Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2998181.2998300acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescscwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Public Access

Huddler: Convening Stable and Familiar Crowd Teams Despite Unpredictable Availability

Published: 25 February 2017 Publication History

Abstract

Distributed, parallel crowd workers can accomplish simple tasks through workflows, but teams of collaborating crowd workers are necessary for complex goals. Unfortunately, a fundamental condition for effective teams -- familiarity with other members -- stands in contrast to crowd work's flexible, on-demand nature. We enable effective crowd teams with Huddler, a system for workers to assemble familiar teams even under unpredictable availability and strict time constraints. Huddler utilizes a dynamic programming algorithm to optimize for highly familiar teammates when individual availability is unknown. We first present a field experiment that demonstrates the value of familiarity for crowd teams: familiar crowd teams doubled the performance of ad-hoc (unfamiliar) teams on a collaborative task. We then report a two-week field deployment wherein Huddler enabled crowd workers to convene highly familiar teams in 18 minutes on average. This research advances the goal of supporting long-term, team-based collaborations without sacrificing the flexibility of crowd work.

References

[1]
Shoshana Altschuller, and Raquel Benbunan-Fich. "Trust, Performance, and the Communication Process in Ad Hoc Decision-Making Virtual Teams." Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 16, no. 1 (2010): 27--47.
[2]
Linda Argote, Paul Ingram, John M. Levine, and Richard L. Moreland. "Knowledge transfer in organizations: Learning from the experience of others." Organizational behavior and human decision processes 82, no. 1 (2000): 1--8.
[3]
Linda Argote. "Input uncertainty and organizational coordination in hospital emergency units." Administrative science quarterly (1982): 420--434.
[4]
Michael S. Bernstein, Greg Little, Robert C. Miller, Björn Hartmann, Mark S. Ackerman, David R. Karger, David Crowell, and Katrina Panovich. "Soylent: a word processor with a crowd inside." In Proceedings of the 23nd annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology, pp. 313--322. ACM, 2010.
[5]
Jeffrey P. Bigham, Chandrika Jayant, Hanjie Ji, Greg Little, Andrew Miller, Robert C. Miller, Robin Miller et al. "VizWiz: nearly real-time answers to visual questions." In Proceedings of the 23nd annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology, pp. 333--342. ACM, 2010.
[6]
Jeffrey P. Bigham, Michael S. Bernstein, and Eytan Adar. "Human-Computer Interaction and Collective Intelligence." Handbook of Collective Intelligence (2015): 57.
[7]
Kathleen Carley. "Organizational learning and personnel turnover."Organization Science 3.1 (1992): 20--46.
[8]
Tom Finholt, Lee Sproull, and Sara Kiesler. "Communication and performance in ad hoc task groups." Intellectual teamwork: Social and technological foundations of cooperative work (1990): 291--325.
[9]
Susan G. Cohen, and Diane E. Bailey. "What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite." Journal of management 23, no. 3 (1997): 239--290.
[10]
Lincoln Dahlberg. "The Internet and democratic discourse: Exploring the prospects of online deliberative forums extending the public sphere." Information, Communication & Society 4, no. 4 (2001): 615--633.
[11]
Steven P. Dow, Alana Glassco, Jonathan Kass, Melissa Schwarz, Daniel L. Schwartz, and Scott R. Klemmer. "Parallel prototyping leads to better design results, more divergence, and increased self-efficacy." ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 17, no. 4 (2010): 18.
[12]
Scott B. Droege, and Jenny M. Hoobler. "Employee turnover and tacit knowledge diffusion: A network perspective." Journal of Managerial Issues(2003): 5064.
[13]
Amy C. Edmondson Teaming: How organizations learn, innovate, and compete in the knowledge economy. John Wiley & Sons, 2012.
[14]
Amy Edmondson. "Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams." Administrative science quarterly 44, no. 2 (1999): 350--383.
[15]
J. Alberto Espinosa, Sandra A. Slaughter, Robert E. Kraut, and James D. Herbsleb. "Team knowledge and coordination in geographically distributed software development." Journal of Management Information Systems 24, no. 1 (2007): 135--169.
[16]
John E. Ettlie "The impact of interorganizational manpower flows on the innovation process." Management Science 31, no. 9 (1985): 10551071.
[17]
Mary L. Gray, Siddharth Suri, Syed S. Ali, and Deepti Kulkarni. "The Crowd is a Collaborative Network." Proceedings of Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (2016).
[18]
Deborah H. Gruenfeld, Elizabeth A. Mannix, Katherine Y. Williams, and Margaret A. Neale. "Group composition and decision making: How member familiarity and information distribution affect process and performance." Organizational behavior and human decision processes 67, no. 1 (1996): 1--15.
[19]
Rebecca M. Guidice, Joyce Thompson Heames, and Sheng Wang. "The indirect relationship between organizational-level knowledge worker turnover and innovation: An integrated application of related literature." The Learning Organization 16, no. 2 (2009): 143--167.
[20]
Daniel Haas, Jason Ansel, Lydia Gu, and Adam Marcus. "Argonaut: macrotask crowdsourcing for complex data processing." Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment 8, no. 12 (2015): 1642--1653.
[21]
J. Richard. Hackman, Leading teams: Setting the stage for great performances. Harvard Business Press, 2002.
[22]
D.A. Harrison, Mohammed, S., McGrath, J.E., Florey, A.T. and Vanderstoep, S.W., 2003. Time matters in team performance: Effects of member familiarity, entrainment, and task discontinuity on speed and quality. Personnel Psychology, 56(3), pp.633--669.
[23]
Mark Hefke, and Ljiljana Stojanovic. "An ontologybased approach for competence bundling and composition of ad-hoc teams in an organization." Proc. I-KNOW'04 (2004): 126--134.
[24]
Pamela J. Hinds, and Mark Mortensen. "Understanding conflict in geographically distributed teams: The moderating effects of shared identity, shared context, and spontaneous communication." Organization science 16, no. 3 (2005): 290--307.
[25]
Robert S. Huckman, and Bradley R. Staats. "Fluid tasks and fluid teams: The impact of diversity in experience and team familiarity on team performance." Manufacturing & Service Operations Management 13, no. 3 (2011): 310--328.
[26]
Robert S. Huckman, Bradley R. Staats, and David M. Upton. "Team familiarity, role experience, and performance: Evidence from Indian software services." Management science 55, no. 1 (2009): 85--100.
[27]
Aniket Kittur, Bongwon Suh, Bryan A. Pendleton, and Ed H. Chi. "He says, she says: conflict and coordination in Wikipedia." In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, pp. 453--462. ACM, 2007.
[28]
Aniket Kittur, Boris Smus, Susheel Khamkar, and Robert E. Kraut. "Crowdforge: Crowdsourcing complex work." In Proceedings of the 24th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology, pp. 43--52. ACM, 2011.
[29]
Aniket Kittur. "Crowdsourcing, collaboration and creativity." ACM Crossroads 17, no. 2 (2010): 22--26.
[30]
David A. Kravitz, and Barbara Martin. "Ringelmann rediscovered: The original article." (1986): 936.
[31]
Karim Lakhani, David A. Garvin, and Eric Lonstein. "Topcoder (a): Developing software through crowdsourcing." Harvard Business School General Management Unit Case 610-032 (2010).
[32]
Walter S. Lasecki, Juho Kim, Nick Rafter, Onkur Sen, Jeffrey P. Bigham, and Michael S. Bernstein. "Apparition: Crowdsourced user interfaces that come To life as you sketch them." In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1925--1934. ACM, 2015.
[33]
Diane Wei Liang, Richard Moreland, and Linda Argote. "Group versus individual training and group performance: The mediating role of transactive memory." Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 21, no. 4 (1995): 384--393.
[34]
Greg Little, Lydia B. Chilton, Max Goldman, and Robert C. Miller. "Turkit: tools for iterative tasks on mechanical turk." In Proceedings of the ACM SIGKDD workshop on human computation, pp. 29--30. ACM, 2009.
[35]
Ioanna Lykourentzou, Shannon Wang, Robert E. Kraut, and Steven P. Dow. "Team Dating: A SelfOrganized Team Formation Strategy for Collaborative Crowdsourcing." In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1243--1249. ACM, 2016.
[36]
Ioanna Lykourentzou, Angeliki Antoniou, Yannick Naudet, and Steven P. Dow. "Personality Matters: Balancing for Personality Types Leads to Better Outcomes for Crowd Teams." (2016).
[37]
Andrew Mao, Winter Mason, Siddharth Suri, and Duncan J. Watts. "An experimental study of team size and performance on a complex task." PloS one 11, no. 4 (2016): e0153048.
[38]
David Martin, Benjamin V. Hanrahan, Jacki O'Neill, and Neha Gupta. "Being a turker." In Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing, pp. 224--235. ACM, 2014.
[39]
Winter Mason, and Siddharth Suri. "Conducting behavioral research on Amazon's Mechanical Turk." Behavior research methods 44.1 (2012): 1--23.
[40]
Joseph E. McGrath, Holly Arrow, and Jennifer L. Berdahl. "The study of groups: past, present, and future." Personality and Social Psychology Review 4, no. 1 (2000): 95--105.
[41]
Mitzi M. Montoya-Weiss, Anne P. Massey, and Michael Song. "Getting it together: Temporal coordination and conflict management in global virtual teams." Academy of management Journal 44, no. 6 (2001): 1251--1262.
[42]
M. Mortensen 2014 "Constructing the Team: The Antecedents and Effects of Membership Model Divergence." Organization Science, 25: 909--931.
[43]
Ingrid Mulder, Janine Swaak, and Joseph Kessels. "In search of reflective behavior and shared understanding in ad hoc expert teams." CyberPsychology & Behavior 7, no. 2 (2004): 141--154.
[44]
Gary M. Olson, and Judith S. Olson. "Distance matters." Human-computer interaction 15, no. 2 (2000): 139--178.
[45]
Ray Reagans, Linda Argote, and Daria Brooks. "Individual experience and experience working together: Predicting learning rates from knowing who knows what and knowing how to work together." Management science 51.6 (2005): 869--881.
[46]
Daniela Retelny, Sébastien Robaszkiewicz, Alexandra To, Walter S. Lasecki, Jay Patel, Negar Rahmati, Tulsee Doshi, Melissa Valentine, and Michael S. Bernstein. "Expert crowdsourcing with flash teams." In Proceedings of the 27th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology, pp. 75--85. ACM, 2014.
[47]
Floor Rink, Aimée A. Kane, Naomi Ellemers, and Gerben Van der Vegt. "Team receptivity to newcomers: Five decades of evidence and future research themes." The Academy of Management Annals 7, no. 1 (2013): 247--293.
[48]
Elena Rocco, Thomas Finholt, Erik C. Hofer, and James Herbsleb. "Designing as if trust mattered." Collaboratory for Research on Electronic Work (CREW) Technical Report (2000).
[49]
Kate Starbird and Leysia Palen. "Voluntweeters: Selforganizing by digital volunteers in times of crisis." In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1071--1080. ACM, 2011.
[50]
Andrew H. Van de Ven, Andre L. Delbecq, and Richard Koenig Jr. "Determinants of coordination modes within organizations." American sociological review (1976): 322--338.
[51]
Anita Williams Woolley, Christopher F. Chabris, Alex Pentland, Nada Hashmi, and Thomas W. Malone. "Evidence for a collective intelligence factor in the performance of human groups." science 330, no. 6004 (2010): 686--688.
[52]
Galen Pickard, Wei Pan, Iyad Rahwan, Manuel Cebrian, Riley Crane, Anmol Madan, and Alex Pentland. "Time-critical social mobilization." Science 334, no. 6055 (2011): 509--512.
[53]
Niloufar Salehi, Lilly C. Irani, Michael S. Bernstein, Ali Alkhatib, Eva Ogbe, and Kristy Milland. "We are dynamo: Overcoming stalling and friction in collective action for crowd workers." In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1621--1630. ACM, 2015.
[54]
Haiyi Zhu, Steven P. Dow, Robert E. Kraut, and Aniket Kittur. "Reviewing versus doing: Learning and performance in crowd assessment." In Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing, pp. 1445--1455. ACM, 2014.
[55]
http://www.pewinternet.org/2016/07/11/research-inthe-crowdsourcing-age-a-casestudy/http://www.pewinternet.org/2016/07/11/research-in-the-crowdsourcing-age-a-case-study/

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Boundary Transitions in Dynamic TeamworkAcademy of Management Review10.5465/amr.2019.047149:3(597-617)Online publication date: Jul-2024
  • (2024)A Conception of Collaborative Decision Support Systems: Approach and Platform ArchitectureКонцепция построения коллаборативных систем поддержки принятия решений: подход и архитектура платформыInformatics and AutomationИнформатика и автоматизация10.15622/ia.23.4.823:4(1139-1172)Online publication date: 26-Jun-2024
  • (2024)Forming Shared Interest Pods: Barriers to Self-Assembly of Interest-Based Small Groups, and Dynamics of Retaining and Giving up Control to Find Collective FitProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36869848:CSCW2(1-50)Online publication date: 8-Nov-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Huddler: Convening Stable and Familiar Crowd Teams Despite Unpredictable Availability

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    CSCW '17: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing
    February 2017
    2556 pages
    ISBN:9781450343350
    DOI:10.1145/2998181
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 25 February 2017

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. crowd teams
    2. crowd work
    3. crowdsourcing

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Funding Sources

    Conference

    CSCW '17
    Sponsor:
    CSCW '17: Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing
    February 25 - March 1, 2017
    Oregon, Portland, USA

    Acceptance Rates

    CSCW '17 Paper Acceptance Rate 183 of 530 submissions, 35%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 2,235 of 8,521 submissions, 26%

    Upcoming Conference

    CSCW '25

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)168
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)16
    Reflects downloads up to 11 Jan 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Boundary Transitions in Dynamic TeamworkAcademy of Management Review10.5465/amr.2019.047149:3(597-617)Online publication date: Jul-2024
    • (2024)A Conception of Collaborative Decision Support Systems: Approach and Platform ArchitectureКонцепция построения коллаборативных систем поддержки принятия решений: подход и архитектура платформыInformatics and AutomationИнформатика и автоматизация10.15622/ia.23.4.823:4(1139-1172)Online publication date: 26-Jun-2024
    • (2024)Forming Shared Interest Pods: Barriers to Self-Assembly of Interest-Based Small Groups, and Dynamics of Retaining and Giving up Control to Find Collective FitProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36869848:CSCW2(1-50)Online publication date: 8-Nov-2024
    • (2024)Platform Architecture for Human-AI Collaborative Decision SupportProceedings of the Eighth International Scientific Conference “Intelligent Information Technologies for Industry” (IITI’24), Volume 110.1007/978-3-031-77688-5_32(334-345)Online publication date: 20-Dec-2024
    • (2024)Gig work and gig workers: An integrative review and agenda for future researchJournal of Organizational Behavior10.1002/job.277545:2(183-208)Online publication date: 24-Jan-2024
    • (2023)Knowing Unknown Teammates: Exploring Anonymity and Explanations in a Teammate Information-Sharing Recommender SystemProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36100757:CSCW2(1-34)Online publication date: 4-Oct-2023
    • (2023)The Value of Activity Traces in Peer Evaluations: An Experimental StudyProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/35796277:CSCW1(1-39)Online publication date: 16-Apr-2023
    • (2023)Are Two Heads Better Than One in AI-Assisted Decision Making? Comparing the Behavior and Performance of Groups and Individuals in Human-AI Collaborative Recidivism Risk AssessmentProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3581015(1-18)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
    • (2023)Understanding work in the online platform economy: the narrow, the broad, and the systemic perspectivesIndustrial and Corporate Change10.1093/icc/dtad00532:4(795-814)Online publication date: 1-Feb-2023
    • (2023)Recommendations with Benefits: Exploring Explanations in Information Sharing Recommender Systems for Temporary TeamsInternational Journal of Human–Computer Interaction10.1080/10447318.2023.227893340:23(8202-8218)Online publication date: 20-Nov-2023
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Login options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media