Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3176258.3176333acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescodaspyConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper
Public Access

SmartProvenance: A Distributed, Blockchain Based DataProvenance System

Published: 13 March 2018 Publication History

Abstract

Blockchain technology has evolved from being an immutable ledger of transactions for cryptocurrencies to a programmable interactive environment for building distributed reliable applications. Although the blockchain technology has been used to address various challenges, to our knowledge none of the previous work focused on using Blockchain to develop a secure and immutable scientific data provenance management framework that automatically verifies the provenance records. In this work, we leverage Blockchain as a platform to facilitate trustworthy data provenance collection, verification, and management. The developed system utilizes smart contracts and open provenance model (OPM) to record immutable data trails. We show that our proposed framework can securely capture and validate provenance data that prevents any malicious modification to the captured data as long as the majority of the participants are honest.

References

[1]
Thiago Vieira Andrew Lippman Ariel Ekblaw, Asaf Azaria. 2016. MedRec: Medical Data Management on the Blockchain. (2016). version: 57e013615dbf3f3300152554.
[2]
David Bollier. 2015. Reinventing Law for the Commons. (2015). http://www. commonaccord.org/
[3]
Zvika Brakerski, Jonathan Katz, Gil Segev, and Arkady Yerukhimovich. 2011. Limits on the Power of Zero-Knowledge Proofs in Cryptographic Constructions. In Theory of Cryptography - 8th Theory of Cryptography Conference, TCC 2011, Providence, RI, USA, March 28-30, 2011. Proceedings. 559--578.
[4]
Jonathan Brown. 2015. Storing compressed text in Ethereum transaction logs. (2015). http://jonathanpatrick.me/blog/ethereum-compressed-text
[5]
Vitalik Buterin. 2015. A Next-Generation Smart Contract and Decentralized Application Platform. (2015). September.
[6]
Tim Clark, Paolo Ciccarese, and Carole A. Goble. 2013. Micropublications: a Semantic Model for Claims, Evidence, Arguments and Annotations in Biomedical Communications. CoRR abs/1305.3506 (2013). http://arxiv.org/abs/1305.3506
[7]
Tierion coporation. 2017. Tierion API. (2017). https://tierion.com/
[8]
Vincent Durham. 2010. NAMECOIN. https://namecoin.org/.
[9]
The Economist. 2016. Better with bitcoin. (2016). http://www.economist.com/news/science-and-technology/21699099- blockchain-technology-could-improve-reliability-medical-trials-better.
[10]
US Food and Drug Administration. 2017. Clinical Research. https://www.fda.gov/ ForPatients/Approvals/Drugs/ucm405622.htm.
[11]
Buyse M George SL. 2015. Data fraud in clinical trials. PMC 5, 2 (2015), 161--173.
[12]
Bela Gipp, Jagrut Kosti, and Corinna Breitinger. 2016. Securing Video Integrity Using Decentralized Trusted Timestamping on the Blockchain. In Proceedings of the 10th Mediterranean Conference on Information Systems (MCIS). Paphos, Cyprus.
[13]
Oded Goldreich. 2004. Foundations of Cryptography: Volume 2, Basic Applications. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, USA.
[14]
Google. 2017. Google Appscript. https://developers.google.com/apps-script/.
[15]
Gideon Greenspan. 2016. Four Genuine Blockchain Use Cases. (May 2016). http://www.coindesk.com/four-genuine-blockchain-use-cases/
[16]
R. R. Downs R. Duerr J. C. Goldstein M. A. Parsons Hills, D. J. and H. K. Ramapriyan. 2015. The importance of data set provenance for science. (2015). version:
[17]
Roman JagomÃdgis, Peeter Laud, and Alisa Pankova. 2015. Preprocessing-Based Verification of Multiparty Protocols with Honest Majority. Cryptology ePrint Archive, Report 2015/674. (2015). http://eprint.iacr.org/2015/674.
[18]
Cruz Jason, Paul and Kaji Yuichi. 2015. The Bitcoin Network as Platform for Trans-Organizational Attribute Authentication. IPSJ SIG Notes 2015, 12 (feb 2015), 1--6. http://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/110009877764/en/
[19]
Ahmed Kosba Andrew Miller Kevin Delmolino, Mitchell Arnett and Elaine Shi. 2015. Step by Step Towards Creating a Safe Smart Contract: Lessons and Insights from a Cryptocurrency Lab. Cryptology ePrint Archive, Report 2015/460. (2015). http://eprint.iacr.org/2015/460.
[20]
Ahmed Kosba, Andrew Miller, Elaine Shi, Zikai Wen, and Charalampos Papa- manthou. 2015. Hawk: The Blockchain Model of Cryptography and Privacy-Preserving Smart Contracts. Cryptology ePrint Archive, Report 2015/675. (2015). http://eprint.iacr.org/2015/675.
[21]
Xueping Liang, Sachin Shetty, Deepak Tosh, Charles Kamhoua, Kevin Kwiat, and Laurent Njilla. 2017. ProvChain: A Blockchain-based Data Provenance Architecture in Cloud Environment with Enhanced Privacy and Availability. In Proceedings of the 17th IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Cluster, Cloud and Grid Computing (CCGrid '17). IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ, USA, 468--477.
[22]
Peter Linder. 2016. DEcryption Contract ENforcement Tool (DECENT): A Practical Alternative to Government Decryption Backdoors. Cryptology ePrint Archive, Report 2016/245. (2016). http://eprint.iacr.org/2016/245.
[23]
Project Provenance Ltd. 2015. Blockchain: the solution for transparency in product supply chains. (2015). https://www.provenance.org/whitepaper
[24]
MeteorJs. 2016. (May 2016). https://www.meteor.com/
[25]
MongoDB. 2017. MongoDB. (Jan. 2017). https://www.mongodb.com/
[26]
Open Provenance model 2007. Open Provenance Model. Open Provenance model. http://openprovenance.org/.
[27]
Aafaf Ouaddah, Anas Abou El Kalam, and Abdellah Ait Ouahman. 2016. FairAccess: a new Blockchain-based access control framework for the Internet of Things. Security and Communication Networks 9, 18 (2016), 5943--5964.
[28]
Eric F. Pettersen, Thomas D. Goddard, Conrad C. Huang, Gregory S. Couch, Daniel M. Greenblatt, Elaine C. Meng, and Thomas E. Ferrin. 2004. UCSF Chimera - A visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. Journal of Computational Chemistry 25, 13 (2004), 1605--1612.
[29]
Aravind Ramachandran and Murat Kantarcioglu. 2017. Using Blockchain and smart contracts for secure data provenance management. (2017). https://arxiv.org/abs/1709.10000
[30]
Gavin Wood. 2017. ETHEREUM: A secure decentralized generalized transaction ledger. (2017). http://gavwood.com/paper.pdf

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Leveraging Artificial Intelligence and Provenance Blockchain Framework to Mitigate Risks in Cloud Manufacturing in Industry 4.0Electronics10.3390/electronics1303066013:3(660)Online publication date: 5-Feb-2024
  • (2024)Smart flow: a provenance-supported smart contract workflow architectureCluster Computing10.1007/s10586-024-04390-x27:6(8173-8187)Online publication date: 1-Sep-2024
  • (2023)Phishing Detection in Blockchain Transaction Networks Using Ensemble LearningTelecom10.3390/telecom40200174:2(279-297)Online publication date: 31-May-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
CODASPY '18: Proceedings of the Eighth ACM Conference on Data and Application Security and Privacy
March 2018
401 pages
ISBN:9781450356329
DOI:10.1145/3176258
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 13 March 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. blockchain platform
  2. data provenance
  3. distributed systems
  4. knowledge management

Qualifiers

  • Short-paper

Funding Sources

Conference

CODASPY '18
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

CODASPY '18 Paper Acceptance Rate 23 of 110 submissions, 21%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 149 of 789 submissions, 19%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)233
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)57
Reflects downloads up to 17 Oct 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Leveraging Artificial Intelligence and Provenance Blockchain Framework to Mitigate Risks in Cloud Manufacturing in Industry 4.0Electronics10.3390/electronics1303066013:3(660)Online publication date: 5-Feb-2024
  • (2024)Smart flow: a provenance-supported smart contract workflow architectureCluster Computing10.1007/s10586-024-04390-x27:6(8173-8187)Online publication date: 1-Sep-2024
  • (2023)Phishing Detection in Blockchain Transaction Networks Using Ensemble LearningTelecom10.3390/telecom40200174:2(279-297)Online publication date: 31-May-2023
  • (2023)ForensiBlock: A Provenance-Driven Blockchain Framework for Data Forensics and Auditability2023 5th IEEE International Conference on Trust, Privacy and Security in Intelligent Systems and Applications (TPS-ISA)10.1109/TPS-ISA58951.2023.00025(136-145)Online publication date: 1-Nov-2023
  • (2023)Recording Behaviors of Artificial Intelligence in BlockchainsIEEE Transactions on Artificial Intelligence10.1109/TAI.2022.32135314:6(1437-1448)Online publication date: Dec-2023
  • (2023)ECHAIN: Securing Electronic Device Provenance through Privacy-Preserving Consortium Blockchains2023 53rd Annual IEEE/IFIP International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks - Supplemental Volume (DSN-S)10.1109/DSN-S58398.2023.00028(77-83)Online publication date: Jun-2023
  • (2023)Data Marketplaces: Best Practices, Challenges, and Advancements for Embedded Finance2023 19th International Conference on Distributed Computing in Smart Systems and the Internet of Things (DCOSS-IoT)10.1109/DCOSS-IoT58021.2023.00088(533-540)Online publication date: Jun-2023
  • (2023)BPDAC: A Blockchain Based and Provenance Enabled Dynamic Access Control SchemeIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2023.334088711(142552-142568)Online publication date: 2023
  • (2023)Blockchain for Mobile NetworksBlockchains10.1002/9781119781042.ch7(185-213)Online publication date: 8-Sep-2023
  • (2022)Application of Blockchain Technology in Production Scheduling and Management of Human Resources CompetenciesSensors10.3390/s2208284422:8(2844)Online publication date: 7-Apr-2022
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Get Access

Login options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media