Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3047273.3047302acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicegovConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Sustainability of the Rural ICT Project: a Case Study of aAQUA e-Agriservice, Maharashtra, India

Published: 07 March 2017 Publication History

Abstract

Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) are continuously emerging as key tools to support development activities undertaken by Governments, civil society and private enterprises. It has been showing significant result in addressing information asymmetry gap in many sectors and localities, especially in agriculture & allied sector. The rural people, specifically farming communities have been getting timely & relevant information, services & support, and farming inputs. However, the sustainability of these ICT based efforts in improving well-being of farming communities is key to the effectiveness of a rural ICT projects in India. The present paper aimed to determine the sustainability of the aAQUA (Almost All Questions Answered) e-Agriservice in Maharashtra state, western parts of India covering the four districts of the state. The study used the ex-post facto (cause to effect) research design in a quasi-intervention setting. The list of registered users was obtained from the service provider (presently Agrocom Software Technologies Pvt. Ltd.) and total of 120 users were selected randomly from four districts (30 users from each district). The sustainable-Agriservice Index (SeAGRSI) was computed based on the five dimensions viz. technological, economic, social, institutional, and political by using Multi-Criteria Analysis (MCA), Mixed Method Approach and Normalized Rank Order Method (NROM). The study revealed that the SeAGRSI for the social indicators was the highest among other dimensions of the sustainability (SeAGRSI = 0.77) followed by the technologically (0.73), economic (0.71) political (0.62) and institutional (0.58) sustainable. It was also found that the mean SeAGRSI was 0.70 as reported by one third (32.50%) of the users, which means 70 per cent the aAQUA e-Agriservice was technologically, socially, economically, institutionally and politically sustainable.

References

[1]
Adrianto, L., Matsuda, Y., and Sakuma, Y. 2005. Assessing local sustainability of fisheries system: A multi-criteria participatory approach with the case of Yoron Isaland, Kagoshima prefecture, Japan. Marine policy, 29 (1): 9--23.
[2]
Annamalai, K. and Rao, S. 2003. What works: ITC's e-Choupal and profitable rural transformation: Web-based information and procurement tools for Indian farmers. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
[3]
Ashraf, M. M., Hanisch, J., and Swatman, P. 2007. ICT intervention towards development. 3rd Conference on Computer and Information Technology (ICCIT), Bangladesh. Developing Countries: Theory and Practice, City University of Hong Kong Press, pp: 83--100.
[4]
Best, M. and Kumar, R. 2008. Sustainability failures of rural telecentres: Challenges from the Sustainable Access in Rural India (SARI) project. Information Technologies and International Development, 4 (4): 31--45.
[5]
Buré, C. 2007. Grounding gender evaluation methodology for telecentres: The experiences of Ecuador and the Phillipines. Ottawa: Telecentre.Org, International Development Research Centre (IDRC).
[6]
Dalenius, T. and Hodges, J. L. 1959. Minimum variance stratification. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 54: 88--101.
[7]
Dash, R., Chattopadhyay, P., and Pahuja, N. 2007. Environmental sustainability index for Indian states. Centre for Development Finance Institute for Financial Management and Research, Chennai.
[8]
Dossani, R., Misra, D. C., and Jhaveri, R. 2005. Enabling ICT for rural India. Project Report, Asia-Pacific Research Center, Stanford University and National Informatics Centre, Government of India.
[9]
Draca, M., Sadun, R., and Reenen, J. V. 2006. Productivity and ICT: A review of the evidence, Centre for Economic Performance (CEP) discussion paper No. 749, London school of economics and political science, London.
[10]
Guilford, J. P. (1954). Psychological methods. Tata McGraw Hill Publishing Co. Ltd. Noida, UP.
[11]
Heeks, R. (2002). Information systems and developing countries: Failure, success and local improvisations. The Info. Society, 18(2): 101--112.
[12]
Heeks, R. (2010). Do information and communication technologies contribute to development? J. of Internat. Development, 22: 625--640.
[13]
IFAD Strategic Framework (2007). Enabling the rural poor to overcome poverty. EB 2006/89/R.2/Rev.1. 89th Session, Rome.
[14]
Kerlinger, F. N. (1983). Foundation of behavioural research. S. S. Chabra Publishers, Delhi, India. pp: 151--153.
[15]
Kretschmer, T. (2012) Information and communication technologies and productivity growth: A survey of the literature", OECD Digital Economy Papers, No. 195, OECD Publishing.
[16]
Kuriyan, R., Ray, I. and Toyama, K. (2008). Information and communication technologies for development: The bottom of the pyramid model in practice. The Information Society, 24(2): 93--104.
[17]
Lio, M. and Liu, M. (2006) ICT and agricultural productivity: evidence from cross-country data, Agricultural Economics, 34: 221--228.
[18]
Mbarika, V. W. A., Okoli, C., Byrd, T. A. and Datta, P. (2005). The neglected continent of IS research: A research agenda for Sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of the AIS, 6(5): 130--170.
[19]
McNamara, K. S. (2003). Information and communication technologies, poverty and development: Learning from Experience. A Background Paper for the InfoDev Annual Symposium, Geneva, Switzerland.
[20]
Mendoza, G. A. and Prabhu, R. 2003. Qualitative Multi-criteria Approaches to Assessing Indicators of Sustainable Forest Resources Management. Forest Ecol. Manag. 174: 329--343.
[21]
Meso, P., Datta, P. and Mbarika, V. (2006). Moderating information and communication technologies influences on socioeconomic development with good governance: A study of the developing countries. J. of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 57(2): 186--197.
[22]
Musa, P.F. (2006). Making a case for modifying the technology acceptance model to account for limited accessibility in developing countries. Information Technology for Development, 12(3), 213--224.
[23]
Pade-Khene, C., Mallinson, B. and Sewry, D. (2011). Sustainable rural ICT project management practice for developing countries: Investigating the DWESA and RUMEP projects. Information Technology for Development, 17(3): 187--212.
[24]
Parkins, J. R., Richard, C. S. and Varghese, J. 2001. Moving towards local-level indicators of sustainability of forest-based communities: a mixed-method approach. Social Indicators Research, pp. 43--72.
[25]
Promila (1994). Gender analysis in dairy and crop production in Kangra district, Himachal Pradesh. Ph.D. Thesis, NDRI, Karnal, Haryana.
[26]
Raju, K. A. (2004). A case for harnessing information technology for rural development. The Internat. Information & Library Review, 36:233--240.
[27]
Ramamritham, K., Bahuman, C. and Bahuman, A. (2011) aAQUA: ICT-enabled Knowledge Services to Farmers in India. M. Hazelman and S. Attaluri's edited book on 'Success Stories on ICT/ICM in AR4D in Asia and the Pacific Region', FAO.
[28]
Rao, N. H. (2006). A framework for implementing information and communication technologies in agricultural development in India. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 74: 491--518.
[29]
Rao, S. S. (2008). Social development in Indian rural communities: Adoption of telecentres. International J. of Information Management, 28: 474--482.
[30]
Sah, A. K. (1996). A descriptive study of existing dairy farming practices and constraints in adoption of improved dairy practices among dairy farmers in Banka district, Bihar. M.Sc. Thesis, NDRI, Karnal, Haryana.
[31]
Singh, Nirvikar (2007) ICT and rural development in India, UCSC working paper.
[32]
Tacchi, J., Slater, D., & Lewis, P. 2003. Evaluating community based media initiatives: An ethnographic action research approach. Paper presented at the meeting of the Information Technology for Development Conference, Oxford, UK.
[33]
Unwin, T. 2009. ICT4D: Information and Communication Technology for Development, Cambridge university press, Cambridge, UK.
[34]
Upton, D. M. and Fuller, V. A. (2004). The ITC e-Choupal initiative (Case No. 9-604- 016). Boston, MA: Harvard Business School.
[35]
Wadkar, S. K., Singh, K., Kadian, K. S., Malhotra, R. and Garde, Y. A. (2015) Comparative study on effectiveness of the aAQUA e-Agriservice among dairy farmers of Maharashtra, Indian Journal of Dairy Science, 68(4): 408--411.
[36]
World Commission on Environment and Development 1987. Our common future, Oxford university press, Oxford.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Challenges and Opportunities for Sustainable Engineering: Products, Services, Technologies, and Social Inclusivity with a Gender ApproachSustainability10.3390/su1605188816:5(1888)Online publication date: 25-Feb-2024
  • (2021)Empowering Communities in Marginalized Surroundings: Opportunities from Collaborative Community-Managed Electrification and Advanced ICTCHI Greece 2021: 1st International Conference of the ACM Greek SIGCHI Chapter10.1145/3489410.3489437(1-7)Online publication date: 25-Nov-2021
  • (2019)Symbiotic EncountersProceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3290605.3300547(1-13)Online publication date: 2-May-2019

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
ICEGOV '17: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance
March 2017
657 pages
ISBN:9781450348256
DOI:10.1145/3047273
© 2017 Association for Computing Machinery. ACM acknowledges that this contribution was authored or co-authored by an employee, contractor or affiliate of a national government. As such, the Government retains a nonexclusive, royalty-free right to publish or reproduce this article, or to allow others to do so, for Government purposes only.

In-Cooperation

  • UNESCO

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 07 March 2017

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Dimensions of Sustainability
  2. Rural ICT Projects
  3. Sustainable aAQUA e-Agriservice Index

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

ICEGOV '17

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 350 of 865 submissions, 40%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)4
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 16 Oct 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Challenges and Opportunities for Sustainable Engineering: Products, Services, Technologies, and Social Inclusivity with a Gender ApproachSustainability10.3390/su1605188816:5(1888)Online publication date: 25-Feb-2024
  • (2021)Empowering Communities in Marginalized Surroundings: Opportunities from Collaborative Community-Managed Electrification and Advanced ICTCHI Greece 2021: 1st International Conference of the ACM Greek SIGCHI Chapter10.1145/3489410.3489437(1-7)Online publication date: 25-Nov-2021
  • (2019)Symbiotic EncountersProceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3290605.3300547(1-13)Online publication date: 2-May-2019

View Options

Get Access

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media