Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2892664.2892700acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmodularityConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Towards contractual interfaces for reusable functional quality attribute operationalisations

Published: 14 March 2016 Publication History

Abstract

The quality of a software system can be measured by the extent to which it possesses a desired combination of quality attributes (QAs). While some QAs are achieved implicitly through the interaction of various functional components of the system, others (e.g., security) can be encapsulated in dedicated software components. These QAs are known as functional quality attributes (FQAs). As applications may require different FQAs, and each FQA can be composed of many concerns (e.g., access control and authentication), integrating FQAs is very complex and requires dedicated expertise. Software architects are required to manually define FQA components, identify appropriate points in their architecture where to weave them, and verify that the composition of these FQA components with the other components is correct. This is a complex and error prone process. In our previous work we defined reusable FQAs by encapsulating them as aspectual architecture models that can be woven into a base architecture. So far, the joinpoints for weaving had to be identified manually. This made it difficult for software architects to verify that they have woven all the necessary FQAs into all the right places. In this paper, we address this problem by introducing a notion of contract for FQAs so that the correct application of an FQA (or one of its concerns) can be checked or, alternatively, appropriate binding points can be identified and proposed to the software architect automatically.

References

[1]
O. Alam, J. Kienzle, and G. Mussbacher. Concern-oriented software design. In Model-Driven Engineering Languages and Systems, volume 8107 of LNCS, pages 604–621. 2013.
[2]
ISBN 978-3-642-41532-6. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41533-3_37. T. Arendt, E. Biermann, S. Jurack, C. Krause, and G. Taentzer. Henshin: Advanced concepts and tools for in-place emf model transformations. In Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems, volume 6394 of LNCS, pages 121–135. 2010.
[3]
ISBN 978-3-642-16144-5. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16145-2_9. F. Bachmann, L. Bass, M. Klein, and C. Shelton. Designing software architectures to achieve quality attribute requirements. Software, IEE Proceedings -, 152(4):153–165, 2005. ISSN 1462-5970.
[4]
R. d. O. Cavalcanti, E. S. de Almeida, and S. R. Meira. Extending the RiPLEDE process with quality attribute variability realization. In QoSA-ISARCS, 2011.
[5]
L. Chung, B. A. Nixon, E. Yu, and J. Mylopoulos. Non-Functional Requirements in Software Engineering. The Kluwer international series in software engineering. Kluwer Academic Publishers Group, Dordrecht, Netherlands, 1999. ISBN 0-7923-8666-3. J. M. Horcas, M. Pinto, and L. Fuentes. Injecting quality attributes into software architectures with the common variability language. In Component-Based Software Engineering, CBSE, pages 35–44, 2014.
[6]
URL http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2602458.2602460. J. M. Horcas, M. Pinto, and L. Fuentes. An automatic process for weaving functional quality attributes using a software product line approach. Journal of Systems and Software, 112:78–95, 2016.
[7]
J. Kienzle, W. Al Abed, and J. Klein. Aspect-oriented multi-view modeling. In Aspect-Oriented Software Development, AOSD, pages 87–98, 2009. ISBN 978-1-60558-442-3. URL http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1509239.1509252. M. Matinlassi, E. Niemelä, and L. Dobrica. Quality-driven Architecture Design and Quality Analysis Method: A Revolutionary Initiation Approach to a Product Line Architecture. 2002.

Cited By

View all
  • (2017)Extending the Common Variability Language (CVL) EngineProceedings of the 21st International Systems and Software Product Line Conference - Volume B10.1145/3109729.3109749(32-37)Online publication date: 25-Sep-2017

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
MODULARITY Companion 2016: Companion Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Modularity
March 2016
217 pages
ISBN:9781450340335
DOI:10.1145/2892664
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

In-Cooperation

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 14 March 2016

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Aspect-Orientation
  2. Model-Driven Development
  3. Quality Attributes
  4. Weaving Patterns

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

Modularity '16

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 41 of 139 submissions, 29%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)2
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 08 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2017)Extending the Common Variability Language (CVL) EngineProceedings of the 21st International Systems and Software Product Line Conference - Volume B10.1145/3109729.3109749(32-37)Online publication date: 25-Sep-2017

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media