Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3017680.3017769acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessigcseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Public Access

Assessing Children's Understanding of the Work of Computer Scientists: The Draw-a-Computer-Scientist Test

Published: 08 March 2017 Publication History

Abstract

We developed the Draw-A-Computer-Scientist-Test (DACST) to better understand elementary school students' conceptions of computer scientists and the nature of their work. By understanding how young children perceive computer scientists, we can broaden their ideas about the activities and images of computer scientists. We administered the DACST to 87 fourth-grade students (ages 8-9) as a pre- and post-assessment to a computer science curriculum. All students attended the same school and were taught by the same female teacher. Before the curriculum, we found that students most often drew male computer scientists working alone, and featured actions that were connected to technology in general (e.g., typing, printing), but not specific to computer science. After the curriculum, more female students drew female computer scientists than before, and the featured actions were more specific to computer science (e.g., programming a game). We also share insights about the classroom-learning environment that may have contributed to changes in students' understanding of computer scientists and their work.

References

[1]
Alvarado, C. (2014). CS Ed Week 2013: The hour of code. ACM SIGCSE Bull, 46(1), 2--4.
[2]
Richtel, M. (2014). Reading, writing, arithmetic, and lately, coding. The New York Times.
[3]
Smith, M. (January, 2016). Computer science for all. Retrieved from https://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2016/01/30/computer-science-all.
[4]
Cooper, S. (2010). The design of Alice. ACM Transactions in Computing Education, 10(4), 15.
[5]
Flannery, L. P., Silverman, B., Kazakoff, E. R., Bers, M. U., Bontá, P., & Resnick, M. (2013). Designing ScratchJr: Support for early childhood learning through computer programming. IDC '12. ACM.
[6]
Hill, C., Dwyer, H.A., Martinez, T., Harlow, D. & Franklin, D. (2015). Floors and flexibility: Designing a programming environment for 4th-6th grade classrooms. SIGCSE '15. ACM.
[7]
Resnick, M., Maloney, J., Monroy-Hernandez, A., Rusk, N., Eastmond, E., Brennan, K., Millner, A., Rosenbaum, E., Silver, J., Silverman, B., Kafai, Y. (2009). Scratch: Programming for all. Communications of the ACM, 52(11) 60--67.
[8]
Duncan, C., Bell, T., & Tanimoto, S. (2014). Should your 8-year-old learn coding? In Proceedings of the 9th Workshop in Primary and Secondary Computing Education (pp. 60--69). ACM.
[9]
Hansen, A.K., Dwyer, H.A., Hansen, E.R., Harlow, D.B., Franklin, D. (2016). Differentiating for diversity: Using universal design for learning in computer science education. In SIGCSE'16. ACM.
[10]
Margolis, J. & Fisher, A. (2003). Unlocking the clubhouse: Women in computing. MIT Press.
[11]
Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. Basic Books, Inc., New York, NY.
[12]
Tai, R. H., Liu, C.Q., Maltese, A.V., Fan, X. (2006). Career choice: Enhanced: Planning early for careers in science. Science, 312, 1143--1144.
[13]
Chambers, D.W. (1983). Stereotypic images of the scientist: The Draw-a-Scientist Test. Science Education, 67(2), 255--265.
[14]
Finson, K. D. (2004). Drawing a scientist: What we do and do not know after fifty years of drawings. School Science and Mathematics, 102(7), 335--345.
[15]
Knight, M. & Cunningham, C.M. (2004). Draw an engineer test (DAET): Development of a tool to investigate students' ideas about engineers and engineering. In Proceedings of the 2004 ASEE annual conference and exposition, Salt Lake City, Utah, June 20--23,2004.
[16]
Lyons, J. & Thomson, S. (2006). Investigating the long-term impact of an engineering-based GK-12 program on students' perceptions of engineering. In Proceedings of the 2006 ASEE annual conference and exposition, Chicago, Illinois, June 18--21, 2006.
[17]
Yap, C., Elbert, C., Lyons, J. (2003). Assessing students' perception of the engineering profession. Paper presented at the South Carolina educators for the practical use of research annual conference, Columbia SC, February 28, 2003
[18]
Hansen, A.K., Dwyer, H.A., Harlow, D.B. & Franklin, D. (2016). What is a computer scientist? Developing the draw-a-computer-scientist test for elementary school students. Paper presented at AERA '16. Washington, DC.
[19]
Mead, M., & Metraux, R. (1957). Image of the scientist among high school students: A pilot study. Science, 126, 384--390.
[20]
Pion, G. M., & Lipsey, M. W. (1981). Public attitudes toward science and technology: what have the surveys told us?. Public Opinion Quarterly, 45(3), 303--316.
[21]
Fralick, B., Kearn, J., Thompson, S., & Lyons, J. (2009). How do middle schoolers draw engineers and scientists?. Journal of Science Education and Technology. 18(1), 60--73.
[22]
Capobianco, B.M., Diefes-Dux, H.A., Mena, I., & Weller, J. (2011). What is an engineer? Implications of elementary school student conceptions for engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(2), 304--328.
[23]
Cunningham, C. M., Lachapelle, C., & Lindgren-Streicher, A. (2005). Assessing elementary school students' conceptions of engineering and technology. In Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition.
[24]
Karatas, F. O., Micklos, A., & Bodner, G. M. (2011). Sixth grade students' views of the nature of engineering and images of engineers. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 20(2), 123--135.
[25]
Grover, S., Rutstein, D., Snow, E. (2016.) "What is a computer?" What do secondary school students think? In SIGCSE '16. ACM.
[26]
Mercier, E. M., Barron, B., & O'Connor, K. M. (2006). Images of self and others as computer users: The role of gender and experience. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22(5), 335--348.
[27]
Cheryan, S., Plaut, V.C., Handron, C., & Hudson, L. (2013). The stereotypical computer scientist: Gendered media representations as a barrier to inclusion for women. Sex roles, 69(1--2), 58--71.
[28]
Lewis, A. (2011). When computer programming was women's work. The Washington Post. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/when-computer-programming-was-womens-work/2011/08/24/gIQAdixGgJ_story.html?utm_term=.09b988ce6789.
[29]
Martin, C. D. (2004.) Draw a computer scientist. In Working Group Reports on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE-WGR'04), 11--12.
[30]
Hewner, M. and Guzdial, M. 2008. Attitudes about computing in postsecondary graduates. In Proceeding of ICER '08. ACM
[31]
Grover, S., Pea, R. & Cooper, S. 2014. Remedying Misperceptions of Computer Science among Middle School Students. In SIGCSE '14. ACM.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)INVESTIGATION OF GENDER-BASED INTEREST IN COMPUTER PROGRAMMING ENGAGEMENTS AMONG STUDENTS OF FEDERAL COLLEGE OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, NEW BUSSAFUDMA JOURNAL OF SCIENCES10.33003/fjs-2024-0804-26268:4(276-282)Online publication date: 27-Aug-2024
  • (2024)Gender, Social Interactions and Interests of Characters Illustrated in Scratch and Python Programming Books for ChildrenProceedings of the 55th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 110.1145/3626252.3630862(262-268)Online publication date: 7-Mar-2024
  • (2024)Gender differences in computing interest: the role of social constructs in early pathsComputer Science Education10.1080/08993408.2024.2433354(1-33)Online publication date: 10-Dec-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Assessing Children's Understanding of the Work of Computer Scientists: The Draw-a-Computer-Scientist Test

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SIGCSE '17: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education
      March 2017
      838 pages
      ISBN:9781450346986
      DOI:10.1145/3017680
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Sponsors

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 08 March 2017

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. K-12 education
      2. computer science education
      3. computer scientists
      4. elementary school

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article

      Funding Sources

      Conference

      SIGCSE '17
      Sponsor:

      Acceptance Rates

      SIGCSE '17 Paper Acceptance Rate 105 of 348 submissions, 30%;
      Overall Acceptance Rate 1,595 of 4,542 submissions, 35%

      Upcoming Conference

      SIGCSE TS 2025
      The 56th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education
      February 26 - March 1, 2025
      Pittsburgh , PA , USA

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)250
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)32
      Reflects downloads up to 25 Jan 2025

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2024)INVESTIGATION OF GENDER-BASED INTEREST IN COMPUTER PROGRAMMING ENGAGEMENTS AMONG STUDENTS OF FEDERAL COLLEGE OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, NEW BUSSAFUDMA JOURNAL OF SCIENCES10.33003/fjs-2024-0804-26268:4(276-282)Online publication date: 27-Aug-2024
      • (2024)Gender, Social Interactions and Interests of Characters Illustrated in Scratch and Python Programming Books for ChildrenProceedings of the 55th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 110.1145/3626252.3630862(262-268)Online publication date: 7-Mar-2024
      • (2024)Gender differences in computing interest: the role of social constructs in early pathsComputer Science Education10.1080/08993408.2024.2433354(1-33)Online publication date: 10-Dec-2024
      • (2023)The impact of country of schooling and gender on secondary school students’ conceptions of and interest in becoming an engineer in Ireland, Kenya and SwedenInternational Journal of STEM Education10.1186/s40594-023-00416-910:1Online publication date: 13-Apr-2023
      • (2023)Draw a Computing StudentProceedings of the 54th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 110.1145/3545945.3569795(903-909)Online publication date: 2-Mar-2023
      • (2023)Draw a Software Engineer Test - An Investigation into Children's Perceptions of Software Engineering ProfessionProceedings of the 45th International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering in Society10.1109/ICSE-SEIS58686.2023.00010(37-47)Online publication date: 17-May-2023
      • (2023)Drawing a Computer Scientst: Assessing the Images of the Computer Scientist Among K-8 Teachers2023 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)10.1109/FIE58773.2023.10343383(1-6)Online publication date: 18-Oct-2023
      • (2023)Students’ Perceptions of Computer Science and the Role of GenderComputer Supported Education10.1007/978-3-031-40501-3_6(125-148)Online publication date: 7-Aug-2023
      • (2022)Capacity-related factors associated with computer science access and participation in Georgia public high schoolsPolicy Futures in Education10.1177/14782103221081920Online publication date: 14-Apr-2022
      • (2022)A Sociocultural Perspective on Computer Science Capital and Its Pedagogical Implications in Computer Science EducationACM Transactions on Computing Education10.1145/348705222:4(1-23)Online publication date: 15-Sep-2022
      • Show More Cited By

      View Options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Login options

      Figures

      Tables

      Media

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media