Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article

Robust In-Field Testing of Digital Microfluidic Biochips

Published: 21 September 2017 Publication History
  • Get Citation Alerts
  • Abstract

    Microfluidic technology offers vast promise for implementing biochemistry-on-chip with diverse applications to clinical diagnosis, genome analysis, drug design, and point-of-care testing. Among various types of fluid-chips, droplet-based digital microfluidic biochips (DMFBs), which consist of a patterned array of controllable electrodes, provide the advantage of programmability, ease of fluidic operations, and versatile droplet mobility. However, because of manufacturing or field defects, electrode degradation, or dielectric breakdown, these chips may suffer from incorrect fluidic behavior. Reliability of fluidic operations is of utmost concern in DMFBs that are used to perform safety-critical bio-protocols. Various methods are deployed to test these devices, either offline or being overlapped with bioassay operations (termed as concurrent or in-field testing). The main challenge of in-field testing lies in the fact that the test must run concurrently with the execution of the normal assay without hampering the correctness of the latter. In prior work, optimal testing for droplet mobility over all electrodes was formulated in terms of finding either a Hamiltonian path or a Eulerian path in an undirected graph that represents the electrode-adjacency structure. Although these models have been studied for offline testing, no such effort was made in the area of concurrent testing. In this work, we propose, for in-field application, an SAT-based modeling and solution approach to find an optimal test plan that can be used to check droplet movement across the boundary between every pair of adjacent electrodes, which is visited by the droplets of the ongoing assay. The proposed method is robust and determines a test solution successfully regardless of the cover assay that is being executed concurrently. Experiments on several real-life assays and other test cases demonstrate the effectiveness of the method with respect to test completion time.

    References

    [1]
    Q. Al-Gayem, H. Liu, A. Richardson, and N. Burd. 2011. Test strategies for electrode degradation in bio-fluidic microsystems. Journal of Electronic Testing: Theory and Applications 27, 1 (2011), 57--68.
    [2]
    S. Bhattacharjee, A. Banerjee, K. Chakrabarty, and B. B. Bhattacharya. 2014. Correctness checking of bio-chemical protocol Realizations on a digital microfluidic biochip. In International Conference on VLSI Design (VLSID’14). 504--509.
    [3]
    K. Chakrabarty and F. Su. 2007. Digital Microfluidic Biochips: Synthesis, Testing, and Reconfiguration Techniques. CRC Press, New York.
    [4]
    L. M. de Moura and N. Bjørner. 2008. Z3: An efficient SMT solver. In Proceedings of TACAS. 337--340 [Z3 is available at https://github.com/Z3Prover/z3].
    [5]
    N. Deo. 1994. Graph Theory with Applications to Engineering and Computer Science. Prentice-Hall of India Pvt.
    [6]
    T. A. Dinh, S. Yamashita, T.-Y. Ho, and K. Chakrabarty. 2015. A general testing method for digital microfluidic biochips under physical constraints. In IEEE International Test Conference (ITC’15). 1--8.
    [7]
    R. B. Fair, A. Khlystov, T. D. Tailor, V. Ivanov, R. D. Evans, P. B. Griffin, V. Srinivasan, V. K. Pamula, M. G. Pollack, and J. Zhou. 2007. Chemical and biological applications of digital-microfluidic devices. IEEE Design and Test of Computers 24, 1 (2007), 10--24.
    [8]
    M. R. Garey and D. V. Johnson. 1990. Computers and Intractability; A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness. W. H. Freeman 8 Co., New York.
    [9]
    L. Gervais, N. de Rooij, and E. Delamarche. 2011. Microfluidic chips for point-of-care immunodiagnostics. Advanced Materials 23, 24 (June2011), H151--H176.
    [10]
    K. Hu, B. N. Hsu, A. Madison, K. Chakrabarty, and R. Fair. 2013. Fault detection, real-time error recovery, and experimental demonstration for digital microfluidic biochips. In Proceedings of DATE. 559--564.
    [11]
    K. Hu, M. Ibrahim, L. Chen, Z. Li, K. Chakrabarty, and R. Fair. 2015. Experimental demonstration of error recovery in an integrated cyberphysical digital-microfluidic platform. In Proceedings of BioCAS. 1--4.
    [12]
    J.-D. Huang, C.-H. Liu, and T.-W. Chiang. 2012. Reactant minimization during sample preparation on digital microfluidic biochips using skewed mixing trees. In IEEE/ACM International Conference on Computer-Aided Design (ICCAD’12). 377--383.
    [13]
    M. J. Jebrail and A. R. Wheeler. 2010. Let’s get digital: Digitizing chemical biology with microfluidics. Current Opinion in Chemical Biology 14, 5 (2010), 574--581.
    [14]
    O. Keszocze, R. Wille, K. Chakrabarty, and R. Drechsler. 2015. A general and exact routing methodology for digital microfluidic biochips. In International Conference on Computer Aided Design (ICCAD’15). 874--881.
    [15]
    O. Keszocze, R. Wille, and R. Drechsler. 2014. Exact routing for digital microfluidic biochips with temporary blockages. In International Conference on Computer Aided Design (ICCAD’14). 405--410.
    [16]
    O. Keszocze, R. Wille, T. Y. Ho, and R. Drechsler. 2014. Exact one-pass synthesis of digital microfluidic biochips. In Design Automation Conference (DAC’14). 1--6.
    [17]
    D. Kroening and O. Strichman. 2008. Decision Procedures for Propositional Logic. Springer, Berlin, 25--57.
    [18]
    Y. S. Mahajan, Z. Fu, and S. Malik. 2004. Zchaff2004: An efficient SAT solver. In International Conference on Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing. 360--375.
    [19]
    D. Mitra, S. Ghoshal, H. Rahaman, K. Chakrabarty, and B. B. Bhattacharya. 2011. Test planning in digital microfluidic biochips using efficient Eulerization techniques. Journal of Electronic Testing: Theory and Applications 27, 5 (2011), 657--671.
    [20]
    D. Mitra, S. Ghoshal, H. Rahaman, K. Chakrabarty, and B. B. Bhattacharya. 2012. On-line error detection in digital microfluidic biochips. In Proceedings of the Asian Test Symposium. 332--337.
    [21]
    A. Papathanasiou and A. Boudouvis. 2005. Manifestation of the connection between dielectric breakdown strength and contact angle saturation in electrowetting. Applied Physics Letters 86 (2005), 164102.
    [22]
    B. Pasaniuc, R. S. Garfinkel, I. I. Mandoiu, and A. Zelikovsky. 2011. Optimal testing of digital microfluidic biochips. INFORMS Journal on Computing 23, 4 (2011), 518--529.
    [23]
    S. Roy, S. Kumar, P. P. Chakrabarti, B. B. Bhattacharya, and K. Chakrabarty. 2014. Demand-driven mixture preparation and droplet streaming using digital microfluidic biochips. In Design Automation Conference (DAC’14). 144:1--144:6.
    [24]
    R. Sista, Z. Hua, P. Thwar, A. Sudarsan, V. Srinivasan, A. Eckhardt, M. Pollack, and V. Pamula. 2008. Development of a digital microfluidic platform for point of care testing. Lab-on-a-Chip 8, 12 (2008), 2091--2104.
    [25]
    F. Su, W. Hwang, and K. Chakrabarty. 2006. Droplet routing in the synthesis of digital microfluidic biochips. In Design Automation Test in Europe (DATE’06) Conference, Vol. 1. 1--6.
    [26]
    F. Su, W. Hwang, A. Mukherjee, and K. Chakrabarty. 2007. Testing and diagnosis of realistic defects in digital microfluidic biochips. Journal of Electronic Testing: Theory and Applications 23, 5 (2007), 219--233.
    [27]
    F. Su, S. Ozev, and K. Chakrabarty. 2003. Testing of droplet-based microelectrofluidic systems. In International Test Conference (ITC’03). 1192--1200.
    [28]
    F. Su, S. Ozev, and K. Chakrabarty. 2005. Ensuring the operational health of droplet-based microelectrofluidic biosensor systems. IEEE Sensors Journal 5, 4 (2005), 763--773.
    [29]
    F. Su, S. Ozev, and K. Chakrabarty. 2006. Concurrent testing of digital microfluidics-based biochips. ACM Transactions on Design Automation of Electronic Systems 11, 2 (2006), 442--464.
    [30]
    L. Zhang, J. J. Mei, B. W. Yan, and Q. Gao. 2014. A test droplets dispensing solution for digital microfluidic biochip parallel testing. In Micro-Nano Technology XV, Vol. 609. 670--674.

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2022)Parallel testing optimization method of digital microfluidic biochipMeasurement10.1016/j.measurement.2022.111018194(111018)Online publication date: May-2022
    • (2019)Micro-Electrode-Dot-Array Digital Microfluidic Biochips: Technology, Design Automation, and Test TechniquesIEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems10.1109/TBCAS.2018.288695213:2(292-313)Online publication date: Apr-2019
    • (2018)IntroductionMicro-Electrode-Dot-Array Digital Microfluidic Biochips10.1007/978-3-030-02964-7_1(1-20)Online publication date: 15-Dec-2018

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Journal on Emerging Technologies in Computing Systems
    ACM Journal on Emerging Technologies in Computing Systems  Volume 14, Issue 1
    January 2018
    289 pages
    ISSN:1550-4832
    EISSN:1550-4840
    DOI:10.1145/3143783
    • Editor:
    • Yuan Xie
    Issue’s Table of Contents
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Journal Family

    Publication History

    Published: 21 September 2017
    Accepted: 01 July 2017
    Revised: 01 May 2017
    Received: 01 March 2017
    Published in JETC Volume 14, Issue 1

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Biochips
    2. digital microfluidics
    3. in-field testing

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed

    Funding Sources

    • INAE Chair Professorship
    • special PPEC-funded grant to Nanotechnology Research Triangle provided by Indian Statistical Institute

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)20
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
    Reflects downloads up to 10 Aug 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2022)Parallel testing optimization method of digital microfluidic biochipMeasurement10.1016/j.measurement.2022.111018194(111018)Online publication date: May-2022
    • (2019)Micro-Electrode-Dot-Array Digital Microfluidic Biochips: Technology, Design Automation, and Test TechniquesIEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems10.1109/TBCAS.2018.288695213:2(292-313)Online publication date: Apr-2019
    • (2018)IntroductionMicro-Electrode-Dot-Array Digital Microfluidic Biochips10.1007/978-3-030-02964-7_1(1-20)Online publication date: 15-Dec-2018

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    Full Access

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media