Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2851613.2851738acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessacConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Load-aware scheduling for heterogeneous multi-core systems

Published: 04 April 2016 Publication History

Abstract

Heterogeneous multi-core systems are becoming more and more common today. To be used to their full potential, the operating system has to be adapted to the new system environment. This is especially true for the scheduler as it is crucial to the overall system performance. In this paper, we present a scheduling approach for heterogeneous systems with two different kinds of cores. One that is very power efficient, but shows only a limited computing power, and the other one that has a very high performance and is very power consuming at the same time. We consider such heterogeneity for a centralized scheduler architecture.
In our approach, we introduce a new load metric in order to classify tasks whether or not they are suited to be executed on a high-performance core. Based on this metric, we present a task state model for scheduling tasks according to their performance classification. We implemented the scheduling approach by extending the Brain Fuck Scheduler (BFS) and evaluated it on an eight core heterogeneous architecture with four low performance and four high-performance cores. The evaluation covers system responsiveness and high load behaviour compared to the vanilla BFS and the decentralized Completely Fair Scheduler (CFS). Even though our approach takes the heterogeneity into account, the results show that it scales better than the vanilla BFS while nearly maintaining its superior responsiveness.

References

[1]
A80 Processor. http://www.allwinnertech.com/en/clq/processora/A80.html. Last visited: 20.09.2015.
[2]
The hackbench scheduler benchmark and stress test. http://people.redhat.com/mingo/cfs-scheduler/tools/hackbench.c. Last visited: 20.09.2015.
[3]
libav, open source audio and video processing tools. https://libav.org/. Last visited: 20.09.2015.
[4]
Merri evaluation board -- A80 OptimusBoard. http://www.merrii.com/en/pla d.asp?id=173. Last visited: 20.09.2015.
[5]
Mplayer, a movie player. http://www.mplayerhq.hu. Last visited: 20.09.2015.
[6]
rt test utils. http://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/clrkwllms/rt-tests.git/. Last visited: 07.12.2015.
[7]
Michela Becchi and Patrick Crowley. Dynamic thread assignment on heterogeneous multiprocessor architectures. In Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Computing Frontiers (CF '06), pages 29--40, New York, NY, USA, 2006. ACM.
[8]
Fred A. Bower, Daniel J. Sorin, and Landon P. Cox. The impact of dynamically heterogeneous multicore processors on thread scheduling. IEEE Micro, 28(3):17--25, May 2008.
[9]
Peter Greenhalgh. big.LITTLE processing with ARM Cortex-A15 & Cortex-A7. White paper, ARM Limited, September 2011.
[10]
José A. Joao, M. Aater Suleman, Onur Mutlu, and Yale N. Patt. Utility-based acceleration of multithreaded applications on asymmetric cmps. SIGARCH Computer Architecture News, 41(3):154--165, June 2013.
[11]
Con Kolivas. BFS cpu scheduler v0.304 stable release. http://lwn.net/Articles/357451/. Last visited: 7.12.2015.
[12]
David Koufaty, Dheeraj Reddy, and Scott Hahn. Bias scheduling in heterogeneous multi-core architectures. In Proceedings of the 5th European Conference on Computer Systems (EuroSys '10), pages 125--138, New York, NY, USA, 2010. ACM.
[13]
Linaro. ARM big.LITTLE MP Kernel tree. https://git.linaro.org/arm/big.LITTLE/mp.git. Last visited: 07.12.2015.
[14]
Martin Lowinski. Analysis and enhancements of scheduling-strategies for multicore systems. Master's thesis, Fakultät für Informatik, Technische Universität München, Germany, March 2013.
[15]
Larry McVoy and Carl Staelin. lmbench: Portable tools for performance analysis. In Proceedings of the 1996 Annual Conference on USENIX Annual Technical Conference (ATEC '96), pages 23--23, Berkeley, CA, USA, 1996. USENIX Association.
[16]
NVIDIA. Nvidia tegra multi-processor architecture. White paper, NVIDIA Corporation, February 2010.
[17]
Juan Carlos Saez, Adrian Pousa, Fernando Castro, Daniel Chaver, and Manuel Prieto-Matias. ACFS: A Completely Fair Scheduler for Asymmetric Single-isa Multicore Systems. In Proceedings of the 30th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing (SAC '15), pages 2027--2032, New York, NY, USA, 2015. ACM.
[18]
Daniel Shelepov, Juan Carlos Saez Alcaide, Stacey Jeffery, Alexandra Fedorova, Nestor Perez, Zhi Feng Huang, Sergey Blagodurov, and Viren Kumar. HASS: A Scheduler for Heterogeneous Multicore Systems. SIGOPS Operating Systems Review, 43(2):66--75, April 2009.
[19]
Timothy Sherwood and Brad Calder. Time varying behavior of programs. Technical report, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA, 1999.
[20]
David W. Wall. Limits of instruction-level parallelism. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems (ASPLOS IV), pages 176--188, New York, NY, USA, 1991. ACM.

Cited By

View all
  • (2018)Contention-Aware Fair Scheduling for Asymmetric Single-ISA Multicore SystemsIEEE Transactions on Computers10.1109/TC.2018.283641867:12(1703-1719)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2018
  • (2018)Latency-aware task scheduling on big.LITTLE heterogeneous computing architecture2018 IEEE International Conference on Applied System Invention (ICASI)10.1109/ICASI.2018.8394254(13-14)Online publication date: Apr-2018
  • (2017)Analysis of NUMA effects in modern multicore systems for the design of high-performance data transfer applicationsFuture Generation Computer Systems10.1016/j.future.2017.04.00174:C(41-50)Online publication date: 1-Sep-2017

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
SAC '16: Proceedings of the 31st Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing
April 2016
2360 pages
ISBN:9781450337397
DOI:10.1145/2851613
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 04 April 2016

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. centralized scheduling
  2. heterogeneous multi-core architecture
  3. task state model

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

SAC 2016
Sponsor:
SAC 2016: Symposium on Applied Computing
April 4 - 8, 2016
Pisa, Italy

Acceptance Rates

SAC '16 Paper Acceptance Rate 252 of 1,047 submissions, 24%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 1,650 of 6,669 submissions, 25%

Upcoming Conference

SAC '25
The 40th ACM/SIGAPP Symposium on Applied Computing
March 31 - April 4, 2025
Catania , Italy

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)3
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 13 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2018)Contention-Aware Fair Scheduling for Asymmetric Single-ISA Multicore SystemsIEEE Transactions on Computers10.1109/TC.2018.283641867:12(1703-1719)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2018
  • (2018)Latency-aware task scheduling on big.LITTLE heterogeneous computing architecture2018 IEEE International Conference on Applied System Invention (ICASI)10.1109/ICASI.2018.8394254(13-14)Online publication date: Apr-2018
  • (2017)Analysis of NUMA effects in modern multicore systems for the design of high-performance data transfer applicationsFuture Generation Computer Systems10.1016/j.future.2017.04.00174:C(41-50)Online publication date: 1-Sep-2017

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media