Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3178876.3186134acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesthewebconfConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Public Access

On Ridesharing Competition and Accessibility: Evidence from Uber, Lyft, and Taxi

Published: 23 April 2018 Publication History

Abstract

Ridesharing services such as Uber and Lyft have become an important part of the Vehicle For Hire (VFH) market, which used to be dominated by taxis. Unfortunately, ridesharing services are not required to share data like taxi services, which has made it challenging to compare the competitive dynamics of these services, or assess their impact on cities. In this paper, we comprehensively compare Uber, Lyft, and taxis with respect to key market features (supply, demand, price, and wait time) in San Francisco and New York City. Based on point pattern statistics, we develop novel statistical techniques to validate our measurement methods. Using spatial lag models, we investigate the accessibility of VFH services, and find that transportation infrastructure and socio-economic features have substantial effects on VFH market features.

References

[1]
ACS. 2015. American Community Survey. (2015). http://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs.
[2]
San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency. 2016. Taxi Medallion by Company Statistics. (6 2016). http://www.sfmta.com/services/taxi-industry/medallions/medallion-holders.
[3]
Luc Anselin. 2001. Spatial econometrics. A companion to theoretical econometrics 310330 (2001).
[4]
David A Belsley. 1991. Conditioning diagnostics: Collinearity and weak data in regression. Number 519.536 B452. Wiley.
[5]
California, Metropolitan Transportation Commission 2012. Communities of Concern, San Francisco Bay Area, California 2005--2009. (2012). http://purl.stanford.edu/dp294hh9321.
[6]
Ryan Calo and Alex Rosenblat. 2017. The Taking Economy: Uber, Information, and Power. Columbia Law Review 117 (March 2017).
[7]
Joe Castiglione, Tilly Chang, Drew Cooper, Jeff Hobson, Warren Logan, Eric Young, Billy Charlton, Christo Wilson, Alan Mislove, Le Chen, and Shan Jiang. 2016. TNCs Today: A Profile of San Francisco Transportation Network Company Activity. San Francisco County Transportation Authority (June 2016).
[8]
Juan Camilo Castillo, Daniel T. Knoepfle, and E. Glen Weyl. 2017. Surge Pricing Solves the Wild Goose Chase. SSRN. (July 2017).
[9]
Census. 2010. Census Block Groups. (2010). https://www.census.gov/geo/reference/gtc/gtc_bg.html.
[10]
Le Chen, Alan Mislove, and Christo Wilson. 2015. Peeking Beneath the Hood of Uber. In Proc. of IMC.
[11]
M Keith Chen and Michael Sheldon. 2015. Dynamic pricing in a labor market: Surge pricing and flexible work on the Uber platform. Technical Report. UCLA.
[12]
Regina R. Clewlow and Gouri Shankar Mishra. 2017. Disruptive Transportation: The Adoption, Utilization, and Impacts of Ride-Hailing in the United States. Technical Report. UC Davis, Report UCD-ITS-RR-17-07.
[13]
Peter Cohen, Robert Hahn, Jonathan Hall, Steven Levitt, and Robert Metcalfe. 2016. Using big data to estimate consumer surplus: The case of uber. Technical Report. NBER.
[14]
NYC Taxi & Limousine Commission. 2017. TLD Trip Record Data. (2017). http://www.nyc.gov/html/tlc/html/about/trip_record_data.shtml.
[15]
Judd Cramer and Alan B. Krueger. 2016. Disruptive Change in the Taxi Business: The Case of Uber. American Economic Review 106, 5 (2016), 177--182.
[16]
San Francisco Open Data. 2012. SF Public Transportation Data. (3 2012). http://data.sfgov.org/Transportation/SFMTA-routes-and-stops-for-March-2012/f5c3--8kkj.
[17]
Philip M Dixon. 2002. Ripley's K function. Encyclopedia of environmetrics (2002).
[18]
Benjamin G Edelman and Damien Geradin. 2015. Efficiencies and regulatory shortcuts: How should we regulate companies like Airbnb and Uber. Stan. Tech. L. Rev. 19 (2015), 293.
[19]
Benjamin G Edelman and Michael Luca. 2014. Digital discrimination: The case of Airbnb.com. (2014).
[20]
Lisette Espin Noboa, Florian Lemmerich, Philipp Singer, and Markus Strohmaier. 2016. Discovering and Characterizing Mobility Patterns in Urban Spaces: A Study of Manhattan Taxi Data. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference Companion on World Wide Web (WWW '16 Companion). 537--542.
[21]
Erica Fink. 2014. Uber threatens drivers: Do not work for Lyft. CNN. (8 2014). http://money.cnn.com/2014/08/04/technology/uber-lyft/index.html.
[22]
FiveThirtyEight. 2015. Uber Pickups in New York City. Kaggle. (9 2015). https://www.kaggle.com/fivethirtyeight/uber-pickups-in-new-york-city.
[23]
Yanbo Ge, Christopher R Knittel, Don MacKenzie, and Stephen Zoepf. 2016. Racial and gender discrimination in transportation network companies. Technical Report. NBER.
[24]
Mareike Glöss, Moira McGregor, and Barry Brown. 2016. Designing for labour: uber and the on-demand mobile workforce. In Proc. of CHI.
[25]
André Braz Golgher and Paul R Voss. 2016. How to interpret the coefficients of spatial models: Spillovers, direct and indirect effects. Spatial Demography 4, 3 (2016), 175--205.
[26]
Suiming Guo, Yaxiao Liu, Ke Xu, and Dah Ming Chiu. 2017. Understanding passenger reaction to dynamic prices in ride-on-demand service. In Proc. of PerCom Workshops.
[27]
Suiming Guo, Yaxiao Liu, Ke Xu, and Dah Ming Chiu. 2017. Understanding ride-on-demand service: Demand and dynamic pricing. In Proc. of PerCom Workshops.
[28]
Jonathan V Hall and Alan B Krueger. 2016. An analysis of the labor market for Uber's driver-partners in the United States. Technical Report. NBER.
[29]
Robert Cornelius Hampshire, Chris Simek, Tayo Fabusuyi, Xuan Di, and Xi Chen. 2017. Measuring the Impact of an Unanticipated Suspension of Ride-Sourcing in Austin, Texas. SSRN. (May 2017).
[30]
Aniko Hannak, Claudia Wagner, David Garcia, Alan Mislove, Markus Strohmaier, and Christo Wilson. 2017. Bias in Online Freelance Marketplaces: Evidence from TaskRabbit and Fiverr. In Proc. of CSCW.
[31]
Mike Issac. 2017. How Uber Deceives the Authorities Worldwide. New York Times. (3 2017). http://nyti.ms/2mBwTH0.
[32]
Farshad Kooti, Mihajlo Grbovic, Luca Maria Aiello, Nemanja Djuric, Vladan Radosavljevic, and Kristina Lerman. 2017. Analyzing Uber's Ride-sharing Economy. In Proc. of WWW Companion.
[33]
Min Kyung Lee, Daniel Kusbit, Evan Metsky, and Laura Dabbish. 2015. Working with machines: The impact of algorithmic and data-driven management on human workers. In Proc. of CHI.
[34]
Michal Lev-Ram. 2017. How Lyft Could Defeat Uber. Fortune. (7 2017). http://fortune.com/2017/07/19/uber-vs-lyft-race/.
[35]
Xi Liu, Li Gong, Yongxi Gong, and Yu Liu. 2015. Revealing travel patterns and city structure with taxi trip data. Journal of Transport Geography 43 (2015), 78 -- 90.
[36]
Moira McGregor, Barry Brown, and Mareike Glöss. 2015. Disrupting the cab: Uber, ridesharing and the taxi industry. Journal of Peer Production 6 (2015).
[37]
Jared Meyer. 2016. Uber Is Not (And Will Never Be) A Monopoly. Forbes. (2 2016). https://www.forbes.com/sites/jaredmeyer/2016/02/15/uber-guardian-not-monopoly-ridesharing.
[38]
Mariella Moon. 2017. Uber's 'Hell' program tracked and targeted Lyft drivers. Engadget. (4 2017). http://engt.co/2oBME0K.
[39]
Benjamin Mueller. 2016. $25,000 Fine Proposed in Taxi Driver's Snub of Black Family. New York Times. (8 2016). http://nyti.ms/2yy4WVm.
[40]
Anastasios Noulas, Vsevolod Salnikov, Desislava Hristova, Cecilia Mascolo, and Renaud Lambiotte. 2017. Developing and Deploying a Taxi Price Comparison Mobile App in the Wild: Insights and Challenges. arXiv preprint arXiv:1701.04208 (2017).
[41]
New York City Department of Transportation. 2014. NYC Public Transportation Data. (9 2014). http://www.nyc.gov/html/dot/html/home/home.shtml.
[42]
Hannah A Posen. 2015. Ridesharing in the Sharing Economy: Should Regulators Impose Uber Regulations on Uber. Iowa L. Rev. 101 (2015), 405.
[43]
Associated Press. 2016. Boston wants better data from Uber, and is taking a roundabout route to try and get it. Boston Globe. (6 2016). https://www.boston.com/news/business/2016/06/28/uber-data-boston-wants.
[44]
Joe Fitzgerald Rodriguez. 2016. 45,000 Uber and Lyft drivers may now operate in SF. SF Examiner. (11 2016). http://bit.ly/2gtgRsj.
[45]
Brishen Rogers. 2015. The social costs of Uber. U. Chi. L. Rev. Dialogue 82 (2015), 85.
[46]
Carolyn Said. 2017. SF demands data from Uber, Lyft on city trips, driver bonuses. San Francisco Chronicle. (6 2017). http://www.sfchronicle.com/business/article/SF-goes-after-Uber-Lyft-for-data-on-city-trips-11196961.php.
[47]
Vsevolod Salnikov, Renaud Lambiotte, Anastasios Noulas, and Cecilia Mascolo. 2015. OpenStreetCab: exploiting taxi mobility patterns in New York City to reduce commuter costs. arXiv preprint arXiv:1503.03021 (2015).
[48]
Rachel Sugar. 2017. Uber and Lyft Cars Now Outnumber Yellow Cabs in NYC 4 to 1. Curbed. (1 2017). http://ny.curbed.com/2017/1/17/14296892/yellow-taxi-nyc-uber-lyft-vianumbers.
[49]
Jacob Thebault-Spieker, Loren Terveen, and Brent Hecht. 2017. Toward a Geo- graphic Understanding of the Sharing Economy: Systemic Biases in UberX and TaskRabbit. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 24, 3 (April 2017), 21:1--21:40.
[50]
Uber. 2017. Uber Movement. (2017). https://movement.uber.com.
[51]
Adam Vaccaro. 2015. Uber to Hand Over Trip Data to Boston. Boston. (1 2015). https://www.boston.com/news/technology/2015/01/13/uber-to-hand-over-trip-data-to-boston.
[52]
Adam Vaccaro. 2016. Highly Touted Boston-Uber Partnership Has Not Lived Up to Hype So Far. Boston. (6 2016). https://www.boston.com/news/business/2016/06/16/bostons-uber-partnership-has-not-lived-up-to-promise.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Designing Shared Information Displays for Agents of Varying Strategic SophisticationProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36373198:CSCW1(1-34)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
  • (2024)A Holistic Approach for Equity-aware Carbon Reduction of the Ridesharing PlatformsProceedings of the 15th ACM International Conference on Future and Sustainable Energy Systems10.1145/3632775.3639586(361-372)Online publication date: 4-Jun-2024
  • (2024)Understanding inequality in ride-hailing service: an investigation of matching and pickup timeTransportation10.1007/s11116-024-10495-4Online publication date: 26-Jun-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
WWW '18: Proceedings of the 2018 World Wide Web Conference
April 2018
2000 pages
ISBN:9781450356398
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

  • IW3C2: International World Wide Web Conference Committee

In-Cooperation

Publisher

International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee

Republic and Canton of Geneva, Switzerland

Publication History

Published: 23 April 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Lyft
  2. Uber
  3. ridesharing
  4. sharing economy
  5. taxi
  6. vehicle for hire

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Funding Sources

Conference

WWW '18
Sponsor:
  • IW3C2
WWW '18: The Web Conference 2018
April 23 - 27, 2018
Lyon, France

Acceptance Rates

WWW '18 Paper Acceptance Rate 170 of 1,155 submissions, 15%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 1,899 of 8,196 submissions, 23%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)1,056
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)94
Reflects downloads up to 12 Sep 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Designing Shared Information Displays for Agents of Varying Strategic SophisticationProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36373198:CSCW1(1-34)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
  • (2024)A Holistic Approach for Equity-aware Carbon Reduction of the Ridesharing PlatformsProceedings of the 15th ACM International Conference on Future and Sustainable Energy Systems10.1145/3632775.3639586(361-372)Online publication date: 4-Jun-2024
  • (2024)Understanding inequality in ride-hailing service: an investigation of matching and pickup timeTransportation10.1007/s11116-024-10495-4Online publication date: 26-Jun-2024
  • (2023)Impact of Carpooling under Mobile Internet on Travel Mode Choices and Urban Traffic Volume: The Case of ChinaSustainability10.3390/su1508659515:8(6595)Online publication date: 13-Apr-2023
  • (2023)Fleet Rebalancing for Expanding Shared e-Mobility Systems: A Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning ApproachIEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems10.1109/TITS.2022.323342224:4(3868-3881)Online publication date: Apr-2023
  • (2023)Mobility and Energy Management in Electric Vehicle Based Mobility-on-Demand Systems: Models and SolutionsIEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems10.1109/TITS.2022.323143524:4(3702-3713)Online publication date: Apr-2023
  • (2023)Two-Sided Instant Incentive Optimization under a Shared Budget in Ride-Hailing Services2023 IEEE 39th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE)10.1109/ICDE55515.2023.00267(3481-3493)Online publication date: Apr-2023
  • (2023)An efficient data-driven method to construct dynamic service areas from large-scale taxi location dataJournal of Intelligent Transportation Systems10.1080/15472450.2023.2289123(1-17)Online publication date: 6-Dec-2023
  • (2023)Impact of negotiation on subsidy scheme to incentivise the integrated use of metro and ride-hailing servicesInternational Journal of Logistics Research and Applications10.1080/13675567.2023.2205115(1-21)Online publication date: 24-Apr-2023
  • (2023)Integrated design framework for on-demand transit system based on spatiotemporal mobility patternsTransportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies10.1016/j.trc.2023.104087150(104087)Online publication date: May-2023
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Get Access

Login options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media