Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2872427.2883006acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesthewebconfConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Public Access

Immersive Recommendation: News and Event Recommendations Using Personal Digital Traces

Published: 11 April 2016 Publication History

Abstract

We propose a new user-centric recommendation model, called Immersive Recommendation, that incorporates cross-platform and diverse personal digital traces into recommendations. Our context-aware topic modeling algorithm systematically profiles users' interests based on their traces from different contexts, and our hybrid recommendation algorithm makes high-quality recommendations by fusing users' personal profiles, item profiles, and existing ratings. Specifically, in this work we target personalized news and local event recommendations for their utility and societal importance. We evaluated the model with a large-scale offline evaluation leveraging users' public Twitter traces. In addition, we conducted a direct evaluation of the model's recommendations in a 33-participant study using Twitter, Facebook and email traces. In the both cases, the proposed model showed significant improvement over the state-of-the-art algorithms, suggesting the value of using this new user-centric recommendation model to improve recommendation quality, including in cold-start situations.

References

[1]
Mozilla, firefox interest dashboard. https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/interest-dashboard/, 2014.
[2]
Context-Aware LDA. https://github.com/changun/CA-LDA, 2015.
[3]
F. Abel, N. Henze, E. Herder, and D. Krause. Interweaving public user profiles on the web. In User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization, pages 16--27. Springer, 2010.
[4]
D. Agarwal and B.-C. Chen. Regression-based latent factor models. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pages 19--28, 2009.
[5]
D. Agarwal and B.-C. Chen. fLDA: matrix factorization through latent dirichlet allocation. In Proceedings of the third ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, pages 91--100, 2010.
[6]
A. Agresti. Analysis of ordinal categorical data, volume 656. John Wiley & Sons, 2010.
[7]
E. M. Airoldi, D. M. Blei, E. A. Erosheva, and S. E. Fienberg. Handbook of Mixed Membership Models and Their Applications. CRC Press, 2014.
[8]
X. Amatriain, J. M. Pujol, and N. Oliver. I like it... i like it not: Evaluating user ratings noise in recommender systems. In User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization, pages 247--258. Springer, 2009.
[9]
T. Bansal, M. Das, and C. Bhattacharyya. Content driven user profiling for comment-worthy recommendations of news and blog articles. In Proceedings of the 9th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, pages 195--202. ACM, 2015.
[10]
P. Bhattacharya, M. B. Zafar, N. Ganguly, S. Ghosh, and K. P. Gummadi. Inferring user interests in the twitter social network. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, RecSys '14, pages 357--360, 2014.
[11]
D. M. Blei. Probabilistic topic models. Communications of the ACM, 55(4):77--84, Apr. 2012.
[12]
C. Chemudugunta and P. S. M. Steyvers. Modeling general and specific aspects of documents with a probabilistic topic model. In Proceedings of the Conference on Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 19, page 241, 2007.
[13]
J. Cohen. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Academic press, 2013.
[14]
S. Cooper. The difference between living in new york and san francisco. https://medium.com/@sarahcpr/the-difference-between-living-in-new-york-and-san-francisco-3e8ae58832a5, 2015. Accessed: 2015-04--21.
[15]
A. P. Dempster, N. M. Laird, and D. B. Rubin. Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (methodological), pages 1--38, 1977.
[16]
D. A. Dillman, J. D. Smyth, and L. Melani. Internet, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: the tailored design method. Wiley & Sons Toronto, 2011.
[17]
D. Estrin. Small Data, Where N = Me. Communications of the ACM, 57(4):32--34, Apr. 2014.
[18]
R. Forrest and A. Kearns. Social cohesion, social capital and the neighbourhood. Urban studies, 38(12):2125--2143, 2001.
[19]
J. L. Herlocker, J. A. Konstan, L. G. Terveen, and J. T. Riedl. Evaluating collaborative filtering recommender systems. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 22(1):5--53, 2004.
[20]
M. Hofer. Adolescents' development of individual interests: A product of multiple goal regulation? Educational Psychologist, 45(3):149--166, 2010.
[21]
B. Hogan. The presentation of self in the age of social media: Distinguishing performances and exhibitions online. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 2010.
[22]
Y. Hu, Y. Koren, and C. Volinsky. Collaborative filtering for implicit feedback datasets. In The Eighth IEEE International Conference on Data Mining, pages 263--272, 2008.
[23]
S. Iyengar and D. R. Kinder. News that matters: Television and American opinion. University of Chicago Press, 2010.
[24]
G. Keppel. Design and analysis: A researcher's handbook. Prentice-Hall, Inc, 1991.
[25]
B. Klimt and Y. Yang. The Enron corpus: A new dataset for email classification research. In Machine learning: ECML 2004, pages 217--226. Springer, 2004.
[26]
Q. V. Le and T. Mikolov. Distributed representations of sentences and documents. arXiv preprint arXiv:1405.4053, 2014.
[27]
R. Likert. A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of psychology, 1932.
[28]
X. Lu, C. Wang, J.-M. Yang, Y. Pang, and L. Zhang. Photo2trip: generating travel routes from geo-tagged photos for trip planning. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Multimedia, pages 143--152, 2010.
[29]
H. Ma, H. Yang, M. R. Lyu, and I. King. Sorec: social recommendation using probabilistic matrix factorization. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Information and knowledge management, pages 931--940, 2008.
[30]
A. E. Marwick and danah boyd. I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New media & society, 13(1):114--133, 2011.
[31]
A. K. McCallum. {MALLET: A Machine Learning for Language Toolkit}. 2002.
[32]
A. Mnih and R. Salakhutdinov. Probabilistic matrix factorization. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pages 1257--1264, 2007.
[33]
S.-T. Park and W. Chu. Pairwise preference regression for cold-start recommendation. In Proceedings of the third ACM conference on Recommender systems, pages 21--28, 2009.
[34]
M. Paul and R. Girju. Cross-cultural analysis of blogs and forums with mixed-collection topic models. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: Volume 3-Volume 3, pages 1408--1417, 2009.
[35]
M. Pennacchiotti, F. Silvestri, H. Vahabi, and R. Venturini. Making your interests follow you on twitter. In Proceedings of the 21st ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, pages 165--174. ACM, 2012.
[36]
R. D. Putnam. Bowling alone: America's declining social capital. Journal of Democracy, 6(1):65--78, 1995.
[37]
R. Řehřek and P. Sojka. Software framework for topic modelling with large corpora. 2010.
[38]
S. Robertson and H. Zaragoza. The probabilistic relevance framework: BM25 and beyond. Now Publishers Inc, 2009.
[39]
S. Sedhain, S. Sanner, D. Braziunas, L. Xie, and J. Christensen. Social collaborative filtering for cold-start recommendations. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, pages 345--348, 2014.
[40]
G. Shani and A. Gunawardana. Evaluating recommendation systems. In Recommender systems handbook, pages 257--297. Springer, 2011.
[41]
Y. Shi, A. Karatzoglou, L. Baltrunas, M. Larson, N. Oliver, and A. Hanjalic. Climf: learning to maximize reciprocal rank with collaborative less-is-more filtering. In Proceedings of the Sixth ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, pages 139--146, 2012.
[42]
Y. Shi, M. Larson, and A. Hanjalic. Collaborative filtering beyond the user-item matrix: A survey of the state of the art and future challenges. ACM Computing Surveys, 47(1):3, 2014.
[43]
R. Sinha and K. Swearingen. The role of transparency in recommender systems. In CHI '02 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 830--831, 2002.
[44]
C. Wang and D. M. Blei. Collaborative topic modeling for recommending scientific articles. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pages 448--456, 2011.
[45]
M. Weimer, A. Karatzoglou, Q. V. Le, and A. Smola. Maximum margin matrix factorization for collaborative ranking. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2007.
[46]
M. Yan, J. Sang, and C. Xu. Mining cross-network association for youtube video promotion. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Multimedia, pages 557--566, 2014.
[47]
L. Yang, C.-K. Hsieh, and D. Estrin. Beyond classification: Latent user interests profiling from visual contents analysis. arXiv preprint arXiv:1512.06785, 2015.
[48]
S.-H. Yang, B. Long, A. Smola, N. Sadagopan, Z. Zheng, and H. Zha. Like like alike: joint friendship and interest propagation in social networks. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on World Wide Web, pages 537--546, 2011.
[49]
X. Yang, Y. Li, and J. Luo. Pinterest board recommendation for twitter users. In Proceedings of the 23rd ACM International Conference on Multimedia, pages 963--966, 2015.
[50]
X. Yu, X. Ren, Y. Sun, Q. Gu, B. Sturt, U. Khandelwal, B. Norick, and J. Han. Personalized entity recommendation: A heterogeneous information network approach. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, pages 283--292, 2014.
[51]
C. Zhai, A. Velivelli, and B. Yu. A cross-collection mixture model for comparative text mining. In Proceedings of the tenth ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pages 743--748, 2004.
[52]
Z. Zhao, Z. Cheng, L. Hong, and E. H. Chi. Improving user topic interest profiles by behavior factorization. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web, pages 1406--1416, 2015.
[53]
C. Zhong, D. Karamshuk, and N. Sastry. Predicting pinterest: Automating a distributed human computation. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web, pages 1417--1426, 2015.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)A review of challenges, algorithms and evaluation methods in news recommendationJournal of Information Science10.1177/01655515241244497Online publication date: 28-Apr-2024
  • (2024)MicroRec: Leveraging Large Language Models for Microservice RecommendationProceedings of the 21st International Conference on Mining Software Repositories10.1145/3643991.3644916(419-430)Online publication date: 15-Apr-2024
  • (2024)Exploring on role of location in intelligent news recommendation from data analysis perspectiveInformation Sciences10.1016/j.ins.2024.120213662(120213)Online publication date: Mar-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
WWW '16: Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on World Wide Web
April 2016
1482 pages
ISBN:9781450341431

Sponsors

  • IW3C2: International World Wide Web Conference Committee

In-Cooperation

Publisher

International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee

Republic and Canton of Geneva, Switzerland

Publication History

Published: 11 April 2016

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. personal digital traces
  2. personalization
  3. recommendations
  4. small data

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Funding Sources

  • UnitedHealth Group
  • AOL Connected Experiences Laboratory
  • Google
  • Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
  • National Science Foundation
  • Pfizer
  • National Institutes of Health

Conference

WWW '16
Sponsor:
  • IW3C2
WWW '16: 25th International World Wide Web Conference
April 11 - 15, 2016
Québec, Montréal, Canada

Acceptance Rates

WWW '16 Paper Acceptance Rate 115 of 727 submissions, 16%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 1,899 of 8,196 submissions, 23%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)136
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)26
Reflects downloads up to 03 Sep 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)A review of challenges, algorithms and evaluation methods in news recommendationJournal of Information Science10.1177/01655515241244497Online publication date: 28-Apr-2024
  • (2024)MicroRec: Leveraging Large Language Models for Microservice RecommendationProceedings of the 21st International Conference on Mining Software Repositories10.1145/3643991.3644916(419-430)Online publication date: 15-Apr-2024
  • (2024)Exploring on role of location in intelligent news recommendation from data analysis perspectiveInformation Sciences10.1016/j.ins.2024.120213662(120213)Online publication date: Mar-2024
  • (2023)Towards Recommender Systems Integrating Contextual Information from Multiple Domains through Tensor FactorizationArtificial Intelligence and Data Science in Recommendation System: Current Trends, Technologies and Applications10.2174/9789815136746123010007(72-109)Online publication date: 14-Aug-2023
  • (2023)Research on Ethical Issues and Coping Strategies of Artificial Intelligence Algorithms Recommending News with the Support of Wireless Sensing TechnologyJournal of Sensors10.1155/2023/86298492023(1-9)Online publication date: 20-Apr-2023
  • (2023)Personalized News Recommendation: Methods and ChallengesACM Transactions on Information Systems10.1145/353025741:1(1-50)Online publication date: 10-Jan-2023
  • (2023)Deep learning in news recommender systems: A comprehensive survey, challenges and future trendsNeurocomputing10.1016/j.neucom.2023.126881562(126881)Online publication date: Dec-2023
  • (2022)Persia: An Open, Hybrid System Scaling Deep Learning-based Recommenders up to 100 Trillion ParametersProceedings of the 28th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining10.1145/3534678.3539070(3288-3298)Online publication date: 14-Aug-2022
  • (2022)Self-supervised learning for fair recommender systemsApplied Soft Computing10.1016/j.asoc.2022.109126125(109126)Online publication date: Aug-2022
  • (2022)Scenario and Architecture for Intelligent Decision Support Based on User Digital LifeArtificial Intelligence Trends in Systems10.1007/978-3-031-09076-9_38(422-433)Online publication date: 8-Jul-2022
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Get Access

Login options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media