Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article

Equations, Contractions, and Unique Solutions

Published: 16 March 2017 Publication History

Abstract

One of the most studied behavioural equivalences is bisimilarity. Its success is much due to the associated bisimulation proof method, which can be further enhanced by means of “bisimulation up-to” techniques such as “up-to context.”
A different proof method is discussed, based on a unique solution of special forms of inequations called contractions and inspired by Milner’s theorem on unique solution of equations. The method is as powerful as the bisimulation proof method and its “up-to context” enhancements. The definition of contraction can be transferred onto other behavioural equivalences, possibly contextual and non-coinductive. This enables a coinductive reasoning style on such equivalences, either by applying the method based on unique solution of contractions or by injecting appropriate contraction preorders into the bisimulation game.
The techniques are illustrated in CCS-like languages; an example dealing with higher-order languages is also shown.

References

[1]
Dean N. Arden. 1961. Delayed-logic and finite-state machines. In Proc. 2nd Annual Symposium on Switching Circuit Theory and Logical Design. IEEE Computer Society, 133--151.
[2]
S. Arun-Kumar and M. Hennessy. 1992. An efficiency preorder for processes. Acta Inform. 29 (1992), 737--760.
[3]
J. C. M. Baeten, T. Basten, and M. A. Reniers. 2010. Process Algebra: Equational Theories of Communicating Processes. Cambridge University Press.
[4]
Jos C. M. Baeten, Jan A. Bergstra, and Jan Willem Klop. 1987. Ready-trace semantics for concrete process algebra with the priority operator. Comput. J. 30, 6 (1987), 498--506.
[5]
Jos C. M. Baeten and Bas Luttik. 2011. Unguardedness mostly means many solutions. Theor. Comput. Sci. 412, 28 (2011), 3090--3100.
[6]
B. Bloom, S. Istrail, and A. R. Meyer. 1995. Bisimulation can’t be traced. J. ACM 42, 1 (1995), 232--268.
[7]
Filippo Bonchi, Fabio Gadducci, and Giacoma Valentina Monreale. 2014a. A general theory of barbs, contexts, and labels. ACM Trans. Comput. Log. 15, 4 (2014), 35:1--35:27.
[8]
Filippo Bonchi, Daniela Petrisan, Damien Pous, and Jurriaan Rot. 2014b. Coinduction up to in a fibrational setting. In Proc. CSL-LICS'14, Thomas A. Henzinger and Dale Miller (Eds.). ACM, 20:1--20:9.
[9]
Filippo Bonchi and Damien Pous. 2013. Checking NFA equivalence with bisimulations up to congruence. In Proc. POPL’13, Roberto Giacobazzi and Radhia Cousot (Eds.). ACM, 457--468.
[10]
Rance Cleaveland and Matthew Hennessy. 1993. Testing equivalence as a bisimulation equivalence. Formal Asp. Comput. 5, 1 (1993), 1--20.
[11]
R. De Nicola and R. Hennessy. 1984. Testing equivalences for processes. Theor. Comput. Sci. 34 (1984), 83--133.
[12]
R. J. van Glabbeek. 1993. The linear time—branching time spectrum ii (the semantics of sequential systems with silent moves). In Proc. CONCUR’93, E. Best (Ed.). Lecture Notes in Computer Science 715 (1993).
[13]
R. J. van Glabbeek. 2001. The linear time—branching time spectrum i. In Handbook of Process Algebra, A. Ponse J. Bergstra and S. Smolka (Eds.). Elsevier, 3--99.
[14]
J. F. Groote and F. W. Vaandrager. 1992. Structured operational semantics and bisimulation as a congruence. Inform. Comput. 100 (1992), 202--260.
[15]
C. A. R. Hoare. 1985. Communicating Sequential Processes. Prentice Hall.
[16]
K. Honda and N. Yoshida. 1995. On reduction-based process semantics. Theor. Comput. Sci. 152, 2 (1995), 437--486.
[17]
John E. Hopcroft, Rajeev Motwani, and Jeffrey D. Ullman. 2006. Introduction to Automata Theory, Languages, and Computation (3rd Edition). Addison-Wesley, Boston, MA.
[18]
G. Hutton and M. Jaskelioff. 2011. Representing Contractive Functions on Streams. (2011).
[19]
Vassileios Koutavas and Mitchell Wand. 2006. Small bisimulations for reasoning about higher-order imperative programs. In Proc. 33rd ACM SIGPLAN-SIGACT Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages. 141--152.
[20]
Michal Kunc. 2005. Simple language equations. Bull. EATCS 85 (2005), 81--102.
[21]
S. B. Lassen. 1998. Relational reasoning about contexts. In Higher-order Operational Techniques in Semantics. Cambridge University Press, 91--135.
[22]
S. B. Lassen. 1999. Bisimulation in untyped lambda calculus: Böhm trees and bisimulation up to context. Electr. Notes Theor. Comput. Sci. 20 (1999), 346--374.
[23]
S. Milius, L.&Stilde;. Moss, and D. Schwencke. 2013. Abstract GSOS rules and a modular treatment of recursive definitions. Logical Methods Comput. Sci. 9, 3 (2013).
[24]
R. Milner. 1989a. Communication and Concurrency. Prentice Hall.
[25]
Robin Milner. 1989b. A complete axiomatisation for observational congruence of finite-state behaviors. Inf. Comput. 81, 2 (1989), 227--247.
[26]
R. Milner and D. Sangiorgi. 1992. Barbed bisimulation. In Proc. 19th ICALP (Lecture Notes in Computer Science), W. Kuich (Ed.), Vol. 623. Springer Verlag, 685--695.
[27]
James H. Morris. Dec. 1968. Lambda-Calculus Models of Programming Languages. Ph.D. thesis MAC-TR-57. M.I.T., project MAC.
[28]
V. Natarajan and Rance Cleaveland. 1995. Divergence and fair testing. In Proc. ICALP’95 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science), Vol. 944. Springer Verlag, 648--659.
[29]
Ion Petre and Arto Salomaa. 2009. Algebraic systems and pushdown automata. In Handbook of Weighted Automata. Springer, 257--289.
[30]
Adrien Piérard and Eijiro Sumii. 2011. Sound bisimulations for higher-order distributed process calculus. In Proc. FOSSACS (Lecture Notes in Computer Science), Martin Hofmann (Ed.), Vol. 6604. Springer, 123--137.
[31]
Andrew Pitts. 2012. Howe’s method. In Advanced Topics in Bisimulation and Coinduction, Davide Sangiorgi and Jan Rutten (Eds.). Cambridge University Press.
[32]
Damien Pous and Davide Sangiorgi. 2012. Enhancements of the bisimulation proof method. In Advanced Topics in Bisimulation and Coinduction, Davide Sangiorgi and Jan Rutten (Eds.). Cambridge University Press.
[33]
Alexander Moshe Rabinovich. 1993. A complete axiomatisation for trace congruence of finite state behaviors. In Proc. 9th MFPS (Lecture Notes in Computer Science), Stephen D. Brookes, Michael G. Main, Austin Melton, Michael W. Mislove, and David A. Schmidt (Eds.), Vol. 802. Springer, 530--543.
[34]
Arend Rensink and Walter Volger. 2007. Fair testing. Inform. Comput. 205 (2007), 125--198.
[35]
A. W. Roscoe. 1998. The Theory and Practice of Concurrency. Prentice Hall. Retrieved from http://www.cs.ox.ac.uk/people/bill.roscoe/publications/68b.pdf.
[36]
A. W. Roscoe. 2010. Understanding Concurrent Systems. Springer.
[37]
Jurriaan Rot, Marcello M. Bonsangue, and Jan J. M. M. Rutten. 2013. Coinductive proof techniques for language equivalence. In Proc. LATA (Lecture Notes in Computer Science), Adrian Horia Dediu, Carlos Martín-Vide, and Bianca Truthe (Eds.), Vol. 7810. Springer, 480--492.
[38]
David Sands. 1998. Computing with contexts: A simple approach. Electron. Not. Theor. Comput. Sci. 10, C (1998), 134--149.
[39]
D. Sangiorgi. 1994. Locality and true-concurrency in calculi for mobile processes. In TACS’94 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science), Vol. 789. Springer, 405--424.
[40]
Davide Sangiorgi, Naoki Kobayashi, and Eijiro Sumii. 2011. Environmental bisimulations for higher-order languages. ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst. 33, 1 (2011), 5.
[41]
D. Sangiorgi and R. Milner. 1992. The problem of “weak bisimulation up to”. In Proc. CONCUR’92 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science), W. R. Cleveland (Ed.), Vol. 630. Springer Verlag, 32--46.
[42]
D. Sangiorgi and D. Walker. 2001. The π-Calculus: A Theory of Mobile Processes. Cambridge University Press.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)An Abstract Account of Up-to Techniques for Inductive Behavioural RelationsLeveraging Applications of Formal Methods, Verification and Validation. REoCAS Colloquium in Honor of Rocce De Nicola10.1007/978-3-031-73709-1_5(62-74)Online publication date: 27-Oct-2024
  • (2024)Preorder-Constrained Simulations for Program Refinement with EffectsCoalgebraic Methods in Computer Science10.1007/978-3-031-66438-0_3(44-64)Online publication date: 6-Apr-2024
  • (2022)From enhanced coinduction towards enhanced inductionProceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages10.1145/34986796:POPL(1-29)Online publication date: 12-Jan-2022
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Transactions on Computational Logic
ACM Transactions on Computational Logic  Volume 18, Issue 1
January 2017
277 pages
ISSN:1529-3785
EISSN:1557-945X
DOI:10.1145/3041822
  • Editor:
  • Orna Kupferman
Issue’s Table of Contents
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 16 March 2017
Accepted: 01 June 2016
Received: 01 January 2016
Published in TOCL Volume 18, Issue 1

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Bisimulation
  2. coinduction
  3. contraction
  4. equations
  5. unique solution

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed

Funding Sources

  • MIUR-PRIN project
  • ANR project

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)13
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 09 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)An Abstract Account of Up-to Techniques for Inductive Behavioural RelationsLeveraging Applications of Formal Methods, Verification and Validation. REoCAS Colloquium in Honor of Rocce De Nicola10.1007/978-3-031-73709-1_5(62-74)Online publication date: 27-Oct-2024
  • (2024)Preorder-Constrained Simulations for Program Refinement with EffectsCoalgebraic Methods in Computer Science10.1007/978-3-031-66438-0_3(44-64)Online publication date: 6-Apr-2024
  • (2022)From enhanced coinduction towards enhanced inductionProceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages10.1145/34986796:POPL(1-29)Online publication date: 12-Jan-2022
  • (2020)Unique solutions of contractions, CCS, and their HOL formalisationInformation and Computation10.1016/j.ic.2020.104606275(104606)Online publication date: Dec-2020
  • (2019)Hierarchical Modeling of Complex Internet of Things Systems Using Conceptual Modeling ApproachesIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2019.29309337(102772-102791)Online publication date: 2019
  • (2018)Unique Solutions of Contractions, CCS, and their HOL FormalisationElectronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science10.4204/EPTCS.276.10276(122-139)Online publication date: 24-Aug-2018
  • (2017)Up-to techniques using sized typesProceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages10.1145/31581312:POPL(1-28)Online publication date: 27-Dec-2017

View Options

Get Access

Login options

Full Access

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media