Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2851581.2892342acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
abstract

Investigating Instructional Pacing Supports for Teaching Students with Intellectual Disability

Published: 07 May 2016 Publication History
  • Get Citation Alerts
  • Abstract

    In this paper, we consider the use of technological instructional pacing supports to teach students with intellectual disability (ID). Based on a qualitative field study where 11 participants used our mobile-based educational platform, we found that although technology may help the instructor control the pace of the class, it also poses barriers to the development of students' autonomy and self-esteem. Our preliminary results also suggest that the balance between instructor-led and self-paced instruction based on technology is promising and would better fit both instructor's and students' needs. These findings provide insights into challenges and opportunities for the design of educational initiatives targeted at people with ID.

    References

    [1]
    Julia Allen. 2015. Evidence-based Practices in the Design of Interactive Multimedia for Learners with Cognitive Learning Disabilities. In Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (SITE '15), 2944--2949. http://www.editlib.org/p/150413
    [2]
    Kevin M. Ayres, Linda Mechling, and Frank J. Sansosti. 2013. The Use Of Mobile Technologies To Assist With Life Skills/Independence Of Students With Moderate/Severe Intellectual Disability And/Or Autism Spectrum Disorders: Considerations For The Future Of School Psychology. Psychology in the Schools, 50, 3: 259--271. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pits.21673
    [3]
    Erin Buehler, William Easley, Samantha McDonald, Niara Comrie, and Amy Hurst. 2015. Inclusion and Education: 3D Printing for Integrated Classrooms. In Proceedings of the 17th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers & Accessibility (ASSETS '15), 281--290. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2700648.2809844
    [4]
    Meg Cramer, Sen H. Hirano, Monica Tentori, Michael T. Yeganyan, and Gillian R. Hayes. 2011. Classroom-based assistive technology: collective use of interactive visual schedules by students with autism. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '11), 1--10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1978944
    [5]
    Taciana P. Falcão. 2010. The role of tangible technologies for special education. In CHI '10 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '10), 2911--2914. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1753846.1753883
    [6]
    Rodrigo L. Guimarães and Andrea B. Mattos. 2015. Exploring the Use of Massive Open Online Courses for Teaching Students with Intellectual Disability. In Proceedings of the 15th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers & Accessibility (ASSETS '15), 343--344. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2700648.2811370
    [7]
    Stefan Johansson, Jan Gulliksen, and Ann Lantz. 2015. User Participation When Users have Mental and Cognitive Disabilities. In Proceedings of the 17th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers & Accessibility (ASSETS '15), 69--76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2700648.2809849
    [8]
    Johnmarshall Reeve. 2009. Why Teachers Adopt a Controlling Motivating Style Toward Students and How They Can Become More Autonomy Supportive. Educational Psychologist, 44, 3: 159--175. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00461520903028990
    [9]
    Joe Reichle. 2011. Evaluation Assistive Technology in the Education of Persons with Severe Disabilities. Journal of Behavioral Education, 20, 1: 77--85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10864-011--9121--1
    [10]
    Steven M. Ross and Ernest A. Rakow. 1981. Learner control versus program control as adaptive strategies for selection of instructional support on math rules. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 5: 745--753. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/00220663.73.5.745
    [11]
    Katie A. Smith, Sally B. Shepley, Jennifer L. Alexander, and Kevin M. Ayres. 2015. The independent use of self-instructions for the acquisition of untrained multi-step tasks for individuals with an intellectual disability: A review of the literature. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 40: 19--30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2015.01.010
    [12]
    Candice R. Stefanou, Kathleen C. Perencevich, Matthew DiCinto, and Julianne C. Turner. 2004. Supporting autonomy in the classroom: Ways teachers encourage student decision making and ownership. Educational Psychologist, 39, 2: 97--110. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3902_2

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2023)Self-triggered Control with Energy Harvesting Sensor NodesACM Transactions on Cyber-Physical Systems10.1145/35973117:3(1-31)Online publication date: 13-Jul-2023
    • (2023)Automated Adversary-in-the-Loop Cyber-Physical Defense PlanningACM Transactions on Cyber-Physical Systems10.1145/35962227:3(1-25)Online publication date: 13-Jul-2023
    • (2023)A Timing-Based Framework for Designing Resilient Cyber-Physical Systems under Safety ConstraintACM Transactions on Cyber-Physical Systems10.1145/35946387:3(1-25)Online publication date: 13-Jul-2023
    • Show More Cited By

    Index Terms

    1. Investigating Instructional Pacing Supports for Teaching Students with Intellectual Disability

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI EA '16: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 2016
      3954 pages
      ISBN:9781450340823
      DOI:10.1145/2851581
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Sponsors

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 07 May 2016

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. educational technology
      2. face-to-face learning
      3. instructor-led training
      4. people with intellectual disability
      5. self-paced instruction
      6. synchronous computer-mediated instruction

      Qualifiers

      • Abstract

      Funding Sources

      • FINEP

      Conference

      CHI'16
      Sponsor:
      CHI'16: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 7 - 12, 2016
      California, San Jose, USA

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI EA '16 Paper Acceptance Rate 1,000 of 5,000 submissions, 20%;
      Overall Acceptance Rate 6,164 of 23,696 submissions, 26%

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)15
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
      Reflects downloads up to 10 Aug 2024

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2023)Self-triggered Control with Energy Harvesting Sensor NodesACM Transactions on Cyber-Physical Systems10.1145/35973117:3(1-31)Online publication date: 13-Jul-2023
      • (2023)Automated Adversary-in-the-Loop Cyber-Physical Defense PlanningACM Transactions on Cyber-Physical Systems10.1145/35962227:3(1-25)Online publication date: 13-Jul-2023
      • (2023)A Timing-Based Framework for Designing Resilient Cyber-Physical Systems under Safety ConstraintACM Transactions on Cyber-Physical Systems10.1145/35946387:3(1-25)Online publication date: 13-Jul-2023
      • (2023)Toward a Distributed Trust Management System for Misbehavior Detection in the Internet of VehiclesACM Transactions on Cyber-Physical Systems10.1145/35946377:3(1-25)Online publication date: 13-Jul-2023
      • (2023)Minimal Critical Sequences in Model-based Safety and Security Analyses: Commonalities and DifferencesACM Transactions on Cyber-Physical Systems10.1145/35938117:3(1-20)Online publication date: 13-Jul-2023
      • (2023)The Design and Prototyping of an App to Teach Adults with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities to Empower Them Against AbuseACM Transactions on Accessible Computing10.1145/356958516:2(1-31)Online publication date: 13-Jul-2023
      • (2023)Characterizing the Technology Needs of Vulnerable Populations for Participation in Research and Design by Adopting Maslow’s Hierarchy of NeedsProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3581221(1-20)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
      • (2022)Designing Post-Trauma Self-Regulation Apps for People with Intellectual and Developmental DisabilitiesProceedings of the 24th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility10.1145/3517428.3544798(1-14)Online publication date: 23-Oct-2022
      • (2021)Designing an App to Help Individuals with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities to Recognize AbuseProceedings of the 23rd International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility10.1145/3441852.3471217(1-14)Online publication date: 17-Oct-2021
      • (2018)A proposal for a unified framework for the design of technologies for people with learning difficultiesTechnology and Disability10.3233/TAD-18019330:1-2(25-40)Online publication date: 5-Sep-2018
      • Show More Cited By

      View Options

      Get Access

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media