Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2930238.2930250acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesumapConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Automatic Teacher Modeling from Live Classroom Audio

Published: 13 July 2016 Publication History

Abstract

We investigate automatic analysis of teachers' instructional strategies from audio recordings collected in live classrooms. We collected a data set of teacher audio and human-coded instructional activities (e.g., lecture, question and answer, group work) in 76 middle school literature, language arts, and civics classes from eleven teachers across six schools. We automatically segment teacher audio to analyze speech vs. rest patterns, generate automatic transcripts of the teachers' speech to extract natural language features, and compute low-level acoustic features. We train supervised machine learning models to identify occurrences of five key instructional segments (Question & Answer, Procedures and Directions, Supervised Seatwork, Small Group Work, and Lecture) that collectively comprise 76% of the data. Models are validated independently of teacher in order to increase generalizability to new teachers from the same sample. We were able to identify the five instructional segments above chance levels with F1 scores ranging from 0.64 to 0.78. We discuss key findings in the context of teacher modeling for formative assessment and professional development.

References

[1]
Alibali, M.W., Nathan, M.J., Wolfgram, M.S., Church, R.B., Jacobs, S.A., Johnson Martinez, C. and Knuth, E.J. 2014. How teachers link ideas in mathematics instruction using speech and gesture: A corpus analysis. Cognition and Instruction. 32, 1 (2014), 65--100.
[2]
Applebee, A.N., Langer, J.A., Nystrand, M. and Gamoran, A. 2003. Discussion-based approaches to developing understanding: Classroom instruction and student performance in middle and high school English. American Educational Research Journal. 40, 3 (2003), 685--730.
[3]
Barrón-Cedeño, A., Vila, M., Martí, M.A. and Rosso, P. 2013. Plagiarism meets paraphrasing: Insights for the next generation in automatic plagiarism detection. Computational Linguistics. 39, 4 (2013), 917--947.
[4]
Blanchard, N., Brady, M., Olney, A.M., Glaus, M., Sun, X., Nystrand, M., Samei, B., Kelly, S. and D'Mello, S. 2015. A Study of Automatic Speech Recognition in Noisy Classroom Environments for Automated Dialog Analysis. Artificial Intelligence in Education. Springer International Publishing. 23--33.
[5]
Blanchard, N., D'Mello, S., Nystrand, M. and Olney, A.M. 2015. Automatic Classification of Question & Answer Discourse Segments from Teacher's Speech in Classrooms. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Educational Data Mining (EDM 2015), International Educational Data Mining Society (2015).
[6]
Caughlan, S., Juzwik, M.M., Borsheim-Black, C., Kelly, S. and Fine, J.G. 2013. English teacher candidates developing dialogically organized instructional practices. Research in the Teaching of English. 47, 3 (2013), 212.
[7]
D'Mello, S.K., Olney, A.M., Blanchard, N., Samei, B., Sun, X., Ward, B. and Kelly, S. 2015. Multimodal Capture of Teacher-Student Interactions for Automated Dialogic Analysis in Live Classrooms. Proceedings of the 2015 ACM on International Conference on Multimodal Interaction (2015), 557--566.
[8]
Drugman, T. and Stylianou, Y. 2014. Maximum voiced frequency estimation: Exploiting amplitude and phase spectra. Signal Processing Letters, IEEE. 21, 10 (2014), 1230--1234.
[9]
Ford, M., Baer, C., Xu, D., Yapanel, U. and Gray, S. 2008. The LENA language environment analysis system. LENA Foundation Technical Report LTR-03-02.
[10]
Gates Foundation 2013. Ensuring fair and reliable measures of effective teaching: Culminating findings from the MET project's three-year study-Policy and practitioner brief. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation Seattle, WA.
[11]
Goldman, R., Pea, R., Barron, B. and Derry, S.J. 2014. Video research in the learning sciences. Routledge.
[12]
Graesser, A.C. and McNamara, D.S. 2012. Automated analysis of essays and open-ended verbal responses. APA handbook of research methods in psychology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. (2012).
[13]
Hall, J.K. 2008. Language education and culture. Encyclopedia of language and education. Springer. 45--55.
[14]
Hall, M., Frank, E., Holmes, G., Pfahringer, B., Reutemann, P. and Witten, I.H. 2009. The WEKA data mining software: an update. ACM SIGKDD explorations newsletter. 11, 1 (2009), 10--18.
[15]
Juzwik, M.M., Borsheim-Black, C., Caughlan, S. and Heintz, A. 2013. Inspiring dialogue: Talking to learn in the English classroom. Teachers College Press.
[16]
Kelly, S. 2007. Classroom discourse and the distribution of student engagement. Social Psychology of Education. 10, 3 (2007), 331--352.
[17]
Lai, M.K. and McNaughton, S. 2013. Analysis and discussion of classroom and achievement data to raise student achievement. Data-based decision making in education. Springer. 23--47.
[18]
Lartillot, O., Toiviainen, P. and Eerola, T. 2008. A matlab toolbox for music information retrieval. Data analysis, machine learning and applications. Springer. 261--268.
[19]
Lewis, D.D. 1998. Naive (Bayes) at forty: The independence assumption in information retrieval. Machine learning: ECML-98. Springer. 4--15.
[20]
Mu, J., Stegmann, K., Mayfield, E., Rosé, C. and Fischer, F. 2012. The ACODEA framework: Developing segmentation and classification schemes for fully automatic analysis of online discussions. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning. 7, 2 (2012), 285--305.
[21]
Nystrand, M. 2004. CLASS 4.0 user's manual. The National Research Center on. (2004).
[22]
Nystrand, M. 2006. Research on the role of classroom discourse as it affects reading comprehension. Research in the Teaching of English. (2006), 392--412.
[23]
Nystrand, M., Gamoran, A., Kachur, R. and Prendergast, C. 1997. Opening dialogue: Understanding the Dynamics of Language and Learning in the English Classroom. Language and Literacy Series.
[24]
Nystrand, M., Wu, L.L., Gamoran, A., Zeiser, S. and Long, D.A. 2003. Questions in time: Investigating the structure and dynamics of unfolding classroom discourse. Discourse processes. 35, 2 (2003), 135--198.
[25]
Olney, A., Louwerse, M., Matthews, E., Marineau, J., Hite-Mitchell, H. and Graesser, A. 2003. Utterance classification in AutoTutor. Proceedings of the HLT-NAACL 03 workshop on Building educational applications using natural language processing-Volume 2 (2003), 1--8.
[26]
Rus, V., D'Mello, S., Hu, X. and Graesser, A. 2013. Recent advances in conversational intelligent tutoring systems. AI magazine. 34, 3 (2013), 42--54.
[27]
Samei, B., Olney, A., Kelly, S., Nystrand, M., D'Mello, S., Blanchard, N., Sun, X., Glaus, M. and Graesser, A. 2014. Domain independent assessment of dialogic properties of classroom discourse. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Educational Data Mining (EDM 2014) International Educational Data Mining Society (2014).
[28]
Samei, B., Olney, A.M., Kelly, S., Nystrand, M., Blanchard, S.D.N. and Graesser, A. Modeling Classroom Discourse: Do Models that Predict Dialogic Instruction Properties Generalize across Populations?
[29]
Sottilare, R.A., Graesser, A., Hu, X. and Holden, H. 2013. Design Recommendations for Intelligent Tutoring Systems: Volume 1-Learner Modeling. US Army Research Laboratory.
[30]
Wang, Z., Miller, K. and Cortina, K. 2013. Using the LENA in Teacher Training: Promoting Student Involvement through automated feedback. Unterrichtswissenschaft. 4, (2013), 290--305.
[31]
Wang, Z., Pan, X., Miller, K.F. and Cortina, K.S. 2014. Automatic classification of activities in classroom discourse. Computers & Education. 78, (2014), 115--123.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)How Well Can Tutoring Audio Be Autoclassified and Machine Explained With XAI: A Comparison of Three Types of MethodsIEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies10.1109/TLT.2024.338102817(1302-1312)Online publication date: 2024
  • (2024)AI-Based Discourse Analysis System (ADAS) for Improved STEM Education2024 IEEE Integrated STEM Education Conference (ISEC)10.1109/ISEC61299.2024.10665112(1-4)Online publication date: 9-Mar-2024
  • (2024)Exploring AI Techniques for Generalizable Teaching Practice IdentificationIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2024.345691512(134702-134713)Online publication date: 2024
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
UMAP '16: Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on User Modeling Adaptation and Personalization
July 2016
366 pages
ISBN:9781450343688
DOI:10.1145/2930238
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 13 July 2016

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. automatic feedback
  2. classroom discourse
  3. dialogic instruction
  4. educational data mining
  5. speech recognition

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Funding Sources

Conference

UMAP '16
Sponsor:
UMAP '16: User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization Conference
July 13 - 17, 2016
Nova Scotia, Halifax, Canada

Acceptance Rates

UMAP '16 Paper Acceptance Rate 21 of 123 submissions, 17%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 162 of 633 submissions, 26%

Upcoming Conference

UMAP '25

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)48
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3
Reflects downloads up to 13 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)How Well Can Tutoring Audio Be Autoclassified and Machine Explained With XAI: A Comparison of Three Types of MethodsIEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies10.1109/TLT.2024.338102817(1302-1312)Online publication date: 2024
  • (2024)AI-Based Discourse Analysis System (ADAS) for Improved STEM Education2024 IEEE Integrated STEM Education Conference (ISEC)10.1109/ISEC61299.2024.10665112(1-4)Online publication date: 9-Mar-2024
  • (2024)Exploring AI Techniques for Generalizable Teaching Practice IdentificationIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2024.345691512(134702-134713)Online publication date: 2024
  • (2024)Automated feedback on discourse moves: teachers’ perceived utility of a professional learning toolEducational technology research and development10.1007/s11423-023-10338-6Online publication date: 9-Jan-2024
  • (2023)Towards Automatic Analysis of Science Classroom TalkFostering Science Teaching and Learning for the Fourth Industrial Revolution and Beyond10.4018/978-1-6684-6932-3.ch006(123-146)Online publication date: 5-May-2023
  • (2023)Exploring the Potential of Machine Learning to Predict Student Performance in an EM Course2023 32nd Annual Conference of the European Association for Education in Electrical and Information Engineering (EAEEIE)10.23919/EAEEIE55804.2023.10181928(1-6)Online publication date: 14-Jun-2023
  • (2023)Empowering Teacher Learning with AI: Automated Evaluation of Teacher Attention to Student Ideas during Argumentation-focused DiscussionLAK23: 13th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference10.1145/3576050.3576067(122-132)Online publication date: 13-Mar-2023
  • (2023)AI-driven Teacher Analytics: Informative Insights on Classroom Activities2023 IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment and Learning for Engineering (TALE)10.1109/TALE56641.2023.10398309(1-8)Online publication date: 28-Nov-2023
  • (2023)Classroom Activity Detection in Noisy Preschool Environments with Audio Analysis2023 International Conference on Smart Systems for applications in Electrical Sciences (ICSSES)10.1109/ICSSES58299.2023.10200492(1-6)Online publication date: 7-Jul-2023
  • (2023)A Toolbox for Understanding the Dynamics of Small Group DiscussionsInternational Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education10.1007/s40593-023-00360-334:2(586-615)Online publication date: 25-Jul-2023
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media