Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3264856.3264858acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open access

Tactile Symbol Discrimination on a Small Pin-array Display

Published: 15 October 2018 Publication History

Abstract

Pin-array displays are a promising technology that allow to display visual information with touch, a crucial issue for blind and partially sighted users. Such displays are programmable, therefore can considerably increase, vary and tailor the amount of information as compared to common embossed paper and, beyond Braille, they allow to display graphics. Due to a shortage in establishing which ideal resolution allows to understand simple graphical concepts, we evaluated the discriminability of tactile symbols at different resolutions and complexity levels in blind, blindfolded low-vision and sighted participants. We report no differences in discrimination accuracy between tactile symbols organized in 3x3 as compared to 4x4 arrays. A metric based on search and discrimination speed in blind and in low-vision participants does not change at different resolutions, whereas in sighted participants it significantly increases when resolution increases. We suggest possible guidelines in designing dictionaries of low-resolution tactile symbols. Our results can help designers, ergonomists and rehabilitators to develop usable human-machine interfaces with tactual symbol coding.

References

[1]
Amick, N. and Corcoran, J. 1997. Guidelines for the Design of Tactile Graphics. American Printing House for the Blind.
[2]
Best practice guidelines for the design, production and presentation of vacuum formed tactile maps: 2002. http://www.tactilebooks.org/%0Atactileguidelines/page1.htm. Accessed: 2018-06--19.
[3]
Brainard, D.H. 1997. The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spatial Vision. 10, 4 (Jan. 1997), 433--436.
[4]
Craig, J.C. 1999. Grating orientation as a measure of tactile spatial acuity. Somatosensory & Motor Research. 16, 3 (Jan. 1999), 197--206.
[5]
van Erp, J.B.F. 2002. Guidelines for the Use of Vibro-Tactile Displays in Human Computer Interaction. Proceedings of Eurohaptics. (2002), 18--22.
[6]
Hammond, F.L. et al. 2012. Soft tactile sensor arrays for micromanipulation. 2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (Oct. 2012), 25--32.
[7]
Heath, W.R. 1958. Maps and graphics for the blind: Some aspects of the discriminability of textural surfaces for use in areal differentiation. University of Washington.
[8]
Heller, M.A. et al. 2005. Pattern perception and pictures for the blind. Psicologica. 26, 1 (2005), 161--171.
[9]
Heller, M.A. 2002. Tactile picture perception in sighted and blind people. Behavioural Brain Research. 135, 1--2 (Sep. 2002), 65--68.
[10]
Jansson, G. 1972. Projektet: PUSS VII: Symboler for Taktila Kartor.
[11]
Jehoel, S. 2007. A series of psychological studies on the design of tactile maps. University of Surrey.
[12]
Johansson, R.S. and LaMotte, R.H. 1983. Tactile detection thresholds for a single asperity on an otherwise smooth surface. Somatosensory research. 1, (1983), 21--31.
[13]
Johnson, K.O. and Phillips, J.R. 1981. Tactile spatial resolution. I. Two-point discrimination, gap detection, grating resolution, and letter recognition. Journal of neurophysiology. 46, 6 (Dec. 1981), 1177--92.
[14]
Kalia, A. a. and Sinha, P. 2011. Tactile Picture Recognition: Errors Are in Shape Acquisition or Object Matching? Seeing and Perceiving. 25, 3--4 (Jan. 2011), 1--16.
[15]
Kleiner, M. et al. 2007. What's new in Psychtoolbox-3 Perception ECVP Abstract Supplement. 36 (2007).
[16]
Montagu, A. 1978. Touching: The Human Significance of the Skin. Columbia University Press.
[17]
Nefs, H.T. et al. 2001. Amplitude and Spatial-Period Discrimination in Sinusoidal Gratings by Dynamic Touch. Perception. 30, 10 (Oct. 2001), 1263--1274.
[18]
Ng, A.W.Y. and Chan, A.H.S. 2014. Tactile Symbol Matching of Different Shape Patterns?: Implications for Shape Coding of Control Devices. Proceedings of the International MultiConference of Engineers and Computer Scientists (Hong Kong, 2014).
[19]
Picard, D. et al. 2010. Haptic recognition of two-dimensional raised-line patterns by early-blind, late-blind, and blindfolded sighted adults. Perception. 39, 2 (2010), 224--235.
[20]
Report of tactile graphics: 2003. www.brailleliteracycanada.ca/CMFiles/Educators/Report_Tactile_Graphics_part3.pdf. Accessed: 2018-06--19.
[21]
Sanders, M.S. and McCormick, E.J. 1993. Human Factors in Engineering and Design. McGraw-Hill.
[22]
Tan, H.Z. and Pentland, A. 1997. Tactual displays for wearable computing. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing. 1, 4 (1997), 225--230.
[23]
Tu, Y. et al. 2003. Evaluation of recognizing tactile pictures in different size display in sighted and blind people. The 6th Asian Design International Conference (Tsukuba, Japan, 2003).
[24]
Zeng, L. et al. 2012. Audio-haptic you-are-here maps on a mobile touch-enabled pin-matrix display. (2012), 95--100.
[25]
Crossan, A., & Brewster, S. (2006, April). Two-handed navigation in a haptic virtual environment. In CHI'06 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 676--681). ACM.
[26]
Tahir, M., Bailly, G., Lecolinet, E., & Mouret, G. (2008, October). TactiMote: a tactile remote control for navigating in long lists. In Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Multimodal interfaces (pp. 285--288). ACM.
[27]
Pietrzak, T., Crossan, A., Brewster, S. A., Martin, B., & Pecci, I. (2009). Creating usable pin array tactons for nonvisual information. IEEE Transactions on Haptics, 2(2), 61--72.
[28]
Ziat, M., Gapenne, O., Stewart, J., & Lenay, C. (2006). Haptic recognition of shapes at different scales: A comparison of two methods of interaction. Interacting with Computers, 19(1), 121--132.
[29]
Leo, F., Cocchi, E., & Brayda, L. (2017). The effect of programmable tactile displays on spatial learning skills in children and adolescents of different visual disability. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 25(7), 861--872.
[30]
Brayda L, Leo F, Baccelliere C, Ferrari E, Vigini C. Updated Tactile Feedback with a Pin Array Matrix Helps Blind People to Reduce Self-Location Errors. Micromachines. 2018; 9(7):351,

Cited By

View all
  • (2025)Investigating Eyes-Free Recognition and Distinguishability of Textile Icons in PairsProceedings of the Nineteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction10.1145/3689050.3704931(1-13)Online publication date: 4-Mar-2025
  • (2024)Popping-Up Poster: A Pin-Based Promotional Poster Device for Engaging Customers through Physical Shape TransformationProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36981388:ISS(283-300)Online publication date: 24-Oct-2024
  • (2024)PRET Printer: Development and Evaluation of a Passive Refreshable Tactile PrinterProceedings of the 7th ACM SIGCAS/SIGCHI Conference on Computing and Sustainable Societies10.1145/3674829.3675070(156-166)Online publication date: 8-Jul-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
MAHCI'18: Proceedings of the 2018 Workshop on Multimedia for Accessible Human Computer Interface
October 2018
38 pages
ISBN:9781450359801
DOI:10.1145/3264856
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 15 October 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. assistive technology
  2. blindness
  3. braille displays
  4. haptic rendering
  5. pin array displays
  6. shape discrimination
  7. tactile discrimination
  8. tactile graphics
  9. tactile symbols
  10. visual impairment

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Funding Sources

Conference

MM '18
Sponsor:
MM '18: ACM Multimedia Conference
October 22, 2018
Seoul, Republic of Korea

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)143
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)19
Reflects downloads up to 25 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2025)Investigating Eyes-Free Recognition and Distinguishability of Textile Icons in PairsProceedings of the Nineteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction10.1145/3689050.3704931(1-13)Online publication date: 4-Mar-2025
  • (2024)Popping-Up Poster: A Pin-Based Promotional Poster Device for Engaging Customers through Physical Shape TransformationProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36981388:ISS(283-300)Online publication date: 24-Oct-2024
  • (2024)PRET Printer: Development and Evaluation of a Passive Refreshable Tactile PrinterProceedings of the 7th ACM SIGCAS/SIGCHI Conference on Computing and Sustainable Societies10.1145/3674829.3675070(156-166)Online publication date: 8-Jul-2024
  • (2024)Mappings in the Home: Selecting Home Appliances in 3D SpaceExtended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613905.3650745(1-7)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
  • (2024)STButton: Exploring Opportunities for Buttons with Spatio-Temporal Tactile OutputExtended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613905.3648671(1-5)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
  • (2024)3D-Printed Models for Optimizing Tactile Braille & Shape DisplayIEEE Transactions on Haptics10.1109/TOH.2024.343358217:4(782-793)Online publication date: 1-Oct-2024
  • (2023)What’s That Shape? Investigating Eyes-Free Recognition of Textile IconsProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3580920(1-12)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
  • (2023)Can blindfolded users replace blind ones in product testing? an empirical studyBehaviour & Information Technology10.1080/0144929X.2023.222676843:8(1664-1682)Online publication date: 6-Jul-2023
  • (2022)Audio-Tactile Reader (ATR): Interaction Concepts for Students with Blindness to Explore Digital STEM Documents on a 2D Haptic Device2022 IEEE Haptics Symposium (HAPTICS)10.1109/HAPTICS52432.2022.9765568(1-6)Online publication date: 21-Mar-2022
  • (2019)Surface HapticsProceedings of the 2019 ACM International Conference on Interactive Surfaces and Spaces10.1145/3343055.3361925(421-425)Online publication date: 10-Nov-2019
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Login options

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media