Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/302979.303105acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free access

Visual profiles: a critical component of universal access

Published: 01 May 1999 Publication History

Abstract

This research focuses on characterizing visually impaired computer users performance on graphical user interfaces by linking clinical assessments of low vision with visual icon identification. This was accomplished by evaluating user performance on basic identification and selection tasks within a graphical user interface, comparing partially sighted user performance with fully sighted user performance, and linking task performance to specific profiles of visual impairment. Results indicate that visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, visual field and color perception were significant predictors of task performance. In addition, icon size and background color significantly influenced performance. Suggestions for future research are provided. Keywords

References

[1]
Arnheim, R. (1972) Visual Thinking. University of California Press, Berkely, CA.
[2]
Bailey, I. L., & Lovie, J. E. (1976) New design principles for visual acuity letter charts. American Journal of Optometry & Physiological Optics, 53 (11), 740-745.
[3]
Buxton, W. (1985) There's more to interaction than meets the eye: some issues in manual input. In Norman, D.A. & Draper, S.W. (Eds.), User Centered Design: New Perspectives on Human-Computer Interaction (pp.319-337). Hillside, NJ:Laurence Erlbaum Associates.
[4]
Czaja, S.J., (1988) Computer technology and the older adult. In M.G. Helander, T.K. Landauer, and P.V. Prabhu (Eds.), Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction (pp.797-812). North Holland: Elsevier.
[5]
Eason, K.D., Johnson, C., & Fairclough, S. (1991) The interaction of sensory modalities in the man-machine interface. In J.A.J. Roufs (Ed.), Vision and Dysfunction: The Man-Machine Interface. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
[6]
Edwards, A. (1995) Computers and people with disabilities. In A. Edwards (Ed.), Extra-Ordinary Human-Computer Interaction (pp.19-43). New York: Cambridge University Press.
[7]
Farrell, F. E, (1991) Fitting physical screen parameters to the human eye. In J.A.J. Roufs (Ed.), Vision and Visual Dysfunction: The Man-Machine Interface. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
[8]
Ferris, F. L., Kassoff, A., Bresnick, G. H., & Bailey, E. (1982). New visual acuity charts for clinical research. American Journal of Ophthalmology, 94, 91-96.
[9]
Foley, J. D., Wallace, V. L. & Chan, P. (1984). The human factors of computer graphics interaction techniques. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 89(8), 13-48.
[10]
Jacko, J. A., & Sears, A. (1998) Designing interfaces for an overlooked user group: Considering the visual profiles of partially sighted users. The 3rd A CM/SIGCAPH Conference on Assistive Technologies (ASSETS 98), Marina del Rey, California, April 15-17, 75-77.
[11]
Kline, R. L., & Glinert, E. P. (1995) Improving GUI accessibility for people with low vision. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CH195), 114-121.
[12]
Kline, D. W., & Schieber, F. (1985) Vision and Aging. In J. E. Birren & K.W. Schaie (Eds.), Handbook of the Psychology of Aging (pp.296-331). New York: Von Nostrand Reinhold Company.
[13]
Kraut, J. A. & McCabe, C. P. (1994) The problem of low vision. In D. M. Albert, F. A. Jakobiec, & N. L. Robinson (Eds.), Principles and Practices of Ophthalmology, 3664-3683.
[14]
Lindman, H.R. (1992) Analysis of variance in experimental design. New York: Springer-Verlag.
[15]
Newell, A. F., & Gregor, P. (1997) Human computer interfaces for people with disabilities. In M.G. Helander, T.K. Landauer, and P.V. Prabhu (Eds.), Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction (pp.813- 824). North Holland: Elsevier.
[16]
Pelli, D. G., Robson, J. G., & Wilkins, A. J. (1988) The design of a new letter chart for measuring contrast sensitivity. Clinical Vision Science, 2(3), 187-199.
[17]
Proctor, R. W. & Van Zandt, T. (1994) Human Factors in Simple and Complex Systems. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
[18]
Scott, I. U., Schein, O. D., West, S., Bandeen-Roche, K., Enger, C., & Folstein, M.F. (1994) Functional status and quality of life measurement among ophthalmic patients. Arch Ophthalmol, 112, 329-335.
[19]
Sears, A., Jacko, J. A., Brewer B., & Robelo, L. (1998) A framework for visual icon design. Proceeding of the 42"a Annual Meeting of the Human Factors Society. Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society, in-press.
[20]
Shneiderman, B. (1998) Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
[21]
Wood, J. M., & Troutbeck, R. J. (1994) Effect of age and visual impairment on driving and vision performance. Transportation Research Record, n1438, Oct. 1994, 84-90.

Cited By

View all
  • (2021)An Empirical Comparison between the Effects of Normal and Low Vision on Kinematics of a Mouse-Mediated Pointing MovementInternational Journal of Human–Computer Interaction10.1080/10447318.2021.195280238:6(562-572)Online publication date: 1-Aug-2021
  • (2016)Enabling Designers to Foresee Which Colors Users Cannot SeeProceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/2858036.2858077(2693-2704)Online publication date: 7-May-2016
  • (2013)Value Sensitive Design and Information SystemsEarly engagement and new technologies: Opening up the laboratory10.1007/978-94-007-7844-3_4(55-95)Online publication date: 11-Dec-2013
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Visual profiles: a critical component of universal access

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    CHI '99: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
    May 1999
    632 pages
    ISBN:0201485591
    DOI:10.1145/302979
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 01 May 1999

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. disabilities
    2. low vision
    3. universal access
    4. visual icons

    Qualifiers

    • Article

    Conference

    CHI99
    Sponsor:
    CHI99: Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
    May 15 - 20, 1999
    Pennsylvania, Pittsburgh, USA

    Acceptance Rates

    CHI '99 Paper Acceptance Rate 78 of 312 submissions, 25%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 6,199 of 26,314 submissions, 24%

    Upcoming Conference

    CHI '25
    CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
    April 26 - May 1, 2025
    Yokohama , Japan

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)63
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)10
    Reflects downloads up to 09 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2021)An Empirical Comparison between the Effects of Normal and Low Vision on Kinematics of a Mouse-Mediated Pointing MovementInternational Journal of Human–Computer Interaction10.1080/10447318.2021.195280238:6(562-572)Online publication date: 1-Aug-2021
    • (2016)Enabling Designers to Foresee Which Colors Users Cannot SeeProceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/2858036.2858077(2693-2704)Online publication date: 7-May-2016
    • (2013)Value Sensitive Design and Information SystemsEarly engagement and new technologies: Opening up the laboratory10.1007/978-94-007-7844-3_4(55-95)Online publication date: 11-Dec-2013
    • (2012)The Effects of Multimodal Feedback and Gender on Task Performance of Stylus Pen UsersInternational Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems10.5772/501879:1Online publication date: 1-Jan-2012
    • (2011)Text highlighting improves user experience for reading with magnified displaysCHI '11 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/1979742.1979917(1891-1896)Online publication date: 7-May-2011
    • (2009)Value Sensitive Design and Information SystemsThe Handbook of Information and Computer Ethics10.1002/9780470281819.ch4(69-101)Online publication date: 26-Jan-2009
    • (2007)Impact of spatial auditory feedback on the efficiency of iconic human-computer interfaces under conditions of visual impairmentComputers in Human Behavior10.1016/j.chb.2004.12.00123:3(1211-1231)Online publication date: 1-May-2007
    • (2007)Characterising user capabilities to support inclusive design evaluationUniversal Access in the Information Society10.1007/s10209-007-0083-y6:2(119-135)Online publication date: 17-Aug-2007
    • (2006)Satisfying Divergent Needs in User-Centered Computing: Accounting for Varied Levels of Visual FunctionReviews of Human Factors and Ergonomics10.1177/1557234X06002001062:1(141-164)Online publication date: 1-Apr-2006
    • (2005)Multimodal Feedback as a Solution to Ocular Disease-Based User Performance Decrements in the Absence of Functional Visual LossInternational Journal of Human-Computer Interaction10.1207/s15327590ijhc1802_418:2(183-218)Online publication date: May-2005
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Get Access

    Login options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media