Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3173574.3174061acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open access

Traces: Studying a Public Reactive Floor-Projection of Walking Trajectories to Support Social Awareness

Published: 21 April 2018 Publication History

Abstract

Walking trajectories have been used to understand how users interact with public displays. However, it has not yet been studied how displaying them in-situ could affect users' awareness about others' presence and activities. We present the study of an interactive public floor-projection called Traces. Traces projects the walking trajectories of individuals as they pass through the lobby of a university building. We investigated Traces through a 6 week in-field study. Our results outline how different uses and understandings of Traces contributed towards its appropriation as a glanceable display for social awareness. We outline design suggestions that future designers should consider to support social awareness with public displays.

Supplementary Material

suppl.mov (pn3980-file3.mp4)
Supplemental video
suppl.mov (pn3980-file5.mp4)
Supplemental video

References

[1]
Mary Barreto, Evangelos Karapanos, and Nuno Nunes. 2013. Why don't families get along with eco-feedback technologies? Proceedings of the Biannual Conference of the Italian Chapter of SIGCHI (CHItaly '13), ACM, 1--4.
[2]
Steve Benford, Andy Crabtree, Martin Flintham, et al. 2011. Creating the Spectacle: Designing Interactional Trajectories through Spectator Interfaces. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 18, 3: 1--28.
[3]
Steve Benford, Gabriella Giannachi, Boriana Koleva, and Tom Rodden. 2009. From interaction to trajectories: Designing Coherent Journeys Through User Experiences. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '09), ACM, 709--718.
[4]
Mark Bilandzic, Ronald Schroeter, and Marcus Foth. 2013. Gelatine: making coworking places gel for better collaboration and social learning. Proceedings of the 25th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference: Augmentation, Application, Innovation, Collaboration (OzCHI '13), ACM, 427--436.
[5]
Daniel Carter. 2014. Encouraging Ambiguous Experience?: Guides for Personal Meaning Making. Proceedings of the 2014 companion publication on Designing interactive systems (DIS Companion '14), ACM, 61--64.
[6]
Luigina Ciolfi, Mikael Fernström, and Liam J Bannon. 2007. The Shannon Portal Installation: An Example of Interaction Design for Public Places. IEEE Computer Society 40, 7: 65--72.
[7]
Paul Dourish. 2003. The appropriation of interactive technologies: Some lessons from placeless documents. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW'03) 12, 4: 465--490.
[8]
Sebastian Draxler, Gunnar Stevens, Martin Stein, Alexander Boden, and David Randall. 2012. Supporting the Social Context of Technology Appropriation: On a Synthesis of Sharing Tools and Tool Knowledge. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'12), ACM, 2835--2844.
[9]
Ava Fatah gen. Schieck, Vasillis Kostakos, and Alan Penn. 2009. Exploring Digital Encounters in the Public Arena. In Struppek M. Willis K., Roussos G., Chorianopoulos K. (ed.). Springer, London.
[10]
Patrick Tobias Fischer, Christian Zöllner, Thilo Hoffmann, Sebastian Piatza, and Eva Hornecker. 2013. Beyond information and utility: Transforming public spaces with media facades. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 33, 2: 38--46.
[11]
Lyndsey Fisk, Marcus Carter, Behnaz Rostami Yeganeh, Frank Vetere, and Bernd Ploderer. 2014. Implicit and Explicit Interactions in Video Mediated Collaboration. Proceedings of the 26th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference on Designing Futures: the Future of Design (OzCHI '14), ACM, 250--259.
[12]
Myriam Fréjus. 2015. Taking into Account User Appropriation and Development to Design Energy. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '15), ACM, 2193--2198.
[13]
Dominic Furniss, Ann Blandford, and Paul Curzon. 2011. Confessions from a grounded theory PhD: experiences and lessons learnt. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '11), ACM, 113--122.
[14]
Sarah Gallacher, Jenny O'Connor, Jon Bird, et al. 2015. Mood Squeezer?: Lightening up the Workplace through Playful and Lightweight Interactions. Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work&Social Computing (CSCW '15), ACM, 891--902.
[15]
William W. Gaver, Jacob Beaver, and Steve Benford. 2003. Ambiguity as a resource for design. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '03), ACM, 233--240.
[16]
Erving Goffman. 1963. Behavior in public places: notes on the social organization of gatherings. The Free Press, New York, NY, USA.
[17]
Steven Houben and Christian Weichel. 2013. Overcoming interaction blindness through curiosity objects. CHI '13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '13), ACM, 1539--1544.
[18]
Elaine M. Huang, Anna Koster, and Jan Borchers. 2008. Overcoming assumptions and uncovering practices: When does the public really look at public displays? Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Pervasive Computing (Pervasive '08), Springer-Verlag, 228--243.
[19]
Clinton Jorge, Julian Hanna, Valentina Nisi, Nuno Nunes, Miguel Caldeira, and Giovanni Innella. 2013. Fostering ambiguity: Decontextualizing and Repurposing a Familiar Public Display. Proceedings of the Biannual Conference of the Italian Chapter of SIGCHI (CHItaly '13), ACM, 10.
[20]
Bradley S. Jorgensen and Richard C. Stedman. 2001. Sense of Place As an Attitude: Lakeshore Owners Attitudes Toward Their Properties. Journal of Environmental Psychology 21: 233--248.
[21]
Rui José, Nuno Otero, and Jorge C.S. Cardoso. 2014. Dimensions of Situatedness for Digital Public Displays. Advances in Human-Computer Interaction, Article 16 (January 2015).
[22]
Evangelos Karapanos, Marc Hassenzahl, and JeanBernard Martens. 2008. User experience over time. CHI '08 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '08), ACM, 3561--3566.
[23]
Kai Kuikkaniemi, Giulio Jacucci, Marko Turpeinen, Eve Hoggan, and Jörg Müller. 2011. From space to stage: How interactive screens will change urban life. Computer 44, 6: 40--47.
[24]
Rod McCall, Shaleph O'Neill, Fiona Carroll, David Benyon, and Michael Smyth. 2005. Responsive environments, place and presence. PsychNology Journal 3, 1: 35--73.
[25]
Joseph F. McCarthy, David W McDonald, Suzanne Soroczak, David H Nguyen, and Al Mamunur Rashid. 2004. Augmenting the Social Space of an Academic Conference. Augmenting the social space of an academic conference. In Proceedings of the 2004 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work (CSCW '04), ACM, 39--48.
[26]
Joseph F McCarthy, Shelly D Farnham, Yogi Patel, et al. 2009. Supporting Community in Third Places with Situated Social Software. Proceedings of the fourth international conference on Communities and technologies (C&T '09), ACM, 225--234.
[27]
David K. McGookin, Stephen A. Brewster, and Georgi Christov. 2014. Studying Digital Graffiti as a LocationBased Social Network. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '14), ACM, 3269--3278.
[28]
Nemanja Memarovic, Sarah Clinch, and Florian Alt. 2015. Understanding Display Blindness in Future Display Deployments. Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Pervasive Displays (PerDis '15), ACM, 7--14.
[29]
Nemanja Memarovic, Marc Langheinrich, Florian Alt, Ivan Elhart, Simo Hosio, and Elisa Rubegni. 2012. Using public displays to stimulate passive engagement, active engagement, and discovery in public spaces. Proceedings of the 4th Media Architecture Biennale Conference on Participation (MAB '12), 55--64.
[30]
Daniel Michelis and Jörg Müller. 2011. The Audience Funnel: Observations of Gesture Based Interaction With Multiple Large Displays in a City Center. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 27, 6: 562--579.
[31]
Jörg Müller, Dennis Wilmsmann, Juliane Exeler, et al. 2009. Display blindness: The effect of expectations on attention towards digital signage. International Conference on Pervasive Computing, Springer, 1--8.
[32]
Michael Muller, Katja Neureiter, Alina Krischkowsky, and Manfred Tscheligi. 2016. Collaborative Appropriation: How Couples, Teams, Groups and Communities Adapt and Adopt Technologies. Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing Companion (CSCW '16 Companion)., 473--480.
[33]
Sean A. Munson, Emily Rosengren, and Paul Resnick. 2011. Thanks and tweets: comparing two public displays. Proceedings of the ACM 2011 conference on Computer supported cooperative work (CSCW '11), ACM, 331--340.
[34]
Gonzalo Parra, Joris Klerkx, and Erik Duval. 2014. Understanding Engagement with Interactive Public Displays. Proceedings of The International Symposium on Pervasive Displays (PerDis '14), ACM, 180--185.
[35]
Pablo-Alejandro Quinones. 2014. Cultivating practice&shepherding technology use: supporting appropriation among unanticipated users. Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work&social computing (CSCW '14), ACM, 305--318.
[36]
Jane Ritchie, Liz Spencer, A. Michael Huberman, and Matthew B. Miles. 2011. Qualitative Data Analysis for Applied Policy Research. In The Qualitative Researcher's Companion, A. Michael Huberman and Matthew B. Miles (eds.). SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, 305--329.
[37]
Yvonne Rogers, Jon Bird, Lisa Koeman, and Vaiva Kalnikait. 2014. What Chalk and Tape Can Tell Us?: Lessons Learnt for Next Generation Urban Displays. Proceedings of The International Symposium on Pervasive Displays (PerDis '14), ACM, 130--135.
[38]
Yvonne Rogers, William R Hazlewood, Paul Marshall, Nick Dalton, and Susanna Hertrich. 2010. Ambient Influence: Can Twinkly Lights Lure and Abstract Representations Trigger Behavioral Change? Proceedings of the 12th ACM international conference on Ubiquitous computing (UbiComp '10), ACM, 261--270.
[39]
Enrico Rukzio, Michael Müller, and Robert Hardy. 2009. Design, Implementation and Evaluation of a Novel Public Display for Pedestrian Navigation: The Rotating Compass. Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'09), ACM, 113--122.
[40]
Harvey Sacks. 1992. Lectures on Conversation. Blackwell Publishing.
[41]
Alex S. Taylor, Siân Lindley, Tim Regan, and David Sweeney. 2015. Data-in-Place: Thinking through the Relations Between Data and Community. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15), ACM, 2863--2872.
[42]
Daniel Vogel and Ravin Balakrishnan. 2004. Interactive Public Ambient Displays: Transitioning from Implicit to Explicit, Public to Personal, Interaction with Multiple Users. Proceedings of the 17th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology (UIST '04), ACM, 137--146.
[43]
William Hollingsworth Whyte. 2001. The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces. Project for Public Spaces.
[44]
Julie R. Williamson and Stephen Brewster. 2014. Capturing performative actions for interaction and social awareness. In Mobile Social Signal Processing (MSSP 2010). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 51--63.
[45]
Julie R. Williamson and Daniel Sundén. 2015. Enter the Circle - Blending Spherical Displays and Playful Embedded Interaction in Public Spaces. PerDis'15, 195--200.
[46]
Julie R. Williamson and John Williamson. 2014. Analysing Pedestrian Traffic Around Public Displays. In Proceedings of The International Symposium on Pervasive Displays (PerDis '14), ACM, 13.
[47]
Christian Winkler, Julian Seifert, David Dobbelstein, and Enrico Rukzio. 2014. Pervasive information through constant personal projection: the ambient mobile pervasive display (AMP-D). Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '14), ACM, 4117--4126.
[48]
Niels Wouters, John Downs, Mitchell Harrop, et al. 2016. Uncovering the Honeypot Effect: How Audiences Engage with Public Interactive Systems. Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS '16), ACM, 5--16.
[49]
Niels Wouters, Jonathan Huyghe, and Andrew Vande Moere. 2014. StreetTalk: participative design of situated public displays for urban neighborhood interaction. Proceedings of the 8th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction Fun, Fast, Foundational - NordiCHI '14, ACM, 747--756.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Let Information Flow Into Awareness: A Design Space for Human-Like Experiences to Promote Informal Communication for Hybrid WorkProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3661549(1666-1680)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
  • (2024)Investigating Effects of Future Path Visualisation on Path Choices During Collision EncountersUntersuchung der Auswirkungen der Visualisierung zukünftiger Pfade auf die Pfadwahl bei KollisionsbegegnungenKN - Journal of Cartography and Geographic Information10.1007/s42489-024-00177-774:3-4(205-219)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2024
  • (2023)Exploring Mobility Behavior Around Ambient Displays Using Clusters of Multi-dimensional Walking TrajectoriesExtended Abstracts of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544549.3585661(1-6)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Traces: Studying a Public Reactive Floor-Projection of Walking Trajectories to Support Social Awareness

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '18: Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2018
      8489 pages
      ISBN:9781450356206
      DOI:10.1145/3173574
      This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives International 4.0 License.

      Sponsors

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 21 April 2018

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Badges

      • Honorable Mention

      Author Tags

      1. behaviour mirroring
      2. projection
      3. public display
      4. reactive display
      5. social awareness
      6. traces

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article

      Conference

      CHI '18
      Sponsor:

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '18 Paper Acceptance Rate 666 of 2,590 submissions, 26%;
      Overall Acceptance Rate 6,199 of 26,314 submissions, 24%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI 2025
      ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 26 - May 1, 2025
      Yokohama , Japan

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)181
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)21
      Reflects downloads up to 18 Feb 2025

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2024)Let Information Flow Into Awareness: A Design Space for Human-Like Experiences to Promote Informal Communication for Hybrid WorkProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3661549(1666-1680)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
      • (2024)Investigating Effects of Future Path Visualisation on Path Choices During Collision EncountersUntersuchung der Auswirkungen der Visualisierung zukünftiger Pfade auf die Pfadwahl bei KollisionsbegegnungenKN - Journal of Cartography and Geographic Information10.1007/s42489-024-00177-774:3-4(205-219)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2024
      • (2023)Exploring Mobility Behavior Around Ambient Displays Using Clusters of Multi-dimensional Walking TrajectoriesExtended Abstracts of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544549.3585661(1-6)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
      • (2022)I Just Can’t Believe These are not Fictitious: Vivifying design examples through narratives populated by existing artefactsProceedings of the 25th International Academic Mindtrek Conference10.1145/3569219.3569394(129-134)Online publication date: 16-Nov-2022
      • (2022)Auggie: Encouraging Effortful Communication through Handcrafted Digital ExperiencesProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/35551526:CSCW2(1-25)Online publication date: 11-Nov-2022
      • (2022)Floor Projection with QR code-based Interactions and Visitor Drawings2022 IEEE 11th Global Conference on Consumer Electronics (GCCE)10.1109/GCCE56475.2022.10014058(318-320)Online publication date: 18-Oct-2022
      • (2022)Supporting collective physical activities by interactive floor projection in a special-needs school settingInternational Journal of Child-Computer Interaction10.1016/j.ijcci.2021.10039232:COnline publication date: 1-Jun-2022
      • (2022)Technology Review for Guiding Persons in Airports and Other HubsDynamics in Logistics10.1007/978-3-031-05359-7_37(462-473)Online publication date: 5-May-2022
      • (2021)(Don't) Mind the StepProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/34885375:ISS(1-18)Online publication date: 5-Nov-2021
      • (2020)Exploring the Design of History-Enriched Floor Interfaces for Asynchronous Navigation SupportProceedings of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3357236.3395496(1391-1403)Online publication date: 3-Jul-2020
      • Show More Cited By

      View Options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Login options

      Figures

      Tables

      Media

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media