goals of the pilot program are to increase interest in AI, contextualize technically rigorous AI concepts through societal impact, and address barriers that could discourage 10th grade girls from pursuing computer science. In this paper we describe the curriculum designed to achieve these goals. Survey results show students had a statistically significant increase in technical knowledge, interest in pursuing careers in AI, and confidence in succeeding in AI and computer science. Additionally, survey results show that the majority of the students found new role models, faculty support, and a sense of community in AI and computer science.

References

[1]
National Center for Women and Information Technology. Women and Information Technology By the Numbers, 2015. Retrieved August 21, 2015 from http://www.ncwit.org/sites/default/files/resources/btn_04032015_web.pdf.
[2]
Degrees in computer and information sciences conferred by degree-granting institutions, by level of degree and sex of student: 1970-71 through 2010-11, 2012. Retrieved August 21, 2015 from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d12/tables/dt12_349.asp.
[3]
Jane Margolis, Allan Fisher, and Faye Miller. The Anatomy of Interest: Women in Undergraduate Computer Science. Women's Studies Quarterly, 28(1/2):pp. 104--127, 2000.
[4]
Greg Scragg and Jesse Smith. A Study of Barriers to Women in Undergraduate Computer Science. SIGCSE Bull., 30(1):82--86, March 1998.
[5]
Lori Carter. Why students with an Apparent Aptitude for Computer Science Don't Choose to Major in Computer Science. In Proceedings of the 37th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, SIGCSE '06, pages 27--31, New York, NY, USA, 2006. ACM.
[6]
Neil Anderson, Colin Lankshear, Carolyn Timms, and Lyn Courtney. Because it's boring, irrelevant and I don't like computers: Why high school girls avoid professionally-oriented ICT subjects. Computers & Education, 50(4):1304 -- 1318, 2008.
[7]
J.M. Cohoon. Must there be so few? Including women in CS. In Software Engineering, 2003. Proceedings. 25th International Conference on, pages 668--674, May 2003.
[8]
Kelly R. Cannon, Katherine A. Panciera, and Nikolaos P. Papanikolopoulos. Second annual robotics summer camp for underrepresented students. SIGCSE Bull., 39(3):14--18, June 2007.
[9]
Inna Pivkina, Enrico Pontelli, Rachel Jensen, and Jessica Haebe. Young women in computing: Lessons learned from an educational & outreach program. SIGCSE Bull., 41(1):509--513, March 2009.
[10]
Janet E. Burge, Gerald C. Gannod, Maureen Doyle, and Karen C. Davis. Girls on the Go: A CS summer camp to attract and inspire female high school students. In Proceeding of the 44th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, SIGCSE '13, pages 615--620, New York, NY, USA, 2013. ACM.
[11]
Lori Pollock, Kathleen McCoy, Sandra Carberry, Namratha Hundigopal, and Xiaoxin You. Increasing high school girls' self confidence and awareness of CS through a positive summer experience. SIGCSE Bull., 36(1):185--189, March 2004.
[12]
Manual for Observing Patterns of Adaptive Learning (OPAL): A Protocol for Classroom Observations.
[13]
B. H. Loyd and C. P. Gressard. Computer attitude scale. Journal of Computing Research., 15(3):241--259, June 1996.
[14]
Brian Dorn and Allison Elliott Tew. Empirical validation and application of the computing attitudes survey. Computer Science Education, 25(1):1--36, 2015.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Factors affecting university students’ generative AI literacy: Evidence and evaluation in the UK and Hong Kong contextsPolicy Futures in Education10.1177/14782103241287401Online publication date: 26-Sep-2024
  • (2024)Examining the Role of Parental Support on Youth’s Interest in and Self-Efficacy of Computer ProgrammingACM Transactions on Computing Education10.1145/367688824:3(1-23)Online publication date: 27-Sep-2024
  • (2024)Co-ML: Collaborative Machine Learning Model Building for Developing Dataset Design PracticesACM Transactions on Computing Education10.1145/364155224:2(1-37)Online publication date: 16-Apr-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
SIGCSE '16: Proceedings of the 47th ACM Technical Symposium on Computing Science Education
February 2016
768 pages
ISBN:9781450336857
DOI:10.1145/2839509
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 17 February 2016

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. artificial intelligence
  2. computer science education
  3. gender and diversity
  4. k-12 education
  5. outreach
  6. recruiting women
  7. summer camps

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

SIGCSE '16
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

SIGCSE '16 Paper Acceptance Rate 105 of 297 submissions, 35%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 1,595 of 4,542 submissions, 35%

Upcoming Conference

SIGCSE TS 2025
The 56th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education
February 26 - March 1, 2025
Pittsburgh , PA , USA

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)118
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)12
Reflects downloads up to 28 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Factors affecting university students’ generative AI literacy: Evidence and evaluation in the UK and Hong Kong contextsPolicy Futures in Education10.1177/14782103241287401Online publication date: 26-Sep-2024
  • (2024)Examining the Role of Parental Support on Youth’s Interest in and Self-Efficacy of Computer ProgrammingACM Transactions on Computing Education10.1145/367688824:3(1-23)Online publication date: 27-Sep-2024
  • (2024)Co-ML: Collaborative Machine Learning Model Building for Developing Dataset Design PracticesACM Transactions on Computing Education10.1145/364155224:2(1-37)Online publication date: 16-Apr-2024
  • (2024)Scratch-NB: A Scratch Extension for Introducing K-12 Learners to Supervised Machine LearningProceedings of the 55th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 110.1145/3626252.3630920(1077-1083)Online publication date: 7-Mar-2024
  • (2024)Towards inclusivity in AI: A comparative study of cognitive engagement between marginalized female students and peersBritish Journal of Educational Technology10.1111/bjet.1346755:6(2557-2573)Online publication date: 23-Apr-2024
  • (2024)AI in Computer Science Education: Tool, Subdomain, and Wildcard2024 47th MIPRO ICT and Electronics Convention (MIPRO)10.1109/MIPRO60963.2024.10569335(1267-1271)Online publication date: 20-May-2024
  • (2024)Delving into primary students’ conceptions of artificial intelligence learning: A drawing-based epistemic network analysisEducation and Information Technologies10.1007/s10639-024-12847-029:18(25457-25486)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2024
  • (2024)Meta-analysis on effects of artificial intelligence education in K-12 South Korean classroomsEducation and Information Technologies10.1007/s10639-024-12738-429:17(22859-22894)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2024
  • (2024)Moralische RoboterundefinedOnline publication date: 4-Mar-2024
  • (2023)AI literacy in K-12: a systematic literature reviewInternational Journal of STEM Education10.1186/s40594-023-00418-710:1Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media