Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3287324.3293763acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessigcseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
abstract

Thinking about Computational Thinking: Lessons from Education Research

Published: 22 February 2019 Publication History

Abstract

Computational thinking (CT) is a means to help learners engage in authentic disciplinary and problem-solving practices of computer science (CS). For CS classrooms, CT is considered "thinking like a computer scientist". CT is believed to be an important learning goal of introductory CS in addition to CS concepts and programming. Despite the growing attention on CT in K-12 CS education, there is lingering confusion on the what and how of CT, and CT's relationship to coding and CS. Education research on disciplinary thinking skills in science and mathematics education can provide guidance for teaching and learning of CT. For example, (a) The shift in emphasis on disciplinary thinking helps focus on deeper conceptual understanding rather than rote learning of knowledge and facts. Hence thinking like a scientist, or mathematician, historian or computer scientist, draws attention to authentic practices of those disciplines. (b) Thinking skills are best taught in context. Therefore, CT should be taught in CS classrooms or integrated into learning of other subjects rather than taught as a separate skill or subject. (c) Even if there is no transfer beyond the context in which they are taught, a focus on thinking skills helps in deeper conceptual learning; (d) Like critical or creative thinking, CT should be integrated into other subjects to enrich learning. Research on meaningful technology integration across subjects provides useful frameworks to inform CT integration efforts. This talk aims to productively move the discourse on CT toward concrete ideas for K-12 educators, researchers, and curricular designers.

References

[1]
Grover, S. & Pea, R. 2013. Computational Thinking in K--12: A Review of the State of the Field. Educational Researcher. 42(1), 38--43.
[2]
Denning, P. J. 2017. Remaining trouble spots with computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 60(6), 33--39.
[3]
Guzdial, M. 2018. Computational Mapping: An important set of skills in Computational Thinking we can define and test. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2NJGLaJ
[4]
Resnick, L. B. (1987). Education and learning to think. National Academies.

Cited By

View all
  • (2020)Aprendizaje basado en el modelo STEM y la clave de la metacogniciónInnoeduca. International Journal of Technology and Educational Innovation10.24310/innoeduca.2020.v6i1.67196:1(14-25)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2020

Index Terms

  1. Thinking about Computational Thinking: Lessons from Education Research

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SIGCSE '19: Proceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education
      February 2019
      1364 pages
      ISBN:9781450358903
      DOI:10.1145/3287324
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Sponsors

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 22 February 2019

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. computational thinking
      2. disciplinary thinking skills
      3. k-12 computer science
      4. problem solving

      Qualifiers

      • Abstract

      Conference

      SIGCSE '19
      Sponsor:

      Acceptance Rates

      SIGCSE '19 Paper Acceptance Rate 169 of 526 submissions, 32%;
      Overall Acceptance Rate 1,595 of 4,542 submissions, 35%

      Upcoming Conference

      SIGCSE TS 2025
      The 56th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education
      February 26 - March 1, 2025
      Pittsburgh , PA , USA

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
      Reflects downloads up to 29 Jan 2025

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2020)Aprendizaje basado en el modelo STEM y la clave de la metacogniciónInnoeduca. International Journal of Technology and Educational Innovation10.24310/innoeduca.2020.v6i1.67196:1(14-25)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2020

      View Options

      View options

      Figures

      Tables

      Media

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media