Cited By
View all- Getto RKuijper AFellner D(2018)Automatic procedural model generation for 3D object variationThe Visual Computer10.1007/s00371-018-1589-4Online publication date: 20-Aug-2018
3D meta model generation with application in 3D object retrieval
Article No.: 6, Pages 1 - 6
Abstract
In the application of 3D object retrieval we search for 3D objects similar to a given query object. When a user searches for a certain class of objects like 'planes' the results can be unsatisfying: Many object variations are possible for a single class and not all of them are covered with one or a few example objects. We propose a meta model representation which corresponds to a procedural model with meta-parameters. Changing the meta-parameters leads to different variations of a 3D object. For the meta model generation a single object is constructed with a modeling tool. We automatically extract a procedural representation of the object. By inserting meta-parameters we generate our meta model. The meta model defines a whole object class. The user can choose a meta model and search for all objects similar to any instance of the meta model to retrieve all objects of a certain class from a 3D object database. We show that the retrieval precision is significantly improved using the meta model as retrieval query.
References
[1]
Ceyhun Burak Akgül, Bülent Sankur, Yücel Yemez, and Francis Schmitt. 2010. Similarity Learning for 3D Object Retrieval Using Relevance Feedback and Risk Minimization. International Journal of Computer Vision 89, 2--3 (Sept. 2010), 392--407.
[2]
Melinos Averkiou, Vladimir G Kim, Youyi Zheng, and Niloy J Mitra. 2014. Shapesynth: Parameterizing model collections for coupled shape exploration and synthesis. In Computer Graphics Forum, Vol. 33. Wiley Online Library, 125--134.
[3]
Matthias Bein, Sven Havemann, André Stork, and D Fellner. 2009. Sketching subdivision surfaces. In Proceedings of the 6th Eurographics Symposium on Sketch-Based Interfaces and Modeling. ACM, 61--68.
[4]
Rene Berndt, Dieter W Fellner, and Sven Havemann. 2005. Generative 3D models: a key to more information within less bandwidth at higher quality. In Proceedings of the tenth international conference on 3D Web technology. ACM, 111--121.
[5]
Martin Bokeloh, Michael Wand, and Hans-Peter Seidel. 2010. A connection between partial symmetry and inverse procedural modeling. In ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), Vol. 29. ACM, 104.
[6]
Rui Fang, Afzal Godil, Xiaolan Li, and Asim Wagan. 2008. A new shape benchmark for 3D object retrieval. In Advances in Visual Computing. Springer, 381--392.
[7]
Matthew Fisher, Daniel Ritchie, Manolis Savva, Thomas Funkhouser, and Pat Hanrahan. 2012. Example-based synthesis of 3D object arrangements. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 31, 6 (2012), 135.
[8]
Sven Havemann and Dieter Fellner. 2001. A versatile 3d model representation for cultural reconstruction. In Proceedings of the 2001 conference on Virtual reality, archeology, and cultural heritage. ACM, 205--212.
[9]
Sven Havemann and Dieter W Fellner. 2005. Generative mesh modeling. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Braunschweig-Institute of Technology.
[10]
Arjun Jain, Thorsten Thormählen, Tobias Ritschel, and Hans-Peter Seidel. 2012. Exploring Shape Variations by 3D-Model Decomposition and Part-based Recombination. In Computer Graphics Forum, Vol. 31. Wiley Online Library, 631--640.
[11]
Vladislav Kraevoy and Alla Sheffer. 2004. Cross-parameterization and compatible remeshing of 3D models. In ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), Vol. 23. ACM, 861--869.
[12]
Biao Leng, Jiabei Zeng, Ming Yao, and Zhang Xiong. 2015. 3D Object Retrieval With Multitopic Model Combining Relevance Feedback and LDA Model. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 24, 1 (Jan. 2015), 94--105.
[13]
Bo Li and Henry Johan. 2013. 3D model retrieval using hybrid features and class information. Multimedia tools and applications 62, 3 (2013), 821--846.
[14]
Jean-Eudes Marvie, Julien Perret, and Kadi Bouatouch. 2005. The FL-system: a functional L-system for procedural geometric modeling. The Visual Computer 21, 5 (2005), 329--339.
[15]
Erick Mendez, Gerhard Schall, Sven Havemann, Dieter Fellner, Dieter Schmalstieg, and Sebastian Junghanns. 2008. Generating semantic 3D models of underground infrastructure. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 28, 3 (2008).
[16]
Antoine Milliez, Michael Wand, M-P Cani, and H-P Seidel. 2013. Mutable elastic models for sculpting structured shapes. In Computer Graphics Forum, Vol. 32. Wiley Online Library, 21--30.
[17]
Pascal Müller, Peter Wonka, Simon Haegler, Andreas Ulmer, and Luc Van Gool. 2006. Procedural modeling of buildings. Acm Transactions On Graphics (Tog) 25, 3 (2006), 614--623.
[18]
Panagiotis Papadakis, Ioannis Pratikakis, Theoharis Theoharis, and Stavros Perantonis. 2010. PANORAMA: A 3D shape descriptor based on panoramic views for unsupervised 3D object retrieval. International Journal of Computer Vision 89, 2--3 (2010), 177--192.
[19]
Philip Shilane, Patrick Min, Michael Kazhdan, and Thomas Funkhouser. 2004. The princeton shape benchmark. In Shape modeling applications, 2004. Proceedings. IEEE, 167--178.
[20]
Ondrej Št'ava, Bedrich Beneš, Radomir Měch, Daniel G Aliaga, and Peter Krištof. 2010. Inverse Procedural Modeling by Automatic Generation of L-systems. In Computer Graphics Forum, Vol. 29. Wiley Online Library, 665--674.
[21]
Torsten Ullrich and Dieter W Fellner. 2011. Generative object definition and semantic recognition. In Proceedings of the 4th Eurographics conference on 3D Object Retrieval. Eurographics Association, 1--8.
[22]
Yaozhen Wang, Zhiwen Liu, Fengqian Pang, and Heng Li. 2015. Boosting 3D model retrieval with class vocabularies and distance vector revision. In TENCON 2015--2015 IEEE Region 10 Conference. IEEE, 1--5.
[23]
Kai Xu, Honghua Li, Hao Zhang, Daniel Cohen-Or, Yueshan Xiong, and Zhi-Quan Cheng. 2010. Style-content separation by anisotropic part scales. In ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), Vol. 29. ACM, 184.
[24]
Mehmet Ersin Yumer, Siddhartha Chaudhuri, Jessica K. Hodgins, and Levent Burak Kara. 2015. Semantic shape editing using deformation handles. ACM Transactions on Graphics 34, 4 (2015), 86:1--86:12.
Index Terms
- 3D meta model generation with application in 3D object retrieval
Recommendations
Meta Model Approach for Mediation
COMPSAC '03: Proceedings of the 27th Annual International Conference on Computer Software and ApplicationsIn this work, we discuss how to interpret traditionalData Flow Diagram (DFD) by Unified Modeling Language(UML) for the purpose of integrating legacy systems withmodern systems. To do that we introduce DFD meta modelby using UML class diagrams and Object ...
Learning View-Model Joint Relevance for 3D Object Retrieval
3D object retrieval has attracted extensive research efforts and become an important task in recent years. It is noted that how to measure the relevance between 3D objects is still a difficult issue. Most of the existing methods employ just the model-...
Content-Based 3D Object Retrieval
Methods for automatically extracting descriptors from 3D objects are key to searching and indexing techniques in their growing repositories. The authors present two recently proposed approaches and discuss methods for benchmarking the 3D retrieval ...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
June 2017
260 pages
Copyright © 2017 ACM.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 27 June 2017
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Short-paper
Conference
CGI '17
Acceptance Rates
Overall Acceptance Rate 35 of 159 submissions, 22%
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- View Citations1Total Citations
- 132Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)4
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 27 Jan 2025
Other Metrics
Citations
Cited By
View all- Getto RKuijper AFellner D(2018)Automatic procedural model generation for 3D object variationThe Visual Computer10.1007/s00371-018-1589-4Online publication date: 20-Aug-2018
View Options
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign in