Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article
Public Access

Exploring Auditory Graphing Software in the Classroom: The Effect of Auditory Graphs on the Classroom Environment

Published: 18 November 2016 Publication History

Abstract

Students who are visually impaired make up a population with unique needs for learning. Some tools have been developed to support these needs in the classroom. One such tool, the Graph and Number line Input and Exploration software (GNIE), was developed by the Georgia Institute of Technology Sonification Lab. GNIE was deployed for use in a middle school math classroom at the Georgia Academy for the Blind (GAB) for 2 years starting in fall 2012. We interviewed the middle school math teacher throughout the deployment to learn about the challenges faced when teaching: lesson planning, execution, and review. We also observed how these changed when using GNIE compared to traditional teaching materials. During these 2 years, we conducted interviews and focus groups with students to learn about their attitudes toward tactile graphs compared to auditory graphs. With these in mind, we present lessons learned from the use of GNIE in a real-world classroom and implications for design of software to aid graphical learning for students with vision impairments.

References

[1]
Gerald Abner and Elizabeth Lahm. 2002. Implementation of assistive technology with students who are visually impaired: Teachers’ readiness. J. Vis. Impair. Blind. 96, 02 (2002), 98--105.
[2]
Francis J. Anscombe. 1973. Graphs in statistical analysis. Am. Stat. 27, 1 (1973), 17--21.
[3]
Jodi Aronson. 1995. A pragmatic view of thematic analysis. Qual. Rep. 2, 1 (1995), 1--3.
[4]
Assistive Technology Partnership. 2008. Assistive Technology in Education: A Guide for the Delivery of Assistive Technology Services for Students with Disabilities.
[5]
Sasha Barab. 2006. Design-based research: A methodological toolkit for the learning scientist. In The Cambridge Handbook of: The Learning Sciences. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 153--169.
[6]
Jared M. Batterman and Bruce N. Walker. 2012. Displaying error 8 uncertainty in auditory graphs. In Proceedings of the 14th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS’12). New York, NY: ACM Press, 285.
[7]
Stephen Brewster. 2002. Visualization tools for blind people using multiple modalities. Disabil. Rehabil. 24, 11--12 (2002), 613--621.
[8]
Lorna Brown, Stephen Brewster, Ramesh Ramloll, Wai Yu, and Beate Riedel. 2002. Browsing modes for exploring sonified line graphs. In Proceedings of British Human-Computer Interaction Conference, 2. Citeseer, 6--9.
[9]
Hennie Brugman, Albert Russel, and Xd Nijmegen. 2004. Annotating multi-media/multi-modal resources with ELAN. In LREC.
[10]
Anthony P. Carnevale, Nicole Smith, and Michelle Melton. 2011. STEM: Science technology engineering mathematics. Georget. Univ. Cent. Educ. Workforce.
[11]
Center for the Study of Mathematics Curriculum. 2012. The Future of STEM Curriculum and Instructional Design: A Research and Development Agenda for Learning Designers.
[12]
Yee Chieh Chew, Brianna J. Tomlinson, and Bruce N. Walker. 2013. Graph and Number line Input and Exploration (GNIE) Tool Technical Report.
[13]
Yee Chieh Chew and Bruce N. Walker. 2013. What did you say? Visually impaired students using bonephones in math class. In 15th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. Bellevue, WA: ACM, 3--4.
[14]
Michael Curran and James Teh. 2015. NVDA. NV Access.
[15]
Benjamin K. Davison. 2012. Evaluating auditory graphs with blind students in a classroom. ACM SIGACCESS Access. Comput. 102 (January 2012), 4--7.
[16]
John M. Downes and Penny Bishop. 2012. Educators engage digital natives and learn from their experiences with technology. Middle School Journal 43, 5 (2012), 6--15.
[17]
Delia Duffey and Christine Fox. 2012. National educational technology trends 2012. State Leadership Empowers Educators, Transforms Teaching and Learning. State Educational Technology Directors Association (SETDA). Washington, D.C.
[18]
Duxbury Systems. 2015. Duxbury Braille Translator. Duxbury Systems.
[19]
Edmentum. n.d. Study Island. Edmentum.
[20]
W. T. Fitch and G. Kramer. 1994. Sonifying the body electric: Superiority of an auditory over a visual display in a complex, multivariate system. St. FE Inst. Stud. Sci. Complex.-Proc. 18 (1994), 307.
[21]
John H. Flowers. 2005. Thirteen years of reflection on auditory graphing: Promises, pitfalls, and potential new directions. Fac. Publ. Dep. Psychol. (2005), 430.
[22]
Teresa Franklin and Li-Wei Peng. 2008. Mobile math: Math educators and students engage in mobile learning. J. Comput. High. Educ. 20, 2 (2008), 69--80.
[23]
Freedom Scientific. n.d. JAWS for Windows.
[24]
John A. Gardner. 2002. Access by blind students and professionals to mainstream math and science. In International Conference on Computers for Handicapped Persons. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 502--507.
[25]
Georgia Department of Education. 2012. Common Core GPS Mathematics. https://www.georgiastandards.org/Common-Core/Pages/Math.aspx.
[26]
Linda Godzicki, Nicole Godzicki, Mary Krofel, and Rachel Michaels. 2013. Increasing motivation and engagement in elementary and middle school students through technology-supported learning environments. Online Submission.
[27]
GW Micro. n.d. Windows-Eyes. GW Micro.
[28]
Stacy M. Kelly. 2009. Use of assistive technology by students with visual impairments: Findings from a national survey. J. Vis. Impair. Blind. 103, 8 (2009), 470.
[29]
Gregory Kramer, Bruce Walker, Terri Bonebright, Perry Cook, John H. Flowers, Nadine Miner, and John Neuhoff. 2010. Sonification report: Status of the field and research agenda. Faculty Publications, Department of Psychology. Paper 444. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/psychfacpub/444.
[30]
Rensis Likert. 1932. A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Arch. Psychol. 140 (1932), 1--55.
[31]
MacKichan Software. 2015. Scientific Notebook. MacKichan Software.
[32]
Douglass L. Mansur, Merra M. Blattner, and Kenneth I. Joy. 1985. Sound graphs: A numerical data analysis method for the blind. J. Med. Syst. 9, 3 (1985), 163--174.
[33]
NASA Information Access Lab. 2004. NASA LTP information access lab: MDE graphing calculator demonstration (Beta 2.0).
[34]
National Federation of the Blind. n.d. Fact Sheet: Blindness and Low Vision. National Federation of the Blind.
[35]
Michael A. Nees and Bruce N. Walker. 2009. Auditory interfaces and sonification. In The Universal Access Handbook. New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 507--521.
[36]
Kirsten Rassmus-Gröhn, Charlotte Magnusson, and Haakan Eftring. 2007. Ahead-audio-haptic drawing editor and explorer for education. In IEEE International Workshop on Haptic, Audio and Visual Environments and Games, 2007 (HAVE’07). IEEE, 62--66.
[37]
Terri Duggan Schwartzbeck and Mary Ann Wolf. 2012. The digital learning imperative: How technology and teaching meet today's education challenges. Alliance for Excellent Education.
[38]
Daniel R. Smith and Bruce N. Walker. 2005. Effects of auditory context cues and training on performance of a point estimation sonification task. Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 19, 8 (December 2005), 1065--1087.
[39]
Daniel R. Smith and Bruce N. Walker. 2002. Tick-marks, axes, and labels: The effects of adding context to auditory graphs. In International Conference on Auditory Display. Kyoto, Japan, 1--6.
[40]
Sun Microsystems Laboratories. 2001. FreeTTS 1.2 - A speech synthesizer written entirely in the JavaTM programming language. Sun Microsystems Laboratories.
[41]
Triumph Learning. 2011. Crosswalk Coach for the Common Core State Standards, Mathematics. Triumph Learning.
[42]
Robert Upson. 2002. Educational sonification exercises: Pathways for mathematics and musical achievement. In International Conference on Auditory Display. Kyoto, Japan, 1--6.
[43]
Robert Upson. 2001. Sonifications as mathematics teaching tools. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Auditory Display (ICAD’01). Citeseer, 222--226.
[44]
U.S. Department of Education. 2004. Building the Legacy: IDEA 2004. U.S. Department of Education.
[45]
Frances Van Scoy, Don McLaughlin, and Angela Fullmer. 2005. Auditory augmentation of haptic graphs: Developing a graphic tool for teaching precalculus skill to blind students. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Auditory Display (ICAD’05).
[46]
Andrew A. Zucker. 2006. Development and testing of math insight software. J. Educ. Technol. Syst. 34, 4 (2006), 371--386.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Hearing a circle: An exploratory study of accessible sonification for young children with blindness and low visionBritish Journal of Visual Impairment10.1177/02646196241253534Online publication date: 21-May-2024
  • (2024)Revisiting visual accessibility with non-textual content: challenges and solutions for human-computer interactionProceedings of the XXIII Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3702038.3702105(1-18)Online publication date: 7-Oct-2024
  • (2024)Enabling Tabular Data Exploration for Blind and Low-Vision UsersProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3661609(1218-1233)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing
ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing  Volume 9, Issue 1
March 2017
92 pages
ISSN:1936-7228
EISSN:1936-7236
DOI:10.1145/3011862
Issue’s Table of Contents
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 18 November 2016
Accepted: 01 September 2016
Revised: 01 August 2016
Received: 01 December 2015
Published in TACCESS Volume 9, Issue 1

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Auditory displays
  2. educational technologies

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed

Funding Sources

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)129
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)19
Reflects downloads up to 26 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Hearing a circle: An exploratory study of accessible sonification for young children with blindness and low visionBritish Journal of Visual Impairment10.1177/02646196241253534Online publication date: 21-May-2024
  • (2024)Revisiting visual accessibility with non-textual content: challenges and solutions for human-computer interactionProceedings of the XXIII Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3702038.3702105(1-18)Online publication date: 7-Oct-2024
  • (2024)Enabling Tabular Data Exploration for Blind and Low-Vision UsersProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3661609(1218-1233)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
  • (2024)Charting Beyond Sight with DataStory: Sensory Substitution and Storytelling in Visual Literacy Education for Visually Impaired ChildrenExtended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613905.3650800(1-8)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
  • (2024)Beyond Vision Impairments: Redefining the Scope of Accessible Data RepresentationsIEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics10.1109/TVCG.2024.335656630:12(7619-7636)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2024
  • (2024)Evaluating the effectiveness of sonification in science education using EdukoiPersonal and Ubiquitous Computing10.1007/s00779-024-01809-528:5(693-711)Online publication date: 1-Oct-2024
  • (2024)Listening to life: Sonification for enhancing discovery in biological researchBiotechnology and Bioengineering10.1002/bit.28729121:10(3009-3019)Online publication date: 28-Apr-2024
  • (2022)Visualization Accessibility in the Wild: Challenges Faced by Visualization DesignersProceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3491102.3517630(1-19)Online publication date: 29-Apr-2022
  • (2022)Infosonics: Accessible Infographics for People who are Blind using Sonification and VoiceProceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3491102.3517465(1-13)Online publication date: 29-Apr-2022
  • (2022)Design and Evaluation of Accessible Collaborative Writing Techniques for People with Vision ImpairmentsACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction10.1145/348016929:2(1-42)Online publication date: 16-Jan-2022
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Login options

Full Access

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media