Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3012709.3012734acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmumConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Context of use and timing of social comparison techniques in behavior change support: a qualitative systematic review

Published: 12 December 2016 Publication History

Abstract

This paper aims to examine the timing and contexts of use of social comparison techniques in supporting behavior change. Timing is evaluated through stages of the behavior change process in accordance with the Transtheoretical Model, while context of use is defined through the level of publicity at three levels: public, semi-public and private. A qualitative systematic review was conducted of prior research dealing with applications featuring social comparison techniques. Through a systematic search strategy, eleven IT artifacts were selected for analysis. Then, patterns of use were analyzed so as to identify experiences on proper timing and context of use. The analysis shows that the technology placed in public spaces is suitable mainly for the first stages in the behavior change process. A private context of use is preferred in later stages.

References

[1]
Aronson, E. 2003. The social animal. Macmillan.
[2]
Bauer, J.S., Consolvo, S., Greenstein, B., Schooler, J., Wu, E., Watson, N.F. And Kientz, J. 2012. ShutEye: encouraging awareness of healthy sleep recommendations with a mobile, peripheral display. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, Anonymous ACM, 1401--1410.
[3]
Burigat, S. and Chittaro, L. 2014. Designing a mobile persuasive application to encourage reduction of users' exposure to cell phone RF emissions. InPersuasive Technology, Anonymous Springer, 13--24.
[4]
Chen, P., Jeng, T., Deng, Y. and Chien, S. 2013. Greensense: developing persuasive service technology by integrating mobile devices and social interaction for sustainable and healthy behavior. In Universal Access in HumanComputer Interaction. User and Context Diversity, Anonymous Springer, 345--354.
[5]
Comber, R. and Thieme, A. 2013. Designing beyond habit: opening space for improved recycling and food waste behaviors through processes of persuasion, social influence and aversive affect. Personal and ubiquitous computing 17, 1197--1210.
[6]
Consolvo, S., Mcdonald, D.W., Toscos, T., Chen, M.Y., Froehlich, J., Harrison, B., Klasnja, P., Lamarca, A., Legrand, L. and Libby, R. 2008. Activity sensing in the wild: a field trial of ubifit garden. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Anonymous ACM, 1797--1806.
[7]
Emeakaroha, A., Ang, C.S., Yan, Y. and Hopthrow, T. 2014. Integrating persuasive technology with energy delegates for energy conservation and carbon emission reduction in a university campus. Energy 76, 357--374.
[8]
European Commission. 2015. European Commission - Fact Sheet: Sustainable Development Goals and the Agenda2030. Retrieved April 14, 2016 from http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_MEMO-15-5709_en.htm.
[9]
European Union. 2010. Europe 2020 - for a healthier EU. Retrieved April 14, 2016 http://ec.europa.eu/health/europe_2020_en.htm
[10]
Festinger, L. 1954. A theory of social comparison processes. Human relations 7, 117--140.
[11]
Fogg, B. 2003. Persuasive Technology: Using Computers to Change what We Think and Do. Morgan Kaufmann.
[12]
Froehlich, J., Dillahunt, T., Klasnja, P., Mankoff, J., Consolvo, S., Harrison, B. and Landay, J.A. 2009. UbiGreen: investigating a mobile tool for tracking and supporting green transportation habits. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Anonymous ACM, 1043--1052.
[13]
Froehlich, J., Findlater, L., Ostergren, M., Ramanathan, S., Peterson, J., Wragg, I., Larson, E., Fu, F., Bai, M. and Patel, S. 2012. The design and evaluation of prototype eco-feedback displays for fixture-level water usage data. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, Anonymous ACM, 2367--2376.
[14]
Gasser, R., Brodbeck, D., Degen, M., Luthiger, J., Wyss, R. and Reichlin, S. 2006. Persuasiveness of a mobile lifestyle coaching application using social facilitation. In Persuasive Technology, Anonymous Springer, 27--38.
[15]
Glanz, K., Rimer, B.K. and Viswanath, K. 2008. Health behavior and health education: theory, research, and practice. John Wiley & Sons,.
[16]
Grain, H. and Schaper, L. 2013. Designing a diabetes mobile application with social network support. In Health Informatics: Digital Health Service Delivery-The Future is Now!: Selected Papers from the 21st Australian National Health Informatics Conference (HIC 2013), Anonymous IOS Press, 58.
[17]
Grant, M., Booth, A. 2009. A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information & Libraries Journal. 26/2.1471 -- 1842
[18]
Grevet, C., Mankoff, J. and Anderson, S.D. 2010. Design and evaluation of a social visualization aimed at encouraging sustainable behavior. In System Sciences (HICSS), 2010 43rd Hawaii International Conference on, Anonymous IEEE, 1--8.
[19]
Grimes, A., Bednar, M., Bolter, J.D. and Grinter, R.E. 2008. EatWell: sharing nutrition-related memories in a low-income community. In Proceedings of the 2008 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, Anonymous ACM, 87--96.
[20]
Gulbinas, R., Jain, R. and Taylor, J. 2014. BizWatts: A modular socio-technical energy management system for empowering commercial building occupants to conserve energy. Applied Energy 136, 1076--1084.
[21]
Gulbinas, R. and Taylor, J.E. 2014. Effects of real-time eco-feedback and organizational network dynamics on energy efficient behavior in commercial buildings. Energy and Buildings 84, 493--500.
[22]
Ijsselsteijn, W., De Kort, Y., Midden, C., Eggen, B. and Van Den Hoven, E. 2006. Persuasive technology for human well-being: setting the scene. In Persuasive technology, Anonymous Springer, 1--5.
[23]
Kim, S. And Paulos, E. 2010. InAir: sharing indoor air quality measurements and visualizations. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Anonymous ACM, 1861--1870.
[24]
Kim, T., Hong, H. and Magerko, B. 2010. Designing for persuasion: toward ambient eco-visualization for awareness. In Persuasive technology, Anonymous Springer, 106--116.
[25]
Kuznetsov, S. and Paulos, E. 2010. UpStream: motivating water conservation with low-cost water flow sensing and persuasive displays. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Anonymous ACM, 1851--1860.
[26]
Lange, P. (2007) Publicly Private and Privately Public: Social Networking on YouTube. Journal of Computer-mediated Communication. Wiley. 13/1. 351--380.
[27]
Lin, J.J., Mamykina, L., Lindtner, S., Delajoux, G. and Strub, H.B. 2006. Fish'n'Steps: Encouraging physical activity with an interactive computer game. In UbiComp 2006: Ubiquitous Computing, Anonymous Springer, 261--278.
[28]
Marcus, A. and Jean, J. 2009. The green machine: going green at home. Inf Des J 17, 233--243.
[29]
Marcus, A., Schieder, T.K. and Cantoni, L. 2013. The travel machine: mobile UX design that combines information design with persuasion design. In Design, User Experience, and Usability. Web, Mobile, and Product Design, Anonymous Springer, 696--705.
[30]
Oduor, M., Alahäivälä, T. and Oinas-Kukkonen, H. 2014. Persuasive software design patterns for social influence. Personal and ubiquitous computing 18, 1689--1704.
[31]
Schwarzer, R., Lippke, S. and Luszczynska, A. 2011. Mechanisms of health behavior change in persons with chronic illness or disability: the Health Action Process Approach (HAPA). Rehabilitation psychology 56, 161
[32]
Sun, L. and Vassileva, J. 2006. Social visualization encouraging participation in online communities. In Groupware: Design, implementation, and use, Anonymous Springer, 349--363.
[33]
Thieme, A., Comber, R., Miebach, J., Weeden, J., Kraemer, N., Lawson, S. and Olivier, P. 2012. We've bin watching you: designing for reflection and social persuasion to promote sustainable lifestyles. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Anonymous ACM, 2337--2346.
[34]
Valkanova, N., Jorda, S., Tomitsch, M. and Vande Moere, A. 2013. Reveal-it!: the impact of a social visualization projection on public awareness and discourse. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Anonymous ACM, 3461--3470. Marilyn Schwartz. 1995. Guidelines for Bias-Free Writing. Indiana University Press.
[35]
Valkanova, N., Walter, R., Vande Moere, A. and Müller, J. 2014. Myposition: Sparking civic discourse by a public interactive poll visualization. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing, Anonymous ACM, 1323--1332.

Cited By

View all
  • (2018)Digital Behaviour Change Interventions to Break and Form HabitsACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction10.1145/319683025:3(1-66)Online publication date: 12-Jun-2018

Index Terms

  1. Context of use and timing of social comparison techniques in behavior change support: a qualitative systematic review

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    MUM '16: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia
    December 2016
    366 pages
    ISBN:9781450348607
    DOI:10.1145/3012709
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 12 December 2016

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. HCI
    2. behavior change
    3. design
    4. interaction design
    5. social comparison
    6. social visualization

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    MUM '16

    Acceptance Rates

    MUM '16 Paper Acceptance Rate 35 of 77 submissions, 45%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 190 of 465 submissions, 41%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)12
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 30 Jan 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2018)Digital Behaviour Change Interventions to Break and Form HabitsACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction10.1145/319683025:3(1-66)Online publication date: 12-Jun-2018

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media